Loading…

A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese

A compelling account of the reading process holds that words must be encoded serially, and so recognized strictly one at a time in the order they are encountered. However, this view has been challenged recently, based on evidence showing that readers sometimes fail to notice when adjacent words appe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cognition 2022-01, Vol.218, p.104922-104922, Article 104922
Main Authors: Liu, Zhiwei, Li, Yan, Cutter, Michael G., Paterson, Kevin B., Wang, Jingxin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f6be035470fd89ff1807534d553399f49b6676b3df4cf5e267c186e0bab33af3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f6be035470fd89ff1807534d553399f49b6676b3df4cf5e267c186e0bab33af3
container_end_page 104922
container_issue
container_start_page 104922
container_title Cognition
container_volume 218
creator Liu, Zhiwei
Li, Yan
Cutter, Michael G.
Paterson, Kevin B.
Wang, Jingxin
description A compelling account of the reading process holds that words must be encoded serially, and so recognized strictly one at a time in the order they are encountered. However, this view has been challenged recently, based on evidence showing that readers sometimes fail to notice when adjacent words appear in ungrammatical order. This is argued to show that words are actually encoded in parallel, so that multiple words are processed simultaneously and therefore might be recognized out of order. We tested this account in an experiment in Chinese with 112 skilled readers, employing methods used previously to demonstrate flexible word order processing, and display techniques that allowed or disallowed the parallel encoding of words. The results provided evidence for flexible word order processing even when words must be encoded serially. Accordingly, while word order can be processed flexibly during reading, this need not entail that words are encoded in parallel.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104922
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2581283130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010027721003450</els_id><sourcerecordid>2581283130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f6be035470fd89ff1807534d553399f49b6676b3df4cf5e267c186e0bab33af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtvGjEURq0qVSG0fyEZKZtshvo1tic7hGhaCakb9pbHvm6NmDGxB6L--5hCWWTT1ZU-nfs6CN0TPCeYiK_buY2_hjCGOMwppqSkvKX0A5oSJVktFVM3aIoxwTWmUk7Qbc5bjDGnUn1CE8YF4w1jU7RaVGMyQ97HDK5-jclV4D3YsTI2xZyrvDcWKjO4agw9PFWrY3AwlMin2FfL32GADJ_RR292Gb5c6gxtvq02y-_1-ufzj-ViXVvO1Vh70QFmDZfYO9V6TxSWDeOuKae0redtJ4QUHXOeW98AFdISJQB3pmPMeDZDj-ex-xRfDpBH3YdsYbczA8RD1rRRhCpGGC7owzt0Gw9pKMdpKmgBWspooeSZ-vtrAq_3KfQm_dEE65NovdVX0fokWp9Fl867y_xD14O79v0zW4DFGYDi4xgg6WzDSZwLqejVLob_LnkDKx6RWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2623039232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Liu, Zhiwei ; Li, Yan ; Cutter, Michael G. ; Paterson, Kevin B. ; Wang, Jingxin</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiwei ; Li, Yan ; Cutter, Michael G. ; Paterson, Kevin B. ; Wang, Jingxin</creatorcontrib><description>A compelling account of the reading process holds that words must be encoded serially, and so recognized strictly one at a time in the order they are encountered. However, this view has been challenged recently, based on evidence showing that readers sometimes fail to notice when adjacent words appear in ungrammatical order. This is argued to show that words are actually encoded in parallel, so that multiple words are processed simultaneously and therefore might be recognized out of order. We tested this account in an experiment in Chinese with 112 skilled readers, employing methods used previously to demonstrate flexible word order processing, and display techniques that allowed or disallowed the parallel encoding of words. The results provided evidence for flexible word order processing even when words must be encoded serially. Accordingly, while word order can be processed flexibly during reading, this need not entail that words are encoded in parallel.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104922</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34634533</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Asians ; China ; Chinese languages ; Encoding ; Humans ; Language ; Order processing ; Parallel processing ; Reading ; Serial processing ; Word order ; Word-transposition effect ; Words</subject><ispartof>Cognition, 2022-01, Vol.218, p.104922-104922, Article 104922</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f6be035470fd89ff1807534d553399f49b6676b3df4cf5e267c186e0bab33af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f6be035470fd89ff1807534d553399f49b6676b3df4cf5e267c186e0bab33af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31269,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34634533$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutter, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, Kevin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingxin</creatorcontrib><title>A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese</title><title>Cognition</title><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><description>A compelling account of the reading process holds that words must be encoded serially, and so recognized strictly one at a time in the order they are encountered. However, this view has been challenged recently, based on evidence showing that readers sometimes fail to notice when adjacent words appear in ungrammatical order. This is argued to show that words are actually encoded in parallel, so that multiple words are processed simultaneously and therefore might be recognized out of order. We tested this account in an experiment in Chinese with 112 skilled readers, employing methods used previously to demonstrate flexible word order processing, and display techniques that allowed or disallowed the parallel encoding of words. The results provided evidence for flexible word order processing even when words must be encoded serially. Accordingly, while word order can be processed flexibly during reading, this need not entail that words are encoded in parallel.