Loading…

MINImal vs. MAXimal Invasive Axillary Staging and Treatment After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Protocol of a Dutch Multicenter Registry Study (MINIMAX)

Node positive breast cancer (cN+) patients with an axillary pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are not expected to benefit from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Therefore, less invasive axillary staging procedures have been introduced to establish response-gu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical breast cancer 2022-01, Vol.22 (1), p.e59-e64
Main Authors: de Wild, Sabine R., Simons, Janine M., Vrancken Peeters, Marie-Jeanne T.F.D., Smidt, Marjolein L., Koppert, Linetta B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6d8a3523831d832365bd1b9242794b0e23cfc7f831d3cf0db865d1718a7fc8bf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6d8a3523831d832365bd1b9242794b0e23cfc7f831d3cf0db865d1718a7fc8bf3
container_end_page e64
container_issue 1
container_start_page e59
container_title Clinical breast cancer
container_volume 22
creator de Wild, Sabine R.
Simons, Janine M.
Vrancken Peeters, Marie-Jeanne T.F.D.
Smidt, Marjolein L.
Koppert, Linetta B.
description Node positive breast cancer (cN+) patients with an axillary pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are not expected to benefit from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Therefore, less invasive axillary staging procedures have been introduced to establish response-guided treatment. However, evidence is lacking with regard to their oncologic safety and impact on quality of life (QoL). We hypothesize that if response-guided treatment is given, less invasive staging procedures are non-inferior to standard ALND in terms of oncologic safety, and superior to standard ALND in terms of QoL. MINIMAX is a Dutch multicenter registry study that includes patients with cN1-3M0 unilateral invasive breast cancer, who receive NST, followed by axillary staging and treatment according to local protocols. In a retrospective registry of ±4000 patients, the primary endpoint is oncologic safety at 5 and 10 years (disease-free, breast-cancer-specific and overall survival, and axillary recurrence rate). In a prospective multicenter registry, the primary endpoints are QoL at 1 and 5 years, and we aim to verify the 5-year oncologic safety. With an estimated 5-year disease-free survival of 72.5% and anticipated loss to follow-up of 10%, a sample size of 549 is needed to have 80% power to detect non-inferiority (with a 10% margin) of less invasive staging procedures. In cN+ patients treated with NST, less invasive axillary staging procedures are already implemented globally. Evidence is needed to support the assumed oncologic safety and superior QoL of such procedures. This study will contribute to evidence-based guidelines. In node positive breast cancer patients who are treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, axillary staging and treatment is still a topic of debate. This multicenter study will contribute to evidence-based guidelines with regard to the oncologic safety and impact on quality of life of less vs. more invasive axillary staging and treatment strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.07.011
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2566045762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1526820921001993</els_id><sourcerecordid>2566045762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6d8a3523831d832365bd1b9242794b0e23cfc7f831d3cf0db865d1718a7fc8bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc1u1DAYjBCIlsILcEA-lkOCfxIni7gsS4GVuktFF4mb5dhftl4l8dZ2oubJeD0ctnDk5JE933zjmSR5TXBGMOHvDplqa5VRTEmGywwT8iQ5JwtWpZhz_jTigvK0onhxlrzw_oAx5Yzg58kZy_OcM56fJ7826-26ky0afYY2y59mxut-lN6MgJYPpm2lm9BtkHvT75HsNdo5kKGDPqBlE8ChLVipD8Mo483t5AN0RqHdHTh5nJDp0dZqQDfWmzBLfozTPqCV7BW49-jG2WCVbZFtkESfhqDu0GZog1FxQRT_Dnvjwx8Hg57Q5Ww32nz7MnnWyNbDq8fzIvnx-Wq3-ppef_uyXi2vU5VjHFKuK8kKyipGdMUo40WtSb2gOS0XeY2BMtWospmfI8K6rnihSUkqWTaqqht2kVyedI_O3g_gg-iMVxBT6cEOXtCCc5wXJaeRSk9U5az3DhpxdDFONwmCxVyYOIi5MDEXJnApYmFx6M2j_lB3oP-N_G0oEj6cCBB_ORpwwisDMTxtHKggtDX_0_8NcTSn9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2566045762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MINImal vs. MAXimal Invasive Axillary Staging and Treatment After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Protocol of a Dutch Multicenter Registry Study (MINIMAX)</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>de Wild, Sabine R. ; Simons, Janine M. ; Vrancken Peeters, Marie-Jeanne T.F.D. ; Smidt, Marjolein L. ; Koppert, Linetta B.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Wild, Sabine R. ; Simons, Janine M. ; Vrancken Peeters, Marie-Jeanne T.F.D. ; Smidt, Marjolein L. ; Koppert, Linetta B. ; MINIMAX Group</creatorcontrib><description>Node positive breast cancer (cN+) patients with an axillary pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are not expected to benefit from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Therefore, less invasive axillary staging procedures have been introduced to establish response-guided treatment. However, evidence is lacking with regard to their oncologic safety and impact on quality of life (QoL). We hypothesize that if response-guided treatment is given, less invasive staging procedures are non-inferior to standard ALND in terms of oncologic safety, and superior to standard ALND in terms of QoL. MINIMAX is a Dutch multicenter registry study that includes patients with cN1-3M0 unilateral invasive breast cancer, who receive NST, followed by axillary staging and treatment according to local protocols. In a retrospective registry of ±4000 patients, the primary endpoint is oncologic safety at 5 and 10 years (disease-free, breast-cancer-specific and overall survival, and axillary recurrence rate). In a prospective multicenter registry, the primary endpoints are QoL