Loading…

Disappointing evaluation of a shared decision-making intervention for residents and orthopaedic surgeons

•A multifaceted intervention showed no effect on the level of shared decision making.•Referred patients mostly preferred surgery for hip and knee osteoarthritis.•Training resulted in improved physician knowledge about shared decision making.•Patients’ uptake of the decision aid was low in hip and kn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Patient education and counseling 2022-05, Vol.105 (5), p.1066-1074
Main Authors: Bossen, Jeroen K.J., Jansen, Jesse, van der Weijden, Trudy, Heyligers, Ide C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•A multifaceted intervention showed no effect on the level of shared decision making.•Referred patients mostly preferred surgery for hip and knee osteoarthritis.•Training resulted in improved physician knowledge about shared decision making.•Patients’ uptake of the decision aid was low in hip and knee osteoarthritis care. To evaluate a shared decision-making (SDM) intervention in orthopaedic hip and knee osteoarthritis care. Using a pre- post intervention design study, we tested an intervention, that included a decision aid for patients (ptDA) and a SDM training course for residents in training and orthopaedic surgeons. The theory of planned behaviour was used for intervention development. Primary outcomes included patient reported decisional conflict, SDM, and satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were physicians’ attitude and knowledge, and uptake of the ptDA. 317 patients were included. The intervention improved physicians’ knowledge about SDM but had no effect on the primary outcomes. 19 eligible patients used the ptDA (17%). SDM was higher for middle educated patients compared to lower educated (mean difference 9.91, p=0.004), patients who saw surgeons instead of residents (mean difference 5.46, p=0.044) and when surgery was chosen and desired by patients compared to situations where surgery was desired but not chosen (mean difference 15.39, p=0.036). Our multifaceted intervention did not improve SDM and ptDA uptake was low. In orthopaedic hip and knee osteoarthritic care other ways should be explored to successful implement SDM. Since residents received lower SDM scores, special focus should go to this group.
ISSN:0738-3991
1873-5134
DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2021.09.029