Loading…

Clinical results and cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency and cyanoacrylate ablation compared with traditional surgical stripping for treating varicose veins

Disease of the venous system is an underappreciated public health problem. Minimally invasive treatments such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cyanoacrylate adhesive ablation (CAA) have almost entirely replaced surgical stripping (SS) of the great and small saphenous veins. The purpose of the pre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY) NY), 2022-07, Vol.10 (4), p.846-854.e2
Main Authors: Vicente-Jiménez, Sandra, Lopez-Valcarcel, Beatriz, Maynar, Manual, Perez-Fernández, Elia, Carrasco, Pilar, Rodriguez-Caravaca, Gil, Navarro, Jose M., Del Riego, Silvia, De Benito, Luis, Fontcuberta, Juan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f390a55afd71e2716ab8acb07968fd90369f612e19cdf47eaf524f94e562cab43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f390a55afd71e2716ab8acb07968fd90369f612e19cdf47eaf524f94e562cab43
container_end_page 854.e2
container_issue 4
container_start_page 846
container_title Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY)
container_volume 10
creator Vicente-Jiménez, Sandra
Lopez-Valcarcel, Beatriz
Maynar, Manual
Perez-Fernández, Elia
Carrasco, Pilar
Rodriguez-Caravaca, Gil
Navarro, Jose M.
Del Riego, Silvia
De Benito, Luis
Fontcuberta, Juan
description Disease of the venous system is an underappreciated public health problem. Minimally invasive treatments such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cyanoacrylate adhesive ablation (CAA) have almost entirely replaced surgical stripping (SS) of the great and small saphenous veins. The purpose of the present study was to compare the outcomes at 3 years after SS, RFA, and CAA by assessing the incidence of complications and reinterventions and performing a cost-effectiveness analysis. From February 2016 to February 2019, all consecutive patients with symptomatic varicose veins treated at vascular department of two hospitals using SS, RFA, or CAA were included in the present study. The clinical outcomes were measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), complications, and reintervention. A comparison with conservative treatment was also performed. A detailed resource use was recorded for each procedure. All costs were normalized to May 2020 U.S. dollars and euros. Analysis of the data was by the treatment received. All statistical tests were two-sided, and the significance level was set at 5%. Two perspectives of the analysis were considered: the social perspective and that of the Spanish Public Health System. The study period was 3 years. No discount rate was applied. A total of 233 patients were enrolled in the present study: SS, n = 90 (38.6%); RFA, 93 (39.9%); and CAA, n = 50 (21.5%). The number of complications was 11 (12.2%), 3 (3.3%), and 3 (6%) in the SS, RFA, and CAA groups, respectively (P = .06). No patient had required reintervention. The median loss of workdays for the SS, RFA, and CAA group was 15 days (interquartile range [IQR], 10-30 days), 0 days (IQR, 0-6 days), and 0 days (IQR, 0-1 days), respectively (P < .001). The median level of satisfaction for the SS, RFA, and CAA group was 9 (IQR, 8-10), 10 (IQR, 9-10), and 10 (IQR, 9-10), respectively (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.10.015
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2598076357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2213333X21005230</els_id><sourcerecordid>2598076357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f390a55afd71e2716ab8acb07968fd90369f612e19cdf47eaf524f94e562cab43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu3CAURVWjJkryA1lULLvxlIcNttRNNepLitRNK2WHMFxSRh5wAbuaj-m_FnfSLMvmwtF56HIQuqNkRwkVbw-7w5rXHSOMVmBHaPcCXTFGecN52798vvOHS3Sb84HU0wvRSfIKXfJW9pQQeYV-7ycfvNETTpCXqWSsg8Um5tKAc2CKXyFAzjg6nLT10SX4uUAwpzPxpEPUJp0mXQDrsQ4fQ9UfZ53A4l--_MBlE254TclLevwbl0vy8-zDI3YxVQpUZX2sOvmaDngFH_INunB6ynD7NK_R948fvu0_N_dfP33Zv79vTEtIaRwfiO467aykwCQVeuy1GYkcRO_sQLgYnKAM6GCsayVo17HWDS10ghk9tvwavTn7zinW7XJRR58NTJMOEJesWDf0RAreyUplZ6pJMecETs3JH3U6KUrU1ow6qK0ZtTWzYbWZKnr95L-MR7DPkn89VMK7MwHqlquHpLLx9ZfB-lRLUDb6__n_AZf_pN0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2598076357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical results and cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency and cyanoacrylate ablation compared with traditional surgical stripping for treating varicose veins</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Vicente-Jiménez, Sandra ; Lopez-Valcarcel, Beatriz ; Maynar, Manual ; Perez-Fernández, Elia ; Carrasco, Pilar ; Rodriguez-Caravaca, Gil ; Navarro, Jose M. ; Del Riego, Silvia ; De Benito, Luis ; Fontcuberta, Juan</creator><creatorcontrib>Vicente-Jiménez, Sandra ; Lopez-Valcarcel, Beatriz ; Maynar, Manual ; Perez-Fernández, Elia ; Carrasco, Pilar ; Rodriguez-Caravaca, Gil ; Navarro, Jose M. ; Del Riego, Silvia ; De Benito, Luis ; Fontcuberta, Juan</creatorcontrib><description>Disease of the venous system is an underappreciated public health problem. Minimally invasive treatments such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cyanoacrylate