Loading…

Comparison of Survival of Patients With T1‐2 cN0 Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated With or Without Elective Neck Dissection

Objectives/Hypothesis This study aimed to examine the prognostic value of elective neck dissection (END) in T1‐2 clinical negative cervical lymph node (cN0) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients. Study Design An observational retrospective study. Methods This retrospective study included 845 patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Laryngoscope 2022-06, Vol.132 (6), p.1205-1212
Main Authors: Zeng, Xuelan, Peng, Liang, Wen, Weiping, Sun, Wei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 1212
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1205
container_title The Laryngoscope
container_volume 132
creator Zeng, Xuelan
Peng, Liang
Wen, Weiping
Sun, Wei
description Objectives/Hypothesis This study aimed to examine the prognostic value of elective neck dissection (END) in T1‐2 clinical negative cervical lymph node (cN0) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients. Study Design An observational retrospective study. Methods This retrospective study included 845 patients diagnosed with T1‐2 cN0 OPC during 2010–2015 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the prognostic roles of END. Furthermore, propensity score matching was used to balance the covariates between the END and observation (OBS) groups, and subgroup analyses were conducted in the matched cohorts. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results Our study showed that END was an independent prognostic factor associated with a better 3‐year OS compared with OBS in human papillomavirus (HPV)‐positive cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.464; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.235–0.916; P = .027). However, we found no prognostic value of END in HPV‐negative cohort (adjusted HR, 0.837; 95% CI, 0.535–1.310; P = .435). In the subgroup analyses, we found that younger patients (≤65 years old) and patients with nontonsillar tumors in HPV‐positive cohort were more likely to benefit from END, while patients with tonsillar tumors in HPV‐negative cohort may benefit from END. Conclusions We found that patients with HPV‐positive T1‐2 cN0 OPC could benefit from END in terms of OS, especially younger patients and those with nontonsillar tumors. Patients with HPV‐negative T1‐2 cN0 OPC could not benefit from END in terms of OS, while those with tonsillar tumors may benefit from END. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 132:1205–1212, 2022
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lary.29951
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2599179516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2599179516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2581-6b3ca8dd44b921486224d57b3fd6f0e5efb49b0dee7f712e34b3c03331ccb1103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkclOwzAQhi0EEqVw4QksceGS4iXrsSplkaoWQRFwspxkQl3SONhJoTcegWfkSXBaTpzmH803i-ZH6JSSASWEXZTSbAYsSQK6h3o04NTzXbKPeq7IvThgz4foyNolITTiAemhz5Fe1dIoqyusC_zQmrVay7LTd7JRUDUWP6lmgef05-ub4WxK8MzoeuEWVa_gyJGsMjB4bkA2kO9gbbZRtw0el5A1ag14CtkbvlTWdrmujtFBIUsLJ3-xjx6vxvPRjTeZXd-OhhOvZkFMvTDlmYzz3PfThFE_Dhnz8yBKeZGHBYEAitRPUpIDREVEGXDfNRDOOc2ylFLC--h8N7c2-r0F24iVshmUpaxAt1awIElo5B4WOvTsH7rUrancdYKFIU94xJKOojvqQ5WwEbVRK_cLQYnoHBCdA2LrgJgM71-2iv8C9Ot8sA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2663937296</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Survival of Patients With T1‐2 cN0 Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated With or Without Elective Neck Dissection</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Zeng, Xuelan ; Peng, Liang ; Wen, Weiping ; Sun, Wei</creator><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xuelan ; Peng, Liang ; Wen, Weiping ; Sun, Wei</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives/Hypothesis This study aimed to examine the prognostic value of elective neck dissection (END) in T1‐2 clinical negative cervical lymph node (cN0) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients. Study Design An observational retrospective study. Methods This retrospective study included 845 patients diagnosed with T1‐2 cN0 OPC during 2010–2015 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the prognostic roles of END. Furthermore, propensity score matching was used to balance the covariates between the END and observation (OBS) groups, and subgroup analyses were conducted in the matched cohorts. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results Our study showed that END was an independent prognostic factor associated with a better 3‐year OS compared with OBS in human papillomavirus (HPV)‐positive cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.464; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.235–0.916; P = .027). However, we found no prognostic value of END in HPV‐negative cohort (adjusted HR, 0.837; 95% CI, 0.535–1.310; P = .435). In the subgroup analyses, we found that younger patients (≤65 years old) and patients with nontonsillar tumors in HPV‐positive cohort were more likely to benefit from END, while patients with tonsillar tumors in HPV‐negative cohort may benefit from END. Conclusions We found that patients with HPV‐positive T1‐2 cN0 OPC could benefit from END in terms of OS, especially younger patients and those with nontonsillar tumors. Patients with HPV‐negative T1‐2 cN0 OPC could not benefit from END in terms of OS, while those with tonsillar tumors may benefit from END. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 132:1205–1212, 2022</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.29951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>cN0 disease ; elective neck dissection ; Human papillomavirus ; Laryngoscopy ; observation ; Oropharyngeal cancer ; survival benefit ; Throat cancer ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2022-06, Vol.132 (6), p.1205-1212</ispartof><rights>2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><rights>2022 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-1044-3767 ; 0000-0002-1075-7475</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xuelan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Weiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Wei</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Survival of Patients With T1‐2 cN0 Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated With or Without Elective Neck Dissection</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><description>Objectives/Hypothesis This study aimed to examine the prognostic value of elective neck dissection (END) in T1‐2 clinical negative cervical lymph node (cN0) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients. Study Design An observational retrospective study. Methods This retrospective study included 845 patients diagnosed with T1‐2 cN0 OPC during 2010–2015 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the prognostic roles of END. Furthermore, propensity score matching was used to balance the covariates between the END and observation (OBS) groups, and subgroup analyses were conducted in the matched cohorts. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results Our study showed that END was an independent prognostic factor associated with a better 3‐year OS compared with OBS in human papillomavirus (HPV)‐positive cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.464; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.235–0.916; P = .027). However, we found no prognostic value of END in HPV‐negative cohort (adjusted HR, 0.837; 95% CI, 0.535–1.310; P = .435). In the subgroup analyses, we found that younger patients (≤65 years old) and patients with nontonsillar tumors in HPV‐positive cohort were more likely to benefit from END, while patients with tonsillar tumors in HPV‐negative cohort may benefit from END. Conclusions We found that patients with HPV‐positive T1‐2 cN0 OPC could benefit from END in terms of OS, especially younger patients and those with nontonsillar tumors. Patients with HPV‐negative T1‐2 cN0 OPC could not benefit from END in terms of OS, while those with tonsillar tumors may benefit from END. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 132:1205–1212, 2022</description><subject>cN0 disease</subject><subject>elective neck dissection</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Laryngoscopy</subject><subject>observation</subject><subject>Oropharyngeal cancer</subject><subject>survival benefit</subject><subject>Throat cancer</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkclOwzAQhi0EEqVw4QksceGS4iXrsSplkaoWQRFwspxkQl3SONhJoTcegWfkSXBaTpzmH803i-ZH6JSSASWEXZTSbAYsSQK6h3o04NTzXbKPeq7IvThgz4foyNolITTiAemhz5Fe1dIoqyusC_zQmrVay7LTd7JRUDUWP6lmgef05-ub4WxK8MzoeuEWVa_gyJGsMjB4bkA2kO9gbbZRtw0el5A1ag14CtkbvlTWdrmujtFBIUsLJ3-xjx6vxvPRjTeZXd-OhhOvZkFMvTDlmYzz3PfThFE_Dhnz8yBKeZGHBYEAitRPUpIDREVEGXDfNRDOOc2ylFLC--h8N7c2-r0F24iVshmUpaxAt1awIElo5B4WOvTsH7rUrancdYKFIU94xJKOojvqQ5WwEbVRK_cLQYnoHBCdA2LrgJgM71-2iv8C9Ot8sA</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Zeng, Xuelan</creator><creator>Peng, Liang</creator><creator>Wen, Weiping</creator><creator>Sun, Wei</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1044-3767</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1075-7475</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Comparison of Survival of Patients With T1‐2 cN0 Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated With or Without Elective Neck Dissection</title><author>Zeng, Xuelan ; Peng, Liang ; Wen, Weiping ; Sun, Wei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2581-6b3ca8dd44b921486224d57b3fd6f0e5efb49b0dee7f712e34b3c03331ccb1103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>cN0 disease</topic><topic>elective neck dissection</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Laryngoscopy</topic><topic>observation</topic><topic>Oropharyngeal cancer</topic><topic>survival benefit</topic><topic>Throat cancer</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xuelan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Weiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Wei</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zeng, Xuelan</au><au>Peng, Liang</au><au>Wen, Weiping</au><au>Sun, Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Survival of Patients With T1‐2 cN0 Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated With or Without Elective Neck Dissection</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1205</spage><epage>1212</epage><pages>1205-1212</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Objectives/Hypothesis This study aimed to examine the prognostic value of elective neck dissection (END) in T1‐2 clinical negative cervical lymph node (cN0) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients. Study Design An observational retrospective study. Methods This retrospective study included 845 patients diagnosed with T1‐2 cN0 OPC during 2010–2015 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the prognostic roles of END. Furthermore, propensity score matching was used to balance the covariates between the END and observation (OBS) groups, and subgroup analyses were conducted in the matched cohorts. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results Our study showed that END was an independent prognostic factor associated with a better 3‐year OS compared with OBS in human papillomavirus (HPV)‐positive cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.464; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.235–0.916; P = .027). However, we found no prognostic value of END in HPV‐negative cohort (adjusted HR, 0.837; 95% CI, 0.535–1.310; P = .435). In the subgroup analyses, we found that younger patients (≤65 years old) and patients with nontonsillar tumors in HPV‐positive cohort were more likely to benefit from END, while patients with tonsillar tumors in HPV‐negative cohort may benefit from END. Conclusions We found that patients with HPV‐positive T1‐2 cN0 OPC could benefit from END in terms of OS, especially younger patients and those with nontonsillar tumors. Patients with HPV‐negative T1‐2 cN0 OPC could not benefit from END in terms of OS, while those with tonsillar tumors may benefit from END. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 132:1205–1212, 2022</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/lary.29951</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1044-3767</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1075-7475</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-852X
ispartof The Laryngoscope, 2022-06, Vol.132 (6), p.1205-1212
issn 0023-852X
1531-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2599179516
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects cN0 disease
elective neck dissection
Human papillomavirus
Laryngoscopy
observation
Oropharyngeal cancer
survival benefit
Throat cancer
Tumors
title Comparison of Survival of Patients With T1‐2 cN0 Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated With or Without Elective Neck Dissection
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T21%3A08%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Survival%20of%20Patients%20With%20T1%E2%80%902%20cN0%20Oropharyngeal%20Cancer%20Treated%20With%20or%20Without%20Elective%20Neck%20Dissection&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Zeng,%20Xuelan&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1205&rft.epage=1212&rft.pages=1205-1212&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.29951&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2599179516%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2581-6b3ca8dd44b921486224d57b3fd6f0e5efb49b0dee7f712e34b3c03331ccb1103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2663937296&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true