Loading…
Comparison of septic and nonseptic pulmonary embolism in children
Background Septic pulmonary embolism (SPE) in children is a rare disease. Data are scarce regarding the clinical and laboratory manifestation of SPE compared with nonseptic pulmonary embolism (ns‐PE). Furthermore, specific guidelines for the management of SPE in children are lacking. Aim We compared...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatric pulmonology 2021-10, Vol.56 (10), p.3395-3401 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Septic pulmonary embolism (SPE) in children is a rare disease. Data are scarce regarding the clinical and laboratory manifestation of SPE compared with nonseptic pulmonary embolism (ns‐PE). Furthermore, specific guidelines for the management of SPE in children are lacking.
Aim
We compared the clinical course and outcome of children with SPE and ns‐PE.
Methods
A retrospective, cohort study of hospitalized children, 2005–2020, with documented pulmonary embolism imaging.
Results
Sixteen children (eight SPE, eight ns‐PE) were identified. Episodes of SPE occurred secondary to endocarditis, musculoskeletal and soft tissue infections, with Staphylococcus aureus (n = 4) and streptococcus spp. (n = 2) as the most common pathogens. Radiographically, SPE presented as a microvascular disease with parenchymatic nodules/cavitations, whereas ns‐PE presented as larger vessel disease with filling defects. Risk factors (including thrombophilia) were noted in 0% and 87.5% of SPE and ns‐PE patients, respectively (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 8755-6863 1099-0496 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ppul.25604 |