Loading…

Biogas and Volatile Fatty Acid Production During Anaerobic Digestion of Straw, Cellulose, and Hemicellulose with Analysis of Microbial Communities and Functions

The anaerobic digestion efficiency and methane production of straw was limited by its complex composition and structure. In this study, rice straw (RS), cellulose, and hemicellulose were used as raw materials to study biogas production performance and changes in the volatile fatty acids (VFAs). Furt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied biochemistry and biotechnology 2022-02, Vol.194 (2), p.762-782
Main Authors: Liu, Jie, Zuo, Xiaoyu, Peng, Ke, He, Rui, Yang, Luyao, Liu, Rufei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e7878cf391f8229a93cfa32b8e61e9997d06273b0bb615c8eb9b01ef337ac0633
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e7878cf391f8229a93cfa32b8e61e9997d06273b0bb615c8eb9b01ef337ac0633
container_end_page 782
container_issue 2
container_start_page 762
container_title Applied biochemistry and biotechnology
container_volume 194
creator Liu, Jie
Zuo, Xiaoyu
Peng, Ke
He, Rui
Yang, Luyao
Liu, Rufei
description The anaerobic digestion efficiency and methane production of straw was limited by its complex composition and structure. In this study, rice straw (RS), cellulose, and hemicellulose were used as raw materials to study biogas production performance and changes in the volatile fatty acids (VFAs). Further, microbial communities and genetic functions were analyzed separately for each material. The biogas production potential of RS, cellulose, and hemicellulose was different, with cumulative biogas production of 283.75, 412.50, and 620.64 mL/(g·VS), respectively. The methane content of the biogas produced from cellulose and hemicellulose was approximately 10% higher than that produced from RS after the methane content stabilized. The accumulation of VFAs occurred in the early stage of anaerobic digestion in all materials, and the cumulative amount of VFAs in both cellulose and hemicellulose was relatively higher than that in RS, and the accumulation time was 12 and 14 days longer, respectively. When anaerobic digestion progressed to a stable stage, Clostridium was the dominant bacterial genus in all three anaerobic digestion systems, and the abundance of Ruminofilibacter was higher during anaerobic digestion of RS. Genetically, anaerobic digestion of all raw materials proceeded mainly via aceticlastic methanogenesis, with similar functional components. The different performance of anaerobic digestion of RS, cellulose, and hemicellulose mainly comes from the difference of composition of raw materials. Increasing the accessibility of cellulose and hemicellulose in RS feedstock by pretreatment is an effective way to improve the efficiency of anaerobic digestion. Since the similar microbial community structure will be acclimated during anaerobic digestion, there is no need to adjust the initial inoculum when the accessibility of cellulose and hemicellulose changes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12010-021-03675-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572932923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2626112975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e7878cf391f8229a93cfa32b8e61e9997d06273b0bb615c8eb9b01ef337ac0633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhq2Kig6FF-gCWWLDoml9qeN4OUwZWqmoSFy2luOcDK6SeLBjjeZteFScSVskFqwsHX__fy4_QmeUXFBC5GWkjFBSEEYLwkspit0RWlAhVC4p-gItCJO8YKxSJ-hVjA-EUFYJ-RKd8CvBrkouF-j3B-c3JmIzNPiH78zoOsBrM457vLSuwV-Cb5IdnR_wdQpu2ODlYCD42ll87TYQD1--xV_HYHbneAVdlzof4fxgeQO9s08lvHPjz0nf7aOLk-izs5OV6fDK930a3OhgnmWdhkPX-Bodt6aL8ObxPUXf1x-_rW6Ku_tPt6vlXWG5FGMBspKVbbmibcWYMorb1nBWV1BSUErJhpT5GjWp65IKW0GtakKh5VwaS0rOT9H72Xcb_K-U99K9i9PoZgCfomZCMsWZYhP67h_0waeQ18pUyUpKmZIiU2ym8ooxBmj1NrjehL2mRE_56Tk_nfPTh_z0LovePlqnuofmWfIUWAb4DMTtlAaEv73_Y_sHdpCnzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2626112975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biogas and Volatile Fatty Acid Production During Anaerobic Digestion of Straw, Cellulose, and Hemicellulose with Analysis of Microbial Communities and Functions</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Liu, Jie ; Zuo, Xiaoyu ; Peng, Ke ; He, Rui ; Yang, Luyao ; Liu, Rufei</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jie ; Zuo, Xiaoyu ; Peng, Ke ; He, Rui ; Yang, Luyao ; Liu, Rufei</creatorcontrib><description>The anaerobic digestion efficiency and methane production of straw was limited by its complex composition and structure. In this study, rice