Loading…
Exploring the relationship between neck flexion and neck problems in occupational populations: a systematic review of the literature
A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the relationship between occupational neck flexion angles and neck problems. The synthesised findings were used to answer three research questions: (1) Is there a positive/negative relationship between neck flexion and neck problems? (2) What is the appr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ergonomics 2022-04, Vol.65 (4), p.587-603 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f175b5be444839c1ad03bebadc9485c2a156f7c9d54b10542d44f43afb5ec533 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f175b5be444839c1ad03bebadc9485c2a156f7c9d54b10542d44f43afb5ec533 |
container_end_page | 603 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 587 |
container_title | Ergonomics |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Norasi, Hamid Tetteh, Emmanuel Sarker, Pramiti Mirka, Gary A. Hallbeck, M. Susan |
description | A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the relationship between occupational neck flexion angles and neck problems. The synthesised findings were used to answer three research questions: (1) Is there a positive/negative relationship between neck flexion and neck problems? (2) What is the appropriate angular threshold for neck flexion as a risk factor for neck problems? (3) What are the gaps in our current knowledge? A review of 21 papers revealed (1) a consistent positive correlation between neck flexion and neck problems, and (2) a neck flexion angle of 20° as the most evidence-based (not necessarily the best) cut-off angle separating high- and low-risk neck flexion postures. Future research should focus on the (1) continuous collection of three-dimensional neck postures through longitudinal studies to quantify cumulative exposures of neck postures, and (2) development of standard descriptions of 'neck problems' and 'neck flexion' to facilitate the development of a dose-response relationship.
Practitioner summary: Practitioners depend on thresholds for evaluating neck postural exposure using work assessment tools; however, the scientific basis for this is unclear. This systematic review investigated the angular threshold for neck flexion and found 20° of neck flexion with the greatest evidence-based support as the threshold for high-risk neck postural exposure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00140139.2021.1976847 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2569383928</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2569383928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f175b5be444839c1ad03bebadc9485c2a156f7c9d54b10542d44f43afb5ec533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxomxiWvbP6EJiRcvs4UBZgZPmqZqkyZe9EwY5mGpDIzAuN27f7hsd7148AQPft_He3wIXVGypWQg14RQTiiT25a0dEtl3w28f4E2lHVdI-r-JdocmOYAvUKvc36sJaOy3aDft0-Lj8mF77g8AE7gdXEx5Ae34BHKDiDgAOYHth6e6gXWYToeLCmOHuaMXcDRmHV5FmqPl7isJ5d3WOO8zwXmWpvq_svBDkf7_JZ3BZIua4ILdGa1z3B5Ws_Rt4-3X28-N_dfPt3dfLhvDOtpaaSlvRjFCJzzgUlD9UTYCKOejOSDMK2morO9kZPgIyWCtxPnljNtRwFGMHaO3h59a-8_V8hFzS4b8F4HiGtWregkq87tUNE3_6CPcU11vEp1vK__LjmplDhSJsWcE1i1JDfrtFeUqEM26m826pCNOmVTde-POhdsTLPexeQnVfS-RmGTDsZlxf5v8Qd8g5hO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2647108940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring the relationship between neck flexion and neck problems in occupational populations: a systematic review of the literature</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Norasi, Hamid ; Tetteh, Emmanuel ; Sarker, Pramiti ; Mirka, Gary A. ; Hallbeck, M. Susan</creator><creatorcontrib>Norasi, Hamid ; Tetteh, Emmanuel ; Sarker, Pramiti ; Mirka, Gary A. ; Hallbeck, M. Susan</creatorcontrib><description>A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the relationship between occupational neck flexion angles and neck problems. The synthesised findings were used to answer three research questions: (1) Is there a positive/negative relationship between neck flexion and neck problems? (2) What is the appropriate angular threshold for neck flexion as a risk factor for neck problems? (3) What are the gaps in our current knowledge? A review of 21 papers revealed (1) a consistent positive correlation between neck flexion and neck problems, and (2) a neck flexion angle of 20° as the most evidence-based (not necessarily the best) cut-off angle separating high- and low-risk neck flexion postures. Future research should focus on the (1) continuous collection of three-dimensional neck postures through longitudinal studies to quantify cumulative exposures of neck postures, and (2) development of standard descriptions of 'neck problems' and 'neck flexion' to facilitate the development of a dose-response relationship.
Practitioner summary: Practitioners depend on thresholds for evaluating neck postural exposure using work assessment tools; however, the scientific basis for this is unclear. This systematic review investigated the angular threshold for neck flexion and found 20° of neck flexion with the greatest evidence-based support as the threshold for high-risk neck postural exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2021.1976847</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>cervical spine ; Correlation analysis ; Evaluation ; Exposure ; Literature reviews ; Longitudinal studies ; Neck ; neck musculoskeletal disorders ; neck pain ; Neck postural exposure ; Posture ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Ergonomics, 2022-04, Vol.65 (4), p.587-603</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2021</rights><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f175b5be444839c1ad03bebadc9485c2a156f7c9d54b10542d44f43afb5ec533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f175b5be444839c1ad03bebadc9485c2a156f7c9d54b10542d44f43afb5ec533</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7140-0357 ; 0000-0002-1669-8058</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Norasi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tetteh, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarker, Pramiti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirka, Gary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallbeck, M. Susan</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring the relationship between neck flexion and neck problems in occupational populations: a systematic review of the literature</title><title>Ergonomics</title><description>A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the relationship between occupational neck flexion angles and neck problems. The synthesised findings were used to answer three research questions: (1) Is there a positive/negative relationship between neck flexion and neck problems? (2) What is the appropriate angular threshold for neck flexion as a risk factor for neck problems? (3) What are the gaps in our current knowledge? A review of 21 papers revealed (1) a consistent positive correlation between neck flexion and neck problems, and (2) a neck flexion angle of 20° as the most evidence-based (not necessarily the best) cut-off angle separating high- and low-risk neck flexion postures. Future research should focus on the (1) continuous collection of three-dimensional neck postures through longitudinal studies to quantify cumulative exposures of neck postures, and (2) development of standard descriptions of 'neck problems' and 'neck flexion' to facilitate the development of a dose-response relationship.
