Loading…
Precision of MRI radiomics features in the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma
Objectives To assess the precision of MRI radiomics features in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors and liver parenchyma. Methods The study population consisted of 55 patients, including 16 with untreated HCCs, who underwent two repeat contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI exams within 1 month to evalua...
Saved in:
Published in: | European radiology 2022-03, Vol.32 (3), p.2030-2040 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8cf3a6b227703de2d696cdfebd2a59a3648ea0409ba4908652f7de65debe881f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8cf3a6b227703de2d696cdfebd2a59a3648ea0409ba4908652f7de65debe881f3 |
container_end_page | 2040 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 2030 |
container_title | European radiology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Carbonell, Guillermo Kennedy, Paul Bane, Octavia Kirmani, Ammar El Homsi, Maria Stocker, Daniel Said, Daniela Mukherjee, Pritam Gevaert, Olivier Lewis, Sara Hectors, Stefanie Taouli, Bachir |
description | Objectives
To assess the precision of MRI radiomics features in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors and liver parenchyma.
Methods
The study population consisted of 55 patients, including 16 with untreated HCCs, who underwent two repeat contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI exams within 1 month to evaluate: (1) test–retest repeatability using the same MRI system (
n
= 28, 10 HCCs); (2) inter-platform reproducibility between different MRI systems (
n
= 27, 6 HCCs); (3) inter-observer reproducibility (
n
= 16, 16 HCCs). Shape and 1st- and 2nd-order radiomics features were quantified on pre-contrast T1-weighted imaging (WI), T1WI portal venous phase (pvp), T2WI, and ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient), on liver regions of interest (ROIs) and HCC volumes of interest (VOIs). Precision was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and coefficient of variation (CV).
Results
There was moderate to excellent test–retest repeatability of shape and 1st- and 2nd-order features for all sequences in HCCs (ICC: 0.53–0.99; CV: 3–29%), and moderate to good test–retest repeatability of 1st- and 2nd-order features for T1WI sequences, and 2nd-order features for T2WI in the liver (ICC: 0.53–0.73; CV: 12–19%). There was poor inter-platform reproducibility for all features and sequences, except for shape and 1st-order features on T1WI in HCCs (CCC: 0.58–0.99; CV: 3–15%). Good to excellent inter-observer reproducibility was found for all features and sequences in HCCs (CCC: 0.80–0.99; CV: 4–15%) and moderate to good for liver (CCC: 0.45–0.86; CV: 6–25%).
Conclusions
MRI radiomics features have acceptable repeatability in the liver and HCC when using the same MRI system and across readers but have low reproducibility across MR systems, except for shape and 1st-order features on T1WI. Data must be interpreted with caution when performing multiplatform radiomics studies.
Key Points
• MRI radiomics features have acceptable repeatability when using the same MRI system but less reproducible when using different MRI platforms.
• MRI radiomics features extracted from T1 weighted-imaging show greater stability across exams than T2 weighted-imaging and ADC.
• Inter-observer reproducibility of MRI radiomics features was found to be good in HCC tumors and acceptable in liver parenchyma. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00330-021-08282-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2576917318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2576917318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8cf3a6b227703de2d696cdfebd2a59a3648ea0409ba4908652f7de65debe881f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LHjEQh0Npqa_af6CHEujFy9bJx-bjKNJaQbGInkM2ma2R3c3bZLfQ_961r7bgwdMMzDO_GR5CPjL4wgD0cQUQAhrgrAHDDW_YG7JhUqwNGPmWbMAK02hr5R7Zr_UeACyT-j3ZE7JVUst2Qy5_FAyppjzR3NPL63NafEx5TKHSHv28FKw0TXS-Qzqk31ionyK9w62fc8BhWAZfaPAlpCmP_pC86_1Q8cNTPSC3377enH5vLq7Ozk9PLpogdDs3JvTCq45zrUFE5FFZFWKPXeS-tV4oadCDBNt5acGolvc6omojdmgM68UBOdrlbkv-tWCd3Zjq4zt-wrxUx1utLNOCmRX9_AK9z0uZ1u8cV1xzJSRTK8V3VCi51oK925Y0-vLHMXCPst1Otltlu7-yHVuXPj1FL92I8d_Ks90VEDugrqPpJ5b_t1-JfQBbuIlr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627263416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Precision of MRI radiomics features in the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Carbonell, Guillermo ; Kennedy, Paul ; Bane, Octavia ; Kirmani, Ammar ; El Homsi, Maria ; Stocker, Daniel ; Said, Daniela ; Mukherjee, Pritam ; Gevaert, Olivier ; Lewis, Sara ; Hectors, Stefanie ; Taouli, Bachir</creator><creatorcontrib>Carbonell, Guillermo ; Kennedy, Paul ; Bane, Octavia ; Kirmani, Ammar ; El Homsi, Maria ; Stocker, Daniel ; Said, Daniela ; Mukherjee, Pritam ; Gevaert, Olivier ; Lewis, Sara ; Hectors, Stefanie ; Taouli, Bachir</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To assess the precision of MRI radiomics features in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors and liver parenchyma.