adhesive ablation (CAA) have almost entirely replaced surgical stripping (SS) of the great and small saphenous veins. The purpose of the present study was to compare the outcomes at 3 years after SS, RFA, and CAA by assessing the incidence of complications and reinterventions and performing a cost-effectiveness analysis. From February 2016 to February 2019, all consecutive patients with symptomatic varicose veins treated at vascular department of two hospitals using SS, RFA, or CAA were included in the present study. The clinical outcomes were measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), complications, and reintervention. A comparison with conservative treatment was also performed. A detailed resource use was recorded for each procedure. All costs were normalized to May 2020 U.S. dollars and euros. Analysis of the data was by the treatment received. All statistical tests were two-sided, and the significance level was set at 5%. Two perspectives of the analysis were considered: the social perspective and that of the Spanish Public Health System. The study period was 3 years. No discount rate was applied. A total of 233 patients were enrolled in the present study: SS, n = 90 (38.6%); RFA, 93 (39.9%); and CAA, n = 50 (21.5%). The number of complications was 11 (12.2%), 3 (3.3%), and 3 (6%) in the SS, RFA, and CAA groups, respectively (P = .06). No patient had required reintervention. The median loss of workdays for the SS, RFA, and CAA group was 15 days (interquartile range [IQR], 10-30 days), 0 days (IQR, 0-6 days), and 0 days (IQR, 0-1 days), respectively (P &lt; .001). The median level of satisfaction for the SS, RFA, and CAA group was 9 (IQR, 8-10), 10 (IQR, 9-10), and 10 (IQR, 9-10), respectively (P &lt; .001). The QALYs was 2.6 years for all three procedures. The median overall cost was €852 (US$926) for SS, €1002 (US$1089) for RFA, and €1228.3 (US$1335) for CAA. The total cost per QALY was €323/QALY (US$351/QALY) for SS, €380/QALY (US$413/QALY) for RFA, and €467/QALY (US$508/QALY) for CAA. The indirect costs were measured by the cost of the workdays lost for each patient and were €1527 (US$1660; IQR, €1018-3054); €0 (IQR, €0-611) for RFA, and €0 (IQR, €0-102) for CAA (P &lt; .001). All three techniques were cost-effective (procedures with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio &lt;€30,000/QALY can be recommended). From the Spanish Public Health System perspective, when considering only the health care costs, the most cost-effective technique was SS. From the social perspective, including the opportunity costs of medical leave, CAA was the most cost-effective technique, saving €1600 per patient, a cost that more than compensated for the savings realized from using SS in direct health care costs. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 2213-333X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2213-3348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.10.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34781007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Chronic venous insufficiency ; Cost-effectiveness ; Cyanoacrylate ; Radiofrequency ablation ; Stripping ; Varicose veins</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY), 2022-07, Vol.10 (4), p.846-854.e2</ispartof><rights>2021 Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f390a55afd71e2716ab8acb07968fd90369f612e19cdf47eaf524f94e562cab43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f390a55afd71e2716ab8acb07968fd90369f612e19cdf47eaf524f94e562cab43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213333X21005230$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3535,27903,27904,45759</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34781007$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vicente-Jiménez, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Valcarcel, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maynar, Manual</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez-Fernández, Elia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Caravaca, Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Jose M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Riego, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Benito, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontcuberta, Juan</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical results and cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency and cyanoacrylate ablation compared with traditional surgical stripping for treating varicose veins</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY)</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord</addtitle><description>Disease of the venous system is an underappreciated public health problem. Minimally invasive treatments such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cyanoacrylate adhesive ablation (CAA) have almost entirely replaced surgical stripping (SS) of the great and small saphenous veins. The purpose of the present study was to compare the outcomes at 3 years after SS, RFA, and CAA by assessing the incidence of complications and reinterventions and performing a cost-effectiveness analysis. From February 2016 to February 