Loading…

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations and Gained and Lost Dominance Score Method

Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a widely used reliability management technology to evaluate the risk of potential failures in a system, product, or service. Nevertheless, the normal risk priority number (RPN) method has been extensively criticized for many deficiencies in practical applic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on cybernetics 2023-03, Vol.53 (3), p.1566-1577
Main Authors: Liu, Zheng, Mou, Xun, Liu, Hu-Chen, Zhang, Ling
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-59d2c265e95241f78dc1011c0781b08bf543f7bf833e389efe17af30026dd8653
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-59d2c265e95241f78dc1011c0781b08bf543f7bf833e389efe17af30026dd8653
container_end_page 1577
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1566
container_title IEEE transactions on cybernetics
container_volume 53
creator Liu, Zheng
Mou, Xun
Liu, Hu-Chen
Zhang, Ling
description Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a widely used reliability management technology to evaluate the risk of potential failures in a system, product, or service. Nevertheless, the normal risk priority number (RPN) method has been extensively criticized for many deficiencies in practical applications. To overcome the drawbacks of traditional FMEA, plenty of methods have been suggested in previous studies. But majority of them evaluated the risk factors of each failure mode directly and cannot take group and individual risk attitudes into account. In this article, we put forward a new FMEA approach integrating probabilistic linguistic preference relations (PLPRs) and gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method. The PLPRs are adopted to describe the risk evaluations of experts by pairwise comparison of failure modes. An extended GLDS method is introduced to derive the risk ranking of failure modes considering both group and individual risk attitudes. Moreover, a two-step optimization model is proposed to determine the weights of risk factors when their weighing information is unknown. Finally, a load-haul-dumper machine risk analysis case is presented to demonstrate the proposed FMEA. It is shown that the approach being proposed in this study provides a practical and effective way for risk evaluation in FMEA.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3105742
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2570113306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9530231</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2776778110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-59d2c265e95241f78dc1011c0781b08bf543f7bf833e389efe17af30026dd8653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFvFCEUxonR2Kb2DzAmhsSLl115MAzMsV3barLGRuvB04SBh9LMQoWZQ6_-5TLuuge58PL4fd8j7yPkJbA1AOve3W2-X64547AWwKRq-BNyyqHVK86VfHqsW3VCzku5Z_Xo2ur0c3IimkYrCeyU_L42YZwz0k_JITXR0Svv0U70IprxsYRCL01BR1OktzkNZghjKFOwdBvij3lf3mb0mDFapF9wNFNIsfy1ujEhVu1SblOZ6Pu0C9Es3Feblpk4_UzuBXnmzVjw_HCfkW_XV3ebD6vt55uPm4vtyoqmm1ayc9zyVmIneQNeaWeBAVimNAxMD142wqvBayFQ6K5-CZTxgjHeOqdbKc7I273vQ06_ZixTvwvF4jiaiGkuPZeq-gnB2oq--Q-9T3OuG6mUUq2qI4FVCvaUzamUuoT-IYedyY89sH7JqF8y6peM-kNGVfP64DwPO3RHxb9EKvBqDwREPD53UjAuQPwBBLeUOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2776778110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations and Gained and Lost Dominance Score Method</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Liu, Zheng ; Mou, Xun ; Liu, Hu-Chen ; Zhang, Ling</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zheng ; Mou, Xun ; Liu, Hu-Chen ; Zhang, Ling</creatorcontrib><description>Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a widely used reliability management technology to evaluate the risk of potential failures in a system, product, or service. Nevertheless, the normal risk priority number (RPN) method has been extensively criticized for many deficiencies in practical applications. To overcome the drawbacks of traditional FMEA, plenty of methods have been suggested in previous studies. But majority of them evaluated the risk factors of each failure mode directly and cannot take group and individual risk attitudes into account. In this article, we put forward a new FMEA approach integrating probabilistic linguistic preference relations (PLPRs) and gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method. The PLPRs are adopted to describe the risk evaluations of experts by pairwise comparison of failure modes. An extended GLDS method is introduced to derive the risk ranking of failure modes considering both group and individual risk attitudes. Moreover, a two-step optimization model is proposed to determine the weights of risk factors when their weighing information is unknown. Finally, a load-haul-dumper machine risk analysis case is presented to demonstrate the proposed FMEA. It is shown that the approach being proposed in this study provides a practical and effective way for risk evaluation in FMEA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-2267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-2275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3105742</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34487510</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITCEB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Decision making ; Failure ; Failure analysis ; Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) ; Failure modes ; gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method ; linguistic decision making ; Linguistics ; Optimization ; Optimization models ; probabilistic linguistic preference relation (PLPR) ; Probabilistic logic ; Reliability ; Reliability analysis ; Risk analysis ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; Technology assessment ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2023-03, Vol.53 (3), p.1566-1577</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-59d2c265e95241f78dc1011c0781b08bf543f7bf833e389efe17af30026dd8653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-59d2c265e95241f78dc1011c0781b08bf543f7bf833e389efe17af30026dd8653</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7505-0796 ; 0000-0003-4566-2107 ; 0000-0002-4605-1343</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9530231$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,54771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34487510$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mou, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hu-Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ling</creatorcontrib><title>Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations and Gained and Lost Dominance Score Method</title><title>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</title><addtitle>TCYB</addtitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Cybern</addtitle><description>Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a widely used reliability management technology to evaluate the risk of potential failures in a