Loading…
Intolerance of uncertainty and physiological responses during instructed uncertain threat: A multi-lab investigation
Individuals with high self-reported Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) tend to interpret uncertainty negatively. Recent research has been inconclusive on evidence of an association between IU and physiological responses during instructed uncertain threat. To address this gap, we conducted secondary ana...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biological psychology 2022-01, Vol.167, p.108223-108223, Article 108223 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3353-db9ed4cd53f0a9aed9cd46586ae29b9e1f1574e1006ad5ebf831f168fb77ae143 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3353-db9ed4cd53f0a9aed9cd46586ae29b9e1f1574e1006ad5ebf831f168fb77ae143 |
container_end_page | 108223 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 108223 |
container_title | Biological psychology |
container_volume | 167 |
creator | Morriss, Jayne Bradford, Daniel E. Wake, Shannon Biagi, Nicolo Tanovic, Ema Kaye, Jesse T. Joormann, Jutta |
description | Individuals with high self-reported Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) tend to interpret uncertainty negatively. Recent research has been inconclusive on evidence of an association between IU and physiological responses during instructed uncertain threat. To address this gap, we conducted secondary analyses of IU and physiology data recorded during instructed uncertain threat tasks from two lab sites (Wisconsin-Madison; n = 128; Yale, n = 95). No IU-related effects were observed for orbicularis oculi activity (auditory startle-reflex). Higher IU was associated with: (1) greater corrugator supercilii activity to predictable and unpredictable threat of shock, compared to the safety from shock, and (2) poorer discriminatory skin conductance response between the unpredictable threat of shock, relative to the safety from shock. These findings suggest that IU-related biases may be captured differently depending on the physiological measure during instructed uncertain threat. Implications of these findings for neurobiological models of uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety are discussed.
•Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is the tendency to react negatively to uncertainty.•We conducted an analysis of two datasets using instructed uncertain threat tasks.•No IU-related effects were found for orbicularis oculi activity.•IU was associated with corrugator supercilli activity.•IU was associated with skin conductance response. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108223 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2598537349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301051121002167</els_id><sourcerecordid>2598537349</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3353-db9ed4cd53f0a9aed9cd46586ae29b9e1f1574e1006ad5ebf831f168fb77ae143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOAyEUhonRaL28grJ0MxWGYS7umsZLExM3uiYMnGlppjAC06RvL021Ll0dcvh-_vAhdEfJlBJaPqynrXFD2KmVm-Ykp2lb5zk7QRNaVywr86I8RRPCCM0Ip_QCXYawJiSdOT9HF6yoap5X9QTFhY2uBy-tAuw6PKbpozQ27rC0Gg-rXTCud0ujZI89hMHZAAHr0Ru7xMaG6EcVQf8lcVx5kPERz_Bm7KPJetkmcAshmqWMxtlrdNbJPsDNz7xCn89PH_PX7O39ZTGfvWWKMc4y3TagC6U564hsJOhG6aLkdSkhb9Id7SivCqCElFJzaLuapVVZd21VSaAFu0L3h3cH777G1C82Jijoe2nBjUHkvKk5q1jRJLQ6oMq7EDx0YvBmI_1OUCL2ysVaHJWLvXJxUJ6Stz8lY7sBfcz9Ok7A7ABA-urWgBdBGUi2tPGgotDO_FvyDWEkmnk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2598537349</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intolerance of uncertainty and physiological responses during instructed uncertain threat: A multi-lab investigation</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Morriss, Jayne ; Bradford, Daniel E. ; Wake, Shannon ; Biagi, Nicolo ; Tanovic, Ema ; Kaye, Jesse T. ; Joormann, Jutta</creator><creatorcontrib>Morriss, Jayne ; Bradford, Daniel E. ; Wake, Shannon ; Biagi, Nicolo ; Tanovic, Ema ; Kaye, Jesse T. ; Joormann, Jutta</creatorcontrib><description>Individuals with high self-reported Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) tend to interpret uncertainty negatively. Recent research has been inconclusive on evidence of an association between IU and physiological responses during instructed uncertain threat. To address this gap, we conducted secondary analyses of IU and physiology data recorded during instructed uncertain threat tasks from two lab sites (Wisconsin-Madison; n = 128; Yale, n = 95). No IU-related effects were observed for orbicularis oculi activity (auditory startle-reflex). Higher IU was associated with: (1) greater corrugator supercilii activity to predictable and unpredictable threat of shock, compared to the safety from shock, and (2) poorer discriminatory skin conductance response between the unpredictable threat of shock, relative to the safety from shock. These findings suggest that IU-related biases may be captured differently depending on the physiological measure during instructed uncertain threat. Implications of these findings for neurobiological models of uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety are discussed.
•Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is the tendency to react negatively to uncertainty.•We conducted an analysis of two datasets using instructed uncertain threat tasks.•No IU-related effects were found for orbicularis oculi activity.•IU was associated with corrugator supercilli activity.•IU was associated with skin conductance response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108223</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34785278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Anxiety Disorders ; Corrugator supercilii ; Humans ; Instructed ; Intolerance of uncertainty ; Orbicularis oculi ; Reflex, Startle - physiology ; Self Report ; Skin conductance ; Threat ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Biological psychology, 2022-01, Vol.167, p.108223-108223, Article 108223</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3353-db9ed4cd53f0a9aed9cd46586ae29b9e1f1574e1006ad5ebf831f168fb77ae143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3353-db9ed4cd53f0a9aed9cd46586ae29b9e1f1574e1006ad5ebf831f168fb77ae143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34785278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morriss, Jayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wake, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biagi, Nicolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanovic, Ema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Jesse T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joormann, Jutta</creatorcontrib><title>Intolerance of uncertainty and physiological responses during instructed uncertain threat: A multi-lab investigation</title><title>Biological psychology</title><addtitle>Biol Psychol</addtitle><description>Individuals with high self-reported Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) tend to interpret uncertainty negatively. Recent research has been inconclusive on evidence of an association between IU and physiological responses during instructed uncertain threat. To address this gap, we conducted secondary analyses of IU and physiology data recorded during instructed uncertain threat tasks from two lab sites (Wisconsin-Madison; n = 128; Yale, n = 95). No IU-related effects were observed for orbicularis oculi activity (auditory startle-reflex). Higher IU was associated with: (1) greater corrugator supercilii activity to predictable and unpredictable threat of shock, compared to the safety from shock, and (2) poorer discriminatory skin conductance response between the unpredictable threat of shock, relative to the safety from shock. These findings suggest that IU-related biases may be captured differently depending on the physiological measure during instructed uncertain threat. Implications of these findings for neurobiological models of uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety are discussed.
•Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is the tendency to react negatively to uncertainty.•We conducted an analysis of two datasets using instructed uncertain threat tasks.•No IU-related effects were found for orbicularis oculi activity.•IU was associated with corrugator supercilli activity.•IU was associated with skin conductance response.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety Disorders</subject><subject>Corrugator supercilii</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Instructed</subject><subject>Intolerance of uncertainty</subject><subject>Orbicularis oculi</subject><subject>Reflex, Startle - physiology</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Skin conductance</subject><subject>Threat</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0301-0511</issn><issn>1873-6246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOAyEUhonRaL28grJ0MxWGYS7umsZLExM3uiYMnGlppjAC06RvL021Ll0dcvh-_vAhdEfJlBJaPqynrXFD2KmVm-Ykp2lb5zk7QRNaVywr86I8RRPCCM0Ip_QCXYawJiSdOT9HF6yoap5X9QTFhY2uBy-tAuw6PKbpozQ27rC0Gg-rXTCud0ujZI89hMHZAAHr0Ru7xMaG6EcVQf8lcVx5kPERz_Bm7KPJetkmcAshmqWMxtlrdNbJPsDNz7xCn89PH_PX7O39ZTGfvWWKMc4y3TagC6U564hsJOhG6aLkdSkhb9Id7SivCqCElFJzaLuapVVZd21VSaAFu0L3h3cH777G1C82Jijoe2nBjUHkvKk5q1jRJLQ6oMq7EDx0YvBmI_1OUCL2ysVaHJWLvXJxUJ6Stz8lY7sBfcz9Ok7A7ABA-urWgBdBGUi2tPGgotDO_FvyDWEkmnk</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Morriss, Jayne</creator><creator>Bradford, Daniel E.</creator><creator>Wake, Shannon</creator><creator>Biagi, Nicolo</creator><creator>Tanovic, Ema</creator><creator>Kaye, Jesse T.