Assessing Phlebotomy Device Preference and Specimen Quality in an Oncology Outpatient Clinic

Oncology patients have frequent venipunctures, which causes scarring, making subsequent draws difficult and painful. Novel blood collection systems may decrease discomfort in patients experiencing repeat blood draws. Oncology outpatients (n = 101; criteria excluded 12) were recruited to determine th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of applied laboratory medicine 2022-03, Vol.7 (2), p.532-540
Main Authors: Merrill, VeRonika D, Ward, Matthew D, Diaz-McNair, Jovita, Pickett, Elizabeth A, Duh, Show-Hong, Christenson, Robert H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Blood Specimen Collection
Hemoglobins - analysis
Humans
L-Lactate Dehydrogenase
Phlebotomy
Potassium
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-7293d2fa04c42cf583407348d506a37294b64794f7091167f08ad0b7129793483
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-7293d2fa04c42cf583407348d506a37294b64794f7091167f08ad0b7129793483
container_end_page 540
container_issue 2
container_start_page 532
container_title The journal of applied laboratory medicine
container_volume 7
creator Merrill, VeRonika D
Ward, Matthew D
Diaz-McNair, Jovita
Pickett, Elizabeth A
Duh, Show-Hong
Christenson, Robert H
description Oncology patients have frequent venipunctures, which causes scarring, making subsequent draws difficult and painful. Novel blood collection systems may decrease discomfort in patients experiencing repeat blood draws. Oncology outpatients (n = 101; criteria excluded 12) were recruited to determine their preference for either of two blood collection systems, the 23-gauge standard BD Vacutainer Push Button Blood Collection Set (Standard Push Button system) or the 25-gauge BD Vacutainer UltraTouch Push Button Blood Collection Set (UltraTouch Push Button system). Subjects received two blinded, randomized blood draws, one with each device and just one device for each arm. Subjects subsequently rated their blinded preference for blood collection system. Specimen quality was assessed for each device with measurements for plasma hemoglobin (Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer, Shimadzu), lactate dehydrogenase, and potassium (Vitros 4600/5600 analyzer, Ortho Diagnostics). Preference for the 25-gauge UltraTouch Push Button system over the 23-gauge Standard Push Button system was significant (UltraTouch, n = 51; Standard n = 30; no preference, n = 8; P = 0.0196). Regarding sample quality, the 25-gauge UltraTouch Push Button system had significantly lower plasma hemoglobin (average 5.34 mg/dL) vs the 23-gauge Standard Push Button system (9.37 mg/dL; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jalm/jfab109
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2580939619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2580939619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-7293d2fa04c42cf583407348d506a37294b64794f7091167f08ad0b7129793483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1LwzAUwIMobszdPEuOHqzLV5PmOOYnDDZRb0JJ03RmpGltWqH_vRlOT-_rx-O9HwCXGN1iJOlir1y92FeqiNUJmBIm0kQQhk9jngqeSJbyCZiHsEcI4YxwTtE5mFDGKWGSTsHHMgQTgvU7uP10pmj6ph7hnfm22sBtZyrTGR9T5Uv42hpta-Phy6Cc7UdofezDjdeNa3Yj3Ax9q3prfA9XznqrL8BZpVww82OcgfeH-7fVU7LePD6vlutEUyL7eLCkJakUYpoRXaUZZUhQlpUp4orGKSs4E5JVAkmMuahQpkpUCEykkJGjM3D9u7ftmq_BhD6vbdDGOeVNM4ScpFmUJTmWEb35RXXXhBD_y9vO1qobc4zyg9L8oDQ_Ko341XHzUNSm_If_BNIfx7xx2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2580939619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Phlebotomy Device Preference and Specimen Quality in an Oncology Outpatient Clinic</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Merrill, VeRonika D ; Ward, Matthew D ; Diaz-McNair, Jovita ; Pickett, Elizabeth A ; Duh, Show-Hong ; Christenson, Robert H</creator><creatorcontrib>Merrill, VeRonika D ; Ward, Matthew D ; Diaz-McNair, Jovita ; Pickett, Elizabeth A ; Duh, Show-Hong ; Christenson, Robert H</creatorcontrib><description>Oncology patients have frequent venipunctures, which causes scarring, making subsequent draws difficult and painful. Novel blood collection systems may decrease discomfort in patients experiencing repeat blood draws. Oncology outpatients (n = 101; criteria excluded 12) were recruited to determine their preference for either of two blood collection systems, the 23-gauge standard BD Vacutainer Push Button Blood Collection Set (Standard Push Button system) or the 25-gauge BD Vacutainer UltraTouch Push Button Blood Collection Set (UltraTouch Push Button system). Subjects received two blinded, randomized blood draws, one with each device and just one device for each arm. Subjects subsequently rated their blinded preference for blood collection system. Specimen quality was assessed for each device with measurements for plasma hemoglobin (Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer, Shimadzu), lactate dehydrogenase, and potassium (Vitros 4600/5600 analyzer, Ortho Diagnostics). Preference for the 25-gauge UltraTouch Push Button system over the 23-gauge Standard Push Button system was significant (UltraTouch, n = 51; Standard n = 30; no preference, n = 8; P = 0.0196). Regarding sample quality, the 25-gauge UltraTouch Push Button system had significantly lower plasma hemoglobin (average 5.34 mg/dL) vs the 23-gauge Standard Push Button system (9.37 mg/dL; P &lt; 0.0001); serum lactate dehydrogenase and potassium differences were not statistically significant. Subjects in an oncology clinic preferred phlebotomy with the 25-gauge UltraTouch Push Button system, and samples using this device had less hemolysis as assessed by plasma hemoglobin.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2576-9456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-7241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfab109</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34632493</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities ; Blood Specimen Collection ; Hemoglobins - analysis ; Humans ; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase ; Phlebotomy ; Potassium</subject><ispartof>The journal of applied laboratory medicine, 2022-03, Vol.7 (2), p.532-540</ispartof><rights>American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-7293d2fa04c42cf583407348d506a37294b64794f7091167f08ad0b7129793483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-7293d2fa04c42cf583407348d506a37294b64794f7091167f08ad0b7129793483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632493$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merrill, VeRonika D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaz-McNair, Jovita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickett, Elizabeth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duh, Show-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christenson, Robert H</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Phlebotomy Device Preference and Specimen Quality in an Oncology Outpatient Clinic</title><title>The journal of applied laboratory medicine</title><addtitle>J Appl Lab Med</addtitle><description>Oncology patients have frequent venipunctures, which causes scarring, making subsequent draws difficult and painful. Novel blood collection systems may decrease discomfort in patients experiencing repeat blood draws. Oncology outpatients (n = 101; criteria excluded 12) were recruited to determine their preference for either of two blood collection systems, the 23-gauge standard BD Vacutainer Push Button Blood Collection Set (Standard Push Button system) or the 25-gauge BD Vacutainer UltraTouch Push Button Blood Collection Set (UltraTouch Push Button system). Subjects received two blinded, randomized blood draws, one with each device and just one device for each arm. Subjects subsequently rated their blinded preference for blood collection system. Specimen quality was assessed for each device with measurements for plasma hemoglobin (Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer, Shimadzu), lactate dehydrogenase, and potassium (Vitros 4600/5600 analyzer, Ortho Diagnostics). Preference for the 25-gauge UltraTouch Push Button system over the 23-gauge Standard Push Button system was significant (UltraTouch, n = 51; Standard n = 30; no preference, n = 8; P = 0.0196). Regarding sample quality, the 25-gauge UltraTouch Push Button system had significantly lower plasma hemoglobin (average 5.34 mg/dL) vs the 23-gauge Standard Push Button system (9.37 mg/dL; P &lt; 0.0001); serum lactate dehydrogenase and potassium differences were not statistically significant. Subjects in an oncology clinic preferred phlebotomy with the 25-gauge UltraTouch Push Button system, and samples using this device had less hemolysis as assessed by plasma hemoglobin.</description><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection</subject><subject>Hemoglobins - analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>L-Lactate Dehydrogenase</subject><subject>Phlebotomy</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><issn>2576-9456</issn><issn>2475-7241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1LwzAUwIMobszdPEuOHqzLV5PmOOYnDDZRb0JJ03RmpGltWqH_vRlOT-_rx-O9HwCXGN1iJOlir1y92FeqiNUJmBIm0kQQhk9jngqeSJbyCZiHsEcI4YxwTtE5mFDGKWGSTsHHMgQTgvU7uP10pmj6ph7hnfm22sBtZyrTGR9T5Uv42hpta-Phy6Cc7UdofezDjdeNa3Yj3Ax9q3prfA9XznqrL8BZpVww82OcgfeH-7fVU7LePD6vlutEUyL7eLCkJakUYpoRXaUZZUhQlpUp4orGKSs4E5JVAkmMuahQpkpUCEykkJGjM3D9u7ftmq_BhD6vbdDGOeVNM4ScpFmUJTmWEb35RXXXhBD_y9vO1qobc4zyg9L8oDQ_Ko341XHzUNSm_If_BNIfx7xx2A</recordid><startdate>20220302</startdate><enddate>20220302</enddate><creator>Merrill, VeRonika D</creator><creator>Ward, Matthew D</creator><creator>Diaz-McNair, Jovita</creator><creator>Pickett, Elizabeth