Loading…

Stationary brush use in naive dairy heifers

Weaned dairy heifers are often housed in environments with few appropriate outlets for grooming or oral manipulation. Our objective was to characterize brush use by naive heifers, including patterns over time. In phase 1, groups of 4 heifers (n = 13 groups, 146.4 ± 9.1 d old, mean ± standard deviati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of dairy science 2021-11, Vol.104 (11), p.12019-12029
Main Authors: Van Os, Jennifer M.C., Goldstein, Savannah A., Weary, Daniel M., von Keyserlingk, Marina A.G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e2a280bccf587c5dd1ba2aa4841ca8066e48baa907bd2af36d59bc469120a1953
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e2a280bccf587c5dd1ba2aa4841ca8066e48baa907bd2af36d59bc469120a1953
container_end_page 12029
container_issue 11
container_start_page 12019
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 104
creator Van Os, Jennifer M.C.
Goldstein, Savannah A.
Weary, Daniel M.
von Keyserlingk, Marina A.G.
description Weaned dairy heifers are often housed in environments with few appropriate outlets for grooming or oral manipulation. Our objective was to characterize brush use by naive heifers, including patterns over time. In phase 1, groups of 4 heifers (n = 13 groups, 146.4 ± 9.1 d old, mean ± standard deviation; SD) were introduced to a bedded pack pen with 4 wall-mounted brushes (25.4 × 6.0 cm with 3.8-cm-long bristles). On d 1, 2, and 6 of exposure, continuous video recordings were used to observe 2 focal heifers per group for brush use (oral manipulation, grooming, and the sum of total brush use; all averaged at the group level). Latency to use a brush upon entering the pen was 3.4 ± 4.9 min (mean ± SD; range: 0.1 to 17.8 min among individuals). Heifers used the brushes for oral manipulation (39.7 ± 17.5% of brush use, mean ± SD) and grooming (60.3 ± 17.5%), primarily of their heads (89.9 ± 5.4% of grooming). In phase 2, heifers were moved in pairs (n = 13 pairs/treatment) to freestall pens either with (brush treatment) or without (control) brushes mounted inside the stalls for the first 5 d of phase 2 (d 8–12 of the study); on the last day (d 13 of the study), brushes were provided in both treatments. On d 8 (brush treatment) and 13 (both treatments), one focal heifer/pen was recorded for the same behaviors as in phase 1. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate brush use patterns across days (phase 1: d 1, 2, and 6; phase 2 brush treatment: d 8 vs. 13) and between treatments on d 13. In phase 1, brush use was greatest on d 1 [45.9 min; 95% confidence interval (CI): 33.2–63.3 min, back-transformed from natural-log values], decreased on d 2 (25.0 min, 95% CI: 18.4–34.0 min), but then remained steady until d 6 (21.0 min, 95% CI: 15.4–28.5 min); the initial reduction in total brush use was due to changes in grooming, but oral manipulation remained relatively static. In phase 2, heifers in the brush treatment showed similar usage on d 8 versus d 13 (3.8 vs. 3.7 min, 95% CI: 1.9–6.8 vs. 1.9–6.5 min). Compared with heifers with continuous brush access on d 8–12, those in the control treatment showed more brush use on d 13, both for oral manipulation (6.6 vs. 2.5 min, 95% CI: 3.8–11.1 vs. 1.3–4.5 min) and grooming (3.5 vs. 1.2 min, 95% CI: 1.9–5.7 vs. 0.5–2.3 min). Our study is the first to characterize stationary brush use in weaned dairy heifers. We conclude that, despite lacking previous experience, heifers use brushes for both grooming and oral manipulation.
