Loading…
Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Purpose In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), bariatric surgery appears to be more effective than medical treatment (MT) at improving glycaemic control and decreasing cardiovascular risk. However, long-term effectiveness has not been systematically assessed using randomised controlled tr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Obesity surgery 2021-12, Vol.31 (12), p.5312-5321 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197y-ca92e0c456065585217094a9972ab8d7e63d612c4dcc77c340133e748f21411f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197y-ca92e0c456065585217094a9972ab8d7e63d612c4dcc77c340133e748f21411f3 |
container_end_page | 5321 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 5312 |
container_title | Obesity surgery |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Carmona, Maria Neves Santos-Sousa, Hugo Lindeza, Luís Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo Nogueiro, Jorge Pereira, André Carneiro, Silvestre Costa-Pinho, André Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo Preto, John |
description | Purpose
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), bariatric surgery appears to be more effective than medical treatment (MT) at improving glycaemic control and decreasing cardiovascular risk. However, long-term effectiveness has not been systematically assessed using randomised controlled trials. In this study, we aimed to systematically assess randomised controlled trials, with at least 5 years of follow-up, on bariatric surgery in patients with T2DM and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m
2
, as well as to compare different bariatric procedures.
Material and Methods
PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science were searched. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the different procedures and MT in terms of full T2DM remission, weight loss, complications and cardiometabolic biomarkers. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and CINeMA.
Results
We included 11 primary studies. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) was found to be one of the most effective treatments for full remission of T2DM (
I
2
= 0, inconsistency
p
value = 0.9223). Biliopancreatic diversion without duodenal switch was found to be more effective than laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding regarding percent total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein change. Regarding percent high-density lipoprotein and weight change, all analysed surgical treatments were shown to be more effective than MT. The confidence rating in our results was overall moderate, but most studies had high risk of performance and detection bias.
Conclusion
Bariatric surgery seems to be effective for T2DM remission. LOAGB appears to be a good option in this context, and a possible alternative to laparoscopic duodenal switch, but the included primary studies in our review are not sufficiently powered to establish a more definitive conclusion. More studies with longer follow-up times are needed to comprehensively assess bariatric surgery in T2DM.
Graphical abstract |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11695-021-05725-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2579632161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2597941147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197y-ca92e0c456065585217094a9972ab8d7e63d612c4dcc77c340133e748f21411f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTFOHDEUhi2USNmQXCCVpTRpDLZnPB6ng4UEJAgokNoy3jdg2JlZ_DyspqPlFkgoF8lROEm8bKRIKdLYLr7_k9_7Cfkg-JbgXG-jEJVRjEvBuNJSsXGDTITmNeOlrF-RCTcVZ7WRxRvyFvGaZ7KSckKepn27cNGlcAd0v2nAr14dINK-obsuBpdi8PRsiJcQAyANHT3NOHQJ6TKkK3o-LoBKuhfcBaQMHMN8HtKA1HUzunt8-Hz_8PzwM59S_Xq8udxu5Wfq6NmICdos8vQ73AVYvuDfIC37eJMdybGdzs1HDPiOvG7cHOH9n3uT_Piyfz49YEcnXw-nO0fMC6NH5p2RwH2pKl4pVSuZ5zelM0ZLd1HPNFTFrBLSlzPvtfZFyUVRgC7rRopSiKbYJJ_W3kXsbwfAZNuAPk_jOugHtFJpUxV5cSKjH_9Br_sh5v-uKKNN9pU6U3JN-dgjRmjsIobWxdEKble92XVvNrdhX3qzYw4V6xBmuMtL_6v-T-o3l_OeyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2597941147</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Carmona, Maria Neves ; Santos-Sousa, Hugo ; Lindeza, Luís ; Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo ; Nogueiro, Jorge ; Pereira, André ; Carneiro, Silvestre ; Costa-Pinho, André ; Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo ; Preto, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Carmona, Maria Neves ; Santos-Sousa, Hugo ; Lindeza, Luís ; Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo ; Nogueiro, Jorge ; Pereira, André ; Carneiro, Silvestre ; Costa-Pinho, André ; Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo ; Preto, John ; CRI-O group</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), bariatric surgery appears to be more effective than medical treatment (MT) at improving glycaemic control and decreasing cardiovascular risk. However, long-term effectiveness has not been systematically assessed using randomised controlled trials. In this study, we aimed to systematically assess randomised controlled trials, with at least 5 years of follow-up, on bariatric surgery in patients with T2DM and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m
2
, as well as to compare different bariatric procedures.