straw (RS), cellulose, and hemicellulose were used as raw materials to study biogas production performance and changes in the volatile fatty acids (VFAs). Further, microbial communities and genetic functions were analyzed separately for each material. The biogas production potential of RS, cellulose, and hemicellulose was different, with cumulative biogas production of 283.75, 412.50, and 620.64 mL/(g·VS), respectively. The methane content of the biogas produced from cellulose and hemicellulose was approximately 10% higher than that produced from RS after the methane content stabilized. The accumulation of VFAs occurred in the early stage of anaerobic digestion in all materials, and the cumulative amount of VFAs in both cellulose and hemicellulose was relatively higher than that in RS, and the accumulation time was 12 and 14 days longer, respectively. When anaerobic digestion progressed to a stable stage, Clostridium was the dominant bacterial genus in all three anaerobic digestion systems, and the abundance of Ruminofilibacter was higher during anaerobic digestion of RS. Genetically, anaerobic digestion of all raw materials proceeded mainly via aceticlastic methanogenesis, with similar functional components. The different performance of anaerobic digestion of RS, cellulose, and hemicellulose mainly comes from the difference of composition of raw materials. Increasing the accessibility of cellulose and hemicellulose in RS feedstock by pretreatment is an effective way to improve the efficiency of anaerobic digestion. Since the similar microbial community structure will be acclimated during anaerobic digestion, there is no need to adjust the initial inoculum when the accessibility of cellulose and hemicellulose changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-2289</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1559-0291</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-0291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12010-021-03675-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34524637</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Accessibility ; Accumulation ; Acid production ; Anaerobic digestion ; Anaerobic microorganisms ; Anaerobiosis ; Biochemistry ; Biofuels ; Biogas ; Biotechnology ; Cellulose ; Cellulose - metabolism ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Community structure ; Composition ; Fatty acids ; Fatty Acids, Volatile - metabolism ; Hemicellulose ; Inoculum ; Methane ; Methane - biosynthesis ; Methane - metabolism ; Methanogenesis ; Microbial activity ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota ; Microorganisms ; Original Article ; Oryza - metabolism ; Polysaccharides - metabolism ; Raw materials ; Refuse as fuel ; Rice straw ; Straw ; Volatile fatty acids</subject><ispartof>Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2022-02, Vol.194 (2), p.762-782</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e7878cf391f8229a93cfa32b8e61e9997d06273b0bb615c8eb9b01ef337ac0633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e7878cf391f8229a93cfa32b8e61e9997d06273b0bb615c8eb9b01ef337ac0633</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8250-4311</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34524637$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuo, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Luyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Rufei</creatorcontrib><title>Biogas and Volatile Fatty Acid Production During Anaerobic Digestion of Straw, Cellulose, and Hemicellulose with Analysis of Microbial Communities and Functions</title><title>Applied biochemistry and biotechnology</title><addtitle>Appl Biochem Biotechnol</addtitle><addtitle>Appl Biochem Biotechnol</addtitle><description>The anaerobic digestion efficiency and methane production of straw was limited by its complex composition and structure. In this study, rice straw (RS), cellulose, and hemicellulose were used as raw materials to study biogas production performance and changes in the volatile fatty acids (VFAs). Further, microbial communities and genetic functions were analyzed separately for each material. The biogas production potential of RS, cellulose, and hemicellulose was different, with cumulative biogas production of 283.75, 412.50, and 620.64 mL/(g·VS), respectively. The methane content of the biogas produced from cellulose and hemicellulose was approximately 10% higher than that produced from RS after the methane content stabilized. The accumulation of VFAs occurred in the early stage of anaerobic