Loading…

Labour induction in twin pregnancies

Medically-indicated deliveries are common in twin pregnancies given the increased risk of various obstetric complications in twin compared to singleton pregnancies, mainly hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and foetal growth restriction. Due to the unique characteristics of twin pregnancies, the su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology 2022-03, Vol.79, p.55-69
Main Authors: Amikam, Uri, Hiersch, Liran, Barrett, Jon, Melamed, Nir
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Medically-indicated deliveries are common in twin pregnancies given the increased risk of various obstetric complications in twin compared to singleton pregnancies, mainly hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and foetal growth restriction. Due to the unique characteristics of twin pregnancies, the success rates and safety of labour induction may be different than in singleton pregnancies. However, while there are abundant data regarding induction of labour in singleton pregnancies, the efficacy and safety of labour induction in twin pregnancies have been far less studied. In the current manuscript we summarize available data on various aspects of labour induction in twin pregnancies including incidence, success rate, prognostic factors, safety and methods for labour induction in twins. This information may assist healthcare providers in counselling patients with twin pregnancies when labour induction is indicated. •Vaginal birth in select twin gestations is as safe as caesarean birth.•Data regarding induction of labour in twins is scarce and mostly retrospective.•Induction of labour appears to be safe in properly selected twin gestations.•The choice of method for labour induction should be individualized based on clinical findings and patient preferences.
ISSN:1521-6934
1532-1932
DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001