at 1 and 5 years, and we aim to verify the 5-year oncologic safety. With an estimated 5-year disease-free survival of 72.5% and anticipated loss to follow-up of 10%, a sample size of 549 is needed to have 80% power to detect non-inferiority (with a 10% margin) of less invasive staging procedures. In cN+ patients treated with NST, less invasive axillary staging procedures are already implemented globally. Evidence is needed to support the assumed oncologic safety and superior QoL of such procedures. This study will contribute to evidence-based guidelines. In node positive breast cancer patients who are treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, axillary staging and treatment is still a topic of debate. This multicenter study will contribute to evidence-based guidelines with regard to the oncologic safety and impact on quality of life of less vs. more invasive axillary staging and treatment strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-8209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-0666</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.07.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34446364</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Axillary lymph node dissection ; Axillary surgery ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision - statistics &amp; numerical data ; MARI-procedure ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Neoplasm Staging ; Netherlands ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Registries ; Sentinel lymph node biopsy ; Targeted axillary dissection</subject><ispartof>Clinical breast cancer, 2022-01, Vol.22 (1), p.e59-e64</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6d8a3523831d832365bd1b9242794b0e23cfc7f831d3cf0db865d1718a7fc8bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6d8a3523831d832365bd1b9242794b0e23cfc7f831d3cf0db865d1718a7fc8bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446364$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Wild, Sabine R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simons, Janine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrancken Peeters, Marie-Jeanne T.F.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smidt, Marjolein L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koppert, Linetta B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MINIMAX Group</creatorcontrib><title>MINImal vs. MAXimal Invasive Axillary Staging and Treatment After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Protocol of a Dutch Multicenter Registry Study (MINIMAX)</title><title>Clinical breast cancer</title><addtitle>Clin Breast Cancer</addtitle><description>Node positive breast cancer (cN+) patients with an axillary pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are not expected to benefit from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Therefore, less invasive axillary staging procedures have been introduced to establish response-guided treatment. However, evidence is lacking with regard to their oncologic safety and impact on quality of life (QoL). We hypothesize that if response-guided treatment is given, less invasive staging procedures are non-inferior to standard ALND in terms of oncologic safety, and superior to standard ALND in terms of QoL. MINIMAX is a Dutch multicenter registry study that includes patients with cN1-3M0 unilateral invasive breast cancer, who receive NST, followed by axillary staging and treatment according to local protocols. In a retrospective registry of ±4000 patients, the primary endpoint is oncologic safety at 5 and 10 years (disease-free, breast-cancer-specific and overall survival, and axillary recurrence rate). In a prospective multicenter registry, the primary endpoints are QoL at 1 and 5 years, and we aim to verify the 5-year oncologic safety. With an estimated 5-year disease-free survival of 72.5% and anticipated loss to follow-up of 10%, a sample size of 549 is needed to have 80% power to detect non-inferiority (with a 10% margin) of less invasive staging procedures. In cN+ patients treated with NST, less invasive axillary staging procedures are already implemented globally. Evidence is needed to support the assumed oncologic safety and superior QoL of such procedures. This study will contribute to evidence-based guidelines. In node positive breast cancer patients who are treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, axillary staging and treatment is still a topic of debate. This multicenter study will contribute to evidence-based guidelines with regard to the oncologic safety and impact on quality of life of less vs. more invasive axillary staging and treatment strategies.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Axillary lymph node dissection</subject><subject>Axillary surgery</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>MARI-procedure</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Sentinel lymph node biopsy</subject><subject>Targeted axillary dissection</subject><issn>1526-8209</issn><issn>1938-0666</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uc1u1DAYjBCIlsILcEA-lkOCfxIni7gsS4GVuktFF4mb5dhftl4l8dZ2oubJeD0ctnDk5JE933zjmSR5TXBGMOHvDplqa5VRTEmGywwT8iQ5JwtWpZhz_jTigvK0onhxlrzw_oAx5Yzg58kZy_OcM56fJ7826-26ky0afYY2y59mxut-lN6MgJYPpm2lm9BtkHvT75HsNdo5kKGDPqBlE8ChLVipD8Mo483t5AN0RqHdHTh5nJDp0dZqQDfWmzBLfozTPqCV7BW49-jG2WCVbZFtkESfhqDu0GZog1FxQRT_Dnvjwx8Hg57Q5Ww32nz7MnnWyNbDq8fzIvnx-Wq3-ppef_uyXi2vU5VjHFKuK8kKyipGdMUo40WtSb2gOS0XeY2BMtWospmfI8K6rnihSUkqWTaqqht2kVyedI_O3g_gg-iMVxBT6cEOXtCCc5wXJaeRSk9U5az3DhpxdDFONwmCxVyYOIi5MDEXJnApYmFx6M2j_lB3oP-N_G0oEj6cCBB_ORpwwisDMTxtHKggtDX_0_8NcTSn9Q</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>de Wild, Sabine R.</creator><creator>Simons, Janine M.</creator><creator>Vrancken Peeters, Marie-Jeanne T.F.D.</creator><creator>Smidt, Marjolein L.