</creator><creator>Joormann, Jutta</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Intolerance of uncertainty and physiological responses during instructed uncertain threat: A multi-lab investigation</title><author>Morriss, Jayne ; Bradford, Daniel E. ; Wake, Shannon ; Biagi, Nicolo ; Tanovic, Ema ; Kaye, Jesse T. ; Joormann, Jutta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3353-db9ed4cd53f0a9aed9cd46586ae29b9e1f1574e1006ad5ebf831f168fb77ae143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety Disorders</topic><topic>Corrugator supercilii</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Instructed</topic><topic>Intolerance of uncertainty</topic><topic>Orbicularis oculi</topic><topic>Reflex, Startle - physiology</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Skin conductance</topic><topic>Threat</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morriss, Jayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wake, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biagi, Nicolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanovic, Ema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Jesse T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joormann, Jutta</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biological psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morriss, Jayne</au><au>Bradford, Daniel E.</au><au>Wake, Shannon</au><au>Biagi, Nicolo</au><au>Tanovic, Ema</au><au>Kaye, Jesse T.</au><au>Joormann, Jutta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intolerance of uncertainty and physiological responses during instructed uncertain threat: A multi-lab investigation</atitle><jtitle>Biological psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Psychol</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>167</volume><spage>108223</spage><epage>108223</epage><pages>108223-108223</pages><artnum>108223</artnum><issn>0301-0511</issn><eissn>1873-6246</eissn><abstract>Individuals with high self-reported Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) tend to interpret uncertainty negatively. Recent research has been inconclusive on evidence of an association between IU and physiological responses during instructed uncertain threat. To address this gap, we conducted secondary analyses of IU and physiology data recorded during instructed uncertain threat tasks from two lab sites (Wisconsin-Madison; n = 128; Yale, n = 95). No IU-related effects were observed for orbicularis oculi activity (auditory startle-reflex). Higher IU was associated with: (1) greater corrugator supercilii activity to predictable and unpredictable threat of shock, compared to the safety from shock, and (2) poorer discriminatory skin conductance response between the unpredictable threat of shock, relative to the safety from shock. These findings suggest that IU-related biases may be captured differently depending on the physiological measure during instructed uncertain threat. Implications of these findings for neurobiological models of uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety are discussed.
•Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is the tendency to react negatively to uncertainty.•We conducted an analysis of two datasets using instructed uncertain threat tasks.•No IU-related effects were found for orbicularis oculi activity.•IU was associated with corrugator supercilli activity.•IU was associated with skin conductance response.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>34785278</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108223</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-0511 |
ispartof | Biological psychology, 2022-01, Vol.167, p.108223-108223, Article 108223 |
issn | 0301-0511 1873-6246 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2598537349 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Anxiety Anxiety Disorders Corrugator supercilii Humans Instructed Intolerance of uncertainty Orbicularis oculi Reflex, Startle - physiology Self Report Skin conductance Threat Uncertainty |
title | Intolerance of uncertainty and physiological responses during instructed uncertain threat: A multi-lab investigation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T22%3A10%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intolerance%20of%20uncertainty%20and%20physiological%20responses%20during%20instructed%20uncertain%20threat:%20A%20multi-lab%20investigation&rft.jtitle=Biological%20psychology&rft.au=Morriss,%20Jayne&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=167&rft.spage=108223&rft.epage=108223&rft.pages=108223-108223&rft.artnum=108223&rft.issn=0301-0511&rft.eissn=1873-6246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108223&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2598537349%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3353-db9ed4cd53f0a9aed9cd46586ae29b9e1f1574e1006ad5ebf831f168fb77ae143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2598537349&rft_id=info:pmid/34785278&rfr_iscdi=true |