digestion in all materials, and the cumulative amount of VFAs in both cellulose and hemicellulose was relatively higher than that in RS, and the accumulation time was 12 and 14 days longer, respectively. When anaerobic digestion progressed to a stable stage, Clostridium was the dominant bacterial genus in all three anaerobic digestion systems, and the abundance of Ruminofilibacter was higher during anaerobic digestion of RS. Genetically, anaerobic digestion of all raw materials proceeded mainly via aceticlastic methanogenesis, with similar functional components. The different performance of anaerobic digestion of RS, cellulose, and hemicellulose mainly comes from the difference of composition of raw materials. Increasing the accessibility of cellulose and hemicellulose in RS feedstock by pretreatment is an effective way to improve the efficiency of anaerobic digestion. Since the similar microbial community structure will be acclimated during anaerobic digestion, there is no need to adjust the initial inoculum when the accessibility of cellulose and hemicellulose changes.</description><subject>Accessibility</subject><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Acid production</subject><subject>Anaerobic digestion</subject><subject>Anaerobic microorganisms</subject><subject>Anaerobiosis</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Cellulose - metabolism</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Fatty Acids, Volatile - metabolism</subject><subject>Hemicellulose</subject><subject>Inoculum</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methane - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Methane - metabolism</subject><subject>Methanogenesis</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Oryza - metabolism</subject><subject>Polysaccharides - metabolism</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Refuse as fuel</subject><subject>Rice straw</subject><subject>Straw</subject><subject>Volatile fatty acids</subject><issn>0273-2289</issn><issn>1559-0291</issn><issn>1559-0291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhq2Kig6FF-gCWWLDoml9qeN4OUwZWqmoSFy2luOcDK6SeLBjjeZteFScSVskFqwsHX__fy4_QmeUXFBC5GWkjFBSEEYLwkspit0RWlAhVC4p-gItCJO8YKxSJ-hVjA-EUFYJ-RKd8CvBrkouF-j3B-c3JmIzNPiH78zoOsBrM457vLSuwV-Cb5IdnR_wdQpu2ODlYCD42ll87TYQD1--xV_HYHbneAVdlzof4fxgeQO9s08lvHPjz0nf7aOLk-izs5OV6fDK930a3OhgnmWdhkPX-Bodt6aL8ObxPUXf1x-_rW6Ku_tPt6vlXWG5FGMBspKVbbmibcWYMorb1nBWV1BSUErJhpT5GjWp65IKW0GtakKh5VwaS0rOT9H72Xcb_K-U99K9i9PoZgCfomZCMsWZYhP67h_0waeQ18pUyUpKmZIiU2ym8ooxBmj1NrjehL2mRE_56Tk_nfPTh_z0LovePlqnuofmWfIUWAb4DMTtlAaEv73_Y_sHdpCnzQ</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Liu, Jie</creator><creator>Zuo, Xiaoyu</creator><creator>Peng, Ke</creator><creator>He, Rui</creator><creator>Yang, Luyao</creator><creator>Liu, Rufei</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8250-4311</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Biogas and Volatile Fatty Acid Production During Anaerobic Digestion of Straw, Cellulose, and Hemicellulose with Analysis of Microbial Communities and Functions</title><author>Liu, Jie ; Zuo, Xiaoyu ; Peng, Ke ; He, Rui ; Yang, Luyao ; Liu, Rufei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e7878cf391f8229a93cfa32b8e61e9997d06273b0bb615c8eb9b01ef337ac0633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Acid production</topic><topic>Anaerobic digestion</topic><topic>Anaerobic microorganisms</topic><topic>Anaerobiosis</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Cellulose - metabolism</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Fatty Acids, Volatile - metabolism</topic><topic>Hemicellulose</topic><topic>Inoculum</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methane - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Methane - metabolism</topic><topic>Methanogenesis</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Oryza - metabolism</topic><topic>Polysaccharides - metabolism</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Refuse as fuel</topic><topic>Rice straw</topic><topic>Straw</topic><topic>Volatile fatty acids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuo, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Luyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Rufei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied biochemistry and biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Jie</au><au>Zuo, Xiaoyu</au><au>Peng, Ke</au><au>He, Rui</au><au>Yang, Luyao</au><au>Liu, Rufei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biogas