Loading…
A simplified CT‐volumetry method for the canine liver
Computed tomographic (CT) liver volumetry using the slice addition technique is an accurate, but a time‐consuming method. Commonly used DICOM‐viewing software only allows contouring of one area per image, which can be troublesome in the transverse plane as different lobes are separated. In this pros...
Saved in:
Published in: | Veterinary radiology & ultrasound 2022-01, Vol.63 (1), p.47-53 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Computed tomographic (CT) liver volumetry using the slice addition technique is an accurate, but a time‐consuming method. Commonly used DICOM‐viewing software only allows contouring of one area per image, which can be troublesome in the transverse plane as different lobes are separated. In this prospective, experimental, methods comparison study, we aimed to determine if hepatic contouring using sagittal reformatting and a reduced number of images would yield accurate results. Computed tomographic studies were performed in five canine cadavers and reviewed using sagittal reformatting. For each dog, the number of images that included the liver was used to create four stacks with progressively fewer images in which the liver would be contoured, each with the following median number of images: A: 60, B: 31, C: 16, and D: 9. Liver volume was calculated by three observers using the different stacks of images. After CT examination, the cadavers were dissected, the liver was removed, and its volume was determined by water displacement. Single score intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to assess interobserver agreement. Kruskal‐Wallis test was used to compare water displacement and CT‐based volumes. There was excellent agreement between observers (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.957; 95% confidence interval, 0.908‐0.982, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1058-8183 1740-8261 |
DOI: | 10.1111/vru.13018 |