Loading…
Automated Brain Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Interpretation Pearls and Pitfalls
Recent advancements in computed tomography technology, including improved brain coverage and automated processing of the perfusion data, have reinforced the use of perfusion computed tomography imaging in the routine evaluation of patients with acute ischemic stroke. The DAWN (Diffusion Weighted Ima...
Saved in:
Published in: | Stroke (1970) 2021-11, Vol.52 (11), p.3728-3738 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-aecad083bf10cb0f0ccab07300d825e4c44664fb5608559653920211a7e64dec3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-aecad083bf10cb0f0ccab07300d825e4c44664fb5608559653920211a7e64dec3 |
container_end_page | 3738 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3728 |
container_title | Stroke (1970) |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Nicolas-Jilwan, Manal Wintermark, Max |
description | Recent advancements in computed tomography technology, including improved brain coverage and automated processing of the perfusion data, have reinforced the use of perfusion computed tomography imaging in the routine evaluation of patients with acute ischemic stroke. The DAWN (Diffusion Weighted Imaging or Computerized Tomography Perfusion Assessment With Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention) and DEFUSE 3 (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke 3) trials have established the benefit of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion up to 24 hours of last seen normal, using perfusion imaging-based patient selection. The compelling data has prompted stroke centers to increasingly introduce automated perfusion computed tomography imaging in the routine evaluation of patients with acute ischemic stroke. We present a comprehensive overview of the acquisition and interpretation of automated perfusion imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke with a special emphasis on the interpretation pearls, pitfalls, and stroke mimicking conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035049 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2576916417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2576916417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-aecad083bf10cb0f0ccab07300d825e4c44664fb5608559653920211a7e64dec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkFtP3DAQha2qVVmg_6Cq_NiXLONrEt4CorAqEisur1iOM2FTctnajhD_HsNS-jA6mtE5M6OPkO8MloxpdnRze331-6y6qJaMsyUIBbL8RBZMcZlJzYvPZAEgyozLstwj-yH8AQAuCvWV7AmptGK5XJD7ao7TYCM29MTbbqRr9O0cummkq8E-dOMDTcPKzRHpKrgNDp2jN9FPj3hMV2NEv_UYbXwNrNH6PlA7NnTdxdb2fTgkX5IG_PauB-Tu19nt6UV2eXW-Oq0uMyfKgmcWnW2gEHXLwNXQgnO2hlwANAVXKJ2UWsu2VhoKpUqtRMmBM2Zz1LJBJw7Iz93erZ_-zhiiGbrgsO_tiNMcDFe5LpmWLE9WubM6P4XgsTVb3w3WPxsG5pWs-SBrElmzI5tiP94vzPWAzUfoH8r_e5-mPmEJj_38hN5s0PZxYxJ7yHUO2dvfLHVZKsXFCyOwhGk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576916417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated Brain Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Interpretation Pearls and Pitfalls</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nicolas-Jilwan, Manal ; Wintermark, Max</creator><creatorcontrib>Nicolas-Jilwan, Manal ; Wintermark, Max</creatorcontrib><description>Recent advancements in computed tomography technology, including improved brain coverage and automated processing of the perfusion data, have reinforced the use of perfusion computed tomography imaging in the routine evaluation of patients with acute ischemic stroke. The DAWN (Diffusion Weighted Imaging or Computerized Tomography Perfusion Assessment With Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention) and DEFUSE 3 (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke 3) trials have established the benefit of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion up to 24 hours of last seen normal, using perfusion imaging-based patient selection. The compelling data has prompted stroke centers to increasingly introduce automated perfusion computed tomography imaging in the routine evaluation of patients with acute ischemic stroke. We present a comprehensive overview of the acquisition and interpretation of automated perfusion imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke with a special emphasis on the interpretation pearls, pitfalls, and stroke mimicking conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-2499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035049</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34565174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Humans ; Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging ; Neuroimaging - methods ; Perfusion Imaging - methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Stroke (1970), 2021-11, Vol.52 (11), p.3728-3738</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-aecad083bf10cb0f0ccab07300d825e4c44664fb5608559653920211a7e64dec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-aecad083bf10cb0f0ccab07300d825e4c44664fb5608559653920211a7e64dec3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6726-3951 ; 0000-0002-5701-5997</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565174$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nicolas-Jilwan, Manal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintermark, Max</creatorcontrib><title>Automated Brain Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Interpretation Pearls and Pitfalls</title><title>Stroke (1970)</title><addtitle>Stroke</addtitle><description>Recent advancements in computed tomography technology, including improved brain coverage and automated