Loading…

Effectiveness and safety of eribulin for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world population

Background Eribulin’s clinical benefit remains unclear; so, studies analyzing its effectiveness in routine clinical practice are interesting. Patients and methods This is a multicenter, retrospective study including patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative metastatic breast ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of oncology pharmacy practice 2022-10, Vol.28 (7), p.1573-1582
Main Authors: Díaz-Acedo, Rocío, Artacho Criado, Silvia, Jiménez Galán, Rocío, Gutiérrez Pizarraya, Antonio, Galván Banqueri, Mercedes, Rodríguez-de-la-Borbolla-Artacho, María, Marcos Rodríguez, José Antonio, Márquez Saavedra, Esther
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-1672d710e5366ad6edadeeff6095caa441a20d7e5ef324102748f2e1eb2b6ea53
container_end_page 1582
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1573
container_title Journal of oncology pharmacy practice
container_volume 28
creator Díaz-Acedo, Rocío
Artacho Criado, Silvia
Jiménez Galán, Rocío
Gutiérrez Pizarraya, Antonio
Galván Banqueri, Mercedes
Rodríguez-de-la-Borbolla-Artacho, María
Marcos Rodríguez, José Antonio
Márquez Saavedra, Esther
description Background Eribulin’s clinical benefit remains unclear; so, studies analyzing its effectiveness in routine clinical practice are interesting. Patients and methods This is a multicenter, retrospective study including patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative metastatic breast cancer which assesses effectiveness and safety of eribulin. Results A total of 140 women were included, with a median age of 57 years. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 8.8 (95% confidence interval: 6.1–11.4) and 2.8 months (95% confidence interval: 2.5–3.1), respectively. For patients with hormonal receptor expression, a significantly longer progression-free survival was observed: 3.4 (95%confidence interval: 2.3–4.5) versus triple negative: 2.0 (95%confidence interval: 1.7–2.3) months, p = 0.003. Also, those who had received capecitabine prior to eribulin had a higher median overall survival than those who had not received it (9.5 months, 95% confidence interval: 6.6–12.5 vs. 4.8 months, 95% confidence interval: 3.4–6.2; p = 0.001). When only triple-negative patients were included, median overall survival was 6.5 (95% confidence interval: 0.1–16.2) for those who had received previous capecitabine versus 4.3 (95% confidence interval: 2.8–5.8) months for patients who had not received it; p =0.006. The safety profile of eribulin was adequate. Conclusion Effectiveness of eribulin in a real-life human epidermal growth factor receptor-2--negative population is lower than that observed in clinical trials. Its benefit seems to be higher in patients with hormonal receptor expression and patients who had received capecitabine prior to eribulin. The safety profile of eribulin is adequate.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/10781552211038241
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2576650256</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10781552211038241</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2576650256</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-1672d710e5366ad6edadeeff6095caa441a20d7e5ef324102748f2e1eb2b6ea53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1KxDAUhYsoOP48gLuAGzcdk7RJOksZxh8YcKPgrtymNzMd2qQmrcO8hM9shhEExdU9cL9zuJybJFeMThlT6pZRVTAhOGeMZgXP2VEyYblSKZ3xt-Oo4z7dA6fJWQgbSmmheDFJPhfGoB6aD7QYAgFbkwAGhx1xhqBvqrFtLDHOk_XYgSXYNzX6Dlqy8m47rIkBPcStR439XnBicQX7QNLhAGGIWpPKY5REg9XoSUyE6IA23Trf1qR3_dhGztmL5MRAG_Dye54nr_eLl_ljunx-eJrfLVPNZ2pImVS8VoyiyKSEWmINNaIxks6EBshzBpzWCgWaLHZBucoLw5FhxSuJILLz5OaQ23v3PmIYyq4JGtsWLLoxlFwoKQXlQkb0-he6caO38bqSq9i9UJTnkWIHSnsXgkdT9r7pwO9KRsv9h8o_H4qe6cETYIU_qf8bvgAUCpLG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2711757024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness and safety of eribulin for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world population</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Díaz-Acedo, Rocío ; Artacho Criado, Silvia ; Jiménez Galán, Rocío ; Gutiérrez Pizarraya, Antonio ; Galván Banqueri, Mercedes ; Rodríguez-de-la-Borbolla-Artacho, María ; Marcos Rodríguez, José Antonio ; Márquez Saavedra, Esther</creator><creatorcontrib>Díaz-Acedo, Rocío ; Artacho Criado, Silvia ; Jiménez Galán, Rocío ; Gutiérrez Pizarraya, Antonio ; Galván Banqueri, Mercedes ; Rodríguez-de-la-Borbolla-Artacho, María ; Marcos Rodríguez, José Antonio ; Márquez Saavedra, Esther</creatorcontrib><description>Background Eribulin’s clinical benefit remains unclear; so, studies analyzing its effectiveness in routine clinical practice are interesting. Patients and methods This is a multicenter, retrospective study including patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative metastatic breast cancer which assesses effectiveness and safety of eribulin. Results A total of 140 women were included, with a median age of 57 years. