Loading…

Born this Way–or Not? The Relationship Between Essentialism and Sexual Minorities’ LGBTQ+ Identification and Belonging

Bisexual people experience lower levels of belonging in the LGBTQ+ community than gay and lesbian people. We investigated one of the factors that may reduce bisexual individuals’ feelings of belonging in and identification with the LGBTQ+ community: Sexual orientation essentialism. Across two online...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of sexual behavior 2021-11, Vol.50 (8), p.3447-3458
Main Authors: Morgenroth, Thekla, Kirby, Teri A., Gee, Isabel A., Ovett, Thomas A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334y-24ee13cdb63b64c325718458aa21f8bc8f2d6126f44d8eaad9c302247f5310d93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334y-24ee13cdb63b64c325718458aa21f8bc8f2d6126f44d8eaad9c302247f5310d93
container_end_page 3458
container_issue 8
container_start_page 3447
container_title Archives of sexual behavior
container_volume 50
creator Morgenroth, Thekla
Kirby, Teri A.
Gee, Isabel A.
Ovett, Thomas A.
description Bisexual people experience lower levels of belonging in the LGBTQ+ community than gay and lesbian people. We investigated one of the factors that may reduce bisexual individuals’ feelings of belonging in and identification with the LGBTQ+ community: Sexual orientation essentialism. Across two online studies with participants recruited through Prolific, we tested whether bisexual people endorsed sexual orientation essentialism less than lesbian and gay individuals and, in turn, feel lower levels of identification and belonging with the LGBTQ+ community. Essentialism separated into three dimensions in Study 1 ( N  = 375): Entitativity, naturalness, and discreteness. Relative to lesbian and gay individuals, bisexual individuals viewed sexual orientation as less natural, in turn reporting lower levels of belonging and identification. They also viewed sexual orientation groups as less discrete, which instead translated to higher levels of belonging and identification. Sexual orientation groups did not differ in their endorsement of entitativity beliefs. In Study 2 ( N  = 390), we focused on naturalness and replicated findings from Study 1. In addition, lower naturalness beliefs were associated with the belief that one’s own views were different from those held by the LGBTQ+ community, which also contributed to lower levels of belonging and identification. Together, these studies contribute to understanding the role of essentialism in intragroup processes and paint a nuanced picture of essentialism in different sexual minority groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10508-021-02145-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572525317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2599280409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334y-24ee13cdb63b64c325718458aa21f8bc8f2d6126f44d8eaad9c302247f5310d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOGzEUhi1UVFLoC3SBLLFBqqb4OpcVahA3KYCAoC4tZ-ZMYjSxU3tGMF3xDl3xejxJnYQWiUUXvkj-zuej8yP0hZJvlJDsIFAiSZ4QRpdLyKTfQAMqM56wnJAPaEAIEUnc2Bb6FMJ9vGWpkB_RFheS5oXMBujX0HmL25kJ-IfuX55-O48vXXuIxzPAN9Do1jgbZmaBh9A-AFh8HALY1ujGhDnWtsK38NjpBl8Y67xpDYSXp2c8Oh2Or7_i82rJ1qZceVb4EBpnp8ZOd9BmrZsAn1_PbXR3cjw-OktGV6fnR99HScm56BMmACgvq0nKJ6koOZMZzYXMtWa0zidlXrMqpSythahy0LoqSk4YE1ktOSVVwbfR_tq78O5nB6FVcxNKaBptwXVBRSGTLMJZRPfeofeu8zZ2F6miiGMVZClka6r0LgQPtVp4M9e-V5SoZTJqnYyKqahVMqqPRbuv6m4yh-pfyd8oIsDXQIhPdgr-7e__aP8Aryma6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2599280409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Born this Way–or Not? The Relationship Between Essentialism and Sexual Minorities’ LGBTQ+ Identification and Belonging</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Morgenroth, Thekla ; Kirby, Teri A. ; Gee, Isabel A. ; Ovett, Thomas A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Morgenroth, Thekla ; Kirby, Teri A. ; Gee, Isabel A. ; Ovett, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><description>Bisexual people experience lower levels of belonging in the LGBTQ+ community than gay and lesbian people. We investigated one of the factors that may reduce bisexual individuals’ feelings of belonging in and identification with the LGBTQ+ community: Sexual orientation essentialism. Across two online studies with participants recruited through Prolific, we tested whether bisexual people endorsed sexual orientation essentialism less than lesbian and gay individuals and, in turn, feel lower levels of identification and belonging with the LGBTQ+ community. Essentialism separated into three dimensions in Study 1 ( N  = 375): Entitativity, naturalness, and discreteness. Relative to lesbian and gay individuals, bisexual individuals viewed sexual orientation as less natural, in turn reporting lower levels of belonging and identification. They also viewed sexual orientation groups as less discrete, which instead translated to higher levels of belonging and identification. Sexual orientation groups did not differ in their endorsement