</creator><creator>Koppert, Linetta B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>MINImal vs. MAXimal Invasive Axillary Staging and Treatment After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Protocol of a Dutch Multicenter Registry Study (MINIMAX)</title><author>de Wild, Sabine R. ; Simons, Janine M. ; Vrancken Peeters, Marie-Jeanne T.F.D. ; Smidt, Marjolein L. ; Koppert, Linetta B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6d8a3523831d832365bd1b9242794b0e23cfc7f831d3cf0db865d1718a7fc8bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Axillary lymph node dissection</topic><topic>Axillary surgery</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>MARI-procedure</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Sentinel lymph node biopsy</topic><topic>Targeted axillary dissection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Wild, Sabine R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simons, Janine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrancken Peeters, Marie-Jeanne T.F.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smidt, Marjolein L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koppert, Linetta B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MINIMAX Group</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical breast cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Wild, Sabine R.</au><au>Simons, Janine M.</au><au>Vrancken Peeters, Marie-Jeanne T.F.D.</au><au>Smidt, Marjolein L.</au><au>Koppert, Linetta B.</au><aucorp>MINIMAX Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MINImal vs. MAXimal Invasive Axillary Staging and Treatment After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Protocol of a Dutch Multicenter Registry Study (MINIMAX)</atitle><jtitle>Clinical breast cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Breast Cancer</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e59</spage><epage>e64</epage><pages>e59-e64</pages><issn>1526-8209</issn><eissn>1938-0666</eissn><abstract>Node positive breast cancer (cN+) patients with an axillary pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are not expected to benefit from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Therefore, less invasive axillary staging procedures have been introduced to establish response-guided treatment. However, evidence is lacking with regard to their oncologic safety and impact on quality of life (QoL). We hypothesize that if response-guided treatment is given, less invasive staging procedures are non-inferior to standard ALND in terms of oncologic safety, and superior to standard ALND in terms of QoL. MINIMAX is a Dutch multicenter registry study that includes patients with cN1-3M0 unilateral invasive breast cancer, who receive NST, followed by axillary staging and treatment according to local protocols. In a retrospective registry of ±4000 patients, the primary endpoint is oncologic safety at 5 and 10 years (disease-free, breast-cancer-specific and overall survival, and axillary recurrence rate). In a prospective multicenter registry, the primary endpoints are QoL at 1 and 5 years, and we aim to verify the 5-year oncologic safety. With an estimated 5-year disease-free survival of 72.5% and anticipated loss to follow-up of 10%, a sample size of 549 is needed to have 80% power to detect non-inferiority (with a 10% margin) of less invasive staging procedures. In cN+ patients treated with NST, less invasive axillary staging procedures are already implemented globally. Evidence is needed to support the assumed oncologic safety and superior QoL of such procedures. This study will contribute to evidence-based guidelines. In node positive breast cancer patients who are treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, axillary staging and treatment is still a topic of debate. This multicenter study will contribute to evidence-based guidelines with regard to the oncologic safety and impact on quality of life of less vs. more invasive axillary staging and treatment strategies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34446364</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clbc.2021.07.011</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-8209
ispartof Clinical breast cancer, 2022-01, Vol.22 (1), p.e59-e64
issn 1526-8209
1938-0666
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2566045762
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Axillary lymph node dissection
Axillary surgery
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lymph Node Excision - statistics & numerical data
MARI-procedure
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods
Neoadjuvant Therapy - statistics & numerical data
Neoplasm Staging
Netherlands
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data
Registries
Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Targeted axillary dissection
title MINImal vs. MAXimal Invasive Axillary Staging and Treatment After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Protocol of a Dutch Multicenter Registry Study (MINIMAX)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A24%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MINImal%20vs.%20MAXimal%20Invasive%20Axillary%20Staging%20and%20Treatment%20After%20Neoadjuvant%20Systemic%20Therapy%20in%20Node%20Positive%20Breast%20Cancer:%20Protocol%20of%20a%20Dutch%20Multicenter%20Registry%20Study%20(MINIMAX)&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20breast%20cancer&rft.au=de%20Wild,%20Sabine%20R.&rft.aucorp=MINIMAX%20Group&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e59&rft.epage=e64&rft.pages=e59-e64&rft.issn=1526-8209&rft.eissn=1938-0666&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clbc.2021.07.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2566045762%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6d8a3523831d832365bd1b9242794b0e23cfc7f831d3cf0db865d1718a7fc8bf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2566045762&rft_id=info:pmid/34446364&rfr_iscdi=true