Methods
The study population consisted of 55 patients, including 16 with untreated HCCs, who underwent two repeat contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI exams within 1 month to evaluate: (1) test–retest repeatability using the same MRI system (
n
= 28, 10 HCCs); (2) inter-platform reproducibility between different MRI systems (
n
= 27, 6 HCCs); (3) inter-observer reproducibility (
n
= 16, 16 HCCs). Shape and 1st- and 2nd-order radiomics features were quantified on pre-contrast T1-weighted imaging (WI), T1WI portal venous phase (pvp), T2WI, and ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient), on liver regions of interest (ROIs) and HCC volumes of interest (VOIs). Precision was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and coefficient of variation (CV).
Results
There was moderate to excellent test–retest repeatability of shape and 1st- and 2nd-order features for all sequences in HCCs (ICC: 0.53–0.99; CV: 3–29%), and moderate to good test–retest repeatability of 1st- and 2nd-order features for T1WI sequences, and 2nd-order features for T2WI in the liver (ICC: 0.53–0.73; CV: 12–19%). There was poor inter-platform reproducibility for all features and sequences, except for shape and 1st-order features on T1WI in HCCs (CCC: 0.58–0.99; CV: 3–15%). Good to excellent inter-observer reproducibility was found for all features and sequences in HCCs (CCC: 0.80–0.99; CV: 4–15%) and moderate to good for liver (CCC: 0.45–0.86; CV: 6–25%).
Conclusions
MRI radiomics features have acceptable repeatability in the liver and HCC when using the same MRI system and across readers but have low reproducibility across MR systems, except for shape and 1st-order features on T1WI. Data must be interpreted with caution when performing multiplatform radiomics studies.
Key Points
• MRI radiomics features have acceptable repeatability when using the same MRI system but less reproducible when using different MRI platforms.
• MRI radiomics features extracted from T1 weighted-imaging show greater stability across exams than T2 weighted-imaging and ADC.
• Inter-observer reproducibility of MRI radiomics features was found to be good in HCC tumors and acceptable in liver parenchyma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08282-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34564745</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging ; Coefficient of variation ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Diffusion coefficient ; Feature extraction ; Hepatocellular carcinoma ; Humans ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Liver ; Liver cancer ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Magnetic Resonance ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Mathematical analysis ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neuroradiology ; Parenchyma ; Population studies ; Radiology ; Radiomics ; Reproducibility ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Sequences ; Tumors ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2022-03, Vol.32 (3), p.2030-2040</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2021</rights><rights>2021. European Society of Radiology.</rights><rights>European Society of Radiology 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8cf3a6b227703de2d696cdfebd2a59a3648ea0409ba4908652f7de65debe881f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8cf3a6b227703de2d696cdfebd2a59a3648ea0409ba4908652f7de65debe881f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6409-1333</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34564745$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carbonell, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bane, Octavia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirmani, Ammar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Homsi, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stocker, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Said, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mukherjee, Pritam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gevaert, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hectors, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taouli, Bachir</creatorcontrib><title>Precision of MRI radiomics features in the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives
To assess the precision of MRI radiomics features in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors and liver parenchyma.
