Loading…
Trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval in Japan: A nationwide database study from 2016 to 2018
Objectives To evaluate the trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval for this type of procedure in April 2016. Methods This nationwide retrospective study included 3722 received robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases carried...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of urology 2021-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1268-1272 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-56b3bd793bf36e12cc1db700377a95c4f9486dd02adfbf07d3b14c38fbe5dffb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-56b3bd793bf36e12cc1db700377a95c4f9486dd02adfbf07d3b14c38fbe5dffb3 |
container_end_page | 1272 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1268 |
container_title | International journal of urology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Yokoyama, Minato Ishioka, Junichiro Toba, Mikayo Fukushima, Hiroshi Tanaka, Hajime Yoshida, Soichiro Matsuoka, Yoh Ai, Masumi Fushimi, Kiyohide Fujii, Yasuhisa |
description | Objectives
To evaluate the trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval for this type of procedure in April 2016.
Methods
This nationwide retrospective study included 3722 received robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases carried out from April 2016 to March 2018 in 124 participating institutions. The institutions were divided into lower‐ and higher‐volume institutions according to the median of 19 robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases during the study period. Surgical outcomes between 616 cases from lower‐volume institutions and 3106 cases from higher‐volume institutions were compared using propensity score matching.
Results
During the study period, both the number of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy surgeries and the number of institutions in which the surgery was carried out steadily increased. Overall, the median anesthesia time was 217 min, the median postoperative length of stay was 9 days, and the proportion of blood transfusions, complications and readmissions were 0.8%, 5.1% and 1.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences in anesthesia time, incidence of blood transfusions, and complication rates between the lower‐volume and higher‐volume institutions. However, a slightly, but significantly, longer postoperative length of stay and a lower incidence of readmission were observed in lower‐volume institutions both before and after propensity score matching.
Conclusions
Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy has become widespread during the initial 2‐year period after government approval with an acceptable safety profile, regardless of the institutional caseloads. This technique has become a standard of care for stage 1 renal cancer patients in Japan. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/iju.14698 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2573441475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2605269997</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-56b3bd793bf36e12cc1db700377a95c4f9486dd02adfbf07d3b14c38fbe5dffb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10btuFTEQBmALgcghUPACaCQaKDbxbW90UcQlUSSapF7Z63Hio7P2YnsTbccj8CQ8FE-CkxMokHAzxXz-NdJPyGtGj1h5x267HDHZ9N0TsmFS8opTyZ-SDe1ZX3Ws5QfkRUpbSpngrHtODoSseSco25CflxG9SaC8gaQs5hWChRh0yL--_1ApuZTRwKxidmoHHuebiGMO0wpmic5fQ75BcN49rHn5s6KKMGN0wYCyGSNch1uMfkKfQc1zDLdFOg_nalb-A5yAV9kFf-cMglFZaZUQUl7MCjaGCThlDeRwP7uX5JlVu4SvHuchufr08fL0S3Xx9fPZ6clFNYq27aq60UKbthfaigYZH0dmdEtpWaq-HqXtZdcYQ7kyVlvaGqGZHEVnNdbGWi0Oybt9bjn324IpD5NLI-52ymNY0sDrVkjJZFsX-vYfug1L9OW6gTe05k3f921R7_dqjCGliHaYo5tUXAdGh_sSh1Li8FBisW8eExc9ofkr_7RWwPEe3Lkdrv9PGs7Or_aRvwHMY6o5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2605269997</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval in Japan: A nationwide database study from 2016 to 2018</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Yokoyama, Minato ; Ishioka, Junichiro ; Toba, Mikayo ; Fukushima, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Hajime ; Yoshida, Soichiro ; Matsuoka, Yoh ; Ai, Masumi ; Fushimi, Kiyohide ; Fujii, Yasuhisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Yokoyama, Minato ; Ishioka, Junichiro ; Toba, Mikayo ; Fukushima, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Hajime ; Yoshida, Soichiro ; Matsuoka, Yoh ; Ai, Masumi ; Fushimi, Kiyohide ; Fujii, Yasuhisa</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To evaluate the trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval for this type of procedure in April 2016.
Methods
This nationwide retrospective study included 3722 received robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases carried out from April 2016 to March 2018 in 124 participating institutions. The institutions were divided into lower‐ and higher‐volume institutions according to the median of 19 robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases during the study period. Surgical outcomes between 616 cases from lower‐volume institutions and 3106 cases from higher‐volume institutions were compared using propensity score matching.