</description><subject>Asians</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Encoding</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Order processing</subject><subject>Parallel processing</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Serial processing</subject><subject>Word order</subject><subject>Word-transposition effect</subject><subject>Words</subject><issn>0010-0277</issn><issn>1873-7838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtvGjEURq0qVSG0fyEZKZtshvo1tic7hGhaCakb9pbHvm6NmDGxB6L--5hCWWTT1ZU-nfs6CN0TPCeYiK_buY2_hjCGOMwppqSkvKX0A5oSJVktFVM3aIoxwTWmUk7Qbc5bjDGnUn1CE8YF4w1jU7RaVGMyQ97HDK5-jclV4D3YsTI2xZyrvDcWKjO4agw9PFWrY3AwlMin2FfL32GADJ_RR292Gb5c6gxtvq02y-_1-ufzj-ViXVvO1Vh70QFmDZfYO9V6TxSWDeOuKae0redtJ4QUHXOeW98AFdISJQB3pmPMeDZDj-ex-xRfDpBH3YdsYbczA8RD1rRRhCpGGC7owzt0Gw9pKMdpKmgBWspooeSZ-vtrAq_3KfQm_dEE65NovdVX0fokWp9Fl867y_xD14O79v0zW4DFGYDi4xgg6WzDSZwLqejVLob_LnkDKx6RWw</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Liu, Zhiwei</creator><creator>Li, Yan</creator><creator>Cutter, Michael G.</creator><creator>Paterson, Kevin B.</creator><creator>Wang, Jingxin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese</title><author>Liu, Zhiwei ; Li, Yan ; Cutter, Michael G. ; Paterson, Kevin B. ; Wang, Jingxin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f6be035470fd89ff1807534d553399f49b6676b3df4cf5e267c186e0bab33af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Asians</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Encoding</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Order processing</topic><topic>Parallel processing</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Serial processing</topic><topic>Word order</topic><topic>Word-transposition effect</topic><topic>Words</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutter, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, Kevin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingxin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Zhiwei</au><au>Li, Yan</au><au>Cutter, Michael G.</au><au>Paterson, Kevin B.</au><au>Wang, Jingxin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese</atitle><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>218</volume><spage>104922</spage><epage>104922</epage><pages>104922-104922</pages><artnum>104922</artnum><issn>0010-0277</issn><eissn>1873-7838</eissn><abstract>A compelling account of the reading process holds that words must be encoded serially, and so recognized strictly one at a time in the order they are encountered. However, this view has been challenged recently, based on evidence showing that readers sometimes fail to notice when adjacent words appear in ungrammatical order. This is argued to show that words are actually encoded in parallel, so that multiple words are processed simultaneously and therefore might be recognized out of order. We tested this account in an experiment in Chinese with 112 skilled readers, employing methods used previously to demonstrate flexible word order processing, and display techniques that allowed or disallowed the parallel encoding of words. The results provided evidence for flexible word order processing even when words must be encoded serially. Accordingly, while word order can be processed flexibly during reading, this need not entail that words are encoded in parallel.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>34634533</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104922</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-0277
ispartof Cognition, 2022-01, Vol.218, p.104922-104922, Article 104922
issn 0010-0277
1873-7838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2581283130
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Asians
China
Chinese languages
Encoding
Humans
Language
Order processing
Parallel processing
Reading
Serial processing
Word order
Word-transposition effect
Words
title A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A11%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20transposed-word%20effect%20across%20space%20and%20time:%20Evidence%20from%20Chinese&rft.jtitle=Cognition&rft.au=Liu,%20Zhiwei&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=218&rft.spage=104922&rft.epage=104922&rft.pages=104922-104922&rft.artnum=104922&rft.issn=0010-0277&rft.eissn=1873-7838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104922&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2581283130%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f6be035470fd89ff1807534d553399f49b6676b3df4cf5e267c186e0bab33af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2623039232&rft_id=info:pmid/34634533&rfr_iscdi=true