Loading…

Is the Capanna Technique a Reliable Method for Revision Surgery after Failure of Previous Limb-Salvage Surgery?

Background Reconstruction of a massive bone defect caused by previous failed limb-salvage surgery in patients with bone sarcoma is challenging. Many procedures have been used, but they all have their inherent disadvantages. The Capanna technique has demonstrated good functional outcomes and a low in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of surgical oncology 2022-02, Vol.29 (2), p.1122-1129
Main Authors: Li, Minghui, Xiao, Xin, Fan, Junjun, Lu, Yajie, Chen, Guojing, Huang, Mengquan, Ji, Chuanlei, Wang, Zhen, Li, Jing
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-5165d3fd9e10ee5da7a07e58fd65542cd1826305a3f7330264b598706650546e3
container_end_page 1129
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1122
container_title Annals of surgical oncology
container_volume 29
creator Li, Minghui
Xiao, Xin
Fan, Junjun
Lu, Yajie
Chen, Guojing
Huang, Mengquan
Ji, Chuanlei
Wang, Zhen
Li, Jing
description Background Reconstruction of a massive bone defect caused by previous failed limb-salvage surgery in patients with bone sarcoma is challenging. Many procedures have been used, but they all have their inherent disadvantages. The Capanna technique has demonstrated good functional outcomes and a low incidence of complications in primary reconstructive surgery of massive bone defect. However, few studies have focused on its usage in revision surgery after failed primary limb-salvage surgery. Methods Between June 2011 and January 2017, 13 patients underwent revision surgery with the Capanna technique for reconstruction of a secondary segmental bone defect caused by a previous failed surgical procedure. The demographics, operating procedures, graft union, functional outcomes, oncologic outcomes, and postoperative complications of each patient were recorded. Results The current study investigated 13 patients. The rate of limb salvage was 100 %. Bone union was achieved for all patients during a mean time of 8.54 ± 2.15 months (range 4–11 months) at the fibula–host bone junction and 14.92 ± 2.33 months (range 12–21 months) at the allograft–host bone junction. The postoperative complications included wound healing issues and internal fixation loosening. Allograft fracture, nonunion, and infection were not observed. All the patients achieved good functional outcomes, with a Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score of 0.86 ± 0.03 at the latest follow-up visit. Conclusions The Capanna technique is a reliable alternative method for revision reconstruction of a segmental bone defect caused by a previous failed surgical procedure. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.
doi_str_mv 10.1245/s10434-021-10506-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2557548202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2616134765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-5165d3fd9e10ee5da7a07e58fd65542cd1826305a3f7330264b598706650546e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LAzEQhoMofv8BDxLw4mU1X5PdnkSK1UJF0XoO6e6sXdluarJbaH-90VoFD54SJs_7ZmZeQk44u-BCwWXgTEmVMMETzoDpZLVF9jnEktIZ3453prOkJzTskYMQ3hjjqWSwS_Zk1PEs6-0TNwy0nSLt27ltGkvHmE-b6r1DaukT1pWd1EjvsZ26gpbOx9qiCpVr6HPnX9EvqS1b9HRgq7rzSF1JH31EXBfoqJpNkmdbL-wrbvCrI7JT2jrg8fd5SF4GN-P-XTJ6uB32r0dJLoVuE-AaClkWPeQMEQqbWpYiZGWhAZTIC54JHWexskylZEKrCfSylGkNDJRGeUjO175z7-I0oTWzKuRY17bB2JwRACmoTDAR0bM_6JvrfBO7M0JzzaVKNURKrKncuxA8lmbuq5n1S8OZ-YzDrOMwMQ7zFYdZRdHpt3U3mWHxI9nsPwJyDYT41MQN_f79j-0HkwiUQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2616134765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the Capanna Technique a Reliable Method for Revision Surgery after Failure of Previous Limb-Salvage Surgery?</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Li, Minghui ; Xiao, Xin ; Fan, Junjun ; Lu, Yajie ; Chen, Guojing ; Huang, Mengquan ; Ji, Chuanlei ; Wang, Zhen ; Li, Jing</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Minghui ; Xiao, Xin ; Fan, Junjun ; Lu, Yajie ; Chen, Guojing ; Huang, Mengquan ; Ji, Chuanlei ; Wang, Zhen ; Li, Jing</creatorcontrib><description>Background Reconstruction of a massive bone defect caused by previous failed limb-salvage surgery in patients with bone sarcoma is challenging. Many procedures have been used, but they all have their inherent disadvantages. The Capanna technique has demonstrated good functional outcomes and a low incidence of complications in primary reconstructive surgery of massive bone defect. However, few studies have focused on its usage in revision surgery after failed primary limb-salvage surgery. Methods Between June 2011 and January 2017, 13 patients underwent revision surgery with the Capanna technique for reconstruction of a secondary segmental bone defect caused by a previous failed surgical procedure. The demographics, operating procedures, graft union, functional outcomes, oncologic outcomes, and postoperative complications of each patient were recorded. Results The current study investigated 13 patients. The rate of limb salvage was 100 %. Bone union was achieved for all patients during a mean time of 8.54 ± 2.15 months (range 4–11 months) at the fibula–host bone junction and 14.92 ± 2.33 months (range 12–21 months) at the allograft–host bone junction. The postoperative complications included wound healing issues and internal fixation loosening. Allograft fracture, nonunion, and infection were not observed. All the patients achieved good functional outcomes, with a Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score of 0.86 ± 0.03 at the latest follow-up visit. Conclusions The Capanna technique is a reliable alternative method for revision reconstruction of a segmental bone defect caused by a previous failed surgical procedure. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10506-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34341889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Bone cancer ; Bone healing ; Bone Neoplasms - surgery ; Bone surgery ; Bone tumors ; Complications ; Demography ; Fibula ; Humans ; Limb Salvage ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nonunion ; Oncology ; Osteosarcoma - surgery ; Patients ; Postoperative ; Reconstructive Oncology ; Reconstructive surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Sarcoma ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Treatment Outcome ; Wound healing</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2022-02, Vol.29 (2), p.1122-1129</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2021</rights><rights>2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.</rights><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-5165d3fd9e10ee5da7a07e58fd65542cd1826305a3f7330264b598706650546e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34341889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Minghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Junjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yajie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Guojing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Mengquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Chuanlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jing</creatorcontrib><title>Is the Capanna Technique a Reliable Method for Revision Surgery after Failure of Previous Limb-Salvage Surgery?</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background Reconstruction of a massive bone defect caused by previous failed limb-salvage surgery in patients with bone sarcoma is challenging. Many procedures have been used, but they all have their inherent disadvantages. The Capanna technique has demonstrated good functional outcomes and a low incidence of complications in primary reconstructive surgery of massive bone defect. However, few studies have focused on its usage in revision surgery after failed primary limb-salvage surgery. Methods Between June 2011 and January 2017, 13 patients underwent revision surgery with the Capanna technique for reconstruction of a secondary segmental bone defect caused by a previous failed surgical procedure. The demographics, operating procedures, graft union, functional outcomes, oncologic outcomes, and postoperative complications of each patient were recorded. Results The current study investigated 13 patients. The rate of limb salvage was 100 %. Bone union was achieved for all patients during a mean time of 8.54 ± 2.15 months (range 4–11 months) at the fibula–host bone junction and 14.92 ± 2.33 months (range 12–21 months) at the allograft–host bone junction. The postoperative complications included wound healing issues and internal fixation loosening. Allograft fracture, nonunion, and infection were not observed. All the patients achieved good functional outcomes, with a Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score of 0.86 ± 0.03 at the latest follow-up visit. Conclusions The Capanna technique is a reliable alternative method for revision reconstruction of a segmental bone defect caused by a previous failed surgical procedure. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.</description><subject>Bone cancer</subject><subject>Bone healing</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Bone tumors</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Fibula</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Limb Salvage</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nonunion</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Osteosarcoma - surgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative</subject><subject>Reconstructive Oncology</subject><subject>Reconstructive surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sarcoma</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1LAzEQhoMofv8BDxLw4mU1X5PdnkSK1UJF0XoO6e6sXdluarJbaH-90VoFD54SJs_7ZmZeQk44u-BCwWXgTEmVMMETzoDpZLVF9jnEktIZ3453prOkJzTskYMQ3hjjqWSwS_Zk1PEs6-0TNwy0nSLt27ltGkvHmE-b6r1DaukT1pWd1EjvsZ26gpbOx9qiCpVr6HPnX9EvqS1b9HRgq7rzSF1JH31EXBfoqJpNkmdbL-wrbvCrI7JT2jrg8fd5SF4GN-P-XTJ6uB32r0dJLoVuE-AaClkWPeQMEQqbWpYiZGWhAZTIC54JHWexskylZEKrCfSylGkNDJRGeUjO175z7-I0oTWzKuRY17bB2JwRACmoTDAR0bM_6JvrfBO7M0JzzaVKNURKrKncuxA8lmbuq5n1S8OZ-YzDrOMwMQ7zFYdZRdHpt3U3mWHxI9nsPwJyDYT41MQN_f79j-0HkwiUQw</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Li, Minghui</creator><creator>Xiao, Xin</creator><creator>Fan, Junjun</creator><creator>Lu, Yajie</creator><creator>Chen, Guojing</creator><creator>Huang, Mengquan</creator><creator>Ji, Chuanlei</creator><creator>Wang, Zhen</creator><creator>Li, Jing</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Is the Capanna Technique a Reliable Method for Revision Surgery after Failure of Previous Limb-Salvage Surgery?