Loading…

Two centuries of distribution data: detection of areas of endemism for the Brazilian angiosperms

Brazil has high levels of biodiversity and has received strong criticism for the increasing country‐wide deforestation that threatens it. Although a significant percentage of land area in Brazil is protected, the areas are insufficient and unevenly distributed. Many studies have contributed to the b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cladistics 2021-08, Vol.37 (4), p.442-458
Main Authors: Gomes‐da‐Silva, Janaína, Forzza, Rafaela Campostrini
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-def7ad7633b5565791995622dc0e987c1df1e3b320bd4ebbf544efd53c920aea3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-def7ad7633b5565791995622dc0e987c1df1e3b320bd4ebbf544efd53c920aea3
container_end_page 458
container_issue 4
container_start_page 442
container_title Cladistics
container_volume 37
creator Gomes‐da‐Silva, Janaína
Forzza, Rafaela Campostrini
description Brazil has high levels of biodiversity and has received strong criticism for the increasing country‐wide deforestation that threatens it. Although a significant percentage of land area in Brazil is protected, the areas are insufficient and unevenly distributed. Many studies have contributed to the biogeographical knowledge of Brazilian flora, but no endemicity analysis (EA) has been conducted including all endemic angiosperms. We investigated the spatial component, drawing on a huge and taxonomically diverse dataset based on 827 016 records collected over the last two centuries. We conducted an EA for 15 034 species from 173 families using an optimality criterion with 2° and 3° grid sizes, in order to search for distributional concordance, to identify the biogeographical units and discuss the implications for conservation. Six analyses were run for basal angiosperms, monocots and eudicots. The EA recovered 66 consensus areas (CAs). The concordance of CAs enabled the identification of five best‐supported areas of endemism––three in the Atlantic and Parana Forest and two areas in the Cerrado province––supported by species of 120 families. The age of divergence for some genera that contributed significantly to the identification of areas recovered in the Cerrado coincides with the recent, 30 Ma, supporting an ancient origin. Most areas in the Atlantic Forest are partially superimposed with the limits of the protected areas, however, big gaps were identified in the Cerrado. Protecting Brazilian biomes was at the heart of Brazil’s environmental policy. Regrettably, this scenario has radically changed based on misleading divergences in conservation policy. Areas of endemism are pivotal for biodiversity conservation due to the common evolutionary history shared by their endemic taxa. Thus, we hope that these congruent patterns of endemism support the establishment of biodiversity priorities.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cla.12445
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2569383449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2552119953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-def7ad7633b5565791995622dc0e987c1df1e3b320bd4ebbf544efd53c920aea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1PwyAYB3BiNDqnB7-AIfGihzpeSju86eJbssTLPFcKD4ppy4Q2i356cVMPJnIhhF_-PPwROqLknKY10Y06pyzPxRYaUSKLjBBOt9GIlPk044SUe2g_xldCCCuY3EV7PM_LKZV0hJ4WK481dP0QHETsLTYu9sHVQ-98h43q1QU20INen9O9CqDWEDoDrYsttj7g_gXwVVAfrnGqw6p7dj4uIbTxAO1Y1UQ4_N7H6PHmejG7y-YPt_ezy3mmueAiM2BLZcqC81qIQpSSSikKxowmIKelpsZS4DVnpDY51LUVeQ7WCK4lIwoUH6PTTe4y-LcBYl-l2TQ0jerAD7FiopB8mj4uEz35Q1_9ELo0XVKC0a-neVJnG6WDjzGArZbBtSq8V5RUX7VXqfZqXXuyx9-JQ92C-ZU_PScw2YCVa-D9_6RqNr_cRH4CGl6L_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552119953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two centuries of distribution data: detection of areas of endemism for the Brazilian angiosperms</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Gomes‐da‐Silva, Janaína ; Forzza, Rafaela Campostrini</creator><creatorcontrib>Gomes‐da‐Silva, Janaína ; Forzza, Rafaela Campostrini</creatorcontrib><description>Brazil has high levels of biodiversity and has received strong criticism for the increasing country‐wide deforestation that threatens it. Although a significant percentage of land area in Brazil is protected, the areas are insufficient and unevenly distributed. Many studies have contributed to the biogeographical knowledge of Brazilian flora, but no endemicity analysis (EA) has been conducted including all endemic angiosperms. We investigated the spatial component, drawing on a huge and taxonomically diverse dataset based on 827 016 records collected over the last two centuries. We conducted an EA for 15 034 species from 173 families using an optimality criterion with 2° and 3° grid sizes, in order to search for distributional concordance, to identify the biogeographical units and discuss the implications for conservation. Six analyses were run for basal angiosperms, monocots and eudicots. The EA recovered 66 consensus areas (CAs). The