Loading…
A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese
A compelling account of the reading process holds that words must be encoded serially, and so recognized strictly one at a time in the order they are encountered. However, this view has been challenged recently, based on evidence showing that readers sometimes fail to notice when adjacent words appe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cognition 2022-01, Vol.218, p.104922-104922, Article 104922 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f6be035470fd89ff1807534d553399f49b6676b3df4cf5e267c186e0bab33af3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f6be035470fd89ff1807534d553399f49b6676b3df4cf5e267c186e0bab33af3 |
container_end_page | 104922 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 104922 |
container_title | Cognition |
container_volume | 218 |
creator | Liu, Zhiwei Li, Yan Cutter, Michael G. Paterson, Kevin B. Wang, Jingxin |
description | A compelling account of the reading process holds that words must be encoded serially, and so recognized strictly one at a time in the order they are encountered. However, this view has been challenged recently, based on evidence showing that readers sometimes fail to notice when adjacent words appear in ungrammatical order. This is argued to show that words are actually encoded in parallel, so that multiple words are processed simultaneously and therefore might be recognized out of order. We tested this account in an experiment in Chinese with 112 skilled readers, employing methods used previously to demonstrate flexible word order processing, and display techniques that allowed or disallowed the parallel encoding of words. The results provided evidence for flexible word order processing even when words must be encoded serially. Accordingly, while word order can be processed flexibly during reading, this need not entail that words are encoded in parallel. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104922 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2581283130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010027721003450</els_id><sourcerecordid>2581283130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f6be035470fd89ff1807534d553399f49b6676b3df4cf5e267c186e0bab33af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtvGjEURq0qVSG0fyEZKZtshvo1tic7hGhaCakb9pbHvm6NmDGxB6L--5hCWWTT1ZU-nfs6CN0TPCeYiK_buY2_hjCGOMwppqSkvKX0A5oSJVktFVM3aIoxwTWmUk7Qbc5bjDGnUn1CE8YF4w1jU7RaVGMyQ97HDK5-jclV4D3YsTI2xZyrvDcWKjO4agw9PFWrY3AwlMin2FfL32GADJ_RR292Gb5c6gxtvq02y-_1-ufzj-ViXVvO1Vh70QFmDZfYO9V6TxSWDeOuKae0redtJ4QUHXOeW98AFdISJQB3pmPMeDZDj-ex-xRfDpBH3YdsYbczA8RD1rRRhCpGGC7owzt0Gw9pKMdpKmgBWspooeSZ-vtrAq_3KfQm_dEE65NovdVX0fokWp9Fl867y_xD14O79v0zW4DFGYDi4xgg6WzDSZwLqejVLob_LnkDKx6RWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2623039232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Liu, Zhiwei ; Li, Yan ; Cutter, Michael G. ; Paterson, Kevin B. ; Wang, Jingxin</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiwei ; Li, Yan ; Cutter, Michael G. ; Paterson, Kevin B. ; Wang, Jingxin</creatorcontrib><description>A compelling account of the reading process holds that words must be encoded serially, and so recognized strictly one at a time in the order they are encountered. However, this view has been challenged recently, based on evidence showing that readers sometimes fail to notice when adjacent words appear in ungrammatical order. This is argued to show that words are actually encoded in parallel, so that multiple words are processed simultaneously and therefore might be recognized out of order. We tested this account in an experiment in Chinese with 112 skilled readers, employing methods used previously to demonstrate flexible word order processing, and display techniques that allowed or disallowed the parallel encoding of words. The results provided evidence for flexible word order processing even when words must be encoded serially. Accordingly, while word order can be processed flexibly during reading, this need not entail that words are encoded in parallel.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104922</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34634533</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Asians ; China ; Chinese languages ; Encoding ; Humans ; Language ; Order processing ; Parallel processing ; Reading ; Serial processing ; Word order ; Word-transposition effect ; Words</subject><ispartof>Cognition, 2022-01, Vol.218, p.104922-104922, Article 104922</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f6be035470fd89ff1807534d553399f49b6676b3df4cf5e267c186e0bab33af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f6be035470fd89ff1807534d553399f49b6676b3df4cf5e267c186e0bab33af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31269,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34634533$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutter, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, Kevin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingxin</creatorcontrib><title>A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese</title><title>Cognition</title><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><description>A compelling account of the reading process holds that words must be encoded serially, and so recognized strictly one at a time in the order they are encountered. However, this view has been challenged recently, based on evidence showing that readers sometimes fail to notice when adjacent words appear in ungrammatical order. This is argued to show that words are actually encoded in parallel, so that multiple words are processed simultaneously and therefore might be recognized out of order. We tested this account in an experiment in Chinese with 112 skilled readers, employing methods used previously to demonstrate flexible word order processing, and display techniques that allowed or disallowed the parallel encoding of words. The results provided evidence for flexible word order processing even when words must be encoded serially. Accordingly, while word order can be processed flexibly during reading, this need not entail that words are encoded in parallel.