of entitativity beliefs. In Study 2 ( N  = 390), we focused on naturalness and replicated findings from Study 1. In addition, lower naturalness beliefs were associated with the belief that one’s own views were different from those held by the LGBTQ+ community, which also contributed to lower levels of belonging and identification. Together, these studies contribute to understanding the role of essentialism in intragroup processes and paint a nuanced picture of essentialism in different sexual minority groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-02145-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34518957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Bisexuality ; Endorsements ; Essentialism ; Female ; Gays &amp; lesbians ; Homosexuality, Female ; Humans ; Identification ; Male ; Original Paper ; Psychology ; Public Health ; Sexual and Gender Minorities ; Sexual Behavior ; Sexual orientation ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Archives of sexual behavior, 2021-11, Vol.50 (8), p.3447-3458</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334y-24ee13cdb63b64c325718458aa21f8bc8f2d6126f44d8eaad9c302247f5310d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334y-24ee13cdb63b64c325718458aa21f8bc8f2d6126f44d8eaad9c302247f5310d93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9876-5017</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2599280409/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2599280409?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21373,27901,27902,33588,33589,43709,74192</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morgenroth, Thekla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Teri A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gee, Isabel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ovett, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><title>Born this Way–or Not? The Relationship Between Essentialism and Sexual Minorities’ LGBTQ+ Identification and Belonging</title><title>Archives of sexual behavior</title><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><description>Bisexual people experience lower levels of belonging in the LGBTQ+ community than gay and lesbian people. We investigated one of the factors that may reduce bisexual individuals’ feelings of belonging in and identification with the LGBTQ+ community: Sexual orientation essentialism. Across two online studies with participants recruited through Prolific, we tested whether bisexual people endorsed sexual orientation essentialism less than lesbian and gay individuals and, in turn, feel lower levels of identification and belonging with the LGBTQ+ community. Essentialism separated into three dimensions in Study 1 ( N  = 375): Entitativity, naturalness, and discreteness. Relative to lesbian and gay individuals, bisexual individuals viewed sexual orientation as less natural, in turn reporting lower levels of belonging and identification. They also viewed sexual orientation groups as less discrete, which instead translated to higher levels of belonging and identification. Sexual orientation groups did not differ in their endorsement of entitativity beliefs. In Study 2 ( N  = 390), we focused on naturalness and replicated findings from Study 1. In addition, lower naturalness beliefs were associated with the belief that one’s own views were different from those held by the LGBTQ+ community, which also contributed to lower levels of belonging and identification. Together, these studies contribute to understanding the role of essentialism in intragroup processes and paint a nuanced picture of essentialism in different sexual minority groups.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Bisexuality</subject><subject>Endorsements</subject><subject>Essentialism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gays &amp; lesbians</subject><subject>Homosexuality, Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Sexual and Gender Minorities</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Sexual orientation</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>0004-0002</issn><issn>1573-2800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOGzEUhi1UVFLoC3SBLLFBqqb4OpcVahA3KYCAoC4tZ-ZMYjSxU3tGMF3xDl3xejxJnYQWiUUXvkj-zuej8yP0hZJvlJDsIFAiSZ4QRpdLyKTfQAMqM56wnJAPaEAIEUnc2Bb6FMJ9vGWpkB_RFheS5oXMBujX0HmL25kJ-IfuX55-O48vXXuIxzPAN9Do1jgbZmaBh9A-AFh8HALY1ujGhDnWtsK38NjpBl8Y67xpDYSXp2c8Oh2Or7_i82rJ1qZceVb4EBpnp8ZOd9BmrZsAn1_PbXR3cjw-OktGV6fnR99HScm56BMmACgvq0nKJ6koOZMZzYXMtWa0zidlXrMqpSythahy0LoqSk4YE1ktOSVVwbfR_tq78O5nB6FVcxNKaBptwXVBRSGTLMJZRPfeofeu8zZ2F6miiGMVZClka6r0LgQPtVp4M9e-V5SoZTJqnYyKqahVMqqPRbuv6m4yh-pfyd8oIsDXQIhPdgr-7e__aP8Aryma6w</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Morgenroth, Thekla</creator><creator>Kirby, Teri A.</creator><creator>Gee, Isabel A.