2019, all consecutive patients with symptomatic varicose veins treated at vascular department of two hospitals using SS, RFA, or CAA were included in the present study. The clinical outcomes were measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), complications, and reintervention. A comparison with conservative treatment was also performed. A detailed resource use was recorded for each procedure. All costs were normalized to May 2020 U.S. dollars and euros. Analysis of the data was by the treatment received. All statistical tests were two-sided, and the significance level was set at 5%. Two perspectives of the analysis were considered: the social perspective and that of the Spanish Public Health System. The study period was 3 years. No discount rate was applied. A total of 233 patients were enrolled in the present study: SS, n = 90 (38.6%); RFA, 93 (39.9%); and CAA, n = 50 (21.5%). The number of complications was 11 (12.2%), 3 (3.3%), and 3 (6%) in the SS, RFA, and CAA groups, respectively (P = .06). No patient had required reintervention. The median loss of workdays for the SS, RFA, and CAA group was 15 days (interquartile range [IQR], 10-30 days), 0 days (IQR, 0-6 days), and 0 days (IQR, 0-1 days), respectively (P &lt; .001). The median level of satisfaction for the SS, RFA, and CAA group was 9 (IQR, 8-10), 10 (IQR, 9-10), and 10 (IQR, 9-10), respectively (P &lt; .001). The QALYs was 2.6 years for all three procedures. The median overall cost was €852 (US$926) for SS, €1002 (US$1089) for RFA, and €1228.3 (US$1335) for CAA. The total cost per QALY was €323/QALY (US$351/QALY) for SS, €380/QALY (US$413/QALY) for RFA, and €467/QALY (US$508/QALY) for CAA. The indirect costs were measured by the cost of the workdays lost for each patient and were €1527 (US$1660; IQR, €1018-3054); €0 (IQR, €0-611) for RFA, and €0 (IQR, €0-102) for CAA (P &lt; .001). All three techniques were cost-effective (procedures with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio &lt;€30,000/QALY can be recommended). From the Spanish Public Health System perspective, when considering only the health care costs, the most cost-effective technique was SS. From the social perspective, including the opportunity costs of medical leave, CAA was the most cost-effective technique, saving €1600 per patient, a cost that more than compensated for the savings realized from using SS in direct health care costs. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Chronic venous insufficiency</subject><subject>Cost-effectiveness</subject><subject>Cyanoacrylate</subject><subject>Radiofrequency ablation</subject><subject>Stripping</subject><subject>Varicose veins</subject><issn>2213-333X</issn><issn>2213-3348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uctu3CAURVWjJkryA1lULLvxlIcNttRNNepLitRNK2WHMFxSRh5wAbuaj-m_FnfSLMvmwtF56HIQuqNkRwkVbw-7w5rXHSOMVmBHaPcCXTFGecN52798vvOHS3Sb84HU0wvRSfIKXfJW9pQQeYV-7ycfvNETTpCXqWSsg8Um5tKAc2CKXyFAzjg6nLT10SX4uUAwpzPxpEPUJp0mXQDrsQ4fQ9UfZ53A4l--_MBlE254TclLevwbl0vy8-zDI3YxVQpUZX2sOvmaDngFH_INunB6ynD7NK_R948fvu0_N_dfP33Zv79vTEtIaRwfiO467aykwCQVeuy1GYkcRO_sQLgYnKAM6GCsayVo17HWDS10ghk9tvwavTn7zinW7XJRR58NTJMOEJesWDf0RAreyUplZ6pJMecETs3JH3U6KUrU1ow6qK0ZtTWzYbWZKnr95L-MR7DPkn89VMK7MwHqlquHpLLx9ZfB-lRLUDb6__n_AZf_pN0</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Vicente-Jiménez, Sandra</creator><creator>Lopez-Valcarcel, Beatriz</creator><creator>Maynar, Manual</creator><creator>Perez-Fernández, Elia</creator><creator>Carrasco, Pilar</creator><creator>Rodriguez-Caravaca, Gil</creator><creator>Navarro, Jose M.</creator><creator>Del Riego, Silvia</creator><creator>De Benito, Luis</creator><creator>Fontcuberta, Juan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Clinical results and cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency and cyanoacrylate ablation compared with traditional surgical stripping for treating varicose veins</title><author>Vicente-Jiménez, Sandra ; Lopez-Valcarcel, Beatriz ; Maynar, Manual ; Perez-Fernández, Elia ; Carrasco, Pilar ; Rodriguez-Caravaca, Gil ; Navarro, Jose M. ; Del Riego, Silvia ; De Benito, Luis ; Fontcuberta, Juan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f390a55afd71e2716ab8acb07968fd90369f612e19cdf47eaf524f94e562cab43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Chronic venous insufficiency</topic><topic>Cost-effectiveness</topic><topic>Cyanoacrylate</topic><topic>Radiofrequency ablation</topic><topic>Stripping</topic><topic>Varicose veins</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vicente-Jiménez, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Valcarcel, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maynar, Manual</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez-Fernández, Elia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Caravaca, Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Jose M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Riego, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Benito, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontcuberta, Juan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vicente-Jiménez, Sandra</au><au>Lopez-Valcarcel, Beatriz</au><au>Maynar, Manual</au><au>Perez-Fernández, Elia</au><au>Carrasco, Pilar</au><au>Rodriguez-Caravaca, Gil</au><au>Navarro, Jose M.