Understanding disparities and barriers associated with pediatric transplant evaluation and time to listing: Moving toward a more comprehensive picture

• Published in: Pediatric transplantation 2022-03, Vol.26 (2), p.e14182-n/a
• Main Authors: Steinberg Christofferson, Elizabeth, Ruzicka, Elizabeth B., Bolt, Matthew, Lyons, Emma, Wachs, Michael, Buchanan, Cindy L., Schmiege, Sarah J., Monnin, Kara
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Candidates; Child; Child, Preschool; ethnicity/race; Female; health disparities; Healthcare Disparities - statistics & numerical data; Heart transplantation; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Kidneys; Liver; Liver transplantation; Male; Morbidity; Motivation; Organ Transplantation; Patients; pediatric transplant; Pediatrics; Regression analysis; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Socioeconomic Factors; socioeconomic status; Statistical analysis; Substance use; transplant psychological evaluation; waiting list; Waiting Lists
• ISSN: 1397-3142; 1399-3046
• DOI: 10.1111/petr.14182

Background Delayed time to listing (TTL) for pediatric transplant patients is associated with increased risks of mortality and morbidity. The full range of health disparities, sociodemographic factors, and other barriers associated with delays in listing in the pediatric transplant candidate evaluation process has not been fully examined. Methods Retrospective chart reviews were conducted for 183 kidney, liver, and heart transplant candidates ages 0–18 who were referred for evaluation during 2012–2015. Demographic information and potential barriers (e g., social/medical factors, financial concerns) were gathered from pre‐transplant evaluations and included in a comprehensive model to evaluate mechanisms that explain differences in TTL. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression models, Cox proportional hazards models, and path analysis were used for analyses. Results Candidates included 26.8% heart, 33.3% liver, and 39.9% kidney patients. The most common barrier to listing was financial (71.6%), followed by caregiver psychological or substance use (57.9%), and medical problems (49.7%). Higher age, kidney, and liver organ type (relative to the heart), and presence of social, medical, administrative/motivation, and financial barriers were all directly associated with longer TTL. Public insurance was indirectly associated with TTL through social, administrative/motivation, and financial barriers. Organ type was indirectly associated with TTL through financial barriers. Conclusions Results suggest social problems, administrative issues, and financial issues act as mechanisms through which insurance type and liver transplant candidates face increased risk of delays in transplant listing time. There are numerous clinical implications and interventions that are warranted to reduce TTL among pediatric transplant candidates with co‐occurring barriers.