processing of the perfusion data, have reinforced the use of perfusion computed tomography imaging in the routine evaluation of patients with acute ischemic stroke. The DAWN (Diffusion Weighted Imaging or Computerized Tomography Perfusion Assessment With Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention) and DEFUSE 3 (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke 3) trials have established the benefit of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion up to 24 hours of last seen normal, using perfusion imaging-based patient selection. The compelling data has prompted stroke centers to increasingly introduce automated perfusion computed tomography imaging in the routine evaluation of patients with acute ischemic stroke. We present a comprehensive overview of the acquisition and interpretation of automated perfusion imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke with a special emphasis on the interpretation pearls, pitfalls, and stroke mimicking conditions.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neuroimaging - methods</subject><subject>Perfusion Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0039-2499</issn><issn>1524-4628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkFtP3DAQha2qVVmg_6Cq_NiXLONrEt4CorAqEisur1iOM2FTctnajhD_HsNS-jA6mtE5M6OPkO8MloxpdnRze331-6y6qJaMsyUIBbL8RBZMcZlJzYvPZAEgyozLstwj-yH8AQAuCvWV7AmptGK5XJD7ao7TYCM29MTbbqRr9O0cummkq8E-dOMDTcPKzRHpKrgNDp2jN9FPj3hMV2NEv_UYbXwNrNH6PlA7NnTdxdb2fTgkX5IG_PauB-Tu19nt6UV2eXW-Oq0uMyfKgmcWnW2gEHXLwNXQgnO2hlwANAVXKJ2UWsu2VhoKpUqtRMmBM2Zz1LJBJw7Iz93erZ_-zhiiGbrgsO_tiNMcDFe5LpmWLE9WubM6P4XgsTVb3w3WPxsG5pWs-SBrElmzI5tiP94vzPWAzUfoH8r_e5-mPmEJj_38hN5s0PZxYxJ7yHUO2dvfLHVZKsXFCyOwhGk</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Nicolas-Jilwan, Manal</creator><creator>Wintermark, Max</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-3951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5701-5997</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Automated Brain Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Interpretation Pearls and Pitfalls</title><author>Nicolas-Jilwan, Manal ; Wintermark, Max</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-aecad083bf10cb0f0ccab07300d825e4c44664fb5608559653920211a7e64dec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neuroimaging - methods</topic><topic>Perfusion Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nicolas-Jilwan, Manal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintermark, Max</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Stroke (1970)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nicolas-Jilwan, Manal</au><au>Wintermark, Max</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated Brain Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Interpretation Pearls and Pitfalls</atitle><jtitle>Stroke (1970)</jtitle><addtitle>Stroke</addtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3728</spage><epage>3738</epage><pages>3728-3738</pages><issn>0039-2499</issn><eissn>1524-4628</eissn><abstract>Recent advancements in computed tomography technology, including improved brain coverage and automated processing of the perfusion data, have reinforced the use of perfusion computed tomography imaging in the routine evaluation of patients with acute ischemic stroke. The DAWN (Diffusion Weighted Imaging or Computerized Tomography Perfusion Assessment With Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention) and DEFUSE 3 (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke 3) trials have established the benefit of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion up to 24 hours of last seen normal, using perfusion imaging-based patient selection. The compelling data has prompted stroke centers to increasingly introduce automated perfusion computed tomography imaging in the routine evaluation of patients with acute ischemic stroke. We present a comprehensive overview of the acquisition and interpretation of automated perfusion imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke with a special emphasis on the interpretation pearls, pitfalls, and stroke mimicking conditions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>34565174</pmid><doi>10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035049</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-3951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5701-5997</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-2499 |
ispartof | Stroke (1970), 2021-11, Vol.52 (11), p.3728-3738 |
issn | 0039-2499 1524-4628 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2576916417 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Humans Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging Neuroimaging - methods Perfusion Imaging - methods Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Automated Brain Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Interpretation Pearls and Pitfalls |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T08%3A46%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20Brain%20Perfusion%20Imaging%20in%20Acute%20Ischemic%20Stroke:%20Interpretation%20Pearls%20and%20Pitfalls&rft.jtitle=Stroke%20(1970)&rft.au=Nicolas-Jilwan,%20Manal&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3728&rft.epage=3738&rft.pages=3728-3738&rft.issn=0039-2499&rft.eissn=1524-4628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2576916417%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-aecad083bf10cb0f0ccab07300d825e4c44664fb5608559653920211a7e64dec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576916417&rft_id=info:pmid/34565174&rfr_iscdi=true |