The impact of a short burst of exercise on sleep inertia

• Published in: Physiology & behavior 2021-12, Vol.242, p.113617-113617, Article 113617
• Main Authors: Kovac, Katya, Vincent, Grace E., Paterson, Jessica L., Reynolds, Amy, Aisbett, Brad, Hilditch, Cassie J., Ferguson, Sally A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Awakening; Circadian Rhythm; Core body temperature; Cortisol awakening response; Exercise; Female; Humans; Polysomnography; Psychomotor Performance; Sleep; Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm; Sleep inertia; Wakefulness
• ISSN: 0031-9384; 1873-507X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113617

•Exercise may reduce sleep inertia by targeting key physiological processes on waking.•Exercise (30 s) on waking improved subjective sleepiness but not cognitive performance.•High intensity exercise led to a greater cortisol awakening response than no exercise.•Core body temperature was not affected by exercise on waking.•Combining exercise with other countermeasures (e.g., caffeine) should be examined. Determine whether 30 s (s) of exercise performed upon waking can reduce sleep inertia and accelerate an increase in the cortisol awakening response (CAR) and core body temperature (CBT), compared to when sedentary. Fifteen participants (mean age ± SD, 25.9 ± 5.9 years; six females) completed a counterbalanced, repeated measures, in-laboratory study involving three single experimental nights, each separated by a four-night recovery period. Participants were woken following a 2-h nap (2400–0200) and completed a cycling bout of high-intensity (30-s sprint), low-intensity (30 s at 60% maximum heart rate), or no exercise (sedentary). Sleep inertia testing (eight batteries, 15-min intervals) began immediately following and included measures of subjective sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) and cognitive performance tasks (psychomotor vigilance, serial addition and subtraction, and spatial configuration). CBT was measured continuously via an ingestible telemetric capsule. The CAR was determined using salivary cortisol samples collected at 0, 30 and 45 min post-waking. Data were analysed using mixed effects analysis of variance. There was no difference in cognitive performance or CBT between conditions. Participants felt less sleepy in the high-intensity condition, followed by the low-intensity and sedentary conditions (p = .003). The CAR was greatest in the high-intensity condition, followed by the sedentary condition, and low-intensity condition (p