Global, regional, and national survey on the burden and quality of care of pancreatic cancer: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 1990–2017

• Published in: Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] 2021-12, Vol.21 (8), p.1443-1450
• Main Authors: Aryannejad, Armin, Tabary, Mohammadreza, Ebrahimi, Narges, Mohammadi, Esmaeil, Fattahi, Nima, Roshani, Shahin, Masinaei, Masoud, Naderimagham, Shohreh, Azadnajafabad, Sina, Jamshidi, Kosar, Fateh, Sahar Mohammadi, Moghimi, Mana, Kompani, Farzad, Rezaei, Negar, Farzadfar, Farshad
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age; Age groups; Aged; Australia; Disease; Female; Gender; Global Burden of Disease; Global Health; Health services utilization; Healthcare quality; Humans; Japan - epidemiology; Male; Mortality; Pancreatic cancer; Pancreatic Neoplasms - epidemiology; Pancreatic Neoplasms - therapy; Patients; Principle component analysis; Public health; Quality of care; Quality of Health Care; Sociodemographics; Variables
• ISSN: 1424-3903; 1424-3911
• DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.09.002

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is among the most lethal cancers worldwide, and the quality of care provided to PC patients is a vital public health concern. We aimed to investigate the quality of care of PC globally and to report its current burden. The Quality of Care Index (QCI) was achieved by performing a Principal Component Analysis utilizing the results of the GBD study 2017. The QCI was defined as a range between 0 and 100, in which higher QCIs show higher quality of care. Possible gender- and age-related inequalities in terms of QCI were explored based on WHO world regions and the sociodemographic index (SDI). In 2017, Japan had the highest QCI among all countries (QCI = 99/100), followed by Australia (QCI = 83/100) and the United States (QCI = 76/100). In Japan and Australia, males and females had almost the same QCIs in 2017, while in the United States, females had lower QCIs than males. In contrast to these high-QCI nations, African countries had the lowest QCIs in 2017. Besides, QCI increased by SDI, and high-SDI regions had the highest QCIs. Regarding patients’ age, elderly cases had higher QCIs than younger patients globally and in high-SDI regions. This study provides clinicians and health authorities with a wider vision around the quality of care of PC worldwide and highlights the existing disparities. This could help them investigate possible effective strategies to improve the quality of care in regions with lower QCIs and higher gender- and age-related inequities.