Loading…

Trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval in Japan: A nationwide database study from 2016 to 2018

Objectives To evaluate the trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval for this type of procedure in April 2016. Methods This nationwide retrospective study included 3722 received robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases carried...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of urology 2021-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1268-1272
Main Authors: Yokoyama, Minato, Ishioka, Junichiro, Toba, Mikayo, Fukushima, Hiroshi, Tanaka, Hajime, Yoshida, Soichiro, Matsuoka, Yoh, Ai, Masumi, Fushimi, Kiyohide, Fujii, Yasuhisa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-56b3bd793bf36e12cc1db700377a95c4f9486dd02adfbf07d3b14c38fbe5dffb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-56b3bd793bf36e12cc1db700377a95c4f9486dd02adfbf07d3b14c38fbe5dffb3
container_end_page 1272
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1268
container_title International journal of urology
container_volume 28
creator Yokoyama, Minato
Ishioka, Junichiro
Toba, Mikayo
Fukushima, Hiroshi
Tanaka, Hajime
Yoshida, Soichiro
Matsuoka, Yoh
Ai, Masumi
Fushimi, Kiyohide
Fujii, Yasuhisa
description Objectives To evaluate the trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval for this type of procedure in April 2016. Methods This nationwide retrospective study included 3722 received robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases carried out from April 2016 to March 2018 in 124 participating institutions. The institutions were divided into lower‐ and higher‐volume institutions according to the median of 19 robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases during the study period. Surgical outcomes between 616 cases from lower‐volume institutions and 3106 cases from higher‐volume institutions were compared using propensity score matching. Results During the study period, both the number of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy surgeries and the number of institutions in which the surgery was carried out steadily increased. Overall, the median anesthesia time was 217 min, the median postoperative length of stay was 9 days, and the proportion of blood transfusions, complications and readmissions were 0.8%, 5.1% and 1.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences in anesthesia time, incidence of blood transfusions, and complication rates between the lower‐volume and higher‐volume institutions. However, a slightly, but significantly, longer postoperative length of stay and a lower incidence of readmission were observed in lower‐volume institutions both before and after propensity score matching. Conclusions Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy has become widespread during the initial 2‐year period after government approval with an acceptable safety profile, regardless of the institutional caseloads. This technique has become a standard of care for stage 1 renal cancer patients in Japan.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/iju.14698
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2573441475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2605269997</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-56b3bd793bf36e12cc1db700377a95c4f9486dd02adfbf07d3b14c38fbe5dffb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10btuFTEQBmALgcghUPACaCQaKDbxbW90UcQlUSSapF7Z63Hio7P2YnsTbccj8CQ8FE-CkxMokHAzxXz-NdJPyGtGj1h5x267HDHZ9N0TsmFS8opTyZ-SDe1ZX3Ws5QfkRUpbSpngrHtODoSseSco25CflxG9SaC8gaQs5hWChRh0yL--_1ApuZTRwKxidmoHHuebiGMO0wpmic5fQ75BcN49rHn5s6KKMGN0wYCyGSNch1uMfkKfQc1zDLdFOg_nalb-A5yAV9kFf-cMglFZaZUQUl7MCjaGCThlDeRwP7uX5JlVu4SvHuchufr08fL0S3Xx9fPZ6clFNYq27aq60UKbthfaigYZH0dmdEtpWaq-HqXtZdcYQ7kyVlvaGqGZHEVnNdbGWi0Oybt9bjn324IpD5NLI-52ymNY0sDrVkjJZFsX-vYfug1L9OW6gTe05k3f921R7_dqjCGliHaYo5tUXAdGh_sSh1Li8FBisW8eExc9ofkr_7RWwPEe3Lkdrv9PGs7Or_aRvwHMY6o5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2605269997</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval in Japan: A nationwide database study from 2016 to 2018</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Yokoyama, Minato ; Ishioka, Junichiro ; Toba, Mikayo ; Fukushima, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Hajime ; Yoshida, Soichiro ; Matsuoka, Yoh ; Ai, Masumi ; Fushimi, Kiyohide ; Fujii, Yasuhisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Yokoyama, Minato ; Ishioka, Junichiro ; Toba, Mikayo ; Fukushima, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Hajime ; Yoshida, Soichiro ; Matsuoka, Yoh ; Ai, Masumi ; Fushimi, Kiyohide ; Fujii, Yasuhisa</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To evaluate the trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval for this type of procedure in April 2016. Methods This nationwide retrospective study included 3722 received robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases carried out from April 2016 to March 2018 in 124 participating institutions. The institutions were divided into lower‐ and higher‐volume institutions according to the median of 19 robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases during the study period. Surgical outcomes between 616 cases from lower‐volume institutions and 3106 cases from higher‐volume institutions were compared using propensity score matching. Results During the study period, both the number of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy surgeries and the number of institutions in which the surgery was carried out steadily increased. Overall, the median anesthesia time was 217 min, the median postoperative length of stay was 9 days, and the proportion of blood transfusions, complications and readmissions were 0.8%, 5.1% and 1.