Loading…

Comparative Effectiveness and Functional Outcome of C2 Dome-like Expansive Versus C2 Expansive Open-door Laminoplasty for Upper Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Retrospective Cohort Study. This study compared the function and radiographical outcomes of the patients who underwent C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty to those C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty for the treatment of OPLL with C2 involved. There are few comparative studies of these two surgical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2022-05, Vol.47 (10), p.E448-E455
Main Authors: Yu, Chengcheng, Wu, Yinan, Zhang, Zengjie, Zhang, Ning, Yu, Xinning, Li, Fangcai, Chen, Weishan, Chen, Qixin, Li, Wanli
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3527-56292f8b2fd806ff5a6b8068c8b9eb94cf1d1262a111dda6fa9fd8648920f4ae3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3527-56292f8b2fd806ff5a6b8068c8b9eb94cf1d1262a111dda6fa9fd8648920f4ae3
container_end_page E455
container_issue 10
container_start_page E448
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)
container_volume 47
creator Yu, Chengcheng
Wu, Yinan
Zhang, Zengjie
Zhang, Ning
Yu, Xinning
Li, Fangcai
Chen, Weishan
Chen, Qixin
Li, Wanli
description Retrospective Cohort Study. This study compared the function and radiographical outcomes of the patients who underwent C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty to those C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty for the treatment of OPLL with C2 involved. There are few comparative studies of these two surgical methods. C2 dome-like and C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty are posterior approaches for posterior longitudinal ligament ossification with C2 level and above. This study performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 59 patients with OPLL up to C2 which cause compression symptoms. 31 patients underwent C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty with C3-7 expansive open-door laminoplasty (Group Dom) and 28 underwent C2-7 expansive open-door laminoplasty (Group Exp). The preoperative and postoperative space available for cord (SAC) of C2 segment, cervical curvature index of C2-7, C2-7 range of motion, Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and neck disability index (NDI) were used to assess clinical out-comes and statistically analyzed. The cervical curvature index, JOA score, and NDI significantly changed at the final follow-up in two groups with no significant intergroup differences. There were no significant differences in preoperative SAC and VAS between the two groups. At the final follow-up, the SAC of C2/3 in Group Exp was significantly larger than Group Dom, while the VAS and range of motion of Group Dom became significantly better than Group Exp. The C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty can reduce postoperative neck pain more obviously and achieve better cervical curvature. C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty can get more adequate decompression in the spinal canal, which may be recommend to the patients with OPLL occupying more than 50% of the vertebral canal at C2/3, or with developmental spinal stenosis. 3.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004221
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572932027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2572932027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3527-56292f8b2fd806ff5a6b8068c8b9eb94cf1d1262a111dda6fa9fd8648920f4ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUsFu1DAUtBCILoU_QMhHLin2S-Ik3EpoC9JKi1rKNXKS565pYqe207K_ytfU6RaK8CWjycy8J48JecvZEWdV8eHT-cUR--dkAPwZWfEcyoTzvHpOViwVkECWigPyyvufUSRSXr0kB2mWQwYFX5HftR0n6WTQt0hPlMJuQQa9p9L09HQ2kbBGDnQzh86OSK2iNdDPESaDvo6mX5M0frH_QOdnv_x94jYTmqS31tG1HLWx0yB92FEVictpQkdrdLe6W_K91yqiZdwyJGyRfrM-oNOL25orHeZeL6us9ZUc0YSP9JieY3DWT_u9aW231gV6EZW71-SFkoPHN4_fQ3J5evK9_pKsN2df6-N10qU5FEkuoAJVtqD6kgmlcinaCMqubCtsq6xTvOcgQHLO-14KJauoFFlZAVOZxPSQvN_nTs7ezOhDM2rf4TBIg3b2DeQFVCkwKKI020u7uLN3qJrJ6VG6XcNZs7TaxFab_1uNtnePE-Z2xP6v6U-NT7l3dogX5q-H-Q5ds0U5hO1DXiHS-BQYAMt5zpIHKr0HdMuxmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572932027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Effectiveness and Functional Outcome of C2 Dome-like Expansive Versus C2 Expansive Open-door Laminoplasty for Upper Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><creator>Yu, Chengcheng ; Wu, Yinan ; Zhang, Zengjie ; Zhang, Ning ; Yu, Xinning ; Li, Fangcai ; Chen, Weishan ; Chen, Qixin ; Li, Wanli</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Chengcheng ; Wu, Yinan ; Zhang, Zengjie ; Zhang, Ning ; Yu, Xinning ; Li, Fangcai ; Chen, Weishan ; Chen, Qixin ; Li, Wanli</creatorcontrib><description>Retrospective Cohort Study. This study compared the function and radiographical outcomes of the patients who underwent C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty to those C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty for the treatment of OPLL with C2 involved. There are few comparative studies of these two surgical methods. C2 dome-like and C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty are posterior approaches for posterior longitudinal ligament ossification with C2 level and above. This study performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 59 patients with OPLL up to C2 which cause compression symptoms. 