Results
During the study period, both the number of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy surgeries and the number of institutions in which the surgery was carried out steadily increased. Overall, the median anesthesia time was 217 min, the median postoperative length of stay was 9 days, and the proportion of blood transfusions, complications and readmissions were 0.8%, 5.1% and 1.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences in anesthesia time, incidence of blood transfusions, and complication rates between the lower‐volume and higher‐volume institutions. However, a slightly, but significantly, longer postoperative length of stay and a lower incidence of readmission were observed in lower‐volume institutions both before and after propensity score matching.
Conclusions
Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy has become widespread during the initial 2‐year period after government approval with an acceptable safety profile, regardless of the institutional caseloads. This technique has become a standard of care for stage 1 renal cancer patients in Japan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0919-8172</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1442-2042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-2042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iju.14698</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34528301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Blood Transfusion ; Blood transfusions ; diagnosis‐procedure combination ; Government ; Humans ; Japan ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Length of stay ; nationwide database study ; Nephrectomy ; Nephrectomy - adverse effects ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; renal cancer ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Robotics ; Robots ; robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy ; Safety ; Surgery ; surgical outcome ; Treatment Outcome ; Trends</subject><ispartof>International journal of urology, 2021-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1268-1272</ispartof><rights>2021 The Japanese Urological Association</rights><rights>2021 The Japanese Urological Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-56b3bd793bf36e12cc1db700377a95c4f9486dd02adfbf07d3b14c38fbe5dffb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-56b3bd793bf36e12cc1db700377a95c4f9486dd02adfbf07d3b14c38fbe5dffb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34528301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yokoyama, Minato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishioka, Junichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toba, Mikayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukushima, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Hajime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Soichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuoka, Yoh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ai, Masumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fushimi, Kiyohide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Yasuhisa</creatorcontrib><title>Trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval in Japan: A nationwide database study from 2016 to 2018</title><title>International journal of urology</title><addtitle>Int J Urol</addtitle><description>Objectives
To evaluate the trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval for this type of procedure in April 2016.
Methods
This nationwide retrospective study included 3722 received robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases carried out from April 2016 to March 2018 in 124 participating institutions. The institutions were divided into lower‐ and higher‐volume institutions according to the median of 19 robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases during the study period. Surgical outcomes between 616 cases from lower‐volume institutions and 3106 cases from higher‐volume institutions were compared using propensity score matching.
Results
During the study period, both the number of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy surgeries and the number of institutions in which the surgery was carried out steadily increased. Overall, the median anesthesia time was 217 min, the median postoperative length of stay was 9 days, and the proportion of blood transfusions, complications and readmissions were 0.8%, 5.1% and 1.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences in anesthesia time, incidence of blood transfusions, and complication rates between the lower‐volume and higher‐volume institutions. However, a slightly, but significantly, longer postoperative length of stay and a lower incidence of readmission were observed in lower‐volume institutions both before and after propensity score matching.
Conclusions
Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy has become widespread during the initial 2‐year period after government approval with an acceptable safety profile, regardless of the institutional caseloads. This technique has become a standard of care for stage 1 renal cancer patients in Japan.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Blood Transfusion</subject><subject>Blood transfusions</subject><subject>diagnosis‐procedure combination</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>nationwide database study</subject><subject>Nephrectomy</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>renal cancer</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>surgical outcome</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0919-8172</issn><issn>1442-2042</issn><issn>1442-2042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10btuFTEQBmALgcghUPACaCQaKDbxbW90UcQlUSSapF7Z63Hio7P2YnsTbccj8CQ8FE-CkxMokHAzxXz-NdJPyGtGj1h5x267HDHZ9N0TsmFS8opTyZ-SDe1ZX3Ws5QfkRUpbSpngrHtODoSseSco25CflxG9SaC8gaQs5hWChRh0yL--_1ApuZTRwKxidmoHHuebiGMO0wpmic5fQ75BcN49rHn5s6KKMGN0wYCyGSNch1uMfkKfQc1zDLdFOg_nalb-A5yAV9kFf-cMglFZaZUQUl7MCjaGCThlDeRwP7uX5JlVu4SvHuchufr08fL0S3Xx9fPZ6clFNYq27aq60UKbthfaigYZH0dmdEtpWaq-HqXtZdcYQ7kyVlvaGqGZHEVnNdbGWi0Oybt9bjn324IpD5NLI-52ymNY0sDrVkjJZFsX-vYfug1L9OW6gTe05k3f921R7_dqjCGliHaYo5tUXAdGh_sSh1Li8FBisW8eExc9ofkr_7RWwPEe3Lkdrv9PGs7Or_aRvwHMY6o5</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Yokoyama, Minato</creator><creator>Ishioka, Junichiro</creator><creator>Toba, Mikayo</creator><creator>Fukushima, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Tanaka, Hajime</creator><creator>Yoshida, Soichiro</creator><creator>Matsuoka, Yoh</creator><creator>Ai, Masumi</creator><creator>Fushimi, Kiyohide</creator><creator>Fujii, Yasuhisa</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval in Japan: A nationwide database study from 2016 to 2018</title><author>Yokoyama, Minato ; Ishioka, Junichiro ; Toba, Mikayo ; Fukushima, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Hajime ; Yoshida, Soichiro ; Matsuoka, Yoh ; Ai, Masumi ; Fushimi, Kiyohide ; Fujii, Yasuhisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-56b3bd793bf36e12cc1db700377a95c4f9486dd02adfbf07d3b14c38fbe5dffb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Blood Transfusion</topic><topic>Blood transfusions</topic><topic>diagnosis‐procedure combination</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>nationwide database study</topic><topic>Nephrectomy</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>renal cancer</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>surgical outcome</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yokoyama, Minato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishioka, Junichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toba, Mikayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukushima, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Hajime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Soichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuoka, Yoh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ai, Masumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fushimi, Kiyohide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Yasuhisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yokoyama, Minato</au><au>Ishioka, Junichiro</au><au>Toba, Mikayo</au><au>Fukushima, Hiroshi</au><au>Tanaka, Hajime</au><au>Yoshida, Soichiro</au><au>Matsuoka, Yoh</au><au>Ai, Masumi</au><au>Fushimi, Kiyohide</au><au>Fujii, Yasuhisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval in Japan: A nationwide database study from 2016 to 2018</atitle><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Urol</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1268</spage><epage>1272</epage><pages>1268-1272</pages><issn>0919-8172</issn><issn>1442-2042</issn><eissn>1442-2042</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To evaluate the trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval for this type of procedure in April 2016.
Methods
This nationwide retrospective study included 3722 received robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases carried out from April 2016 to March 2018 in 124 participating institutions. The institutions were divided into lower‐ and higher‐volume institutions according to the median of 19 robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy cases during the study period. Surgical outcomes between 616 cases from lower‐volume institutions and 3106 cases from higher‐volume institutions were compared using propensity score matching.
Results
During the study period, both the number of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy surgeries and the number of institutions in which the surgery was carried out steadily increased. Overall, the median anesthesia time was 217 min, the median postoperative length of stay was 9 days, and the proportion of blood transfusions, complications and readmissions were 0.8%, 5.1% and 1.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences in anesthesia time, incidence of blood transfusions, and complication rates between the lower‐volume and higher‐volume institutions. However, a slightly, but significantly, longer postoperative length of stay and a lower incidence of readmission were observed in lower‐volume institutions both before and after propensity score matching.
Conclusions
Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy has become widespread during the initial 2‐year period after government approval with an acceptable safety profile, regardless of the institutional caseloads. This technique has become a standard of care for stage 1 renal cancer patients in Japan.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34528301</pmid><doi>10.1111/iju.14698</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0919-8172 |
ispartof | International journal of urology, 2021-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1268-1272 |
issn | 0919-8172 1442-2042 1442-2042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2573441475 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Anesthesia Blood Transfusion Blood transfusions diagnosis‐procedure combination Government Humans Japan Kidney Neoplasms - surgery Length of stay nationwide database study Nephrectomy Nephrectomy - adverse effects Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - etiology renal cancer Retrospective Studies Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Robotics Robots robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy Safety Surgery surgical outcome Treatment Outcome Trends |
title | Trends and safety of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2‐year period after government approval in Japan: A nationwide database study from 2016 to 2018 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A28%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20and%20safety%20of%20robot%E2%80%90assisted%20partial%20nephrectomy%20during%20the%20initial%202%E2%80%90year%20period%20after%20government%20approval%20in%20Japan:%20A%20nationwide%20database%20study%20from%202016%20to%202018&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Yokoyama,%20Minato&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1268&rft.epage=1272&rft.pages=1268-1272&rft.issn=0919-8172&rft.eissn=1442-2042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iju.14698&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2605269997%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-56b3bd793bf36e12cc1db700377a95c4f9486dd02adfbf07d3b14c38fbe5dffb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2605269997&rft_id=info:pmid/34528301&rfr_iscdi=true |