Loading…

Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Purpose In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), bariatric surgery appears to be more effective than medical treatment (MT) at improving glycaemic control and decreasing cardiovascular risk. However, long-term effectiveness has not been systematically assessed using randomised controlled tr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obesity surgery 2021-12, Vol.31 (12), p.5312-5321
Main Authors: Carmona, Maria Neves, Santos-Sousa, Hugo, Lindeza, Luís, Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo, Nogueiro, Jorge, Pereira, André, Carneiro, Silvestre, Costa-Pinho, André, Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo, Preto, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197y-ca92e0c456065585217094a9972ab8d7e63d612c4dcc77c340133e748f21411f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197y-ca92e0c456065585217094a9972ab8d7e63d612c4dcc77c340133e748f21411f3
container_end_page 5321
container_issue 12
container_start_page 5312
container_title Obesity surgery
container_volume 31
creator Carmona, Maria Neves
Santos-Sousa, Hugo
Lindeza, Luís
Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
Nogueiro, Jorge
Pereira, André
Carneiro, Silvestre
Costa-Pinho, André
Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo
Preto, John
description Purpose In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), bariatric surgery appears to be more effective than medical treatment (MT) at improving glycaemic control and decreasing cardiovascular risk. However, long-term effectiveness has not been systematically assessed using randomised controlled trials. In this study, we aimed to systematically assess randomised controlled trials, with at least 5 years of follow-up, on bariatric surgery in patients with T2DM and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 , as well as to compare different bariatric procedures. Material and Methods PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science were searched. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the different procedures and MT in terms of full T2DM remission, weight loss, complications and cardiometabolic biomarkers. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and CINeMA. Results We included 11 primary studies. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) was found to be one of the most effective treatments for full remission of T2DM ( I 2  = 0, inconsistency p value = 0.9223). Biliopancreatic diversion without duodenal switch was found to be more effective than laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding regarding percent total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein change. Regarding percent high-density lipoprotein and weight change, all analysed surgical treatments were shown to be more effective than MT. The confidence rating in our results was overall moderate, but most studies had high risk of performance and detection bias. Conclusion Bariatric surgery seems to be effective for T2DM remission. LOAGB appears to be a good option in this context, and a possible alternative to laparoscopic duodenal switch, but the included primary studies in our review are not sufficiently powered to establish a more definitive conclusion. More studies with longer follow-up times are needed to comprehensively assess bariatric surgery in T2DM. Graphical abstract
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11695-021-05725-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2579632161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2597941147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197y-ca92e0c456065585217094a9972ab8d7e63d612c4dcc77c340133e748f21411f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTFOHDEUhi2USNmQXCCVpTRpDLZnPB6ng4UEJAgokNoy3jdg2JlZ_DyspqPlFkgoF8lROEm8bKRIKdLYLr7_k9_7Cfkg-JbgXG-jEJVRjEvBuNJSsXGDTITmNeOlrF-RCTcVZ7WRxRvyFvGaZ7KSckKepn27cNGlcAd0v2nAr14dINK-obsuBpdi8PRsiJcQAyANHT3NOHQJ6TKkK3o-LoBKuhfcBaQMHMN8HtKA1HUzunt8-Hz_8PzwM59S_Xq8udxu5Wfq6NmICdos8vQ73AVYvuDfIC37eJMdybGdzs1HDPiOvG7cHOH9n3uT_Piyfz49YEcnXw-nO0fMC6NH5p2RwH2pKl4pVSuZ5zelM0ZLd1HPNFTFrBLSlzPvtfZFyUVRgC7rRopSiKbYJJ_W3kXsbwfAZNuAPk_jOugHtFJpUxV5cSKjH_9Br_sh5v-uKKNN9pU6U3JN-dgjRmjsIobWxdEKble92XVvNrdhX3qzYw4V6xBmuMtL_6v-T-o3l_OeyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2597941147</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Carmona, Maria Neves ; Santos-Sousa, Hugo ; Lindeza, Luís ; Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo ; Nogueiro, Jorge ; Pereira, André ; Carneiro, Silvestre ; Costa-Pinho, André ; Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo ; Preto, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Carmona, Maria Neves ; Santos-Sousa, Hugo ; Lindeza, Luís ; Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo ; Nogueiro, Jorge ; Pereira, André ; Carneiro, Silvestre ; Costa-Pinho, André ; Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo ; Preto, John ; CRI-O group</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), bariatric surgery appears to be more effective than medical treatment (MT) at improving glycaemic control and decreasing cardiovascular risk. However, long-term effectiveness has not been systematically assessed using randomised controlled trials. In this study, we aimed to systematically assess randomised controlled trials, with at least 5 years of follow-up, on bariatric surgery in patients with T2DM and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 , as well as to compare different bariatric procedures. Material and Methods PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science were searched. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the different procedures and MT in terms of full T2DM remission, weight loss, complications and cardiometabolic biomarkers. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and CINeMA. Results We included 11 primary studies. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) was found to be one of the most effective treatments for full remission of T2DM ( I 2  = 0, inconsistency p value = 0.9223). Biliopancreatic diversion without duodenal switch was found to be more effective than laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding regarding percent total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein change. Regarding percent high-density lipoprotein and weight change, all analysed surgical treatments were shown to be more effective than MT. The confidence rating in our results was overall moderate, but most studies had high risk of performance and detection bias. Conclusion Bariatric surgery seems to be effective for T2DM remission. LOAGB appears to be a good option in this context, and a possible alternative to laparoscopic duodenal switch, but the included primary studies in our review are not sufficiently powered to establish a more definitive conclusion. More studies with longer follow-up times are needed to comprehensively assess bariatric surgery in T2DM. Graphical abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8923</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1708-0428</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-0428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05725-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Diabetes ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Original Contributions ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Obesity surgery, 2021-12, Vol.31 (12), p.5312-5321</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197y-ca92e0c456065585217094a9972ab8d7e63d612c4dcc77c340133e748f21411f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197y-ca92e0c456065585217094a9972ab8d7e63d612c4dcc77c340133e748f21411f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6176-5654</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carmona, Maria Neves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos-Sousa, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindeza, Luís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueiro, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Silvestre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa-Pinho, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preto, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRI-O group</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis</title><title>Obesity surgery</title><addtitle>OBES SURG</addtitle><description>Purpose In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), bariatric surgery appears to be more effective than medical treatment (MT) at improving glycaemic control and decreasing cardiovascular risk. However, long-term effectiveness has not been systematically assessed using randomised controlled trials. In this study, we aimed to systematically assess randomised controlled trials, with at least 5 years of follow-up, on bariatric surgery in patients with T2DM and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 , as well as to compare different bariatric procedures. Material and Methods PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science were searched. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the different procedures and MT in terms of full T2DM remission, weight loss, complications and cardiometabolic biomarkers. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and CINeMA. Results We included 11 primary studies. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) was found to be one of the most effective treatments for full remission of T2DM ( I 2  = 0, inconsistency p value = 0.9223). Biliopancreatic diversion without duodenal switch was found to be more effective than laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding regarding percent total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein change. Regarding percent high-density lipoprotein and weight change, all analysed surgical treatments were shown to be more effective than MT. The confidence rating in our results was overall moderate, but most studies had high risk of performance and detection bias. Conclusion Bariatric surgery seems to be effective for T2DM remission. LOAGB appears to be a good option in this context, and a possible alternative to laparoscopic duodenal switch, but the included primary studies in our review are not sufficiently powered to establish a more definitive conclusion. More studies with longer follow-up times are needed to comprehensively assess bariatric surgery in T2DM. Graphical abstract</description><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Original Contributions</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0960-8923</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kTFOHDEUhi2USNmQXCCVpTRpDLZnPB6ng4UEJAgokNoy3jdg2JlZ_DyspqPlFkgoF8lROEm8bKRIKdLYLr7_k9_7Cfkg-JbgXG-jEJVRjEvBuNJSsXGDTITmNeOlrF-RCTcVZ7WRxRvyFvGaZ7KSckKepn27cNGlcAd0v2nAr14dINK-obsuBpdi8PRsiJcQAyANHT3NOHQJ6TKkK3o-LoBKuhfcBaQMHMN8HtKA1HUzunt8-Hz_8PzwM59S_Xq8udxu5Wfq6NmICdos8vQ73AVYvuDfIC37eJMdybGdzs1HDPiOvG7cHOH9n3uT_Piyfz49YEcnXw-nO0fMC6NH5p2RwH2pKl4pVSuZ5zelM0ZLd1HPNFTFrBLSlzPvtfZFyUVRgC7rRopSiKbYJJ_W3kXsbwfAZNuAPk_jOugHtFJpUxV5cSKjH_9Br_sh5v-uKKNN9pU6U3JN-dgjRmjsIobWxdEKble92XVvNrdhX3qzYw4V6xBmuMtL_6v-T-o3l_OeyA</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Carmona, Maria