31 patients underwent C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty with C3-7 expansive open-door laminoplasty (Group Dom) and 28 underwent C2-7 expansive open-door laminoplasty (Group Exp). The preoperative and postoperative space available for cord (SAC) of C2 segment, cervical curvature index of C2-7, C2-7 range of motion, Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and neck disability index (NDI) were used to assess clinical out-comes and statistically analyzed. The cervical curvature index, JOA score, and NDI significantly changed at the final follow-up in two groups with no significant intergroup differences. There were no significant differences in preoperative SAC and VAS between the two groups. At the final follow-up, the SAC of C2/3 in Group Exp was significantly larger than Group Dom, while the VAS and range of motion of Group Dom became significantly better than Group Exp. The C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty can reduce postoperative neck pain more obviously and achieve better cervical curvature. C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty can get more adequate decompression in the spinal canal, which may be recommend to the patients with OPLL occupying more than 50% of the vertebral canal at C2/3, or with developmental spinal stenosis. 3.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004221</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34524271</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2022-05, Vol.47 (10), p.E448-E455</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3527-56292f8b2fd806ff5a6b8068c8b9eb94cf1d1262a111dda6fa9fd8648920f4ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3527-56292f8b2fd806ff5a6b8068c8b9eb94cf1d1262a111dda6fa9fd8648920f4ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34524271$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Chengcheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zengjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Xinning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fangcai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Weishan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qixin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wanli</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Effectiveness and Functional Outcome of C2 Dome-like Expansive Versus C2 Expansive Open-door Laminoplasty for Upper Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>Retrospective Cohort Study. This study compared the function and radiographical outcomes of the patients who underwent C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty to those C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty for the treatment of OPLL with C2 involved. There are few comparative studies of these two surgical methods. C2 dome-like and C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty are posterior approaches for posterior longitudinal ligament ossification with C2 level and above. This study performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 59 patients with OPLL up to C2 which cause compression symptoms. 31 patients underwent C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty with C3-7 expansive open-door laminoplasty (Group Dom) and 28 underwent C2-7 expansive open-door laminoplasty (Group Exp). The preoperative and postoperative space available for cord (SAC) of C2 segment, cervical curvature index of C2-7, C2-7 range of motion, Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and neck disability index (NDI) were used to assess clinical out-comes and statistically analyzed. The cervical curvature index, JOA score, and NDI significantly changed at the final follow-up in two groups with no significant intergroup differences. There were no significant differences in preoperative SAC and VAS between the two groups. At the final follow-up, the SAC of C2/3 in Group Exp was significantly larger than Group Dom, while the VAS and range of motion of Group Dom became significantly better than Group Exp. The C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty can reduce postoperative neck pain more obviously and achieve better cervical curvature. C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty can get more adequate decompression in the spinal canal, which may be recommend to the patients with OPLL occupying more than 50% of the vertebral canal at C2/3, or with developmental spinal stenosis. 3.