</title><author>Li, Minghui ; Xiao, Xin ; Fan, Junjun ; Lu, Yajie ; Chen, Guojing ; Huang, Mengquan ; Ji, Chuanlei ; Wang, Zhen ; Li, Jing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-5165d3fd9e10ee5da7a07e58fd65542cd1826305a3f7330264b598706650546e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bone cancer</topic><topic>Bone healing</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Bone tumors</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Fibula</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Limb Salvage</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nonunion</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Osteosarcoma - surgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative</topic><topic>Reconstructive Oncology</topic><topic>Reconstructive surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sarcoma</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Minghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Junjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yajie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Guojing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Mengquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Chuanlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jing</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Minghui</au><au>Xiao, Xin</au><au>Fan, Junjun</au><au>Lu, Yajie</au><au>Chen, Guojing</au><au>Huang, Mengquan</au><au>Ji, Chuanlei</au><au>Wang, Zhen</au><au>Li, Jing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the Capanna Technique a Reliable Method for Revision Surgery after Failure of Previous Limb-Salvage Surgery?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1122</spage><epage>1129</epage><pages>1122-1129</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background Reconstruction of a massive bone defect caused by previous failed limb-salvage surgery in patients with bone sarcoma is challenging. Many procedures have been used, but they all have their inherent disadvantages. The Capanna technique has demonstrated good functional outcomes and a low incidence of complications in primary reconstructive surgery of massive bone defect. However, few studies have focused on its usage in revision surgery after failed primary limb-salvage surgery. Methods Between June 2011 and January 2017, 13 patients underwent revision surgery with the Capanna technique for reconstruction of a secondary segmental bone defect caused by a previous failed surgical procedure. The demographics, operating procedures, graft union, functional outcomes, oncologic outcomes, and postoperative complications of each patient were recorded. Results The current study investigated 13 patients. The rate of limb salvage was 100 %. Bone union was achieved for all patients during a mean time of 8.54 ± 2.15 months (range 4–11 months) at the fibula–host bone junction and 14.92 ± 2.33 months (range 12–21 months) at the allograft–host bone junction. The postoperative complications included wound healing issues and internal fixation loosening. Allograft fracture, nonunion, and infection were not observed. All the patients achieved good functional outcomes, with a Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score of 0.86 ± 0.03 at the latest follow-up visit. Conclusions The Capanna technique is a reliable alternative method for revision reconstruction of a segmental bone defect caused by a previous failed surgical procedure. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>34341889</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-021-10506-z</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-9265
ispartof Annals of surgical oncology, 2022-02, Vol.29 (2), p.1122-1129
issn 1068-9265
1534-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2557548202
source Springer Link
subjects Bone cancer
Bone healing
Bone Neoplasms - surgery
Bone surgery
Bone tumors
Complications
Demography
Fibula
Humans
Limb Salvage
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nonunion
Oncology
Osteosarcoma - surgery
Patients
Postoperative
Reconstructive Oncology
Reconstructive surgery
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Sarcoma
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Treatment Outcome
Wound healing
title Is the Capanna Technique a Reliable Method for Revision Surgery after Failure of Previous Limb-Salvage Surgery?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A35%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20Capanna%20Technique%20a%20Reliable%20Method%20for%20Revision%20Surgery%20after%20Failure%20of%20Previous%20Limb-Salvage%20Surgery?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Li,%20Minghui&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1122&rft.epage=1129&rft.pages=1122-1129&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-021-10506-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2616134765%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-5165d3fd9e10ee5da7a07e58fd65542cd1826305a3f7330264b598706650546e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2616134765&rft_id=info:pmid/34341889&rfr_iscdi=true