concordance of CAs enabled the identification of five best‐supported areas of endemism––three in the Atlantic and Parana Forest and two areas in the Cerrado province––supported by species of 120 families. The age of divergence for some genera that contributed significantly to the identification of areas recovered in the Cerrado coincides with the recent, &lt;10 Ma, estimated age of that province. By contrast, the areas in the Atlantic and Parana Forest are supported by genera with earlier diversification &gt;30 Ma, supporting an ancient origin. Most areas in the Atlantic Forest are partially superimposed with the limits of the protected areas, however, big gaps were identified in the Cerrado. Protecting Brazilian biomes was at the heart of Brazil’s environmental policy. Regrettably, this scenario has radically changed based on misleading divergences in conservation policy. Areas of endemism are pivotal for biodiversity conservation due to the common evolutionary history shared by their endemic taxa. Thus, we hope that these congruent patterns of endemism support the establishment of biodiversity priorities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cla.12445</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34478191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Angiosperms ; Biodiversity ; Biological Evolution ; Brazil ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Deforestation ; Divergence ; Environmental policy ; Forests ; Genera ; Magnoliopsida - physiology ; Phylogeny ; Protected areas</subject><ispartof>Cladistics, 2021-08, Vol.37 (4), p.442-458</ispartof><rights>The Willi Hennig Society 2020</rights><rights>The Willi Hennig Society 2020.</rights><rights>2021 The Willi Hennig Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-def7ad7633b5565791995622dc0e987c1df1e3b320bd4ebbf544efd53c920aea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-def7ad7633b5565791995622dc0e987c1df1e3b320bd4ebbf544efd53c920aea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0817-186X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34478191$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gomes‐da‐Silva, Janaína</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forzza, Rafaela Campostrini</creatorcontrib><title>Two centuries of distribution data: detection of areas of endemism for the Brazilian angiosperms</title><title>Cladistics</title><addtitle>Cladistics</addtitle><description>Brazil has high levels of biodiversity and has received strong criticism for the increasing country‐wide deforestation that threatens it. Although a significant percentage of land area in Brazil is protected, the areas are insufficient and unevenly distributed. Many studies have contributed to the biogeographical knowledge of Brazilian flora, but no endemicity analysis (EA) has been conducted including all endemic angiosperms. We investigated the spatial component, drawing on a huge and taxonomically diverse dataset based on 827 016 records collected over the last two centuries. We conducted an EA for 15 034 species from 173 families using an optimality criterion with 2° and 3° grid sizes, in order to search for distributional concordance, to identify the biogeographical units and discuss the implications for conservation. Six analyses were run for basal angiosperms, monocots and eudicots. The EA recovered 66 consensus areas (CAs). The concordance of CAs enabled the identification of five best‐supported areas of endemism––three in the Atlantic and Parana Forest and two areas in the Cerrado province––supported by species of 120 families. The age of divergence for some genera that contributed significantly to the identification of areas recovered in the Cerrado coincides with the recent, &lt;10 Ma, estimated age of that province. By contrast, the areas in the Atlantic and Parana Forest are supported by genera with earlier diversification &gt;30 Ma, supporting an ancient origin. Most areas in the Atlantic Forest are partially superimposed with the limits of the protected areas, however, big gaps were identified in the Cerrado. Protecting Brazilian biomes was at the heart of Brazil’s environmental policy. Regrettably, this scenario has radically changed based on misleading divergences in conservation policy. Areas of endemism are pivotal for biodiversity conservation due to the common evolutionary history shared by their endemic taxa. Thus, we hope that these congruent patterns of endemism support the establishment of biodiversity priorities.</description><subject>Angiosperms</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Genera</subject><subject>Magnoliopsida - physiology</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><issn>0748-3007</issn><issn>1096-0031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1PwyAYB3BiNDqnB7-AIfGihzpeSju86eJbssTLPFcKD4ppy4Q2i356cVMPJnIhhF_-PPwROqLknKY10Y06pyzPxRYaUSKLjBBOt9GIlPk044SUe2g_xldCCCuY3EV7PM_LKZV0hJ4WK481dP0QHETsLTYu9sHVQ-98h43q1QU20INen9O9CqDWEDoDrYsttj7g_gXwVVAfrnGqw6p7dj4uIbTxAO1Y1UQ4_N7H6PHmejG7y-YPt_ezy3mmueAiM2BLZcqC81qIQpSSSikKxowmIKelpsZS4DVnpDY51LUVeQ7WCK4lIwoUH6PTTe4y-LcBYl-l2TQ0jerAD7FiopB8mj4uEz35Q1_9ELo0XVKC0a-neVJnG6WDjzGArZbBtSq8V5RUX7VXqfZqXXuyx9-JQ92C-ZU_PScw2YCVa-D9_6RqNr_cRH4CGl6L_g</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Gomes‐da‐Silva, Janaína</creator><creator>Forzza, Rafaela Campostrini</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0817-186X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Two centuries of distribution data: detection of areas of endemism for the Brazilian angiosperms</title><author>Gomes‐da‐Silva, Janaína ; Forzza, Rafaela Campostrini</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-def7ad7633b5565791995622dc0e987c1df1e3b320bd4ebbf544efd53c920aea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Angiosperms</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Genera</topic><topic>Magnoliopsida - physiology</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gomes‐da‐Silva, Janaína</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forzza, Rafaela Campostrini</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cladistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gomes‐da‐Silva, Janaína</au><au>Forzza, Rafaela Campostrini</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two centuries of distribution data: detection of areas of endemism for the Brazilian angiosperms</atitle><jtitle>Cladistics</jtitle><addtitle>Cladistics</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>442</spage><epage>458</epage><pages>442-458</pages><issn>0748-3007</issn><eissn>1096-0031</eissn><abstract>Brazil has high levels of biodiversity and has received strong criticism for the increasing country‐wide deforestation that threatens it. Although a significant percentage of land area in Brazil is protected, the areas are insufficient and unevenly distributed. Many studies have contributed to the biogeographical knowledge of Brazilian flora, but no endemicity analysis (EA) has been conducted including all endemic angiosperms. We investigated the spatial component, drawing on a huge and taxonomically diverse dataset based on 827 016 records collected over the last two centuries. We conducted an EA for 15 034 species from 173 families using an optimality criterion with 2° and 3° grid sizes, in order to search for distributional concordance, to identify the biogeographical units and discuss the implications for conservation. Six analyses were run for basal angiosperms, monocots and eudicots. The EA recovered 66 consensus areas (CAs). The concordance of CAs enabled the identification of five best‐supported areas of endemism––three in the Atlantic and Parana Forest and two areas in the Cerrado province––supported by species of 120 families. The age of divergence for some genera that contributed significantly to the identification of areas recovered in the Cerrado coincides with the recent, &lt;10 Ma, estimated age of that province. By contrast, the areas in the Atlantic and Parana Forest are supported by genera with earlier diversification &gt;30 Ma, supporting an ancient origin. Most areas in the Atlantic Forest are partially superimposed with the limits of the protected areas, however, big gaps were identified in the Cerrado. Protecting Brazilian biomes was at the heart of Brazil’s environmental policy. Regrettably, this scenario has radically changed based on misleading divergences in conservation policy. Areas of endemism are pivotal for biodiversity conservation due to the common evolutionary history shared by their endemic taxa. Thus, we hope that these congruent patterns of endemism support the establishment of biodiversity priorities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34478191</pmid><doi>10.1111/cla.12445</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0817-186X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-3007
ispartof Cladistics, 2021-08, Vol.37 (4), p.442-458
issn 0748-3007
1096-0031
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2569383449
source Wiley
subjects Angiosperms
Biodiversity
Biological Evolution
Brazil
Conservation
Conservation of Natural Resources
Deforestation
Divergence
Environmental policy
Forests
Genera
Magnoliopsida - physiology
Phylogeny
Protected areas
title Two centuries of distribution data: detection of areas of endemism for the Brazilian angiosperms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A09%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20centuries%20of%20distribution%20data:%20detection%20of%20areas%20of%20endemism%20for%20the%20Brazilian%20angiosperms&rft.jtitle=Cladistics&rft.au=Gomes%E2%80%90da%E2%80%90Silva,%20Jana%C3%ADna&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=442&rft.epage=458&rft.pages=442-458&rft.issn=0748-3007&rft.eissn=1096-0031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cla.12445&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2552119953%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-def7ad7633b5565791995622dc0e987c1df1e3b320bd4ebbf544efd53c920aea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552119953&rft_id=info:pmid/34478191&rfr_iscdi=true