</description><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUsFu1DAUtBCILoU_QMhHLin2S-Ik3EpoC9JKi1rKNXKS565pYqe207K_ytfU6RaK8CWjycy8J48JecvZEWdV8eHT-cUR--dkAPwZWfEcyoTzvHpOViwVkECWigPyyvufUSRSXr0kB2mWQwYFX5HftR0n6WTQt0hPlMJuQQa9p9L09HQ2kbBGDnQzh86OSK2iNdDPESaDvo6mX5M0frH_QOdnv_x94jYTmqS31tG1HLWx0yB92FEVictpQkdrdLe6W_K91yqiZdwyJGyRfrM-oNOL25orHeZeL6us9ZUc0YSP9JieY3DWT_u9aW231gV6EZW71-SFkoPHN4_fQ3J5evK9_pKsN2df6-N10qU5FEkuoAJVtqD6kgmlcinaCMqubCtsq6xTvOcgQHLO-14KJauoFFlZAVOZxPSQvN_nTs7ezOhDM2rf4TBIg3b2DeQFVCkwKKI020u7uLN3qJrJ6VG6XcNZs7TaxFab_1uNtnePE-Z2xP6v6U-NT7l3dogX5q-H-Q5ds0U5hO1DXiHS-BQYAMt5zpIHKr0HdMuxmw</recordid><startdate>20220515</startdate><enddate>20220515</enddate><creator>Yu, Chengcheng</creator><creator>Wu, Yinan</creator><creator>Zhang, Zengjie</creator><creator>Zhang, Ning</creator><creator>Yu, Xinning</creator><creator>Li, Fangcai</creator><creator>Chen, Weishan</creator><creator>Chen, Qixin</creator><creator>Li, Wanli</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220515</creationdate><title>Comparative Effectiveness and Functional Outcome of C2 Dome-like Expansive Versus C2 Expansive Open-door Laminoplasty for Upper Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><author>Yu, Chengcheng ; Wu, Yinan ; Zhang, Zengjie ; Zhang, Ning ; Yu, Xinning ; Li, Fangcai ; Chen, Weishan ; Chen, Qixin ; Li, Wanli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3527-56292f8b2fd806ff5a6b8068c8b9eb94cf1d1262a111dda6fa9fd8648920f4ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Chengcheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zengjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Xinning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fangcai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Weishan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qixin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wanli</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Chengcheng</au><au>Wu, Yinan</au><au>Zhang, Zengjie</au><au>Zhang, Ning</au><au>Yu, Xinning</au><au>Li, Fangcai</au><au>Chen, Weishan</au><au>Chen, Qixin</au><au>Li, Wanli</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Effectiveness and Functional Outcome of C2 Dome-like Expansive Versus C2 Expansive Open-door Laminoplasty for Upper Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Retrospective Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>2022-05-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>E448</spage><epage>E455</epage><pages>E448-E455</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><abstract>Retrospective Cohort Study. This study compared the function and radiographical outcomes of the patients who underwent C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty to those C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty for the treatment of OPLL with C2 involved. There are few comparative studies of these two surgical methods. C2 dome-like and C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty are posterior approaches for posterior longitudinal ligament ossification with C2 level and above. This study performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 59 patients with OPLL up to C2 which cause compression symptoms. 31 patients underwent C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty with C3-7 expansive open-door laminoplasty (Group Dom) and 28 underwent C2-7 expansive open-door laminoplasty (Group Exp). The preoperative and postoperative space available for cord (SAC) of C2 segment, cervical curvature index of C2-7, C2-7 range of motion, Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and neck disability index (NDI) were used to assess clinical out-comes and statistically analyzed. The cervical curvature index, JOA score, and NDI significantly changed at the final follow-up in two groups with no significant intergroup differences. There were no significant differences in preoperative SAC and VAS between the two groups. At the final follow-up, the SAC of C2/3 in Group Exp was significantly larger than Group Dom, while the VAS and range of motion of Group Dom became significantly better than Group Exp. The C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty can reduce postoperative neck pain more obviously and achieve better cervical curvature. C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty can get more adequate decompression in the spinal canal, which may be recommend to the patients with OPLL occupying more than 50% of the vertebral canal at C2/3, or with developmental spinal stenosis. 3.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>34524271</pmid><doi>10.1097/BRS.0000000000004221</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2022-05, Vol.47 (10), p.E448-E455
issn 0362-2436
1528-1159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572932027
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
title Comparative Effectiveness and Functional Outcome of C2 Dome-like Expansive Versus C2 Expansive Open-door Laminoplasty for Upper Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Retrospective Cohort Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A36%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Effectiveness%20and%20Functional%20Outcome%20of%20C2%20Dome-like%20Expansive%20Versus%20C2%20Expansive%20Open-door%20Laminoplasty%20for%20Upper%20Cervical%20Ossification%20of%20the%20Posterior%20Longitudinal%20Ligament:%20A%20Retrospective%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=Yu,%20Chengcheng&rft.date=2022-05-15&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=E448&rft.epage=E455&rft.pages=E448-E455&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004221&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2572932027%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3527-56292f8b2fd806ff5a6b8068c8b9eb94cf1d1262a111dda6fa9fd8648920f4ae3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572932027&rft_id=info:pmid/34524271&rfr_iscdi=true