A</creator><creator>Duh, Show-Hong</creator><creator>Christenson, Robert H</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220302</creationdate><title>Assessing Phlebotomy Device Preference and Specimen Quality in an Oncology Outpatient Clinic</title><author>Merrill, VeRonika D ; Ward, Matthew D ; Diaz-McNair, Jovita ; Pickett, Elizabeth A ; Duh, Show-Hong ; Christenson, Robert H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-7293d2fa04c42cf583407348d506a37294b64794f7091167f08ad0b7129793483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection</topic><topic>Hemoglobins - analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>L-Lactate Dehydrogenase</topic><topic>Phlebotomy</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merrill, VeRonika D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaz-McNair, Jovita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickett, Elizabeth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duh, Show-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christenson, Robert H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of applied laboratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merrill, VeRonika D</au><au>Ward, Matthew D</au><au>Diaz-McNair, Jovita</au><au>Pickett, Elizabeth A</au><au>Duh, Show-Hong</au><au>Christenson, Robert H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Phlebotomy Device Preference and Specimen Quality in an Oncology Outpatient Clinic</atitle><jtitle>The journal of applied laboratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Lab Med</addtitle><date>2022-03-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>532</spage><epage>540</epage><pages>532-540</pages><issn>2576-9456</issn><eissn>2475-7241</eissn><abstract>Oncology patients have frequent venipunctures, which causes scarring, making subsequent draws difficult and painful. Novel blood collection systems may decrease discomfort in patients experiencing repeat blood draws. Oncology outpatients (n = 101; criteria excluded 12) were recruited to determine their preference for either of two blood collection systems, the 23-gauge standard BD Vacutainer Push Button Blood Collection Set (Standard Push Button system) or the 25-gauge BD Vacutainer UltraTouch Push Button Blood Collection Set (UltraTouch Push Button system). Subjects received two blinded, randomized blood draws, one with each device and just one device for each arm. Subjects subsequently rated their blinded preference for blood collection system. Specimen quality was assessed for each device with measurements for plasma hemoglobin (Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer, Shimadzu), lactate dehydrogenase, and potassium (Vitros 4600/5600 analyzer, Ortho Diagnostics). Preference for the 25-gauge UltraTouch Push Button system over the 23-gauge Standard Push Button system was significant (UltraTouch, n = 51; Standard n = 30; no preference, n = 8; P = 0.0196). Regarding sample quality, the 25-gauge UltraTouch Push Button system had significantly lower plasma hemoglobin (average 5.34 mg/dL) vs the 23-gauge Standard Push Button system (9.37 mg/dL; P &lt; 0.0001); serum lactate dehydrogenase and potassium differences were not statistically significant. Subjects in an oncology clinic preferred phlebotomy with the 25-gauge UltraTouch Push Button system, and samples using this device had less hemolysis as assessed by plasma hemoglobin.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>34632493</pmid><doi>10.1093/jalm/jfab109</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2576-9456
ispartof The journal of applied laboratory medicine, 2022-03, Vol.7 (2), p.532-540
issn 2576-9456
2475-7241
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2580939619
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Ambulatory Care Facilities
Blood Specimen Collection
Hemoglobins - analysis
Humans
L-Lactate Dehydrogenase
Phlebotomy
Potassium
title Assessing Phlebotomy Device Preference and Specimen Quality in an Oncology Outpatient Clinic
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A23%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Phlebotomy%20Device%20Preference%20and%20Specimen%20Quality%20in%20an%20Oncology%20Outpatient%20Clinic&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20applied%20laboratory%20medicine&rft.au=Merrill,%20VeRonika%20D&rft.date=2022-03-02&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=532&rft.epage=540&rft.pages=532-540&rft.issn=2576-9456&rft.eissn=2475-7241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jalm/jfab109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2580939619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-7293d2fa04c42cf583407348d506a37294b64794f7091167f08ad0b7129793483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2580939619&rft_id=info:pmid/34632493&rfr_iscdi=true