Loading…
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations and Gained and Lost Dominance Score Method
Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a widely used reliability management technology to evaluate the risk of potential failures in a system, product, or service. Nevertheless, the normal risk priority number (RPN) method has been extensively criticized for many deficiencies in practical applic...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on cybernetics 2023-03, Vol.53 (3), p.1566-1577 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-59d2c265e95241f78dc1011c0781b08bf543f7bf833e389efe17af30026dd8653 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-59d2c265e95241f78dc1011c0781b08bf543f7bf833e389efe17af30026dd8653 |
container_end_page | 1577 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1566 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on cybernetics |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Liu, Zheng Mou, Xun Liu, Hu-Chen Zhang, Ling |
description | Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a widely used reliability management technology to evaluate the risk of potential failures in a system, product, or service. Nevertheless, the normal risk priority number (RPN) method has been extensively criticized for many deficiencies in practical applications. To overcome the drawbacks of traditional FMEA, plenty of methods have been suggested in previous studies. But majority of them evaluated the risk factors of each failure mode directly and cannot take group and individual risk attitudes into account. In this article, we put forward a new FMEA approach integrating probabilistic linguistic preference relations (PLPRs) and gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method. The PLPRs are adopted to describe the risk evaluations of experts by pairwise comparison of failure modes. An extended GLDS method is introduced to derive the risk ranking of failure modes considering both group and individual risk attitudes. Moreover, a two-step optimization model is proposed to determine the weights of risk factors when their weighing information is unknown. Finally, a load-haul-dumper machine risk analysis case is presented to demonstrate the proposed FMEA. It is shown that the approach being proposed in this study provides a practical and effective way for risk evaluation in FMEA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3105742 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2570113306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9530231</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2776778110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-59d2c265e95241f78dc1011c0781b08bf543f7bf833e389efe17af30026dd8653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFvFCEUxonR2Kb2DzAmhsSLl115MAzMsV3barLGRuvB04SBh9LMQoWZQ6_-5TLuuge58PL4fd8j7yPkJbA1AOve3W2-X64547AWwKRq-BNyyqHVK86VfHqsW3VCzku5Z_Xo2ur0c3IimkYrCeyU_L42YZwz0k_JITXR0Svv0U70IprxsYRCL01BR1OktzkNZghjKFOwdBvij3lf3mb0mDFapF9wNFNIsfy1ujEhVu1SblOZ6Pu0C9Es3Feblpk4_UzuBXnmzVjw_HCfkW_XV3ebD6vt55uPm4vtyoqmm1ayc9zyVmIneQNeaWeBAVimNAxMD142wqvBayFQ6K5-CZTxgjHeOqdbKc7I273vQ06_ZixTvwvF4jiaiGkuPZeq-gnB2oq--Q-9T3OuG6mUUq2qI4FVCvaUzamUuoT-IYedyY89sH7JqF8y6peM-kNGVfP64DwPO3RHxb9EKvBqDwREPD53UjAuQPwBBLeUOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2776778110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations and Gained and Lost Dominance Score Method</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Liu, Zheng ; Mou, Xun ; Liu, Hu-Chen ; Zhang, Ling</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zheng ; Mou, Xun ; Liu, Hu-Chen ; Zhang, Ling</creatorcontrib><description>Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a widely used reliability management technology to evaluate the risk of potential failures in a system, product, or service. Nevertheless, the normal risk priority number (RPN) method has been extensively criticized for many deficiencies in practical applications. To overcome the drawbacks of traditional FMEA, plenty of methods have been suggested in previous studies. But majority of them evaluated the risk factors of each failure mode directly and cannot take group and individual risk attitudes into account. In this article, we put forward a new FMEA approach integrating probabilistic linguistic preference relations (PLPRs) and gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method. The PLPRs are adopted to describe the risk evaluations of experts by pairwise comparison of failure modes. An extended GLDS method is introduced to derive the risk ranking of failure modes considering both group and individual risk attitudes. Moreover, a two-step optimization model is proposed to determine the weights of risk factors when their weighing information is unknown. Finally, a load-haul-dumper machine risk analysis case is presented to demonstrate the proposed FMEA. It is shown that the approach being proposed in this study provides a practical and effective way for risk evaluation in FMEA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-2267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-2275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3105742</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34487510</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITCEB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Decision making ; Failure ; Failure analysis ; Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) ; Failure modes ; gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method ; linguistic decision making ; Linguistics ; Optimization ; Optimization models ; probabilistic linguistic preference relation (PLPR) ; Probabilistic logic ; Reliability ; Reliability analysis ; Risk analysis ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; Technology assessment ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2023-03, Vol.53 (3), p.1566-1577</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-59d2c265e95241f78dc1011c0781b08bf543f7bf833e389efe17af30026dd8653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-59d2c265e95241f78dc1011c0781b08bf543f7bf833e389efe17af30026dd8653</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7505-0796 ; 0000-0003-4566-2107 ; 0000-0002-4605-1343</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9530231$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,54771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34487510$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mou, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hu-Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ling</creatorcontrib><title>Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations and Gained and Lost Dominance Score Method</title><title>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</title><addtitle>TCYB</addtitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Cybern</addtitle><description>Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a widely used reliability management technology to evaluate the risk of potential failures in a system, product, or