</creator><creator>Ovett, Thomas A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PMKZF</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9876-5017</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Born this Way–or Not? The Relationship Between Essentialism and Sexual Minorities’ LGBTQ+ Identification and Belonging</title><author>Morgenroth, Thekla ; Kirby, Teri A. ; Gee, Isabel A. ; Ovett, Thomas A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334y-24ee13cdb63b64c325718458aa21f8bc8f2d6126f44d8eaad9c302247f5310d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Bisexuality</topic><topic>Endorsements</topic><topic>Essentialism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gays &amp; lesbians</topic><topic>Homosexuality, Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Sexual and Gender Minorities</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Sexual orientation</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morgenroth, Thekla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Teri A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gee, Isabel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ovett, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Digital Collections</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology &amp; Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's &amp; Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of sexual behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morgenroth, Thekla</au><au>Kirby, Teri A.</au><au>Gee, Isabel A.</au><au>Ovett, Thomas A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Born this Way–or Not? The Relationship Between Essentialism and Sexual Minorities’ LGBTQ+ Identification and Belonging</atitle><jtitle>Archives of sexual behavior</jtitle><stitle>Arch Sex Behav</stitle><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3447</spage><epage>3458</epage><pages>3447-3458</pages><issn>0004-0002</issn><eissn>1573-2800</eissn><abstract>Bisexual people experience lower levels of belonging in the LGBTQ+ community than gay and lesbian people. We investigated one of the factors that may reduce bisexual individuals’ feelings of belonging in and identification with the LGBTQ+ community: Sexual orientation essentialism. Across two online studies with participants recruited through Prolific, we tested whether bisexual people endorsed sexual orientation essentialism less than lesbian and gay individuals and, in turn, feel lower levels of identification and belonging with the LGBTQ+ community. Essentialism separated into three dimensions in Study 1 ( N  = 375): Entitativity, naturalness, and discreteness. Relative to lesbian and gay individuals, bisexual individuals viewed sexual orientation as less natural, in turn reporting lower levels of belonging and identification. They also viewed sexual orientation groups as less discrete, which instead translated to higher levels of belonging and identification. Sexual orientation groups did not differ in their endorsement of entitativity beliefs. In Study 2 ( N  = 390), we focused on naturalness and replicated findings from Study 1. In addition, lower naturalness beliefs were associated with the belief that one’s own views were different from those held by the LGBTQ+ community, which also contributed to lower levels of belonging and identification. Together, these studies contribute to understanding the role of essentialism in intragroup processes and paint a nuanced picture of essentialism in different sexual minority groups.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>34518957</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10508-021-02145-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9876-5017</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-0002
ispartof Archives of sexual behavior, 2021-11, Vol.50 (8), p.3447-3458
issn 0004-0002
1573-2800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572525317
source Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Springer Link
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Bisexuality
Endorsements
Essentialism
Female
Gays & lesbians
Homosexuality, Female
Humans
Identification
Male
Original Paper
Psychology
Public Health
Sexual and Gender Minorities
Sexual Behavior
Sexual orientation
Social Sciences
title Born this Way–or Not? The Relationship Between Essentialism and Sexual Minorities’ LGBTQ+ Identification and Belonging
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T23%3A45%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Born%20this%20Way%E2%80%93or%20Not?%20The%20Relationship%20Between%20Essentialism%20and%20Sexual%20Minorities%E2%80%99%20LGBTQ+%20Identification%20and%20Belonging&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20sexual%20behavior&rft.au=Morgenroth,%20Thekla&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3447&rft.epage=3458&rft.pages=3447-3458&rft.issn=0004-0002&rft.eissn=1573-2800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10508-021-02145-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2599280409%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334y-24ee13cdb63b64c325718458aa21f8bc8f2d6126f44d8eaad9c302247f5310d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2599280409&rft_id=info:pmid/34518957&rfr_iscdi=true