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.2021-20467
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2559671108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030221007864</els_id><sourcerecordid>2559671108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e2a280bccf587c5dd1ba2aa4841ca8066e48baa907bd2af36d59bc469120a1953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqWwMmdEQgm2EzvOiCooSJUYgNm62BfVVZsUX1KJf49LWZlOT_fe6d7H2K3gRSm0edh4KiSXIpe80vUZmwklVV6KxpyzGedS5rzk8pJdEW2SFJKrGbt_H2EMQw_xO2vjROtsIsxCn_UQDph5CGmxxtBhpGt20cGW8OZvztnn89PH4iVfvS1fF4-r3JVajDlKkIa3znXK1E55L1qQAJWphAPDtcbKtAANr1svoSu1V03rKt2kj0A0qpyzu9PdfRy-JqTR7gI53G6hx2EiK5VqdC0EN8lanKwuDkQRO7uPYZfKWMHtkYpNVOyRiv2lkgLmFMBU4BAwWnIBe4c-RHSj9UP4L_oDKhtnfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2559671108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stationary brush use in naive dairy heifers</title><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Van Os, Jennifer M.C. ; Goldstein, Savannah A. ; Weary, Daniel M. ; von Keyserlingk, Marina A.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Os, Jennifer M.C. ; Goldstein, Savannah A. ; Weary, Daniel M. ; von Keyserlingk, Marina A.G.</creatorcontrib><description>Weaned dairy heifers are often housed in environments with few appropriate outlets for grooming or oral manipulation. Our objective was to characterize brush use by naive heifers, including patterns over time. In phase 1, groups of 4 heifers (n = 13 groups, 146.4 ± 9.1 d old, mean ± standard deviation; SD) were introduced to a bedded pack pen with 4 wall-mounted brushes (25.4 × 6.0 cm with 3.8-cm-long bristles). On d 1, 2, and 6 of exposure, continuous video recordings were used to observe 2 focal heifers per group for brush use (oral manipulation, grooming, and the sum of total brush use; all averaged at the group level). Latency to use a brush upon entering the pen was 3.4 ± 4.9 min (mean ± SD; range: 0.1 to 17.8 min among individuals). Heifers used the brushes for oral manipulation (39.7 ± 17.5% of brush use, mean ± SD) and grooming (60.3 ± 17.5%), primarily of their heads (89.9 ± 5.4% of grooming). In phase 2, heifers were moved in pairs (n = 13 pairs/treatment) to freestall pens either with (brush treatment) or without (control) brushes mounted inside the stalls for the first 5 d of phase 2 (d 8–12 of the study); on the last day (d 13 of the study), brushes were provided in both treatments. On d 8 (brush treatment) and 13 (both treatments), one focal heifer/pen was recorded for the same behaviors as in phase 1. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate brush use patterns across days (phase 1: d 1, 2, and 6; phase 2 brush treatment: d 8 vs. 13) and between treatments on d 13. In phase 1, brush use was greatest on d 1 [45.9 min; 95% confidence interval (CI): 33.2–63.3 min, back-transformed from natural-log values], decreased on d 2 (25.0 min, 95% CI: 18.4–34.0 min), but then remained steady until d 6 (21.0 min, 95% CI: 15.4–28.5 min); the initial reduction in total brush use was due to changes in grooming, but oral manipulation remained relatively static. In phase 2, heifers in the brush treatment showed similar usage on d 8 versus d 13 (3.8 vs. 3.7 min, 95% CI: 1.9–6.8 vs. 1.9–6.5 min). Compared with heifers with continuous brush access on d 8–12, those in the control treatment showed more brush use on d 13, both for oral manipulation (6.6 vs. 2.5 min, 95% CI: 3.8–11.1 vs. 1.3–4.5 min) and grooming (3.5 vs. 1.2 min, 95% CI: 1.9–5.7 vs. 0.5–2.3 min). Our study is the first to characterize stationary brush use in weaned dairy heifers. We conclude that, despite lacking previous experience, heifers use brushes for both grooming and oral manipulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-20467</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>environmental enrichment ; grooming ; oral behavior</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2021-11, Vol.104 (11), p.12019-12029</ispartof><rights>2021 American Dairy Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e2a280bccf587c5dd1ba2aa4841ca8066e48baa907bd2af36d59bc469120a1953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e2a280bccf587c5dd1ba2aa4841ca8066e48baa907bd2af36d59bc469120a1953</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7107-2867 ; 0000-0002-1427-3152 ; 0000-0002-0917-3982 ; 0000-0002-6883-7179</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030221007864$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3535,27903,27904,45759</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Os, Jennifer M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Savannah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weary, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Keyserlingk, Marina A.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Stationary brush use in naive dairy heifers</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><description>Weaned dairy heifers are often housed in environments with few appropriate outlets for grooming or oral manipulation. Our objective was to characterize brush use by naive heifers, including patterns over time. In phase 1, groups of 4 heifers (n = 13 groups, 146.4 ± 9.1 d old, mean ± standard deviation; SD) were introduced to a bedded pack pen with 4 wall-mounted brushes (25.4 × 6.0 cm with 3.8-cm-long bristles). On d 1, 2, and 6 of exposure, continuous video recordings were used to observe 2 focal heifers per group for brush use (oral manipulation, grooming, and the sum of total brush use; all averaged at the group level). Latency to use a brush upon entering the pen was 3.4 ± 4.9 min (mean ± SD; range: 0.1 to 17.8 min among individuals). Heifers used the brushes for oral manipulation (39.7 ± 17.5% of brush use, mean ± SD) and grooming (60.3 ± 17.5%), primarily of their heads (89.9 ± 5.4% of grooming). In phase 2, heifers were moved in pairs (n = 13 pairs/treatment) to freestall pens either with (brush treatment) or without (control) brushes mounted inside the stalls for the first 5 d of phase 2 (d 8–12 of the study); on the last day (d 13 of the study), brushes were provided in both treatments. On d 8 (brush treatment) and 13 (both treatments), one focal heifer/pen was recorded for the same behaviors as in phase 1. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate brush use patterns across days (phase 1: d 1, 2, and 6; phase 2 brush treatment: d 8 vs. 13) and between treatments on d 13. In phase 1, brush use was greatest on d 1 [45.9 min; 95% confidence interval (CI): 33.2–63.3 min, back-transformed from natural-log values], decreased on d 2 (25.0 min, 95% CI: 18.4–34.0 min), but then remained steady until d 6 (21.0 min, 95% CI: 15.4–28.5 min); the initial reduction in total brush use was due to changes in grooming, but oral manipulation remained relatively static. In phase 2, heifers in the brush treatment showed similar usage on d 8 versus d 13 (3.8 vs. 3.7 min, 95% CI: 1.9–6.8 vs. 1.9–6.5 min). Compared with heifers with continuous brush access on d 8–12, those in the control treatment showed more brush use on d 13, both for oral manipulation (6.6 vs. 2.5 min, 95% CI: 3.8–11.1 vs. 1.3–4.5 min) and grooming (3.5 vs. 1.2 min, 95% CI: 1.9–5.7 vs. 0.5–2.3 min). Our study is the first to characterize stationary brush use in weaned dairy heifers. We conclude that, despite lacking previous experience, heifers use brushes for both grooming and oral manipulation.</description><subject>environmental enrichment</subject><subject>grooming</subject><subject>oral behavior</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqWwMmdEQgm2EzvOiCooSJUYgNm62BfVVZsUX1KJf49LWZlOT_fe6d7H2K3gRSm0edh4KiSXIpe80vUZmwklVV6KxpyzGedS5rzk8pJdEW2SFJKrGbt_H2EMQw_xO2vjROtsIsxCn_UQDph5CGmxxtBhpGt20cGW8OZvztnn89PH4iVfvS1fF4-r3JVajDlKkIa3znXK1E55L1qQAJWphAPDtcbKtAANr1svoSu1V03rKt2kj0A0qpyzu9PdfRy-JqTR7gI53G6hx2EiK5VqdC0EN8lanKwuDkQRO7uPYZfKWMHtkYpNVOyRiv2lkgLmFMBU4BAwWnIBe4c-RHSj9UP4L_oDKhtnfA</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Van Os, Jennifer M.C.</creator><creator>Goldstein, Savannah A.</creator><creator>Weary, Daniel M.</creator><creator>von Keyserlingk, Marina A.G.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7107-2867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1427-3152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0917-3982</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6883-7179</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Stationary brush use in naive dairy heifers</title><author>Van Os, Jennifer M.C. ; Goldstein, Savannah A. ; Weary, Daniel M. ; von Keyserlingk, Marina A.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e2a280bccf587c5dd1ba2aa4841ca8066e48baa907bd2af36d59bc469120a1953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>environmental enrichment</topic><topic>grooming</topic><topic>oral behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Os, Jennifer M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Savannah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weary, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Keyserlingk, Marina A.