Effects of low-level light therapy on xerostomia related to hyposalivation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

• Published in: Lasers in medical science 2022-03, Vol.37 (2), p.745-758
• Main Authors: Golež, Aljaž, Frangež, Igor, Cankar, Ksenija, Frangež, Helena Ban, Ovsenik, Maja, Nemeth, Lidija
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical trials; Dentistry; Dysphagia; Exocrine glands; Flow velocity; Humans; Irradiation; Lasers; Light irradiation; Light therapy; Low-Level Light Therapy; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Meta-analysis; Optical Devices; Optics; Pain; Patients; Photonics; Quality; Quality of Life; Quantum Optics; Questions; Radiation; Review Article; Saliva; Saliva - metabolism; Salivary gland; Salivary glands; Salivary Glands - radiation effects; Systematic review; Xerostomia; Xerostomia - etiology; Xerostomia - therapy
• ISSN: 0268-8921; 1435-604X
• DOI: 10.1007/s10103-021-03392-0

Hyposalivation is a condition represented by a reduced salivary flow and may include symptoms such as mouth dryness (xerostomia), loss of taste, pain, dysphagia, and dysphonia, all of which greatly affect an individual’s quality of life. The aim of the present study was to systematically review the effects of low-level light therapy irradiation (photobiomodulation) on salivary gland function in patients with hyposalivation. The main question of the systematic review was: “Does low-level light irradiation therapy of the salivary glands affect salivary flow rate or indicators of salivary function (ion and protein concentrations) in patients with xerostomia or hyposalivation?” The question was based on the PICO (participant, intervention, control, outcome) principle and followed the PRISMA guidelines. Databases were explored and papers published between the years 1997 and 2020 were reviewed for the following Mesh-term keywords and their corresponding entry terms in different combinations: “Low-level light therapy,” “Xerostomia,” “Saliva,” “Salivary glands,” “Salivation.” The initial sample consisted of 220 articles. Of those, 47 articles were used for full-text analysis and 18 were used for a systematic review, 14 were used in meta-analysis. According to their individual quality, most articles were classified as high quality of evidence according to the GRADE score. Meta-analysis of the evidence observed increase of unstimulated salivary flow 0.51 SMD compared to placebo (95% CI: 0.16–0.86), I 2  = 50%, p  = 0.005. The findings of our review revealed evidence of a beneficial effect of photobiomodulation therapy on salivary gland function. The therapy alleviates xerostomia and hyposalivation. However, these effects are reported short term only and did not induce lasting effects of photobiomodulation therapy on patients’ quality of life.