Loading…
Deep learning radiomics of ultrasonography can predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer at an early stage of treatment: a prospective study
Objectives Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women worldwide, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is considered the standard of treatment for most patients with BC. However, response rates to NAC vary among patients, which leads to delays in appropriate treatment and affects the prognos...
Saved in:
Published in: | European radiology 2022-03, Vol.32 (3), p.2099-2109 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f8ecb247bf94120d81374ae6dcf16cae1b91494be5c743c660d29474d77310f53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f8ecb247bf94120d81374ae6dcf16cae1b91494be5c743c660d29474d77310f53 |
container_end_page | 2109 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 2099 |
container_title | European radiology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Gu, Jionghui Tong, Tong He, Chang Xu, Min Yang, Xin Tian, Jie Jiang, Tianan Wang, Kun |
description | Objectives
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women worldwide, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is considered the standard of treatment for most patients with BC. However, response rates to NAC vary among patients, which leads to delays in appropriate treatment and affects the prognosis for patients who ineffectively respond to NAC. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of deep learning radiomics (DLR) in the prediction of NAC response at an early stage.
Methods
In total, 168 patients with clinicopathologically confirmed BC were enrolled in this prospective study, from March 2016 to December 2020. All patients completed NAC treatment and underwent ultrasonography (US) at three time points (before NAC, after the second course, and after the fourth course). We developed two DLR models, DLR-2 and DLR-4, for predicting responses after the second and fourth courses of NAC. Furthermore, a novel deep learning radiomics pipeline (DLRP) was proposed for stepwise prediction of response at different time points of NAC administration.
Results
In the validation cohort, DLR-2 achieved an AUC of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.770–0.851) with an NPV of 83.3% (95% CI: 76.5–89.6). DLR-4 achieved an AUC of 0.937 (95% CI: 0.913–0.955) with a specificity of 90.5% (95% CI: 86.3–94.2). Moreover, 19 of 21 non-response patients were successfully identified by DLRP, suggesting that they could benefit from treatment strategy adjustment at an early stage of NAC.
Conclusions
The proposed DLRP strategy holds promise for effectively predicting NAC response at its early stage for BC patients.
Key Points
• We proposed two novel deep learning radiomics (DLR) models to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC) patients based on US images at different NAC time points.
• Combining two DLR models, a deep learning radiomics pipeline (DLRP) was proposed for stepwise prediction of response to NAC.
• The DLRP may provide BC patients and physicians with an effective and feasible tool to predict response to NAC at an early stage and to determine further personalized treatment options. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00330-021-08293-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2582811408</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2627261986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f8ecb247bf94120d81374ae6dcf16cae1b91494be5c743c660d29474d77310f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAYxC0EotvCC3BAlrhwCfhf7JgbaqEgVeICZ8uxv-xmldjBdirlbXhUvGwBiQMnH_ybmW80CL2g5A0lRL3NhHBOGsJoQzqmebM9QjsqOGso6cRjtCOad43SWlygy5yPhBBNhXqKLriQrdCy3aEfNwALnsCmMIY9TtaPcR5dxnHA61SSzTHEfbLLYcPOBrwk8KMrOEFeYsiAS8QBovXH9d6Ggt0B5lgOUBUbHgPuE9hcTlIHCduCq0cNmzaci93DKaZUpMwQyjtsq3_MC7gy3kMlVr89Q08GO2V4_vBeoW8fP3y9_tTcfbn9fP3-rnFctaUZOnA9E6oftKCM-I5yJSxI7wYqnQXa1-pa9NA6JbiTknimhRJeKU7J0PIr9PrsWy_4vkIuZh6zg2mytd6aDWs71lEqSFfRV_-gx7imUK8zTDLFJNWdrBQ7U65WygkGs6RxtmkzlJjTfua8n6n7mV_7ma2KXj5Yr_0M_o_k92AV4Gcg16-wh_Q3-z-2PwGWUamY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627261986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deep learning radiomics of ultrasonography can predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer at an early stage of treatment: a prospective study</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Gu, Jionghui ; Tong, Tong ; He, Chang ; Xu, Min ; Yang, Xin ; Tian, Jie ; Jiang, Tianan ; Wang, Kun</creator><creatorcontrib>Gu, Jionghui ; Tong, Tong ; He, Chang ; Xu, Min ; Yang, Xin ; Tian, Jie ; Jiang, Tianan ; Wang, Kun</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women worldwide, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is considered the standard of treatment for most patients with BC. However, response rates to NAC vary among patients, which leads to delays in appropriate treatment and affects the prognosis for patients who ineffectively respond to NAC. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of deep learning radiomics (DLR) in the prediction of NAC response at an early stage.
