Loading…
Left bundle branch pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Background The clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been demonstrated. However, a nonresponse rate of CRT nearly 1/3. Recent studies have reported left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has achieved remarkable effect...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2022-02, Vol.45 (2), p.212-218 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
The clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been demonstrated. However, a nonresponse rate of CRT nearly 1/3. Recent studies have reported left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has achieved remarkable effect in CRT. This study aim to explore the efficacy and safety of LBBP in heart failure patients with LBBB.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science, and CNKI databases for studies about LBBP in heart failure patients with LBBB. QRS duration (QRSd), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter (LVEDD), pacing threshold and other related data were extracted and summarized.
Results
A total of 6 studies were included, and the success rate of LBBP was 93.2%. Compared with baseline, LBBP could shorten QRSd (MD = 61.23, 95% CI: 58.21–64.25, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0147-8389 1540-8159 |
DOI: | 10.1111/pace.14405 |