Delayed hemorrhage after pediatric stereo-electroencephalography: delayed occurrence or delayed diagnosis?

• Published in: Child's nervous system 2021-12, Vol.37 (12), p.3817-3826
• Main Authors: Brugada-Bellsolà, Ferran, Candela-Cantó, Santiago, Muchart López, Jordi, Aparicio Calvo, Javier, Alamar Abril, Mariana, Becerra Castro, Victoria, Rumià Arboix, Jordi, Hinojosa Mena-Bernal, Jose
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Child; Delayed Diagnosis; Drug Resistant Epilepsy - surgery; Electrodes, Implanted; Electroencephalography; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages - diagnostic imaging; Intracranial Hemorrhages - etiology; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neurosciences; Neurosurgery; Original Article; Retrospective Studies; Stereotaxic Techniques
• ISSN: 0256-7040; 1433-0350
• DOI: 10.1007/s00381-021-05297-3

Background Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) is a well-known invasive diagnostic method for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Its rate of complications is relatively low, being the intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) the most relevant. Most centers perform immediate imaging studies after SEEG to rule out complications. However, delayed intracranial hemorrhages (DIH) can occur despite normal imaging studies in the immediate postoperative period. Methods We performed a retrospective review of DRE pediatric patients operated on SEEG between April 2016 and December 2020 in our institution. After implantation, an immediate postoperative CT was performed to check electrode placement and rule out acute complications. An additional MRI was performed 24 h after surgery. We collected all postoperative hemorrhages and considered them as major or minor according to Wellmer´s classification. Results Overall, 25 DRE patients were operated on SEEG with 316 electrodes implanted. Three ICHs were diagnosed on postoperative imaging. Two of them were asymptomatic requiring no treatment, while the other needed surgical evacuation after clinical worsening. The total risk of hemorrhage per procedure was 12%, but just one third of them were clinically relevant. Two hemorrhages were not visible on immediate postoperative CT, being incidentally diagnosed in the 24 h MRI. We recorded them as DIH and are reported in detail. Conclusion Few reports of DIH after SEEG exist in the literature. It remains unclear whether these cases are late occurring hemorrhages or immediate postoperative hemorrhages undiagnosed on initial imaging. According to our findings, we recommend to perform additional late postoperative imaging to diagnose these cases and manage them accurately.