Methods
The study population consisted of 55 patients, including 16 with untreated HCCs, who underwent two repeat contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI exams within 1 month to evaluate: (1) test–retest repeatability using the same MRI system (
n
= 28, 10 HCCs); (2) inter-platform reproducibility between different MRI systems (
n
= 27, 6 HCCs); (3) inter-observer reproducibility (
n
= 16, 16 HCCs). Shape and 1st- and 2nd-order radiomics features were quantified on pre-contrast T1-weighted imaging (WI), T1WI portal venous phase (pvp), T2WI, and ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient), on liver regions of interest (ROIs) and HCC volumes of interest (VOIs). Precision was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and coefficient of variation (CV).
Results
There was moderate to excellent test–retest repeatability of shape and 1st- and 2nd-order features for all sequences in HCCs (ICC: 0.53–0.99; CV: 3–29%), and moderate to good test–retest repeatability of 1st- and 2nd-order features for T1WI sequences, and 2nd-order features for T2WI in the liver (ICC: 0.53–0.73; CV: 12–19%). There was poor inter-platform reproducibility for all features and sequences, except for shape and 1st-order features on T1WI in HCCs (CCC: 0.58–0.99; CV: 3–15%). Good to excellent inter-observer reproducibility was found for all features and sequences in HCCs (CCC: 0.80–0.99; CV: 4–15%) and moderate to good for liver (CCC: 0.45–0.86; CV: 6–25%).
Conclusions
MRI radiomics features have acceptable repeatability in the liver and HCC when using the same MRI system and across readers but have low reproducibility across MR systems, except for shape and 1st-order features on T1WI. Data must be interpreted with caution when performing multiplatform radiomics studies.
Key Points
• MRI radiomics features have acceptable repeatability when using the same MRI system but less reproducible when using different MRI platforms.
• MRI radiomics features extracted from T1 weighted-imaging show greater stability across exams than T2 weighted-imaging and ADC.
• Inter-observer reproducibility of MRI radiomics features was found to be good in HCC tumors and acceptable in liver parenchyma.</description><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coefficient of variation</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Diffusion coefficient</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Hepatocellular carcinoma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Parenchyma</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiomics</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sequences</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LHjEQh0Npqa_af6CHEujFy9bJx-bjKNJaQbGInkM2ma2R3c3bZLfQ_961r7bgwdMMzDO_GR5CPjL4wgD0cQUQAhrgrAHDDW_YG7JhUqwNGPmWbMAK02hr5R7Zr_UeACyT-j3ZE7JVUst2Qy5_FAyppjzR3NPL63NafEx5TKHSHv28FKw0TXS-Qzqk31ionyK9w62fc8BhWAZfaPAlpCmP_pC86_1Q8cNTPSC3377enH5vLq7Ozk9PLpogdDs3JvTCq45zrUFE5FFZFWKPXeS-tV4oadCDBNt5acGolvc6omojdmgM68UBOdrlbkv-tWCd3Zjq4zt-wrxUx1utLNOCmRX9_AK9z0uZ1u8cV1xzJSRTK8V3VCi51oK925Y0-vLHMXCPst1Otltlu7-yHVuXPj1FL92I8d_Ks90VEDugrqPpJ5b_t1-JfQBbuIlr</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Carbonell, Guillermo</creator><creator>Kennedy, Paul</creator><creator>Bane, Octavia</creator><creator>Kirmani, Ammar</creator><creator>El Homsi, Maria</creator><creator>Stocker, Daniel</creator><creator>Said, Daniela</creator><creator>Mukherjee, Pritam</creator><creator>Gevaert, Olivier</creator><creator>Lewis, Sara</creator><creator>Hectors, Stefanie</creator><creator>Taouli, Bachir</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6409-1333</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Precision of MRI radiomics features in the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma</title><author>Carbonell, Guillermo ; Kennedy, Paul ; Bane, Octavia ; Kirmani, Ammar ; El Homsi, Maria ; Stocker, Daniel ; Said, Daniela ; Mukherjee, Pritam ; Gevaert, Olivier ; Lewis, Sara ; Hectors, Stefanie ; Taouli, Bachir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8cf3a6b227703de2d696cdfebd2a59a3648ea0409ba4908652f7de65debe881f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coefficient of variation</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Diffusion coefficient</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Hepatocellular carcinoma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Parenchyma</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiomics</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sequences</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carbonell, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bane, Octavia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirmani, Ammar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Homsi, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stocker, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Said, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mukherjee, Pritam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gevaert, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hectors, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taouli, Bachir</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carbonell, Guillermo</au><au>Kennedy, Paul</au><au>Bane, Octavia</au><au>Kirmani, Ammar</au><au>El Homsi, Maria</au><au>Stocker, Daniel</au><au>Said, Daniela</au><au>Mukherjee, Pritam</au><au>Gevaert, Olivier</au><au>Lewis, Sara</au><au>Hectors, Stefanie</au><au>Taouli, Bachir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Precision of MRI radiomics features in the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2030</spage><epage>2040</epage><pages>2030-2040</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To assess the precision of MRI radiomics features in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors and liver parenchyma.
Methods
The study population consisted of 55 patients, including 16 with untreated HCCs, who underwent two repeat contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI exams within 1 month to evaluate: (1) test–retest repeatability using the same MRI system (
n
= 28, 10 HCCs); (2) inter-platform reproducibility between different MRI systems (
n
= 27, 6 HCCs); (3) inter-observer reproducibility (
n
= 16, 16 HCCs). Shape and 1st- and 2nd-order radiomics features were quantified on pre-contrast T1-weighted imaging (WI), T1WI portal venous phase (pvp), T2WI, and ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient), on liver regions of interest (ROIs) and HCC volumes of interest (VOIs). Precision was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and coefficient of variation (CV).
Results
There was moderate to excellent test–retest repeatability of shape and 1st- and 2nd-order features for all sequences in HCCs (ICC: 0.53–0.99; CV: 3–29%), and moderate to good test–retest repeatability of 1st- and 2nd-order features for T1WI sequences, and 2nd-order features for T2WI in the liver (ICC: 0.53–0.73; CV: 12–19%). There was poor inter-platform reproducibility for all features and sequences, except for shape and 1st-order features on T1WI in HCCs (CCC: 0.58–0.99; CV: 3–15%). Good to excellent inter-observer reproducibility was found for all features and sequences in HCCs (CCC: 0.80–0.99; CV: 4–15%) and moderate to good for liver (CCC: 0.45–0.86; CV: 6–25%).
Conclusions
MRI radiomics features have acceptable repeatability in the liver and HCC when using the same MRI system and across readers but have low reproducibility across MR systems, except for shape and 1st-order features on T1WI. Data must be interpreted with caution when performing multiplatform radiomics studies.
Key Points
• MRI radiomics features have acceptable repeatability when using the same MRI system but less reproducible when using different MRI platforms.
• MRI radiomics features extracted from T1 weighted-imaging show greater stability across exams than T2 weighted-imaging and ADC.
• Inter-observer reproducibility of MRI radiomics features was found to be good in HCC tumors and acceptable in liver parenchyma.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34564745</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-021-08282-1</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6409-1333</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-7994 |
ispartof | European radiology, 2022-03, Vol.32 (3), p.2030-2040 |
issn | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2576917318 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging Coefficient of variation Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Diagnostic Radiology Diffusion coefficient Feature extraction Hepatocellular carcinoma Humans Imaging Internal Medicine Interventional Radiology Liver Liver cancer Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Magnetic Resonance Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mathematical analysis Medical imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neuroradiology Parenchyma Population studies Radiology Radiomics Reproducibility Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies Sequences Tumors Ultrasound |
title | Precision of MRI radiomics features in the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T12%3A58%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Precision%20of%20MRI%20radiomics%20features%20in%20the%20liver%20and%20hepatocellular%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Carbonell,%20Guillermo&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2030&rft.epage=2040&rft.pages=2030-2040&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-021-08282-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2576917318%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8cf3a6b227703de2d696cdfebd2a59a3648ea0409ba4908652f7de65debe881f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627263416&rft_id=info:pmid/34564745&rfr_iscdi=true |