Neves</creator><creator>Santos-Sousa, Hugo</creator><creator>Lindeza, Luís</creator><creator>Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo</creator><creator>Nogueiro, Jorge</creator><creator>Pereira, André</creator><creator>Carneiro, Silvestre</creator><creator>Costa-Pinho, André</creator><creator>Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo</creator><creator>Preto, John</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6176-5654</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis</title><author>Carmona, Maria Neves ; Santos-Sousa, Hugo ; Lindeza, Luís ; Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo ; Nogueiro, Jorge ; Pereira, André ; Carneiro, Silvestre ; Costa-Pinho, André ; Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo ; Preto, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197y-ca92e0c456065585217094a9972ab8d7e63d612c4dcc77c340133e748f21411f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Original Contributions</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carmona, Maria Neves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos-Sousa, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindeza, Luís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueiro, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Silvestre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa-Pinho, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preto, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRI-O group</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carmona, Maria Neves</au><au>Santos-Sousa, Hugo</au><au>Lindeza, Luís</au><au>Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo</au><au>Nogueiro, Jorge</au><au>Pereira, André</au><au>Carneiro, Silvestre</au><au>Costa-Pinho, André</au><au>Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo</au><au>Preto, John</au><aucorp>CRI-O group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle><stitle>OBES SURG</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>5312</spage><epage>5321</epage><pages>5312-5321</pages><issn>0960-8923</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><eissn>1708-0428</eissn><abstract>Purpose In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), bariatric surgery appears to be more effective than medical treatment (MT) at improving glycaemic control and decreasing cardiovascular risk. However, long-term effectiveness has not been systematically assessed using randomised controlled trials. In this study, we aimed to systematically assess randomised controlled trials, with at least 5 years of follow-up, on bariatric surgery in patients with T2DM and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 , as well as to compare different bariatric procedures. Material and Methods PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science were searched. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the different procedures and MT in terms of full T2DM remission, weight loss, complications and cardiometabolic biomarkers. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and CINeMA. Results We included 11 primary studies. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) was found to be one of the most effective treatments for full remission of T2DM ( I 2  = 0, inconsistency p value = 0.9223). Biliopancreatic diversion without duodenal switch was found to be more effective than laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding regarding percent total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein change. Regarding percent high-density lipoprotein and weight change, all analysed surgical treatments were shown to be more effective than MT. The confidence rating in our results was overall moderate, but most studies had high risk of performance and detection bias. Conclusion Bariatric surgery seems to be effective for T2DM remission. LOAGB appears to be a good option in this context, and a possible alternative to laparoscopic duodenal switch, but the included primary studies in our review are not sufficiently powered to establish a more definitive conclusion. More studies with longer follow-up times are needed to comprehensively assess bariatric surgery in T2DM. Graphical abstract</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11695-021-05725-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6176-5654</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-8923
ispartof Obesity surgery, 2021-12, Vol.31 (12), p.5312-5321
issn 0960-8923
1708-0428
1708-0428
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2579632161
source Springer Link
subjects Diabetes
Gastrointestinal surgery
Laparoscopy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Original Contributions
Surgery
title Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A08%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Effectiveness%20of%20Bariatric%20Surgeries%20in%20Patients%20with%20Type%202%20Diabetes%20Mellitus%20and%20BMI%E2%80%89%E2%89%A5%E2%80%8925%C2%A0kg/m2:%20a%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Network%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20surgery&rft.au=Carmona,%20Maria%20Neves&rft.aucorp=CRI-O%20group&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=5312&rft.epage=5321&rft.pages=5312-5321&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11695-021-05725-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2597941147%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197y-ca92e0c456065585217094a9972ab8d7e63d612c4dcc77c340133e748f21411f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2597941147&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true