Loading…

Polarized M2 macrophages induced by mechanical stretching modulate bone regeneration of the craniofacial suture for midfacial hypoplasia treatment

The underlying mechanism of the trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis (TSDO) technique as an effective treatment that improves the symptoms of midfacial hypoplasia syndromes is not clearly understood. Increasing findings in the orthopedics field indicate that macrophages are mechanically sensitive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cell and tissue research 2021-12, Vol.386 (3), p.585-603
Main Authors: Liang, Wei, Ding, Pengbing, Qian, Jiaying, Li, Guan, Lu, Enhang, Zhao, Zhenmin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-6375189b7be57f02a529ea963bbb417c268c9ae55937e46eb8441254ad6caaf33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-6375189b7be57f02a529ea963bbb417c268c9ae55937e46eb8441254ad6caaf33
container_end_page 603
container_issue 3
container_start_page 585
container_title Cell and tissue research
container_volume 386
creator Liang, Wei
Ding, Pengbing
Qian, Jiaying
Li, Guan
Lu, Enhang
Zhao, Zhenmin
description The underlying mechanism of the trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis (TSDO) technique as an effective treatment that improves the symptoms of midfacial hypoplasia syndromes is not clearly understood. Increasing findings in the orthopedics field indicate that macrophages are mechanically sensitive and their phenotypes can respond to mechanical cues. However, how macrophages respond to mechanical stretching and consequently influence osteoblast differentiation of suture-derived stem cells (SuSCs) remains unclear, particularly during the TSDO process. In the present study, we established a TSDO rat model to determine whether and how macrophages were polarized in response to stretching and consequently affected bone regeneration of the suture frontal edge. Notably, after performing immunofluorescence, RNA-sequencing, and micro-computed tomography, it was demonstrated that macrophages are first recruited by various chemokines factors and polarized to the M2 phenotype upon optimal stretching. The latter in turn regulates SuSC activity and facilitates bone regeneration in sutures. Moreover, when the activated M2 macrophages were suppressed by pharmacological manipulation, new bone microarchitecture could rarely be detected under mechanical stretching and the expansion of the sutures was clear. Additionally, macrophages achieved M2 polarization in response to the optimal mechanical stretching (10%, 0.5 Hz) and strongly facilitated SuSC osteogenic differentiation and human umbilical vein endothelial cell angiogenesis using an indirect co-culture system in vitro. Collectively, this study revealed the mechanical stimulation-immune response-bone regeneration axis and clarified at least in part how sutures achieve bone regeneration in response to mechanical force.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00441-021-03533-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2598076028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A682856170</galeid><sourcerecordid>A682856170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-6375189b7be57f02a529ea963bbb417c268c9ae55937e46eb8441254ad6caaf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks2KFDEUhQtRnHH0BVxIQBA3NaaSyk8th8E_GNGFgrtwK3WrK0NV0iapRc9j-MSm7dZxRCSEwM13Drk3p6qeNvS8oVS9SpS2bVNTVjYXnNfiXnXatJzVVCt9vzqlnLJaSfn1pHqU0jWlTStl97A64a2QuhPqtPr-KcwQ3Q0O5AMjC9gYthNsMBHnh9WWcr8jC9oJvLMwk5QjZjs5vyFLGNYZMpI-eCQRN-gxQnbBkzCSPCGxsajCCNbtlWteI5IxRLK44VicdtuwnSE5IMUY8oI-P64ejDAnfHI8z6ovb15_vnxXX318-_7y4qq2reK5llyJRne96lGokTIQrEPoJO_7vm2UZVLbDlCIjitsJfa6DIuJFgZpAUbOz6qXB99tDN9WTNksLlmcZ_AY1mSY6DRVkjJd0Od_oddhjb68bk-pjkstmltqAzMa58eQI9i9qbmQmmkhG0ULdf4PqqwBF2fLKEdX6ncEL_4QTAhznlKY1_2k012QHcDyiSlFHM02ugXizjTU7BNjDokxJTHmZ2KMKKJnx9bWfsHht-RXRArAD0AqV36D8bb3_9j-ALRPy-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2597936851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Polarized M2 macrophages induced by mechanical stretching modulate bone regeneration of the craniofacial suture for midfacial hypoplasia treatment</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Liang, Wei ; Ding, Pengbing ; Qian, Jiaying ; Li, Guan ; Lu, Enhang ; Zhao, Zhenmin</creator><creatorcontrib>Liang, Wei ; Ding, Pengbing ; Qian, Jiaying ; Li, Guan ; Lu, Enhang ; Zhao, Zhenmin</creatorcontrib><description>The underlying mechanism of the trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis (TSDO) technique as an effective treatment that improves the symptoms of midfacial hypoplasia syndromes is not clearly understood. Increasing findings in the orthopedics field indicate that macrophages are mechanically sensitive and their phenotypes can respond to mechanical cues. However, how macrophages respond to mechanical stretching and consequently influence osteoblast differentiation of suture-derived stem cells (SuSCs) remains unclear, particularly during the TSDO process. In the present study, we established a TSDO rat model to determine whether and how macrophages were polarized in response to stretching and consequently affected bone regeneration of the suture frontal edge. Notably, after performing immunofluorescence, RNA-sequencing, and micro-computed tomography, it was demonstrated that macrophages are first recruited by various chemokines factors and polarized to the M2 phenotype upon optimal stretching. The latter in turn regulates SuSC activity and facilitates bone regeneration in sutures. Moreover, when the activated M2 macrophages were suppressed by pharmacological manipulation, new bone microarchitecture could rarely be detected under mechanical stretching and the expansion of the sutures was clear. Additionally, macrophages achieved M2 polarization in response to the optimal mechanical stretching (10%, 0.5 Hz) and strongly facilitated SuSC osteogenic differentiation and human umbilical vein endothelial cell angiogenesis using an indirect co-culture system in vitro. Collectively, this study revealed the mechanical stimulation-immune response-bone regeneration axis and clarified at least in part how sutures achieve bone regeneration in response to mechanical force.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-766X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0878</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00441-021-03533-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34568957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Angiogenesis ; Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Bone growth ; Bone Regeneration - physiology ; Cell culture ; Cell differentiation ; Chemokines ; Computed tomography ; Cranial Sutures ; Disease Models, Animal ; Distraction osteogenesis ; Endothelial cells ; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ; Face - surgery ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Hypoplasia ; Immune response ; Immunofluorescence ; Macrophages ; Macrophages - metabolism ; Male ; Mechanical stimuli ; Molecular Medicine ; Osteoblastogenesis ; Phenotypes ; Proteomics ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Regeneration ; Regular Article ; RNA ; Stem cell transplantation ; Stem cells ; Sutures ; Umbilical vein</subject><ispartof>Cell and tissue research, 2021-12, Vol.386 (3), p.585-603</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-6375189b7be57f02a529ea963bbb417c268c9ae55937e46eb8441254ad6caaf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-6375189b7be57f02a529ea963bbb417c268c9ae55937e46eb8441254ad6caaf33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7177-2169</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Pengbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Jiaying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Enhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Zhenmin</creatorcontrib><title>Polarized M2 macrophages induced by mechanical stretching modulate bone regeneration of the craniofacial suture for midfacial hypoplasia treatment</title><title>Cell and tissue research</title><addtitle>Cell Tissue Res</addtitle><addtitle>Cell Tissue Res</addtitle><description>The underlying mechanism of the trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis (TSDO) technique as an effective treatment that improves the symptoms of midfacial hypoplasia syndromes is not clearly understood. Increasing findings in the orthopedics field indicate that macrophages are mechanically sensitive and their phenotypes can respond to mechanical cues. However, how macrophages respond to mechanical stretching and consequently influence osteoblast differentiation of suture-derived stem cells (SuSCs) remains unclear, particularly during the TSDO process. In the present study, we established a TSDO rat model to determine whether and how macrophages were polarized in response to stretching and consequently affected bone regeneration of the suture frontal edge. Notably, after performing immunofluorescence, RNA-sequencing, and micro-computed tomography, it was demonstrated that macrophages are first recruited by various chemokines factors and polarized to the M2 phenotype upon optimal stretching. The latter in turn regulates SuSC activity and facilitates bone regeneration in sutures. Moreover, when the activated M2 macrophages were suppressed by pharmacological manipulation, new bone microarchitecture could rarely be detected under mechanical stretching and the expansion of the sutures was clear. Additionally, macrophages achieved M2 polarization in response to the optimal mechanical stretching (10%, 0.5 Hz) and strongly facilitated SuSC osteogenic differentiation and human umbilical vein endothelial cell angiogenesis using an indirect co-culture system in vitro. Collectively, this study revealed the mechanical stimulation-immune response-bone regeneration axis and clarified at least in part how sutures achieve bone regeneration in response to mechanical force.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Angiogenesis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Bone growth</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration - physiology</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cell differentiation</subject><subject>Chemokines</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cranial Sutures</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Distraction osteogenesis</subject><subject>Endothelial cells</subject><subject>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid</subject><subject>Face - surgery</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypoplasia</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Immunofluorescence</subject><subject>Macrophages</subject><subject>Macrophages - metabolism</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mechanical stimuli</subject><subject>Molecular Medicine</subject><subject>Osteoblastogenesis</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Proteomics</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>Stem cell transplantation</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Umbilical vein</subject><issn>0302-766X</issn><issn>1432-0878</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ks2KFDEUhQtRnHH0BVxIQBA3NaaSyk8th8E_GNGFgrtwK3WrK0NV0iapRc9j-MSm7dZxRCSEwM13Drk3p6qeNvS8oVS9SpS2bVNTVjYXnNfiXnXatJzVVCt9vzqlnLJaSfn1pHqU0jWlTStl97A64a2QuhPqtPr-KcwQ3Q0O5AMjC9gYthNsMBHnh9WWcr8jC9oJvLMwk5QjZjs5vyFLGNYZMpI-eCQRN-gxQnbBkzCSPCGxsajCCNbtlWteI5IxRLK44VicdtuwnSE5IMUY8oI-P64ejDAnfHI8z6ovb15_vnxXX318-_7y4qq2reK5llyJRne96lGokTIQrEPoJO_7vm2UZVLbDlCIjitsJfa6DIuJFgZpAUbOz6qXB99tDN9WTNksLlmcZ_AY1mSY6DRVkjJd0Od_oddhjb68bk-pjkstmltqAzMa58eQI9i9qbmQmmkhG0ULdf4PqqwBF2fLKEdX6ncEL_4QTAhznlKY1_2k012QHcDyiSlFHM02ugXizjTU7BNjDokxJTHmZ2KMKKJnx9bWfsHht-RXRArAD0AqV36D8bb3_9j-ALRPy-c</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Liang, Wei</creator><creator>Ding, Pengbing</creator><creator>Qian, Jiaying</creator><creator>Li, Guan</creator><creator>Lu, Enhang</creator><creator>Zhao, Zhenmin</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7177-2169</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Polarized M2 macrophages induced by mechanical stretching modulate bone regeneration of the craniofacial suture for midfacial hypoplasia treatment</title><author>Liang, Wei ; Ding, Pengbing ; Qian, Jiaying ; Li, Guan ; Lu, Enhang ; Zhao, Zhenmin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-6375189b7be57f02a529ea963bbb417c268c9ae55937e46eb8441254ad6caaf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Angiogenesis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Bone growth</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration - physiology</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cell differentiation</topic><topic>Chemokines</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cranial Sutures</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Distraction osteogenesis</topic><topic>Endothelial cells</topic><topic>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid</topic><topic>Face - surgery</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypoplasia</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Immunofluorescence</topic><topic>Macrophages</topic><topic>Macrophages - metabolism</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mechanical stimuli</topic><topic>Molecular Medicine</topic><topic>Osteoblastogenesis</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Proteomics</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>Stem cell transplantation</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Umbilical vein</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Pengbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Jiaying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Enhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Zhenmin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cell and tissue