Methods
In total, 168 patients with clinicopathologically confirmed BC were enrolled in this prospective study, from March 2016 to December 2020. All patients completed NAC treatment and underwent ultrasonography (US) at three time points (before NAC, after the second course, and after the fourth course). We developed two DLR models, DLR-2 and DLR-4, for predicting responses after the second and fourth courses of NAC. Furthermore, a novel deep learning radiomics pipeline (DLRP) was proposed for stepwise prediction of response at different time points of NAC administration.
Results
In the validation cohort, DLR-2 achieved an AUC of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.770–0.851) with an NPV of 83.3% (95% CI: 76.5–89.6). DLR-4 achieved an AUC of 0.937 (95% CI: 0.913–0.955) with a specificity of 90.5% (95% CI: 86.3–94.2). Moreover, 19 of 21 non-response patients were successfully identified by DLRP, suggesting that they could benefit from treatment strategy adjustment at an early stage of NAC.
Conclusions
The proposed DLRP strategy holds promise for effectively predicting NAC response at its early stage for BC patients.
Key Points
• We proposed two novel deep learning radiomics (DLR) models to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC) patients based on US images at different NAC time points.
• Combining two DLR models, a deep learning radiomics pipeline (DLRP) was proposed for stepwise prediction of response to NAC.
• The DLRP may provide BC patients and physicians with an effective and feasible tool to predict response to NAC at an early stage and to determine further personalized treatment options.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08293-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34654965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Chemotherapy ; Deep Learning ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Feasibility ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neuroradiology ; Patients ; Physicians ; Predictions ; Prospective Studies ; Radiology ; Radiomics ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2022-03, Vol.32 (3), p.2099-2109</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2021</rights><rights>2021. European Society of Radiology.</rights><rights>European Society of Radiology 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f8ecb247bf94120d81374ae6dcf16cae1b91494be5c743c660d29474d77310f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f8ecb247bf94120d81374ae6dcf16cae1b91494be5c743c660d29474d77310f53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2513-768X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34654965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gu, Jionghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Tianan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kun</creatorcontrib><title>Deep learning radiomics of ultrasonography can predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer at an early stage of treatment: a prospective study</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women worldwide, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is considered the standard of treatment for most patients with BC. However, response rates to NAC vary among patients, which leads to delays in appropriate treatment and affects the prognosis for patients who ineffectively respond to NAC. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of deep learning radiomics (DLR) in the prediction of NAC response at an early stage.
Methods
In total, 168 patients with clinicopathologically confirmed BC were enrolled in this prospective study, from March 2016 to December 2020. All patients completed NAC treatment and underwent ultrasonography (US) at three time points (before NAC, after the second course, and after the fourth course). We developed two DLR models, DLR-2 and DLR-4, for predicting responses after the second and fourth courses of NAC. Furthermore, a novel deep learning radiomics pipeline (DLRP) was proposed for stepwise prediction of response at different time points of NAC administration.
Results
In the validation cohort, DLR-2 achieved an AUC of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.770–0.851) with an NPV of 83.3% (95% CI: 76.5–89.6). DLR-4 achieved an AUC of 0.937 (95% CI: 0.913–0.955) with a specificity of 90.5% (95% CI: 86.3–94.2). Moreover, 19 of 21 non-response patients were successfully identified by DLRP, suggesting that they could benefit from treatment strategy adjustment at an early stage of NAC.
Conclusions
The proposed DLRP strategy holds promise for effectively predicting NAC response at its early stage for BC patients.
Key Points
• We proposed two novel deep learning radiomics (DLR) models to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC) patients based on US images at different NAC time points.
• Combining two DLR models, a deep learning radiomics pipeline (DLRP) was proposed for stepwise prediction of response to NAC.
