Loading…

Relating environmental pressures to littoral biological water quality indicators in Western Balkan lakes: Can we fill the largest gaps?

Along six transects in each of six lakes across the Western Balkans, we collected data for three groups of littoral biological water quality indicators: epilithic diatoms, macrophytes, and benthic invertebrates. We assessed the relationships between them and three environmental pressures: nutrient l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Science of the total environment 2022-01, Vol.804, p.150160-150160, Article 150160
Main Authors: Vermaat, Jan E., Biberdžić, Vera, Braho, Vjola, Gjoreska, Biljana Budzakoska, Cara, Magdalena, Dana, Zamira, Đurašković, Pavle, Eriksen, Tor Erik, Hjermann, Dag, Imeri, Alma, Jovanović, Katarina, Krizmanić, Jelena, Kupe, Lirika, Loshkoska, Tatjana, Kemp, Joanna Lynn, Marković, Aleksandra, Patceva, Suzana, Rakočević, Jelena, Stojanović, Katarina, Talevska, Marina, Trajanovska, Sonja, Trajanovski, Sasho, Veljanoska-Sarafiloska, Elizabeta, Vidaković, Danijela, Zdraveski, Konstantin, Živić, Ivana, Schneider, Susanne C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Along six transects in each of six lakes across the Western Balkans, we collected data for three groups of littoral biological water quality indicators: epilithic diatoms, macrophytes, and benthic invertebrates. We assessed the relationships between them and three environmental pressures: nutrient load (eutrophication), hydro-morphological alteration of the shoreline, and water level variation, separating the effect of individual lakes and continuous explanatory variables. Lake water total phosphorus concentration (TP) showed substantial variation but was not related to any of the tested biological indicators, nor to any of the tested pressures. We suggest that this may be due to feedback processes such as P removal in the lake littoral zone. Instead, we found that a gradient in surrounding land-use towards increasing urbanization, and a land-use-based estimate of P run-off, served as a better descriptor of eutrophication. Overall, eutrophication and water level fluctuation were most important for explaining variation in the assessed indicators, whereas shoreline hydro-morphological alteration was less important. Diatom indicators were most responsive to all three pressures, whereas macrophyte biomass and species number responded only to water level fluctuation. The Trophic Diatom Index for Lakes (TDIL) was negatively related to urbanization and wave exposure. This indicates that it is a suitable indicator for pressures related to urbanization, although a confounding effect of wave exposure is possible. Invertebrate abundance responded strongly to eutrophication, but the indicator based on taxonomic composition (Average Score Per Taxon) did not. Our results suggest that our metrics can be applied in Western Balkan lakes, despite the high number of endemic species present in some of these lakes. We argue that local water management should focus on abating the causes of eutrophication and water level fluctuation, whilst preserving sufficient lengths of undeveloped shoreline to ensure good water quality in the long run. [Display omitted] •We assessed three pressures on littoral biological indicators in 6 Balkan lakes.•Six littoral transects in each lake varied in water quality and surrounding land use.•Abundance and diversity of macrophytes, diatoms and invertebrates were used.•Most important pressures were water level fluctuation and eutrophication due to urbanization.•Shoreline alteration was less important in explaining indicator variability.
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150160