Material and Methods
PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science were searched. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the different procedures and MT in terms of full T2DM remission, weight loss, complications and cardiometabolic biomarkers. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and CINeMA.
Results
We included 11 primary studies. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) was found to be one of the most effective treatments for full remission of T2DM (
I
2
= 0, inconsistency
p
value = 0.9223). Biliopancreatic diversion without duodenal switch was found to be more effective than laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding regarding percent total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein change. Regarding percent high-density lipoprotein and weight change, all analysed surgical treatments were shown to be more effective than MT. The confidence rating in our results was overall moderate, but most studies had high risk of performance and detection bias.
Conclusion
Bariatric surgery seems to be effective for T2DM remission. LOAGB appears to be a good option in this context, and a possible alternative to laparoscopic duodenal switch, but the included primary studies in our review are not sufficiently powered to establish a more definitive conclusion. More studies with longer follow-up times are needed to comprehensively assess bariatric surgery in T2DM.
Graphical abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8923</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1708-0428</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-0428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05725-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Diabetes ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Original Contributions ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Obesity surgery, 2021-12, Vol.31 (12), p.5312-5321</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197y-ca92e0c456065585217094a9972ab8d7e63d612c4dcc77c340133e748f21411f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197y-ca92e0c456065585217094a9972ab8d7e63d612c4dcc77c340133e748f21411f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6176-5654</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carmona, Maria Neves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos-Sousa, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindeza, Luís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueiro, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Silvestre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa-Pinho, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preto, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRI-O group</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis</title><title>Obesity surgery</title><addtitle>OBES SURG</addtitle><description>Purpose
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), bariatric surgery appears to be more effective than medical treatment (MT) at improving glycaemic control and decreasing cardiovascular risk. However, long-term effectiveness has not been systematically assessed using randomised controlled trials. In this study, we aimed to systematically assess randomised controlled trials, with at least 5 years of follow-up, on bariatric surgery in patients with T2DM and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m
2
, as well as to compare different bariatric procedures.
Material and Methods
PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science were searched. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the different procedures and MT in terms of full T2DM remission, weight loss, complications and cardiometabolic biomarkers. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and CINeMA.
Results
We included 11 primary studies. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) was found to be one of the most effective treatments for full remission of T2DM (
I
2
= 0, inconsistency
p
value = 0.9223). Biliopancreatic diversion without duodenal switch was found to be more effective than laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding regarding percent total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein change. Regarding percent high-density lipoprotein and weight change, all analysed surgical treatments were shown to be more effective than MT. The confidence rating in our results was overall moderate, but most studies had high risk of performance and detection bias.
Conclusion
Bariatric surgery seems to be effective for T2DM remission. LOAGB appears to be a good option in this context, and a possible alternative to laparoscopic duodenal switch, but the included primary studies in our review are not sufficiently powered to establish a more definitive conclusion. More studies with longer follow-up times are needed to comprehensively assess bariatric surgery in T2DM.