</description><subject>Asians</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Encoding</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Order processing</subject><subject>Parallel processing</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Serial processing</subject><subject>Word order</subject><subject>Word-transposition effect</subject><subject>Words</subject><issn>0010-0277</issn><issn>1873-7838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtvGjEURq0qVSG0fyEZKZtshvo1tic7hGhaCakb9pbHvm6NmDGxB6L--5hCWWTT1ZU-nfs6CN0TPCeYiK_buY2_hjCGOMwppqSkvKX0A5oSJVktFVM3aIoxwTWmUk7Qbc5bjDGnUn1CE8YF4w1jU7RaVGMyQ97HDK5-jclV4D3YsTI2xZyrvDcWKjO4agw9PFWrY3AwlMin2FfL32GADJ_RR292Gb5c6gxtvq02y-_1-ufzj-ViXVvO1Vh70QFmDZfYO9V6TxSWDeOuKae0redtJ4QUHXOeW98AFdISJQB3pmPMeDZDj-ex-xRfDpBH3YdsYbczA8RD1rRRhCpGGC7owzt0Gw9pKMdpKmgBWspooeSZ-vtrAq_3KfQm_dEE65NovdVX0fokWp9Fl867y_xD14O79v0zW4DFGYDi4xgg6WzDSZwLqejVLob_LnkDKx6RWw</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Liu, Zhiwei</creator><creator>Li, Yan</creator><creator>Cutter, Michael G.</creator><creator>Paterson, Kevin B.</creator><creator>Wang, Jingxin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese</title><author>Liu, Zhiwei ; Li, Yan ; Cutter, Michael G. ; Paterson, Kevin B. ; Wang, Jingxin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f6be035470fd89ff1807534d553399f49b6676b3df4cf5e267c186e0bab33af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Asians</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Encoding</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Order processing</topic><topic>Parallel processing</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Serial processing</topic><topic>Word order</topic><topic>Word-transposition effect</topic><topic>Words</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutter, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, Kevin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingxin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Zhiwei</au><au>Li, Yan</au><au>Cutter, Michael G.</au><au>Paterson, Kevin B.</au><au>Wang, Jingxin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese</atitle><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>218</volume><spage>104922</spage><epage>104922</epage><pages>104922-104922</pages><artnum>104922</artnum><issn>0010-0277</issn><eissn>1873-7838</eissn><abstract>A compelling account of the reading process holds that words must be encoded serially, and so recognized strictly one at a time in the order they are encountered. However, this view has been challenged recently, based on evidence showing that readers sometimes fail to notice when adjacent words appear in ungrammatical order. This is argued to show that words are actually encoded in parallel, so that multiple words are processed simultaneously and therefore might be recognized out of order. We tested this account in an experiment in Chinese with 112 skilled readers, employing methods used previously to demonstrate flexible word order processing, and display techniques that allowed or disallowed the parallel encoding of words. The results provided evidence for flexible word order processing even when words must be encoded serially. Accordingly, while word order can be processed flexibly during reading, this need not entail that words are encoded in parallel.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>34634533</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104922</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-0277 |
ispartof | Cognition, 2022-01, Vol.218, p.104922-104922, Article 104922 |
issn | 0010-0277 1873-7838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2581283130 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Asians China Chinese languages Encoding Humans Language Order processing Parallel processing Reading Serial processing Word order Word-transposition effect Words |
title | A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A11%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20transposed-word%20effect%20across%20space%20and%20time:%20Evidence%20from%20Chinese&rft.jtitle=Cognition&rft.au=Liu,%20Zhiwei&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=218&rft.spage=104922&rft.epage=104922&rft.pages=104922-104922&rft.artnum=104922&rft.issn=0010-0277&rft.eissn=1873-7838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104922&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2581283130%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f6be035470fd89ff1807534d553399f49b6676b3df4cf5e267c186e0bab33af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2623039232&rft_id=info:pmid/34634533&rfr_iscdi=true |