Anthropogenic drivers of avian community turnover from local to regional scales

• Published in: Global change biology 2022-02, Vol.28 (3), p.770-781
• Main Authors: Di Cecco, Grace J., Hurlbert, Allen H.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal breeding; Animals; Anthropogenic changes; Anthropogenic factors; Biodiversity; birds; Birds - physiology; Breeding; Climate Change; Ecological effects; Ecosystem; Foraging; Guilds; Human influences; Land use; Ordination; Regional analysis; Scale (ratio); spatial scaling; Species; Surveying; Temperature; traits; turnover; Variance
• ISSN: 1354-1013; 1365-2486
• DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15967

Anthropogenic change has altered the composition and function of ecological communities across the globe. As a result, there is a need for studies examining observed community compositional change and determining whether and how anthropogenic change drivers may be influencing that turnover. In particular, it is also important to determine to what extent community turnover is idiosyncratic or if turnover can be explained by predictable responses across species based on traits or niche characteristics. Here, we measured turnover in avian communities across North America from 1990 to 2016 in the Breeding Bird Survey using an ordination method, and modeled turnover as a function of land use and climate change drivers from local to regional scales. We also examined how turnover may be attributed to species groups, including foraging guilds, trophic groups, migratory distance, and breeding biomes. We found that at local scales, land use change explained a greater proportion of variance in turnover than climate change variables, while as scale increased, trends in temperature explained a greater proportion of variance in turnover. We also found across the study region, turnover could be attributed to one of a handful of species undergoing strong expansions or strong declines over the study time period. We did not observe consistent patterns in compositional change in any trait groups we examined except for those that included previously identified highly influential species. Our results have two important implications: First, the relative importance of different anthropogenic change drivers may vary with scale, which should be considered in studies’ modeling impacts of global change on biodiversity. Second, in North American avian communities, individual species undergoing large shifts in population may drive signals in compositional change, and composite community turnover metrics should be carefully selected as a result. Avian communities are undergoing compositional change, and the relative importance of different anthropogenic change drivers of community turnover changes with scale. At local scales, turnover is more explained by land cover change, while at regional scales, climate change is more explanatory. Individual species experiencing population expansions or declines also contribute to turnover observed over the last 20 years in North American breeding bird communities.