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences in anesthesia time, incidence of blood transfusions, and complication rates between the lower‐volume and higher‐volume institutions. However, a slightly, but significantly, longer postoperative length of stay and a lower incidence of readmission were observed in lower‐volume institutions both before and after propensity score matching. Conclusions Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy has become widespread during the initial 2‐year period after government approval with an acceptable safety profile, regardless of the institutional caseloads. This technique has become a standard of care for stage 1 renal cancer patients in Japan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0919-8172</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1442-2042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-2042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iju.14698</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34528301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Blood Transfusion ; Blood transfusions ; diagnosis‐procedure combination ; Government ; Humans ; Japan ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Length of stay ; nationwide database study ; Nephrectomy ; Nephrectomy - adverse effects ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; renal cancer ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Robotics ; Robots ; robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy ; Safety ; Surgery ; surgical outcome ; Treatment Outcome ; Trends</subject><ispartof>International journal of urology, 2021-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1268-1272</ispartof><rights>2021 The Japanese Urological Association</rights><rights>2021 The Japanese Urological Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-56b3bd793bf36e12cc1db700377a95c4f9486dd02adfbf07d3b14c38fbe5dffb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-56b3bd793bf36e12cc1db700377a95c4f9486dd02adfbf07d3b14c38fbe5dffb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34528301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yokoyama, Minato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishioka, Junichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toba, Mikayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukushima, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Hajime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Soichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuoka, Yoh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ai, Masumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fushimi, Kiyohide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Yasuhisa</creatorcontrib><title>Trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval in Japan: A nationwide database study from 2016 to 2018</title><title>International journal of urology</title><addtitle>Int J Urol</addtitle><description>Objectives To evaluate the trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval for this type of procedure in April 2016. Methods This nationwide retrospective study included 3722 received robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases carried out from April 2016 to March 2018 in 124 participating institutions. The institutions were divided into lower‐ and higher‐volume institutions according to the median of 19 robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases during the study period. Surgical outcomes between 616 cases from lower‐volume institutions and 3106 cases from higher‐volume institutions were compared using propensity score matching. Results During the study period, both the number of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy surgeries and the number of institutions in which the surgery was carried out steadily increased. Overall, the median anesthesia time was 217 min, the median postoperative length of stay was 9 days, and the proportion of blood transfusions, complications and readmissions were 0.8%, 5.1% and 1.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences in anesthesia time, incidence of blood transfusions, and complication rates between the lower‐volume and higher‐volume institutions. However, a slightly, but significantly, longer postoperative length of stay and a lower incidence of readmission were observed in lower‐volume institutions both before and after propensity score matching. Conclusions Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy has become widespread during the initial 2‐year period after government approval with an acceptable safety profile, regardless of the institutional caseloads. This technique has become a standard of care for stage 1 renal cancer patients in Japan.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Blood Transfusion</subject><subject>Blood transfusions</subject><subject>diagnosis‐procedure combination</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>nationwide database study</subject><subject>Nephrectomy</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>renal cancer</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>surgical outcome</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0919-8172</issn><issn>1442-2042</issn><issn>1442-2042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10btuFTEQBmALgcghUPACaCQaKDbxbW90UcQlUSSapF7Z63Hio7P2YnsTbccj8CQ8FE-CkxMokHAzxXz-NdJPyGtGj1h5x267HDHZ9N0TsmFS8opTyZ-SDe1ZX3Ws5QfkRUpbSpngrHtODoSseSco25CflxG9SaC8gaQs5hWChRh0yL--_1ApuZTRwKxidmoHHuebiGMO0wpmic5fQ75BcN49rHn5s6KKMGN0wYCyGSNch1uMfkKfQc1zDLdFOg_nalb-A5yAV9kFf-cMglFZaZUQUl7MCjaGCThlDeRwP7uX5JlVu4SvHuchufr08fL0S3Xx9fPZ6clFNYq27aq60UKbthfaigYZH0dmdEtpWaq-HqXtZdcYQ7kyVlvaGqGZHEVnNdbGWi0Oybt9bjn324IpD5NLI-52ymNY0sDrVkjJZFsX-vYfug1L9OW6gTe05k3f921R7_dqjCGliHaYo5tUXAdGh_sSh1Li8FBisW8eExc9ofkr_7RWwPEe3Lkdrv9PGs7Or_aRvwHMY6o5</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Yokoyama, Minato</creator><creator>Ishioka, Junichiro</creator><creator>Toba, Mikayo</creator><creator>Fukushima, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Tanaka, Hajime</creator><creator>Yoshida, Soichiro</creator><creator>Matsuoka, Yoh</creator><creator>Ai, Masumi</creator><creator>Fushimi, Kiyohide</creator><creator>Fujii, Yasuhisa</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval in Japan: A nationwide database study from 2016 to 2018</title><author>Yokoyama, Minato ; Ishioka, Junichiro ; Toba, Mikayo ; Fukushima, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Hajime ; Yoshida, Soichiro ; Matsuoka, Yoh ; Ai, Masumi ; Fushimi, Kiyohide ; Fujii, Yasuhisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-56b3bd793bf36e12cc1db700377a95c4f9486dd02adfbf07d3b14c38fbe5dffb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Blood Transfusion</topic><topic>Blood transfusions</topic><topic>diagnosis‐procedure combination</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>nationwide database study</topic><topic>Nephrectomy</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>renal cancer</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>surgical outcome</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yokoyama, Minato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishioka, Junichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toba, Mikayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukushima, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Hajime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Soichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuoka, Yoh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ai, Masumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fushimi, Kiyohide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Yasuhisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yokoyama, Minato</au><au>Ishioka, Junichiro</au><au>Toba, Mikayo</au><au>Fukushima, Hiroshi</au><au>Tanaka, Hajime</au><au>Yoshida, Soichiro</au><au>Matsuoka, Yoh</au><au>Ai, Masumi</au><au>Fushimi, Kiyohide</au><au>Fujii, Yasuhisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval in Japan: A nationwide database study from 2016 to 2018</atitle><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Urol</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1268</spage><epage>1272</epage><pages>1268-1272</pages><issn>0919-8172</issn><issn>1442-2042</issn><eissn>1442-2042</eissn><abstract>Objectives To evaluate the trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval for this type of procedure in April 2016. Methods This nationwide retrospective study included 3722 received robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases carried out from April 2016 to March 2018 in 124 participating institutions. The institutions were divided into lower‐ and higher‐volume institutions according to the median of 19 robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases during the study period. Surgical outcomes between 616 cases from lower‐volume institutions and 3106 cases from higher‐volume institutions were compared using propensity score matching. Results During the study period, both the number of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy surgeries and the number of institutions in which the surgery was carried out steadily increased. Overall, the median anesthesia time was 217 min, the median postoperative length of stay was 9 days, and the proportion of blood transfusions, complications and readmissions were 0.8%, 5.1% and 1.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences in anesthesia time, incidence of blood transfusions, and complication rates between the lower‐volume and higher‐volume institutions. However, a slightly, but significantly, longer postoperative length of stay and a lower incidence of readmission were observed in lower‐volume institutions both before and after propensity score matching. Conclusions Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy has become widespread during the initial 2‐year period after government approval with an acceptable safety profile, regardless of the institutional caseloads. This technique has become a standard of care for stage 1 renal cancer patients in Japan.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34528301</pmid><doi>10.1111/iju.14698</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0919-8172
ispartof International journal of urology, 2021-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1268-1272
issn 0919-8172
1442-2042
1442-2042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2573441475
source Wiley
subjects Anesthesia
Blood Transfusion
Blood transfusions
diagnosis‐procedure combination
Government
Humans
Japan
Kidney Neoplasms - surgery
Length of stay
nationwide database study
Nephrectomy
Nephrectomy - adverse effects
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
renal cancer
Retrospective Studies
Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Robotics
Robots
robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy
Safety
Surgery
surgical outcome
Treatment Outcome
Trends
title Trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval in Japan: A nationwide database study from 2016 to 2018
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A28%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20and%20safety%20of%20robot%E2%80%90assisted%20partial%20nephrectomy%20during%20the%20initial%202%E2%80%90year%20period%20after%20government%20approval%20in%20Japan:%20A%20nationwide%20database%20study%20from%202016%20to%202018&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Yokoyama,%20Minato&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1268&rft.epage=1272&rft.pages=1268-1272&rft.issn=0919-8172&rft.eissn=1442-2042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iju.14698&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2605269997%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-56b3bd793bf36e12cc1db700377a95c4f9486dd02adfbf07d3b14c38fbe5dffb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2605269997&rft_id=info:pmid/34528301&rfr_iscdi=true