Standardized Classification of Lumbar Spine Degeneration on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reduces Intra- and Inter-subspecialty Variability

• Published in: Current problems in diagnostic radiology 2022-07, Vol.51 (4), p.491-496
• Main Authors: Miskin, Nityanand, Gaviola, Glenn C., Huang, Raymond Y., Kim, Christine J., Lee, Thomas C., Small, Kirstin M., Wieschhoff, Ged G., Mandell, Jacob C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Constriction, Pathologic - pathology; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Observer Variation; Reproducibility of Results
• ISSN: 0363-0188; 1535-6302
• DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2021.08.001

To determine the efficacy of standardized definitions of degenerative change in reducing variability in interpretation of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging within and between groups of subspecialty-trained neuroradiologists (NR) and musculoskeletal radiologists (MSK). Six radiologists, three from both NR and MSK groups were trained on a standardized classification system of degenerative change. After an 11-month washout period, they independently re-interpreted fifty exams at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels. Responses were converted to a six-point ordinal scale for the assessment of neural foraminal stenosis and spinal canal stenosis (SCS), three-point scale for lateral recess stenosis, and four-point scale for facet osteoarthritis (FO). Intra-subspecialty and inter-subspecialty analysis was performed using the weighted Cohen's kappa with a binary matrix of all reader pairs. Inter-subspecialty agreement improved from k=0.527 (moderate) to k=0.602 (substantial) for neural foraminal stenosis, from k=0.540 (moderate) to k=0.652 (substantial) for SCS, from k=0.0818 (slight) to k=0.337 (fair) for lateral recess stenosis, and from k=0.176 (slight) to k=0.495 (moderate) for FO. The NR group demonstrated improved intra-subspecialty agreement for the assessment of SCS, from k=0.368 (fair) to k=0.638 (substantial). The MSK group demonstrated improved intra-subspecialty agreement for the assessment of FO, from k=0.134 (slight) to k=0.413 (moderate). Intra-subspecialty agreement was similar for other parameters before and after training. As result of the standardized definitions training, the NR and MSK groups each improved in one of the four parameters, while inter-subspecialty variability improved in all four parameters. These definitions may be useful in clinical practice across radiology subspecialties.