On the inappropriate use of Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) divergences in the DNA-barcoding literature

Here we present evidence, based on 10 datasets comprising 5283 sequences for 200 genera, that the use of the Kimura‐2‐parameter (K2P) model in DNA‐barcoding studies is poorly justified. We demonstrate that K2P is neither expected nor confirmed to be an appropriate model for closely related COI seque...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cladistics 2012-04, Vol.28 (2), p.190-194
Main Authors: Srivathsan, Amrita, Meier, Rudolf
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
cladistics
DNA
Trees
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5320-d476ef2a62eab2fcaa93e95059d21db972ad181ac4837bc194f6f5ab67e971eb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5320-d476ef2a62eab2fcaa93e95059d21db972ad181ac4837bc194f6f5ab67e971eb3
container_end_page 194
container_issue 2
container_start_page 190
container_title Cladistics
container_volume 28
creator Srivathsan, Amrita
Meier, Rudolf
description Here we present evidence, based on 10 datasets comprising 5283 sequences for 200 genera, that the use of the Kimura‐2‐parameter (K2P) model in DNA‐barcoding studies is poorly justified. We demonstrate that K2P is neither expected nor confirmed to be an appropriate model for closely related COI sequences. In addition, we show that the use of uncorrected distances yields higher or similar identification success rates for neighbour‐joining trees and distance‐based identification techniques. K2P also does not widen the barcoding gap for closely related sequences. We conclude that the spread of K2P through the barcoding literature is difficult to explain, and urge the use of evidence‐based approaches to DNA barcoding. © The Willi Hennig Society 2011.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00370.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2606920495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1024656447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5320-d476ef2a62eab2fcaa93e95059d21db972ad181ac4837bc194f6f5ab67e971eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1v0zAUQC0EEmXwH_w4HhyuncSuJV5K2ca0qkN8jEdzk9wMlzQpdsK6f4-7or2CX3wln3MlH8a4hEym82aTSbBaAOQyUyBlliYD2f4Jmz0-PGUzMMVc5ADmOXsR4wYAlFZ2xr5f93z8Qdz3uNuFYRc8jsSnSHxo-ZXfTgGFEjsMuKWRAj-9Uh9f88b_pnBLfU0xmQ8L3q8XosJQD43vb3nnE4zjFOgle9ZiF-nV3_uEfT0_-7L8IFbXF5fLxUrUZa5ANIXR1CrUirBSbY1oc7IllLZRsqmsUdjIucS6mOemqqUtWt2WWGlD1kiq8hN2etybfvFroji6rY81dR32NEzRKQ3aKihs-U9Ugip0qYvCJHR-ROswxBiodanQFsN9gtyhv9u4Q2Z3yOwO_d1Df7dP6tujeuc7uv9vzy1XizQkXRx1H0faP-oYfjptclO6b-sLV35SN-fvbtbuc_4HWpKZqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024656447</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the inappropriate use of Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) divergences in the DNA-barcoding literature</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Srivathsan, Amrita ; Meier, Rudolf</creator><creatorcontrib>Srivathsan, Amrita ; Meier, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><description>Here we present evidence, based on 10 datasets comprising 5283 sequences for 200 genera, that the use of the Kimura‐2‐parameter (K2P) model in DNA‐barcoding studies is poorly justified. We demonstrate that K2P is neither expected nor confirmed to be an appropriate model for closely related COI sequences. In addition, we show that the use of uncorrected distances yields higher or similar identification success rates for neighbour‐joining trees and distance‐based identification techniques. K2P also does not widen the barcoding gap for closely related sequences. We conclude that the spread of K2P through the barcoding literature is difficult to explain, and urge the use of evidence‐based approaches to DNA barcoding. © The Willi Hennig Society 2011.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00370.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>cladistics ; DNA ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Cladistics, 2012-04, Vol.28 (2), p.190-194</ispartof><rights>The Willi Hennig Society 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5320-d476ef2a62eab2fcaa93e95059d21db972ad181ac4837bc194f6f5ab67e971eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5320-d476ef2a62eab2fcaa93e95059d21db972ad181ac4837bc194f6f5ab67e971eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Srivathsan, Amrita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><title>On the inappropriate use of Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) divergences in the DNA-barcoding