and Volatile Fatty Acid Production During Anaerobic Digestion of Straw, Cellulose, and Hemicellulose with Analysis of Microbial Communities and Functions</atitle><jtitle>Applied biochemistry and biotechnology</jtitle><stitle>Appl Biochem Biotechnol</stitle><addtitle>Appl Biochem Biotechnol</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>194</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>762</spage><epage>782</epage><pages>762-782</pages><issn>0273-2289</issn><issn>1559-0291</issn><eissn>1559-0291</eissn><abstract>The anaerobic digestion efficiency and methane production of straw was limited by its complex composition and structure. In this study, rice straw (RS), cellulose, and hemicellulose were used as raw materials to study biogas production performance and changes in the volatile fatty acids (VFAs). Further, microbial communities and genetic functions were analyzed separately for each material. The biogas production potential of RS, cellulose, and hemicellulose was different, with cumulative biogas production of 283.75, 412.50, and 620.64 mL/(g·VS), respectively. The methane content of the biogas produced from cellulose and hemicellulose was approximately 10% higher than that produced from RS after the methane content stabilized. The accumulation of VFAs occurred in the early stage of anaerobic digestion in all materials, and the cumulative amount of VFAs in both cellulose and hemicellulose was relatively higher than that in RS, and the accumulation time was 12 and 14 days longer, respectively. When anaerobic digestion progressed to a stable stage, Clostridium was the dominant bacterial genus in all three anaerobic digestion systems, and the abundance of Ruminofilibacter was higher during anaerobic digestion of RS. Genetically, anaerobic digestion of all raw materials proceeded mainly via aceticlastic methanogenesis, with similar functional components. The different performance of anaerobic digestion of RS, cellulose, and hemicellulose mainly comes from the difference of composition of raw materials. Increasing the accessibility of cellulose and hemicellulose in RS feedstock by pretreatment is an effective way to improve the efficiency of anaerobic digestion. Since the similar microbial community structure will be acclimated during anaerobic digestion, there is no need to adjust the initial inoculum when the accessibility of cellulose and hemicellulose changes.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>34524637</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12010-021-03675-w</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8250-4311</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-2289
ispartof Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2022-02, Vol.194 (2), p.762-782
issn 0273-2289
1559-0291
1559-0291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572932923
source Springer Link
subjects Accessibility
Accumulation
Acid production
Anaerobic digestion
Anaerobic microorganisms
Anaerobiosis
Biochemistry
Biofuels
Biogas
Biotechnology
Cellulose
Cellulose - metabolism
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Community structure
Composition
Fatty acids
Fatty Acids, Volatile - metabolism
Hemicellulose
Inoculum
Methane
Methane - biosynthesis
Methane - metabolism
Methanogenesis
Microbial activity
Microbiomes
Microbiota
Microorganisms
Original Article
Oryza - metabolism
Polysaccharides - metabolism
Raw materials
Refuse as fuel
Rice straw
Straw
Volatile fatty acids
title Biogas and Volatile Fatty Acid Production During Anaerobic Digestion of Straw, Cellulose, and Hemicellulose with Analysis of Microbial Communities and Functions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A06%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biogas%20and%20Volatile%20Fatty%20Acid%20Production%20During%20Anaerobic%20Digestion%20of%20Straw,%20Cellulose,%20and%20Hemicellulose%20with%20Analysis%20of%20Microbial%20Communities%20and%20Functions&rft.jtitle=Applied%20biochemistry%20and%20biotechnology&rft.au=Liu,%20Jie&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=194&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=762&rft.epage=782&rft.pages=762-782&rft.issn=0273-2289&rft.eissn=1559-0291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12010-021-03675-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2626112975%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e7878cf391f8229a93cfa32b8e61e9997d06273b0bb615c8eb9b01ef337ac0633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2626112975&rft_id=info:pmid/34524637&rfr_iscdi=true