service. Nevertheless, the normal risk priority number (RPN) method has been extensively criticized for many deficiencies in practical applications. To overcome the drawbacks of traditional FMEA, plenty of methods have been suggested in previous studies. But majority of them evaluated the risk factors of each failure mode directly and cannot take group and individual risk attitudes into account. In this article, we put forward a new FMEA approach integrating probabilistic linguistic preference relations (PLPRs) and gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method. The PLPRs are adopted to describe the risk evaluations of experts by pairwise comparison of failure modes. An extended GLDS method is introduced to derive the risk ranking of failure modes considering both group and individual risk attitudes. Moreover, a two-step optimization model is proposed to determine the weights of risk factors when their weighing information is unknown. Finally, a load-haul-dumper machine risk analysis case is presented to demonstrate the proposed FMEA. It is shown that the approach being proposed in this study provides a practical and effective way for risk evaluation in FMEA.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method</subject><subject>linguistic decision making</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization models</subject><subject>probabilistic linguistic preference relation (PLPR)</subject><subject>Probabilistic logic</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>2168-2267</issn><issn>2168-2275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkcFvFCEUxonR2Kb2DzAmhsSLl115MAzMsV3barLGRuvB04SBh9LMQoWZQ6_-5TLuuge58PL4fd8j7yPkJbA1AOve3W2-X64547AWwKRq-BNyyqHVK86VfHqsW3VCzku5Z_Xo2ur0c3IimkYrCeyU_L42YZwz0k_JITXR0Svv0U70IprxsYRCL01BR1OktzkNZghjKFOwdBvij3lf3mb0mDFapF9wNFNIsfy1ujEhVu1SblOZ6Pu0C9Es3Feblpk4_UzuBXnmzVjw_HCfkW_XV3ebD6vt55uPm4vtyoqmm1ayc9zyVmIneQNeaWeBAVimNAxMD142wqvBayFQ6K5-CZTxgjHeOqdbKc7I273vQ06_ZixTvwvF4jiaiGkuPZeq-gnB2oq--Q-9T3OuG6mUUq2qI4FVCvaUzamUuoT-IYedyY89sH7JqF8y6peM-kNGVfP64DwPO3RHxb9EKvBqDwREPD53UjAuQPwBBLeUOg</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Liu, Zheng</creator><creator>Mou, Xun</creator><creator>Liu, Hu-Chen</creator><creator>Zhang, Ling</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7505-0796</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4566-2107</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4605-1343</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations and Gained and Lost Dominance Score Method</title><author>Liu, Zheng ; Mou, Xun ; Liu, Hu-Chen ; Zhang, Ling</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-59d2c265e95241f78dc1011c0781b08bf543f7bf833e389efe17af30026dd8653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method</topic><topic>linguistic decision making</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization models</topic><topic>probabilistic linguistic preference relation (PLPR)</topic><topic>Probabilistic logic</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mou, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hu-Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ling</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Zheng</au><au>Mou, Xun</au><au>Liu, Hu-Chen</au><au>Zhang, Ling</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations and Gained and Lost Dominance Score Method</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</jtitle><stitle>TCYB</stitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Cybern</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1566</spage><epage>1577</epage><pages>1566-1577</pages><issn>2168-2267</issn><eissn>2168-2275</eissn><coden>ITCEB8</coden><abstract>Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a widely used reliability management technology to evaluate the risk of potential failures in a system, product, or service. Nevertheless, the normal risk priority number (RPN) method has been extensively criticized for many deficiencies in practical applications. To overcome the drawbacks of traditional FMEA, plenty of methods have been suggested in previous studies. But majority of them evaluated the risk factors of each failure mode directly and cannot take group and individual risk attitudes into account. In this article, we put forward a new FMEA approach integrating probabilistic linguistic preference relations (PLPRs) and gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method. The PLPRs are adopted to describe the risk evaluations of experts by pairwise comparison of failure modes. An extended GLDS method is introduced to derive the risk ranking of failure modes considering both group and individual risk attitudes. Moreover, a two-step optimization model is proposed to determine the weights of risk factors when their weighing information is unknown. Finally, a load-haul-dumper machine risk analysis case is presented to demonstrate the proposed FMEA. It is shown that the approach being proposed in this study provides a practical and effective way for risk evaluation in FMEA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>34487510</pmid><doi>10.1109/TCYB.2021.3105742</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7505-0796</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4566-2107</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4605-1343</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-2267 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2023-03, Vol.53 (3), p.1566-1577 |
issn | 2168-2267 2168-2275 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2570113306 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals |
subjects | Attitudes Decision making Failure Failure analysis Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) Failure modes gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method linguistic decision making Linguistics Optimization Optimization models probabilistic linguistic preference relation (PLPR) Probabilistic logic Reliability Reliability analysis Risk analysis Risk assessment Risk management Technology assessment Uncertainty |
title | Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations and Gained and Lost Dominance Score Method |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T04%3A55%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Failure%20Mode%20and%20Effect%20Analysis%20Based%20on%20Probabilistic%20Linguistic%20Preference%20Relations%20and%20Gained%20and%20Lost%20Dominance%20Score%20Method&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20cybernetics&rft.au=Liu,%20Zheng&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1566&rft.epage=1577&rft.pages=1566-1577&rft.issn=2168-2267&rft.eissn=2168-2275&rft.coden=ITCEB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3105742&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2776778110%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-59d2c265e95241f78dc1011c0781b08bf543f7bf833e389efe17af30026dd8653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2776778110&rft_id=info:pmid/34487510&rft_ieee_id=9530231&rfr_iscdi=true |