Practitioner summary: Practitioners depend on thresholds for evaluating neck postural exposure using work assessment tools; however, the scientific basis for this is unclear. This systematic review investigated the angular threshold for neck flexion and found 20° of neck flexion with the greatest evidence-based support as the threshold for high-risk neck postural exposure.</description><subject>cervical spine</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>neck musculoskeletal disorders</subject><subject>neck pain</subject><subject>Neck postural exposure</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxomxiWvbP6EJiRcvs4UBZgZPmqZqkyZe9EwY5mGpDIzAuN27f7hsd7148AQPft_He3wIXVGypWQg14RQTiiT25a0dEtl3w28f4E2lHVdI-r-JdocmOYAvUKvc36sJaOy3aDft0-Lj8mF77g8AE7gdXEx5Ae34BHKDiDgAOYHth6e6gXWYToeLCmOHuaMXcDRmHV5FmqPl7isJ5d3WOO8zwXmWpvq_svBDkf7_JZ3BZIua4ILdGa1z3B5Ws_Rt4-3X28-N_dfPt3dfLhvDOtpaaSlvRjFCJzzgUlD9UTYCKOejOSDMK2morO9kZPgIyWCtxPnljNtRwFGMHaO3h59a-8_V8hFzS4b8F4HiGtWregkq87tUNE3_6CPcU11vEp1vK__LjmplDhSJsWcE1i1JDfrtFeUqEM26m826pCNOmVTde-POhdsTLPexeQnVfS-RmGTDsZlxf5v8Qd8g5hO</recordid><startdate>20220403</startdate><enddate>20220403</enddate><creator>Norasi, Hamid</creator><creator>Tetteh, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Sarker, Pramiti</creator><creator>Mirka, Gary A.</creator><creator>Hallbeck, M. Susan</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis LLC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7140-0357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1669-8058</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220403</creationdate><title>Exploring the relationship between neck flexion and neck problems in occupational populations: a systematic review of the literature</title><author>Norasi, Hamid ; Tetteh, Emmanuel ; Sarker, Pramiti ; Mirka, Gary A. ; Hallbeck, M. Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f175b5be444839c1ad03bebadc9485c2a156f7c9d54b10542d44f43afb5ec533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>cervical spine</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>neck musculoskeletal disorders</topic><topic>neck pain</topic><topic>Neck postural exposure</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Norasi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tetteh, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarker, Pramiti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirka, Gary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallbeck, M. Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Norasi, Hamid</au><au>Tetteh, Emmanuel</au><au>Sarker, Pramiti</au><au>Mirka, Gary A.</au><au>Hallbeck, M. Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring the relationship between neck flexion and neck problems in occupational populations: a systematic review of the literature</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><date>2022-04-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>587</spage><epage>603</epage><pages>587-603</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><abstract>A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the relationship between occupational neck flexion angles and neck problems. The synthesised findings were used to answer three research questions: (1) Is there a positive/negative relationship between neck flexion and neck problems? (2) What is the appropriate angular threshold for neck flexion as a risk factor for neck problems? (3) What are the gaps in our current knowledge? A review of 21 papers revealed (1) a consistent positive correlation between neck flexion and neck problems, and (2) a neck flexion angle of 20° as the most evidence-based (not necessarily the best) cut-off angle separating high- and low-risk neck flexion postures. Future research should focus on the (1) continuous collection of three-dimensional neck postures through longitudinal studies to quantify cumulative exposures of neck postures, and (2) development of standard descriptions of 'neck problems' and 'neck flexion' to facilitate the development of a dose-response relationship.
Practitioner summary: Practitioners depend on thresholds for evaluating neck postural exposure using work assessment tools; however, the scientific basis for this is unclear. This systematic review investigated the angular threshold for neck flexion and found 20° of neck flexion with the greatest evidence-based support as the threshold for high-risk neck postural exposure.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00140139.2021.1976847</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7140-0357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1669-8058</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-0139 |
ispartof | Ergonomics, 2022-04, Vol.65 (4), p.587-603 |
issn | 0014-0139 1366-5847 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2569383928 |
source | Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | cervical spine Correlation analysis Evaluation Exposure Literature reviews Longitudinal studies Neck neck musculoskeletal disorders neck pain Neck postural exposure Posture Risk analysis Risk factors Systematic review |
title | Exploring the relationship between neck flexion and neck problems in occupational populations: a systematic review of the literature |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A24%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20the%20relationship%20between%20neck%20flexion%20and%20neck%20problems%20in%20occupational%20populations:%20a%20systematic%20review%20of%20the%20literature&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=Norasi,%20Hamid&rft.date=2022-04-03&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=587&rft.epage=603&rft.pages=587-603&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00140139.2021.1976847&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2569383928%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f175b5be444839c1ad03bebadc9485c2a156f7c9d54b10542d44f43afb5ec533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2647108940&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |