Are Care-Recipient Outcomes Attributable to Improved Caregiver Well-Being? A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial of Benefit-Finding Intervention

• Published in: The American journal of geriatric psychiatry 2022-08, Vol.30 (8), p.903-913
• Main Authors: Cheng, Sheung-Tak, Chan, Wai Chi, Lam, Linda C.W.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: activities of daily living; Alzheimer's disease; benefit-finding; caregiving; neuropsychiatric symptoms
• ISSN: 1064-7481; 1545-7214
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.08.009

•What is the primary question addressed by this study? This study examines the effects of the benefit-finding intervention on care-recipient outcomes via reduced caregiver depression.•What is the main finding of this study? Compared with simplified psychoeducation as control, benefit-finding participants reported fewer neuropsychiatric symptoms in their care-recipients at 4-month follow-up, and this effect was mediated by improved caregiver depression at postintervention.•What is the meaning of the finding? Less depressed caregivers may be able to provide better care and more positive interactions which lead to reduced NPS in care-recipients, providing further support for the value of caregiver interventions in general, and the benefit-finding intervention in particular. The benefit-finding therapeutic (BFT) intervention, training cognitive reappraisal, and alternative thinking to construct positive aspects of caregiving have been found to reduce caregiver depression. This study examines BFT effects on care-recipient outcomes via reduced caregiver depression. Cluster-randomized double-blind controlled trial. Social centers and clinics. A total of 129 caregivers. Inclusion criteria were 1) primary caregiver aged 18+, 2) without cognitive impairment, 3) providing ≥14 care hours weekly to a relative with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease, and 4) scoring ≥3 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Exclusion criterion was care-recipient having Parkinsonism or other forms of dementia. BFT was evaluated against two forms of psychoeducation—standard and simplified (lectures only) psychoeducation. Care-recipient outcomes included neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), functional impairment, and global dementia severity (Clinical Dementia Rating sum-of-box), measured at baseline, postintervention, and 4- and 10-month follow up. Mixed-effects regressions showed a significant effect on NPS when compared with simplified psychoeducation only, with BFT participants reporting fewer NPS (especially mood symptoms) at 4-month follow-up (d = -0.52). Furthermore, longitudinal path analysis (using changes in caregiver depression scores at postintervention to predict changes in care-recipient NPS at follow-up) found that this effect was mediated by improved caregiver depression. No other intervention or mediation effects were found or were consistent across analyses. Less depressed caregivers may be able to provide better care and more positive interactions, leading to reduced NPS