How Accurate Is ICD-10 Coding for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?

• Published in: The Journal of arthroplasty 2021-12, Vol.36 (12), p.3950-3958
• Main Authors: Roof, Mackenzie A., Lygrisse, Katherine, Keitel, Lauren, Siddiqi, Ahmed, Emara, Ahmed, Piuzzi, Nicolas S., Chen, Antonia F., Callaghan, John, Schwarzkopf, Ran, Bedard, Nicholas A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; billing; coding; Humans; ICD-10; ICD-10-PCS; International Classification of Diseases; Patella; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; revision total knee arthroplasty
• ISSN: 0883-5403; 1532-8406
• DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.08.021

The International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) came into effect in October 2015. The new procedural codes (ICD-10-PCS) were designed to specify granular aspects of the procedure, including laterality and revised components. This specificity could improve data collection in institutional databases, large registries, and administrative claims data. Given these possible applications, this study’s purpose was to assess the accuracy of ICD-10-PCS coding for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). This multicenter retrospective analysis utilized the rTKA databases at four academic medical centers for all aseptic rTKAs between October 1, 2015 and July 3, 2019. Operative reports were reviewed to determine laterality and revised components (tibial, femoral, liner, and patellar component), which were then compared with the ICD-10-PCS codes associated with the billing records. Proper coding required both component removal and replacement codes. The correct series of removal and replacement codes was determined using the American Joint Replacement Registry’s guidelines. In total, 1906 rTKAs were examined, and 98.0% had at least one proper ICD-10-PCS code, indicating an rTKA had occurred. Coding for components replaced was correct in 76.3% of cases. When examining both removal and replacement codes, accuracy dropped to 57.0%. Nearly 25% of rTKA procedures were incorrectly coded for replaced components, and over 40% were incorrectly coded for removed and replaced components. ICD-10-PCS codes can accurately identify that an rTKA has occurred; however, the inaccuracy in identifying which specific components were revised should prompt further evaluation of the coding process before utilizing ICD-10-PCS codes to report granular rTKA data. III, retrospective observational analysis.