Loading…

Clinical wear and quality assessment of monolithic and lithium disilicate layered zirconia restorations

Background Wear and quality assessments of translucent monolithic zirconia and CAD‐on® restorations were performed. Methods Forty 3‐unit posterior fixed partial denture (FPD) in 18 patients (age:18–50 years) were made from translucent monolithic zirconia (tm) (Zenostar T) and zirconia‐frameworked, l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Australian dental journal 2021-12, Vol.66 (4), p.413-422
Main Authors: Çömlekoğlu, ME, Tekeroğlu, F, Dündar Çömlekoğlu, M, Özcan, M, Türkün, LŞ, Paken, G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Wear and quality assessments of translucent monolithic zirconia and CAD‐on® restorations were performed. Methods Forty 3‐unit posterior fixed partial denture (FPD) in 18 patients (age:18–50 years) were made from translucent monolithic zirconia (tm) (Zenostar T) and zirconia‐frameworked, lithium disilicate layered (c) (CAD‐on), materials in a split‐mouth design. Restorations were digitally fabricated and their internal and marginal adaptations were measured before cementation followed by luting (Multilink Speed). Clinical evaluations were made by modified United States Public Health Service criteria at baseline, 6, 12, and 24‐months. Wear of the restorations and the antagonists were digitally evaluated after optical scanning of stone casts at 1st week and 24 m through a software (Cerec 4.4). Statistical analysis was made (analysis of variance, Shapiro‐Wilk, Friedman and Wilcoxon tests (SPSS 20)) at α = 0.05 significance level. Results At 24 m, all restorations were clinically acceptable. Insignificant differences were found between tm and c restorations (P > 0.05). Mean internal and marginal adaptation of c restorations were significantly better (145 µm (premolar)‐174 µm (molar)) than tm (190 µm (premolar)‐207 µm (molar)) (P 
ISSN:0045-0421
1834-7819
DOI:10.1111/adj.12869