</au><au>Del Riego, Silvia</au><au>De Benito, Luis</au><au>Fontcuberta, Juan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical results and cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency and cyanoacrylate ablation compared with traditional surgical stripping for treating varicose veins</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY)</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>846</spage><epage>854.e2</epage><pages>846-854.e2</pages><issn>2213-333X</issn><eissn>2213-3348</eissn><abstract>Disease of the venous system is an underappreciated public health problem. Minimally invasive treatments such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cyanoacrylate adhesive ablation (CAA) have almost entirely replaced surgical stripping (SS) of the great and small saphenous veins. The purpose of the present study was to compare the outcomes at 3 years after SS, RFA, and CAA by assessing the incidence of complications and reinterventions and performing a cost-effectiveness analysis. From February 2016 to February 2019, all consecutive patients with symptomatic varicose veins treated at vascular department of two hospitals using SS, RFA, or CAA were included in the present study. The clinical outcomes were measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), complications, and reintervention. A comparison with conservative treatment was also performed. A detailed resource use was recorded for each procedure. All costs were normalized to May 2020 U.S. dollars and euros. Analysis of the data was by the treatment received. All statistical tests were two-sided, and the significance level was set at 5%. Two perspectives of the analysis were considered: the social perspective and that of the Spanish Public Health System. The study period was 3 years. No discount rate was applied. A total of 233 patients were enrolled in the present study: SS, n = 90 (38.6%); RFA, 93 (39.9%); and CAA, n = 50 (21.5%). The number of complications was 11 (12.2%), 3 (3.3%), and 3 (6%) in the SS, RFA, and CAA groups, respectively (P = .06). No patient had required reintervention. The median loss of workdays for the SS, RFA, and CAA group was 15 days (interquartile range [IQR], 10-30 days), 0 days (IQR, 0-6 days), and 0 days (IQR, 0-1 days), respectively (P &lt; .001). The median level of satisfaction for the SS, RFA, and CAA group was 9 (IQR, 8-10), 10 (IQR, 9-10), and 10 (IQR, 9-10), respectively (P &lt; .001). The QALYs was 2.6 years for all three procedures. The median overall cost was €852 (US$926) for SS, €1002 (US$1089) for RFA, and €1228.3 (US$1335) for CAA. The total cost per QALY was €323/QALY (US$351/QALY) for SS, €380/QALY (US$413/QALY) for RFA, and €467/QALY (US$508/QALY) for CAA. The indirect costs were measured by the cost of the workdays lost for each patient and were €1527 (US$1660; IQR, €1018-3054); €0 (IQR, €0-611) for RFA, and €0 (IQR, €0-102) for CAA (P &lt; .001). All three techniques were cost-effective (procedures with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio &lt;€30,000/QALY can be recommended). From the Spanish Public Health System perspective, when considering only the health care costs, the most cost-effective technique was SS. From the social perspective, including the opportunity costs of medical leave, CAA was the most cost-effective technique, saving €1600 per patient, a cost that more than compensated for the savings realized from using SS in direct health care costs. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34781007</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.10.015</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2213-333X
ispartof Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY), 2022-07, Vol.10 (4), p.846-854.e2
issn 2213-333X
2213-3348
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2598076357
source ScienceDirect; ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Chronic venous insufficiency
Cost-effectiveness
Cyanoacrylate
Radiofrequency ablation
Stripping
Varicose veins
title Clinical results and cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency and cyanoacrylate ablation compared with traditional surgical stripping for treating varicose veins
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A14%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20results%20and%20cost-effectiveness%20of%20radiofrequency%20and%20cyanoacrylate%20ablation%20compared%20with%20traditional%20surgical%20stripping%20for%20treating%20varicose%20veins&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery.%20Venous%20and%20lymphatic%20disorders%20(New%20York,%20NY)&rft.au=Vicente-Jim%C3%A9nez,%20Sandra&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=846&rft.epage=854.e2&rft.pages=846-854.e2&rft.issn=2213-333X&rft.eissn=2213-3348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.10.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2598076357%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f390a55afd71e2716ab8acb07968fd90369f612e19cdf47eaf524f94e562cab43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2598076357&rft_id=info:pmid/34781007&rfr_iscdi=true