Graphical abstract</description><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Original Contributions</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0960-8923</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kTFOHDEUhi2USNmQXCCVpTRpDLZnPB6ng4UEJAgokNoy3jdg2JlZ_DyspqPlFkgoF8lROEm8bKRIKdLYLr7_k9_7Cfkg-JbgXG-jEJVRjEvBuNJSsXGDTITmNeOlrF-RCTcVZ7WRxRvyFvGaZ7KSckKepn27cNGlcAd0v2nAr14dINK-obsuBpdi8PRsiJcQAyANHT3NOHQJ6TKkK3o-LoBKuhfcBaQMHMN8HtKA1HUzunt8-Hz_8PzwM59S_Xq8udxu5Wfq6NmICdos8vQ73AVYvuDfIC37eJMdybGdzs1HDPiOvG7cHOH9n3uT_Piyfz49YEcnXw-nO0fMC6NH5p2RwH2pKl4pVSuZ5zelM0ZLd1HPNFTFrBLSlzPvtfZFyUVRgC7rRopSiKbYJJ_W3kXsbwfAZNuAPk_jOugHtFJpUxV5cSKjH_9Br_sh5v-uKKNN9pU6U3JN-dgjRmjsIobWxdEKble92XVvNrdhX3qzYw4V6xBmuMtL_6v-T-o3l_OeyA</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Carmona, Maria Neves</creator><creator>Santos-Sousa, Hugo</creator><creator>Lindeza, Luís</creator><creator>Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo</creator><creator>Nogueiro, Jorge</creator><creator>Pereira, André</creator><creator>Carneiro, Silvestre</creator><creator>Costa-Pinho, André</creator><creator>Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo</creator><creator>Preto, John</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6176-5654</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis</title><author>Carmona, Maria Neves ; Santos-Sousa, Hugo ; Lindeza, Luís ; Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo ; Nogueiro, Jorge ; Pereira, André ; Carneiro, Silvestre ; Costa-Pinho, André ; Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo ; Preto, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197y-ca92e0c456065585217094a9972ab8d7e63d612c4dcc77c340133e748f21411f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Original Contributions</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carmona, Maria Neves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos-Sousa, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindeza, Luís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueiro, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Silvestre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa-Pinho, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preto, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRI-O group</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carmona, Maria Neves</au><au>Santos-Sousa, Hugo</au><au>Lindeza, Luís</au><au>Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo</au><au>Nogueiro, Jorge</au><au>Pereira, André</au><au>Carneiro, Silvestre</au><au>Costa-Pinho, André</au><au>Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo</au><au>Preto, John</au><aucorp>CRI-O group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle><stitle>OBES SURG</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>5312</spage><epage>5321</epage><pages>5312-5321</pages><issn>0960-8923</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><eissn>1708-0428</eissn><abstract>Purpose
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), bariatric surgery appears to be more effective than medical treatment (MT) at improving glycaemic control and decreasing cardiovascular risk. However, long-term effectiveness has not been systematically assessed using randomised controlled trials. In this study, we aimed to systematically assess randomised controlled trials, with at least 5 years of follow-up, on bariatric surgery in patients with T2DM and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m
2
, as well as to compare different bariatric procedures.
Material and Methods
PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science were searched. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the different procedures and MT in terms of full T2DM remission, weight loss, complications and cardiometabolic biomarkers. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and CINeMA.
Results
We included 11 primary studies. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) was found to be one of the most effective treatments for full remission of T2DM (
I
2
= 0, inconsistency
p
value = 0.9223). Biliopancreatic diversion without duodenal switch was found to be more effective than laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding regarding percent total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein change. Regarding percent high-density lipoprotein and weight change, all analysed surgical treatments were shown to be more effective than MT. The confidence rating in our results was overall moderate, but most studies had high risk of performance and detection bias.
Conclusion
Bariatric surgery seems to be effective for T2DM remission. LOAGB appears to be a good option in this context, and a possible alternative to laparoscopic duodenal switch, but the included primary studies in our review are not sufficiently powered to establish a more definitive conclusion. More studies with longer follow-up times are needed to comprehensively assess bariatric surgery in T2DM.
Graphical abstract</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11695-021-05725-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6176-5654</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-8923 |
ispartof | Obesity surgery, 2021-12, Vol.31 (12), p.5312-5321 |
issn | 0960-8923 1708-0428 1708-0428 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2579632161 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Diabetes Gastrointestinal surgery Laparoscopy Medicine Medicine & Public Health Meta-analysis Original Contributions Surgery |
title | Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A08%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Effectiveness%20of%20Bariatric%20Surgeries%20in%20Patients%20with%20Type%202%20Diabetes%20Mellitus%20and%20BMI%E2%80%89%E2%89%A5%E2%80%8925%C2%A0kg/m2:%20a%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Network%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20surgery&rft.au=Carmona,%20Maria%20Neves&rft.aucorp=CRI-O%20group&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=5312&rft.epage=5321&rft.pages=5312-5321&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11695-021-05725-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2597941147%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197y-ca92e0c456065585217094a9972ab8d7e63d612c4dcc77c340133e748f21411f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2597941147&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |