Loading…

Exploring the relationship between neck flexion and neck problems in occupational populations: a systematic review of the literature

A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the relationship between occupational neck flexion angles and neck problems. The synthesised findings were used to answer three research questions: (1) Is there a positive/negative relationship between neck flexion and neck problems? (2) What is the appr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ergonomics 2022-04, Vol.65 (4), p.587-603
Main Authors: Norasi, Hamid, Tetteh, Emmanuel, Sarker, Pramiti, Mirka, Gary A., Hallbeck, M. Susan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f175b5be444839c1ad03bebadc9485c2a156f7c9d54b10542d44f43afb5ec533
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f175b5be444839c1ad03bebadc9485c2a156f7c9d54b10542d44f43afb5ec533
container_end_page 603
container_issue 4
container_start_page 587
container_title Ergonomics
container_volume 65
creator Norasi, Hamid
Tetteh, Emmanuel
Sarker, Pramiti
Mirka, Gary A.
Hallbeck, M. Susan
description A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the relationship between occupational neck flexion angles and neck problems. The synthesised findings were used to answer three research questions: (1) Is there a positive/negative relationship between neck flexion and neck problems? (2) What is the appropriate angular threshold for neck flexion as a risk factor for neck problems? (3) What are the gaps in our current knowledge? A review of 21 papers revealed (1) a consistent positive correlation between neck flexion and neck problems, and (2) a neck flexion angle of 20° as the most evidence-based (not necessarily the best) cut-off angle separating high- and low-risk neck flexion postures. Future research should focus on the (1) continuous collection of three-dimensional neck postures through longitudinal studies to quantify cumulative exposures of neck postures, and (2) development of standard descriptions of 'neck problems' and 'neck flexion' to facilitate the development of a dose-response relationship. Practitioner summary: Practitioners depend on thresholds for evaluating neck postural exposure using work assessment tools; however, the scientific basis for this is unclear. This systematic review investigated the angular threshold for neck flexion and found 20° of neck flexion with the greatest evidence-based support as the threshold for high-risk neck postural exposure.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00140139.2021.1976847
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2569383928</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2569383928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f175b5be444839c1ad03bebadc9485c2a156f7c9d54b10542d44f43afb5ec533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxomxiWvbP6EJiRcvs4UBZgZPmqZqkyZe9EwY5mGpDIzAuN27f7hsd7148AQPft_He3wIXVGypWQg14RQTiiT25a0dEtl3w28f4E2lHVdI-r-JdocmOYAvUKvc36sJaOy3aDft0-Lj8mF77g8AE7gdXEx5Ae34BHKDiDgAOYHth6e6gXWYToeLCmOHuaMXcDRmHV5FmqPl7isJ5d3WOO8zwXmWpvq_svBDkf7_JZ3BZIua4ILdGa1z3B5Ws_Rt4-3X28-N_dfPt3dfLhvDOtpaaSlvRjFCJzzgUlD9UTYCKOejOSDMK2morO9kZPgIyWCtxPnljNtRwFGMHaO3h59a-8_V8hFzS4b8F4HiGtWregkq87tUNE3_6CPcU11vEp1vK__LjmplDhSJsWcE1i1JDfrtFeUqEM26m826pCNOmVTde-POhdsTLPexeQnVfS-RmGTDsZlxf5v8Qd8g5hO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2647108940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring the relationship between neck flexion and neck problems in occupational populations: a systematic review of the literature</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Norasi, Hamid ; Tetteh, Emmanuel ; Sarker, Pramiti ; Mirka, Gary A. ; Hallbeck, M. Susan</creator><creatorcontrib>Norasi, Hamid ; Tetteh, Emmanuel ; Sarker, Pramiti ; Mirka, Gary A. ; Hallbeck, M. Susan</creatorcontrib><description>A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the relationship between occupational neck flexion angles and neck problems. The synthesised findings were used to answer three research questions: (1) Is there a positive/negative relationship between neck flexion and neck problems? (2) What is the appropriate angular threshold for neck flexion as a risk factor for neck problems? (3) What are the gaps in our current knowledge? A review of 21 papers revealed (1) a consistent positive correlation between neck flexion and neck problems, and (2) a neck flexion angle of 20° as the most evidence-based (not necessarily the best) cut-off angle separating high- and low-risk neck flexion postures. Future research should focus on the (1) continuous collection of three-dimensional neck postures through longitudinal studies to quantify cumulative exposures of neck postures, and (2) development of standard descriptions of 'neck problems' and 'neck flexion' to facilitate the development of a dose-response relationship. Practitioner summary: Practitioners depend on thresholds for evaluating neck postural exposure using work assessment tools; however, the scientific basis for this is unclear. This systematic review investigated the angular threshold for neck flexion and found 20° of neck flexion with the greatest evidence-based support as the threshold for high-risk neck postural exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2021.1976847</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>cervical spine ; Correlation analysis ; Evaluation ; Exposure ; Literature reviews ; Longitudinal studies ; Neck ; neck musculoskeletal disorders ; neck pain ; Neck postural exposure ; Posture ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Ergonomics, 2022-04, Vol.65 (4), p.587-603</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2021</rights><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f175b5be444839c1ad03bebadc9485c2a156f7c9d54b10542d44f43afb5ec533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f175b5be444839c1ad03bebadc9485c2a156f7c9d54b10542d44f43afb5ec533</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7140-0357 ; 0000-0002-1669-8058</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Norasi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tetteh, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarker, Pramiti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirka, Gary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallbeck, M. Susan</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring the relationship between neck flexion and neck problems in occupational populations: a systematic review of the literature</title><title>Ergonomics</title><description>A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the relationship between occupational neck flexion angles and neck problems. The synthesised findings were used to answer three research questions: (1) Is there a positive/negative relationship between neck flexion and neck problems? (2) What is the appropriate angular threshold for neck flexion as a risk factor for neck problems? (3) What are the gaps in our current knowledge? A review of 21 papers revealed (1) a consistent positive correlation between neck flexion and neck problems, and (2) a neck flexion angle of 20° as the most evidence-based (not necessarily the best) cut-off angle separating high- and low-risk neck flexion postures. Future research should focus on the (1) continuous collection of three-dimensional neck postures through longitudinal studies to quantify cumulative exposures of neck postures, and (2) development of standard descriptions of 'neck problems' and 'neck flexion' to facilitate the development of a dose-response relationship. Practitioner summary: Practitioners depend on thresholds for evaluating neck postural exposure using work assessment tools; however, the scientific basis for this is unclear. This systematic review investigated the angular threshold for neck flexion and found 20° of neck flexion with the greatest evidence-based support as the threshold for high-risk neck postural exposure.</description><subject>cervical spine</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>neck musculoskeletal disorders</subject><subject>neck pain</subject><subject>Neck postural exposure</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxomxiWvbP6EJiRcvs4UBZgZPmqZqkyZe9EwY5mGpDIzAuN27f7hsd7148AQPft_He3wIXVGypWQg14RQTiiT25a0dEtl3w28f4E2lHVdI-r-JdocmOYAvUKvc36sJaOy3aDft0-Lj8mF77g8AE7gdXEx5Ae34BHKDiDgAOYHth6e6gXWYToeLCmOHuaMXcDRmHV5FmqPl7isJ5d3WOO8zwXmWpvq_svBDkf7_JZ3BZIua4ILdGa1z3B5Ws_Rt4-3X28-N_dfPt3dfLhvDOtpaaSlvRjFCJzzgUlD9UTYCKOejOSDMK2morO9kZPgIyWCtxPnljNtRwFGMHaO3h59a-8_V8hFzS4b8F4HiGtWregkq87tUNE3_6CPcU11vEp1vK__LjmplDhSJsWcE1i1JDfrtFeUqEM26m826pCNOmVTde-POhdsTLPexeQnVfS-RmGTDsZlxf5v8Qd8g5hO</recordid><startdate>20220403</startdate><enddate>20220403</enddate><creator>Norasi, Hamid</creator><creator>Tetteh, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Sarker, Pramiti</creator><creator>Mirka, Gary A.</creator><creator>Hallbeck, M. Susan</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7140-0357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1669-8058</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220403</creationdate><title>Exploring the relationship between neck flexion and neck problems in occupational populations: a systematic review of the literature</title><author>Norasi, Hamid ; Tetteh, Emmanuel ; Sarker, Pramiti ; Mirka, Gary A. ; Hallbeck, M. Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f175b5be444839c1ad03bebadc9485c2a156f7c9d54b10542d44f43afb5ec533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>cervical spine</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>neck musculoskeletal disorders</topic><topic>neck pain</topic><topic>Neck postural exposure</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Norasi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tetteh, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarker, Pramiti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirka, Gary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallbeck, M. Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Norasi, Hamid</au><au>Tetteh, Emmanuel</au><au>Sarker, Pramiti</au><au>Mirka, Gary A.</au><au>Hallbeck, M. Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring the relationship between neck flexion and neck problems in occupational populations: a systematic review of the literature</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><date>2022-04-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>587</spage><epage>603</epage><pages>587-603</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><abstract>A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the relationship between occupational neck flexion angles and neck problems. The synthesised findings were used to answer three research questions: (1) Is there a positive/negative relationship between neck flexion and neck problems? (2) What is the appropriate angular threshold for neck flexion as a risk factor for neck problems? (3) What are the gaps in our current knowledge? A review of 21 papers revealed (1) a consistent positive correlation between neck flexion and neck problems, and (2) a neck flexion angle of 20° as the most evidence-based (not necessarily the best) cut-off angle separating high- and low-risk neck flexion postures. Future research should focus on the (1) continuous collection of three-dimensional neck postures through longitudinal studies to quantify cumulative exposures of neck postures, and (2) development of standard descriptions of 'neck problems' and 'neck flexion' to facilitate the development of a dose-response relationship. Practitioner summary: Practitioners depend on thresholds for evaluating neck postural exposure using work assessment tools; however, the scientific basis for this is unclear. This systematic review investigated the angular threshold for neck flexion and found 20° of neck flexion with the greatest evidence-based support as the threshold for high-risk neck postural exposure.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00140139.2021.1976847</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7140-0357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1669-8058</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-0139
ispartof Ergonomics, 2022-04, Vol.65 (4), p.587-603
issn 0014-0139
1366-5847
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2569383928
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects cervical spine
Correlation analysis
Evaluation
Exposure
Literature reviews
Longitudinal studies
Neck
neck musculoskeletal disorders
neck pain
Neck postural exposure
Posture
Risk analysis
Risk factors
Systematic review
title Exploring the relationship between neck flexion and neck problems in occupational populations: a systematic review of the literature
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A24%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20the%20relationship%20between%20neck%20flexion%20and%20neck%20problems%20in%20occupational%20populations:%20a%20systematic%20review%20of%20the%20literature&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=Norasi,%20Hamid&rft.date=2022-04-03&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=587&rft.epage=603&rft.pages=587-603&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00140139.2021.1976847&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2569383928%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f175b5be444839c1ad03bebadc9485c2a156f7c9d54b10542d44f43afb5ec533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2647108940&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true