A new technique useful for lumbosacral percutaneous pedicle screw placement without fluoroscopy or computer-aided navigation systems

• Published in: Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2022-11, Vol.27 (6), p.1190-1196
• Main Authors: Tani, Yoichi, Saito, Takanori, Taniguchi, Shinichiro, Ishihara, Masayuki, Paku, Masaaki, Adachi, Takashi, Ando, Muneharu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0949-2658; 1436-2023
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.07.019

Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placements in the lumbosacral spine generally rely on fluoroscopy at the expense of radiation exposure. Our accumulated experience in open PS placements without fluoroscopic guidance realized a consistent shift toward PPS insertion with newly developed devices, which require neither fluoroscopy nor navigation. We wish to report our new technique and evaluations of its accuracy. Our equipment consisted of a pedicle targeting tool to identify and escort the cannulated awl to the correct starting point for cortical bone perforation and a cannulated awl-probe system with a guidewire to maintain the optimal position throughout the subsequent surgical steps. The surgeon could advance the blunt-tipped probe searching for the cancellous bone track using tactile feedback as experienced in open techniques. A 2-year period of transition from a free-hand (1169 screws in 286 patients) to the new PPS technique (1933 screws in 413 patients) allowed accuracy comparison between the two procedures using postoperative CT scans. Compared with the open-group, the PPS-group showed a lower rate of fully contained intrapedicular PS placements at L1 through S1, as a whole (90.7% vs 85.4%), but not at L4 through S1 (89.9% vs 90.2%). Less-accurate PPS placements at upper than lower lumbar spines in part reflect intended pedicle perforations laterally as a trade-off for avoiding facet violation immediately above the most cephalad screw. The PPS-group also had a higher incidence of PS-related transient nerve root complications (0% vs 1.7%). These values for the PPS-group, however, fell within those previously reported for free-hand or fluoroscopy techniques. Our new PPS technique, although useful for eliminating the potential risk of repeated radiation exposure, fell short of reaching the accuracy of the free-hand technique. Nerve integrity monitoring with PS stimulation, which we currently use, will help further improve the technical precision. Original Article. The study was approved by our institutional review boad (2,019,231).