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 8.8 (95% confidence interval: 6.1–11.4) and 2.8 months (95% confidence interval: 2.5–3.1), respectively. For patients with hormonal receptor expression, a significantly longer progression-free survival was observed: 3.4 (95%confidence interval: 2.3–4.5) versus triple negative: 2.0 (95%confidence interval: 1.7–2.3) months, p = 0.003. Also, those who had received capecitabine prior to eribulin had a higher median overall survival than those who had not received it (9.5 months, 95% confidence interval: 6.6–12.5 vs. 4.8 months, 95% confidence interval: 3.4–6.2; p = 0.001). When only triple-negative patients were included, median overall survival was 6.5 (95% confidence interval: 0.1–16.2) for those who had received previous capecitabine versus 4.3 (95% confidence interval: 2.8–5.8) months for patients who had not received it; p =0.006. The safety profile of eribulin was adequate. Conclusion Effectiveness of eribulin in a real-life human epidermal growth factor receptor-2--negative population is lower than that observed in clinical trials. Its benefit seems to be higher in patients with hormonal receptor expression and patients who had received capecitabine prior to eribulin. The safety profile of eribulin is adequate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-1552</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-092X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10781552211038241</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; Clinical trials ; Confidence intervals ; Epidermal growth factor ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Patients ; Safety ; Survival</subject><ispartof>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice, 2022-10, Vol.28 (7), p.1573-1582</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-1672d710e5366ad6edadeeff6095caa441a20d7e5ef324102748f2e1eb2b6ea53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7186-0572</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,79110</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Díaz-Acedo, Rocío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artacho Criado, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez Galán, Rocío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez Pizarraya, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galván Banqueri, Mercedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-de-la-Borbolla-Artacho, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcos Rodríguez, José Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Márquez Saavedra, Esther</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness and safety of eribulin for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world population</title><title>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice</title><addtitle>J Oncol Pharm Pract</addtitle><description>Background Eribulin’s clinical benefit remains unclear; so, studies analyzing its effectiveness in routine clinical practice are interesting. Patients and methods This is a multicenter, retrospective study including patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative metastatic breast cancer which assesses effectiveness and safety of eribulin. Results A total of 140 women were included, with a median age of 57 years. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 8.8 (95% confidence interval: 6.1–11.4) and 2.8 months (95% confidence interval: 2.5–3.1), respectively. For patients with hormonal receptor expression, a significantly longer progression-free survival was observed: 3.4 (95%confidence interval: 2.3–4.5) versus triple negative: 2.0 (95%confidence interval: 1.7–2.3) months, p = 0.003. Also, those who had received capecitabine prior to eribulin had a higher median overall survival than those who had not received it (9.5 months, 95% confidence interval: 6.6–12.5 vs. 4.8 months, 95% confidence interval: 3.4–6.2; p = 0.001). When only triple-negative patients were included, median overall survival was 6.5 (95% confidence interval: 0.1–16.2) for those who had received previous capecitabine versus 4.3 (95% confidence interval: 2.8–5.8) months for patients who had not received it; p =0.006. The safety profile of eribulin was adequate. Conclusion Effectiveness of eribulin in a real-life human epidermal growth factor receptor-2--negative population is lower than that observed in clinical trials. Its benefit seems to be higher in patients with hormonal receptor expression and patients who had received capecitabine prior to eribulin. The safety profile of eribulin is adequate.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Epidermal growth factor</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>1078-1552</issn><issn>1477-092X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1KxDAUhYsoOP48gLuAGzcdk7RJOksZxh8YcKPgrtymNzMd2qQmrcO8hM9shhEExdU9cL9zuJybJFeMThlT6pZRVTAhOGeMZgXP2VEyYblSKZ3xt-Oo4z7dA6fJWQgbSmmheDFJPhfGoB6aD7QYAgFbkwAGhx1xhqBvqrFtLDHOk_XYgSXYNzX6Dlqy8m47rIkBPcStR439XnBicQX7QNLhAGGIWpPKY5REg9XoSUyE6IA23Trf1qR3_dhGztmL5MRAG_Dye54nr_eLl_ljunx-eJrfLVPNZ2pImVS8VoyiyKSEWmINNaIxks6EBshzBpzWCgWaLHZBucoLw5FhxSuJILLz5OaQ23v3PmIYyq4JGtsWLLoxlFwoKQXlQkb0-he6caO38bqSq9i9UJTnkWIHSnsXgkdT9r7pwO9KRsv9h8o_H4qe6cETYIU_qf8bvgAUCpLG</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Díaz-Acedo, Rocío</creator><creator>Artacho Criado, Silvia</creator><creator>Jiménez Galán, Rocío</creator><creator>Gutiérrez Pizarraya, Antonio</creator><creator>Galván Banqueri, Mercedes</creator><creator>Rodríguez-de-la-Borbolla-Artacho, María</creator><creator>Marcos Rodríguez, José Antonio</creator><creator>Márquez Saavedra, Esther</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7186-0572</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Effectiveness and safety of eribulin for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world population</title><author>Díaz-Acedo, Rocío ; Artacho Criado, Silvia ; Jiménez Galán, Rocío ; Gutiérrez Pizarraya, Antonio ; Galván Banqueri, Mercedes ; Rodríguez-de-la-Borbolla-Artacho, María ; Marcos Rodríguez, José Antonio ; Márquez Saavedra, Esther</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-1672d710e5366ad6edadeeff6095caa441a20d7e5ef324102748f2e1eb2b6ea53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Epidermal growth factor</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Díaz-Acedo, Rocío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artacho Criado, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez Galán, Rocío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez Pizarraya, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galván Banqueri, Mercedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-de-la-Borbolla-Artacho, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcos Rodríguez, José Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Márquez Saavedra, Esther</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Díaz-Acedo, Rocío</au><au>Artacho Criado, Silvia</au><au>Jiménez Galán, Rocío</au><au>Gutiérrez Pizarraya, Antonio</au><au>Galván Banqueri, Mercedes</au><au>Rodríguez-de-la-Borbolla-Artacho, María</au><au>Marcos Rodríguez, José Antonio</au><au>Márquez Saavedra, Esther</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness and safety of eribulin for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world population</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Oncol Pharm Pract</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1573</spage><epage>1582</epage><pages>1573-1582</pages><issn>1078-1552</issn><eissn>1477-092X</eissn><abstract>Background Eribulin’s clinical benefit remains unclear; so, studies analyzing its effectiveness in routine clinical practice are interesting. Patients and methods This is a multicenter, retrospective study including patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative metastatic breast cancer which assesses effectiveness and safety of eribulin. Results A total of 140 women were included, with a median age of 57 years. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 8.8 (95% confidence interval: 6.1–11.4) and 2.8 months (95% confidence interval: 2.5–3.1), respectively. For patients with hormonal receptor expression, a significantly longer progression-free survival was observed: 3.4 (95%confidence interval: 2.3–4.5) versus triple negative: 2.0 (95%confidence interval: 1.7–2.3) months, p = 0.003. Also, those who had received capecitabine prior to eribulin had a higher median overall survival than those who had not received it (9.5 months, 95% confidence interval: 6.6–12.5 vs. 4.8 months, 95% confidence interval: 3.4–6.2; p = 0.001). When only triple-negative patients were included, median overall survival was 6.5 (95% confidence interval: 0.1–16.2) for those who had received previous capecitabine versus 4.3 (95% confidence interval: 2.8–5.8) months for patients who had not received it; p =0.006. The safety profile of eribulin was adequate. Conclusion Effectiveness of eribulin in a real-life human epidermal growth factor receptor-2--negative population is lower than that observed in clinical trials. Its benefit seems to be higher in patients with hormonal receptor expression and patients who had received capecitabine prior to eribulin. The safety profile of eribulin is adequate.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/10781552211038241</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7186-0572</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-1552
ispartof Journal of oncology pharmacy practice, 2022-10, Vol.28 (7), p.1573-1582
issn 1078-1552
1477-092X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2576650256
source SAGE
subjects Breast cancer
Clinical trials
Confidence intervals
Epidermal growth factor
Metastases
Metastasis
Patients
Safety
Survival
title Effectiveness and safety of eribulin for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world population
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A37%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20and%20safety%20of%20eribulin%20for%20human%20epidermal%20growth%20factor%20receptor%202%20negative%20metastatic%20breast%20cancer%20in%20a%20real-world%20population&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oncology%20pharmacy%20practice&rft.au=D%C3%ADaz-Acedo,%20Roc%C3%ADo&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1573&rft.epage=1582&rft.pages=1573-1582&rft.issn=1078-1552&rft.eissn=1477-092X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10781552211038241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2576650256%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-1672d710e5366ad6edadeeff6095caa441a20d7e5ef324102748f2e1eb2b6ea53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2711757024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10781552211038241&rfr_iscdi=true