research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liang, Wei</au><au>Ding, Pengbing</au><au>Qian, Jiaying</au><au>Li, Guan</au><au>Lu, Enhang</au><au>Zhao, Zhenmin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Polarized M2 macrophages induced by mechanical stretching modulate bone regeneration of the craniofacial suture for midfacial hypoplasia treatment</atitle><jtitle>Cell and tissue research</jtitle><stitle>Cell Tissue Res</stitle><addtitle>Cell Tissue Res</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>386</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>585</spage><epage>603</epage><pages>585-603</pages><issn>0302-766X</issn><eissn>1432-0878</eissn><abstract>The underlying mechanism of the trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis (TSDO) technique as an effective treatment that improves the symptoms of midfacial hypoplasia syndromes is not clearly understood. Increasing findings in the orthopedics field indicate that macrophages are mechanically sensitive and their phenotypes can respond to mechanical cues. However, how macrophages respond to mechanical stretching and consequently influence osteoblast differentiation of suture-derived stem cells (SuSCs) remains unclear, particularly during the TSDO process. In the present study, we established a TSDO rat model to determine whether and how macrophages were polarized in response to stretching and consequently affected bone regeneration of the suture frontal edge. Notably, after performing immunofluorescence, RNA-sequencing, and micro-computed tomography, it was demonstrated that macrophages are first recruited by various chemokines factors and polarized to the M2 phenotype upon optimal stretching. The latter in turn regulates SuSC activity and facilitates bone regeneration in sutures. Moreover, when the activated M2 macrophages were suppressed by pharmacological manipulation, new bone microarchitecture could rarely be detected under mechanical stretching and the expansion of the sutures was clear. Additionally, macrophages achieved M2 polarization in response to the optimal mechanical stretching (10%, 0.5 Hz) and strongly facilitated SuSC osteogenic differentiation and human umbilical vein endothelial cell angiogenesis using an indirect co-culture system in vitro. Collectively, this study revealed the mechanical stimulation-immune response-bone regeneration axis and clarified at least in part how sutures achieve bone regeneration in response to mechanical force.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34568957</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00441-021-03533-5</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7177-2169</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-766X
ispartof Cell and tissue research, 2021-12, Vol.386 (3), p.585-603
issn 0302-766X
1432-0878
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2598076028
source Springer Nature
subjects Analysis
Angiogenesis
Animals
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Bone growth
Bone Regeneration - physiology
Cell culture
Cell differentiation
Chemokines
Computed tomography
Cranial Sutures
Disease Models, Animal
Distraction osteogenesis
Endothelial cells
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
Face - surgery
Human Genetics
Humans
Hypoplasia
Immune response
Immunofluorescence
Macrophages
Macrophages - metabolism
Male
Mechanical stimuli
Molecular Medicine
Osteoblastogenesis
Phenotypes
Proteomics
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Regeneration
Regular Article
RNA
Stem cell transplantation
Stem cells
Sutures
Umbilical vein
title Polarized M2 macrophages induced by mechanical stretching modulate bone regeneration of the craniofacial suture for midfacial hypoplasia treatment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T00%3A02%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Polarized%20M2%20macrophages%20induced%20by%20mechanical%20stretching%20modulate%20bone%20regeneration%20of%20the%20craniofacial%20suture%20for%20midfacial%20hypoplasia%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Cell%20and%20tissue%20research&rft.au=Liang,%20Wei&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=386&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=585&rft.epage=603&rft.pages=585-603&rft.issn=0302-766X&rft.eissn=1432-0878&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00441-021-03533-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA682856170%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-6375189b7be57f02a529ea963bbb417c268c9ae55937e46eb8441254ad6caaf33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2597936851&rft_id=info:pmid/34568957&rft_galeid=A682856170&rfr_iscdi=true