• The DLRP may provide BC patients and physicians with an effective and feasible tool to predict response to NAC at an early stage and to determine further personalized treatment options.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiomics</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAYxC0EotvCC3BAlrhwCfhf7JgbaqEgVeICZ8uxv-xmldjBdirlbXhUvGwBiQMnH_ybmW80CL2g5A0lRL3NhHBOGsJoQzqmebM9QjsqOGso6cRjtCOad43SWlygy5yPhBBNhXqKLriQrdCy3aEfNwALnsCmMIY9TtaPcR5dxnHA61SSzTHEfbLLYcPOBrwk8KMrOEFeYsiAS8QBovXH9d6Ggt0B5lgOUBUbHgPuE9hcTlIHCduCq0cNmzaci93DKaZUpMwQyjtsq3_MC7gy3kMlVr89Q08GO2V4_vBeoW8fP3y9_tTcfbn9fP3-rnFctaUZOnA9E6oftKCM-I5yJSxI7wYqnQXa1-pa9NA6JbiTknimhRJeKU7J0PIr9PrsWy_4vkIuZh6zg2mytd6aDWs71lEqSFfRV_-gx7imUK8zTDLFJNWdrBQ7U65WygkGs6RxtmkzlJjTfua8n6n7mV_7ma2KXj5Yr_0M_o_k92AV4Gcg16-wh_Q3-z-2PwGWUamY</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Gu, Jionghui</creator><creator>Tong, Tong</creator><creator>He, Chang</creator><creator>Xu, Min</creator><creator>Yang, Xin</creator><creator>Tian, Jie</creator><creator>Jiang, Tianan</creator><creator>Wang, Kun</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-768X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Deep learning radiomics of ultrasonography can predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer at an early stage of treatment: a prospective study</title><author>Gu, Jionghui ; Tong, Tong ; He, Chang ; Xu, Min ; Yang, Xin ; Tian, Jie ; Jiang, Tianan ; Wang, Kun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f8ecb247bf94120d81374ae6dcf16cae1b91494be5c743c660d29474d77310f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiomics</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gu, Jionghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Tianan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gu, Jionghui</au><au>Tong, Tong</au><au>He, Chang</au><au>Xu, Min</au><au>Yang, Xin</au><au>Tian, Jie</au><au>Jiang, Tianan</au><au>Wang, Kun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deep learning radiomics of ultrasonography can predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer at an early stage of treatment: a prospective study</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2099</spage><epage>2109</epage><pages>2099-2109</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women worldwide, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is considered the standard of treatment for most patients with BC. However, response rates to NAC vary among patients, which leads to delays in appropriate treatment and affects the prognosis for patients who ineffectively respond to NAC. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of deep learning radiomics (DLR) in the prediction of NAC response at an early stage.
Methods
In total, 168 patients with clinicopathologically confirmed BC were enrolled in this prospective study, from March 2016 to December 2020. All patients completed NAC treatment and underwent ultrasonography (US) at three time points (before NAC, after the second course, and after the fourth course). We developed two DLR models, DLR-2 and DLR-4, for predicting responses after the second and fourth courses of NAC. Furthermore, a novel deep learning radiomics pipeline (DLRP) was proposed for stepwise prediction of response at different time points of NAC administration.
Results
In the validation cohort, DLR-2 achieved an AUC of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.770–0.851) with an NPV of 83.3% (95% CI: 76.5–89.6). DLR-4 achieved an AUC of 0.937 (95% CI: 0.913–0.955) with a specificity of 90.5% (95% CI: 86.3–94.2). Moreover, 19 of 21 non-response patients were successfully identified by DLRP, suggesting that they could benefit from treatment strategy adjustment at an early stage of NAC.
Conclusions
The proposed DLRP strategy holds promise for effectively predicting NAC response at its early stage for BC patients.
Key Points
• We proposed two novel deep learning radiomics (DLR) models to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC) patients based on US images at different NAC time points.
• Combining two DLR models, a deep learning radiomics pipeline (DLRP) was proposed for stepwise prediction of response to NAC.
• The DLRP may provide BC patients and physicians with an effective and feasible tool to predict response to NAC at an early stage and to determine further personalized treatment options.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34654965</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-021-08293-y</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-768X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-7994 |
ispartof | European radiology, 2022-03, Vol.32 (3), p.2099-2109 |
issn | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2582811408 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy Chemotherapy Deep Learning Diagnostic Radiology Feasibility Female Humans Imaging Internal Medicine Interventional Radiology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neoadjuvant Therapy Neuroradiology Patients Physicians Predictions Prospective Studies Radiology Radiomics Retrospective Studies Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography Ultrasound |
title | Deep learning radiomics of ultrasonography can predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer at an early stage of treatment: a prospective study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T00%3A07%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep%20learning%20radiomics%20of%20ultrasonography%20can%20predict%20response%20to%20neoadjuvant%20chemotherapy%20in%20breast%20cancer%20at%20an%20early%20stage%20of%20treatment:%20a%20prospective%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Gu,%20Jionghui&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2099&rft.epage=2109&rft.pages=2099-2109&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-021-08293-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2627261986%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f8ecb247bf94120d81374ae6dcf16cae1b91494be5c743c660d29474d77310f53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627261986&rft_id=info:pmid/34654965&rfr_iscdi=true |