system, product, or service. Nevertheless, the normal risk priority number (RPN) method has been extensively criticized for many deficiencies in practical applications. To overcome the drawbacks of traditional FMEA, plenty of methods have been suggested in previous studies. But majority of them evaluated the risk factors of each failure mode directly and cannot take group and individual risk attitudes into account. In this article, we put forward a new FMEA approach integrating probabilistic linguistic preference relations (PLPRs) and gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method. The PLPRs are adopted to describe the risk evaluations of experts by pairwise comparison of failure modes. An extended GLDS method is introduced to derive the risk ranking of failure modes considering both group and individual risk attitudes. Moreover, a two-step optimization model is proposed to determine the weights of risk factors when their weighing information is unknown. Finally, a load-haul-dumper machine risk analysis case is presented to demonstrate the proposed FMEA. It is shown that the approach being proposed in this study provides a practical and effective way for risk evaluation in FMEA.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method</subject><subject>linguistic decision making</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization models</subject><subject>probabilistic linguistic preference relation (PLPR)</subject><subject>Probabilistic logic</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>2168-2267</issn><issn>2168-2275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkcFvFCEUxonR2Kb2DzAmhsSLl115MAzMsV3barLGRuvB04SBh9LMQoWZQ6_-5TLuuge58PL4fd8j7yPkJbA1AOve3W2-X64547AWwKRq-BNyyqHVK86VfHqsW3VCzku5Z_Xo2ur0c3IimkYrCeyU_L42YZwz0k_JITXR0Svv0U70IprxsYRCL01BR1OktzkNZghjKFOwdBvij3lf3mb0mDFapF9wNFNIsfy1ujEhVu1SblOZ6Pu0C9Es3Feblpk4_UzuBXnmzVjw_HCfkW_XV3ebD6vt55uPm4vtyoqmm1ayc9zyVmIneQNeaWeBAVimNAxMD142wqvBayFQ6K5-CZTxgjHeOqdbKc7I273vQ06_ZixTvwvF4jiaiGkuPZeq-gnB2oq--Q-9T3OuG6mUUq2qI4FVCvaUzamUuoT-IYedyY89sH7JqF8y6peM-kNGVfP64DwPO3RHxb9EKvBqDwREPD53UjAuQPwBBLeUOg</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Liu, Zheng</creator><creator>Mou, Xun</creator><creator>Liu, Hu-Chen</creator><creator>Zhang, Ling</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7505-0796</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4566-2107</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4605-1343</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations and Gained and Lost Dominance Score Method</title><author>Liu, Zheng ; Mou, Xun ; Liu, Hu-Chen ; Zhang, Ling</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-59d2c265e95241f78dc1011c0781b08bf543f7bf833e389efe17af30026dd8653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method</topic><topic>linguistic decision making</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization models</topic><topic>probabilistic linguistic preference relation (PLPR)</topic><topic>Probabilistic logic</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mou, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hu-Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ling</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Zheng</au><au>Mou, Xun</au><au>Liu, Hu-Chen</au><au>Zhang, Ling</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations and Gained and Lost Dominance Score Method</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</jtitle><stitle>TCYB</stitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Cybern</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1566</spage><epage>1577</epage><pages>1566-1577</pages><issn>2168-2267</issn><eissn>2168-2275</eissn><coden>ITCEB8</coden><abstract>Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a widely used reliability management technology to evaluate the risk of potential failures in a system, product, or service. Nevertheless, the normal risk priority number (RPN) method has been extensively criticized for many deficiencies in practical applications. To overcome the drawbacks of traditional FMEA, plenty of methods have been suggested in previous studies. But majority of them evaluated the risk factors of each failure mode directly and cannot take group and individual risk attitudes into account. In this article, we put forward a new FMEA approach integrating probabilistic linguistic preference relations (PLPRs) and gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method. The PLPRs are adopted to describe the risk evaluations of experts by pairwise comparison of failure modes. An extended GLDS method is introduced to derive the risk ranking of failure modes considering both group and individual risk attitudes. Moreover, a two-step optimization model is proposed to determine the weights of risk factors when their weighing information is unknown. Finally, a load-haul-dumper machine risk analysis case is presented to demonstrate the proposed FMEA. It is shown that the approach being proposed in this study provides a practical and effective way for risk evaluation in FMEA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>34487510</pmid><doi>10.1109/TCYB.2021.3105742</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7505-0796</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4566-2107</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4605-1343</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-2267
ispartof IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2023-03, Vol.53 (3), p.1566-1577
issn 2168-2267
2168-2275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2570113306
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals
subjects Attitudes
Decision making
Failure
Failure analysis
Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)
Failure modes
gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method
linguistic decision making
Linguistics
Optimization
Optimization models
probabilistic linguistic preference relation (PLPR)
Probabilistic logic
Reliability
Reliability analysis
Risk analysis
Risk assessment
Risk management
Technology assessment
Uncertainty
title Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations and Gained and Lost Dominance Score Method
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T04%3A55%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Failure%20Mode%20and%20Effect%20Analysis%20Based%20on%20Probabilistic%20Linguistic%20Preference%20Relations%20and%20Gained%20and%20Lost%20Dominance%20Score%20Method&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20cybernetics&rft.au=Liu,%20Zheng&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1566&rft.epage=1577&rft.pages=1566-1577&rft.issn=2168-2267&rft.eissn=2168-2275&rft.coden=ITCEB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3105742&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2776778110%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-59d2c265e95241f78dc1011c0781b08bf543f7bf833e389efe17af30026dd8653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2776778110&rft_id=info:pmid/34487510&rft_ieee_id=9530231&rfr_iscdi=true