Loading…

Next‐generation balloon‐expandable Myval transcatheter heart valve in low‐risk aortic stenosis patients

Objectives We aimed to describe hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes at 30‐day follow‐up of the balloon‐expandable (BE) Myval transcatheter heart valve (THV) in low‐risk patients. Background The results of the next‐generation BE Myval THV in low‐risk aortic stenosis (AS) patients are still...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2022-02, Vol.99 (3), p.889-895
Main Authors: García‐Gómez, Mario, Delgado‐Arana, Jose Raúl, Halim, Jonathan, De Marco, Federico, Trani, Carlo, Martin, Pedro, Won‐Keun, Kim, Montorfano, Matteo, Heijer, Peter, Bedogni, Francesco, Sardella, Gennaro, IJsselmuiden, Alexander J. J., Campante Teles, Rui, Aristizabal‐Duque, Christian H., Gordillo, Ximena, Santos‐Martinez, Sandra, Barrero, Alejandro, Gómez‐Salvador, Itziar, Ancona, Marco, Redondo, Alfredo, Román, J. Alberto San, Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives We aimed to describe hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes at 30‐day follow‐up of the balloon‐expandable (BE) Myval transcatheter heart valve (THV) in low‐risk patients. Background The results of the next‐generation BE Myval THV in low‐risk aortic stenosis (AS) patients are still unknown. Methods Retrospective registry performed in nine European centers including patients with low predicted operative mortality risk according to Society of thoracic surgeons (STS) and European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE‐II) scores. Results Between September 2019 and February 2021, a total of 100 patients (51% males, mean age 80 ± 6.5 years) were included. Mean STS score and EuroSCORE‐II were 2.4 ± 0.8% and 2.2 ± 0.7%, respectively. Intermediate sizes were used in 39% (21.5 mm: 8%, 24.5 mm: 15%, 27.5 mm: 15%). There were no cases of valve embolization, coronary artery occlusion, annulus rupture, or procedural death. A definitive pacemaker implantation was needed in eight patients (8%). At 30‐day follow‐up aortic valve area (0.7 ± 0.2 vs. 2.1 ± 0.6 cm2) and mean aortic valve gradient (43.4 ± 11.1 vs. 9.0 ± 3.7 mmHg) improved significantly (p 
ISSN:1522-1946
1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/ccd.29923