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Os, Jennifer M.C.</au><au>Goldstein, Savannah A.</au><au>Weary, Daniel M.</au><au>von Keyserlingk, Marina A.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stationary brush use in naive dairy heifers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>12019</spage><epage>12029</epage><pages>12019-12029</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>Weaned dairy heifers are often housed in environments with few appropriate outlets for grooming or oral manipulation. Our objective was to characterize brush use by naive heifers, including patterns over time. In phase 1, groups of 4 heifers (n = 13 groups, 146.4 ± 9.1 d old, mean ± standard deviation; SD) were introduced to a bedded pack pen with 4 wall-mounted brushes (25.4 × 6.0 cm with 3.8-cm-long bristles). On d 1, 2, and 6 of exposure, continuous video recordings were used to observe 2 focal heifers per group for brush use (oral manipulation, grooming, and the sum of total brush use; all averaged at the group level). Latency to use a brush upon entering the pen was 3.4 ± 4.9 min (mean ± SD; range: 0.1 to 17.8 min among individuals). Heifers used the brushes for oral manipulation (39.7 ± 17.5% of brush use, mean ± SD) and grooming (60.3 ± 17.5%), primarily of their heads (89.9 ± 5.4% of grooming). In phase 2, heifers were moved in pairs (n = 13 pairs/treatment) to freestall pens either with (brush treatment) or without (control) brushes mounted inside the stalls for the first 5 d of phase 2 (d 8–12 of the study); on the last day (d 13 of the study), brushes were provided in both treatments. On d 8 (brush treatment) and 13 (both treatments), one focal heifer/pen was recorded for the same behaviors as in phase 1. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate brush use patterns across days (phase 1: d 1, 2, and 6; phase 2 brush treatment: d 8 vs. 13) and between treatments on d 13. In phase 1, brush use was greatest on d 1 [45.9 min; 95% confidence interval (CI): 33.2–63.3 min, back-transformed from natural-log values], decreased on d 2 (25.0 min, 95% CI: 18.4–34.0 min), but then remained steady until d 6 (21.0 min, 95% CI: 15.4–28.5 min); the initial reduction in total brush use was due to changes in grooming, but oral manipulation remained relatively static. In phase 2, heifers in the brush treatment showed similar usage on d 8 versus d 13 (3.8 vs. 3.7 min, 95% CI: 1.9–6.8 vs. 1.9–6.5 min). Compared with heifers with continuous brush access on d 8–12, those in the control treatment showed more brush use on d 13, both for oral manipulation (6.6 vs. 2.5 min, 95% CI: 3.8–11.1 vs. 1.3–4.5 min) and grooming (3.5 vs. 1.2 min, 95% CI: 1.9–5.7 vs. 0.5–2.3 min). Our study is the first to characterize stationary brush use in weaned dairy heifers. We conclude that, despite lacking previous experience, heifers use brushes for both grooming and oral manipulation.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.3168/jds.2021-20467</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7107-2867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1427-3152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0917-3982</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6883-7179</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 2021-11, Vol.104 (11), p.12019-12029
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2559671108
source EZB Free E-Journals; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects environmental enrichment
grooming
oral behavior
title Stationary brush use in naive dairy heifers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T02%3A37%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stationary%20brush%20use%20in%20naive%20dairy%20heifers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Van%20Os,%20Jennifer%20M.C.&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=12019&rft.epage=12029&rft.pages=12019-12029&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2021-20467&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2559671108%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e2a280bccf587c5dd1ba2aa4841ca8066e48baa907bd2af36d59bc469120a1953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2559671108&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true