literature</title><title>Cladistics</title><description>Here we present evidence, based on 10 datasets comprising 5283 sequences for 200 genera, that the use of the Kimura‐2‐parameter (K2P) model in DNA‐barcoding studies is poorly justified. We demonstrate that K2P is neither expected nor confirmed to be an appropriate model for closely related COI sequences. In addition, we show that the use of uncorrected distances yields higher or similar identification success rates for neighbour‐joining trees and distance‐based identification techniques. K2P also does not widen the barcoding gap for closely related sequences. We conclude that the spread of K2P through the barcoding literature is difficult to explain, and urge the use of evidence‐based approaches to DNA barcoding. © The Willi Hennig Society 2011.</description><subject>cladistics</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0748-3007</issn><issn>1096-0031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1v0zAUQC0EEmXwH_w4HhyuncSuJV5K2ca0qkN8jEdzk9wMlzQpdsK6f4-7or2CX3wln3MlH8a4hEym82aTSbBaAOQyUyBlliYD2f4Jmz0-PGUzMMVc5ADmOXsR4wYAlFZ2xr5f93z8Qdz3uNuFYRc8jsSnSHxo-ZXfTgGFEjsMuKWRAj-9Uh9f88b_pnBLfU0xmQ8L3q8XosJQD43vb3nnE4zjFOgle9ZiF-nV3_uEfT0_-7L8IFbXF5fLxUrUZa5ANIXR1CrUirBSbY1oc7IllLZRsqmsUdjIucS6mOemqqUtWt2WWGlD1kiq8hN2etybfvFroji6rY81dR32NEzRKQ3aKihs-U9Ugip0qYvCJHR-ROswxBiodanQFsN9gtyhv9u4Q2Z3yOwO_d1Df7dP6tujeuc7uv9vzy1XizQkXRx1H0faP-oYfjptclO6b-sLV35SN-fvbtbuc_4HWpKZqA</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>Srivathsan, Amrita</creator><creator>Meier, Rudolf</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>On the inappropriate use of Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) divergences in the DNA-barcoding literature</title><author>Srivathsan, Amrita ; Meier, Rudolf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5320-d476ef2a62eab2fcaa93e95059d21db972ad181ac4837bc194f6f5ab67e971eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>cladistics</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Srivathsan, Amrita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cladistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Srivathsan, Amrita</au><au>Meier, Rudolf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the inappropriate use of Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) divergences in the DNA-barcoding literature</atitle><jtitle>Cladistics</jtitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>190</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>190-194</pages><issn>0748-3007</issn><eissn>1096-0031</eissn><abstract>Here we present evidence, based on 10 datasets comprising 5283 sequences for 200 genera, that the use of the Kimura‐2‐parameter (K2P) model in DNA‐barcoding studies is poorly justified. We demonstrate that K2P is neither expected nor confirmed to be an appropriate model for closely related COI sequences. In addition, we show that the use of uncorrected distances yields higher or similar identification success rates for neighbour‐joining trees and distance‐based identification techniques. K2P also does not widen the barcoding gap for closely related sequences. We conclude that the spread of K2P through the barcoding literature is difficult to explain, and urge the use of evidence‐based approaches to DNA barcoding. © The Willi Hennig Society 2011.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00370.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-3007
ispartof Cladistics, 2012-04, Vol.28 (2), p.190-194
issn 0748-3007
1096-0031
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2606920495
source Wiley
subjects cladistics
DNA
Trees
title On the inappropriate use of Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) divergences in the DNA-barcoding literature
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A45%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20inappropriate%20use%20of%20Kimura-2-parameter%20(K2P)%20divergences%20in%20the%20DNA-barcoding%20literature&rft.jtitle=Cladistics&rft.au=Srivathsan,%20Amrita&rft.date=2012-04&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=190&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=190-194&rft.issn=0748-3007&rft.eissn=1096-0031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00370.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1024656447%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5320-d476ef2a62eab2fcaa93e95059d21db972ad181ac4837bc194f6f5ab67e971eb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024656447&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true