Loading…

A phase 2 evaluation of pembrolizumab for recurrent Lynch‐like versus sporadic endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability

Background Microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a biomarker for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Whether mechanisms underlying microsatellite instability alter responses to ICIs is unclear. This article reports data from a prospective phase 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer 2022-03, Vol.128 (6), p.1206-1218
Main Authors: Bellone, Stefania, Roque, Dana M., Siegel, Eric R., Buza, Natalia, Hui, Pei, Bonazzoli, Elena, Guglielmi, Adele, Zammataro, Luca, Nagarkatti, Nupur, Zaidi, Samir, Lee, Jungsoo, Silasi, Dan‐Arin, Huang, Gloria S., Andikyan, Vaagn, Damast, Shari, Clark, Mitchell, Azodi, Masoud, Schwartz, Peter E., Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R., Harold, Justin A., Mauricio, Dennis, Zeybek, Burak, Menderes, Gulden, Altwerger, Gary, Ratner, Elena, Alexandrov, Ludmil B., Iwasaki, Akiko, Kong, Yong, Song, Eric, Dong, Weilai, Elvin, Julia A., Choi, Jungmin, Santin, Alessandro D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-675f1033da60a61077fb8465fa9384e5797b882c94d728b476bcbf81ce2e903
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-675f1033da60a61077fb8465fa9384e5797b882c94d728b476bcbf81ce2e903
container_end_page 1218
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1206
container_title Cancer
container_volume 128
creator Bellone, Stefania
Roque, Dana M.
Siegel, Eric R.
Buza, Natalia
Hui, Pei
Bonazzoli, Elena
Guglielmi, Adele
Zammataro, Luca
Nagarkatti, Nupur
Zaidi, Samir
Lee, Jungsoo
Silasi, Dan‐Arin
Huang, Gloria S.
Andikyan, Vaagn
Damast, Shari
Clark, Mitchell
Azodi, Masoud
Schwartz, Peter E.
Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R.
Harold, Justin A.
Mauricio, Dennis
Zeybek, Burak
Menderes, Gulden
Altwerger, Gary
Ratner, Elena
Alexandrov, Ludmil B.
Iwasaki, Akiko
Kong, Yong
Song, Eric
Dong, Weilai
Elvin, Julia A.
Choi, Jungmin
Santin, Alessandro D.
description Background Microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a biomarker for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Whether mechanisms underlying microsatellite instability alter responses to ICIs is unclear. This article reports data from a prospective phase 2 pilot study of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent MSI‐H endometrial cancer (EC) analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES) and potential mechanisms of primary/secondary ICI resistance (NCT02899793). Methods Patients with measurable MSI‐H/dMMR EC confirmed by polymerase chain reaction/immunohistochemistry were evaluated by WES and received 200 mg of pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Twenty‐five patients (24 evaluable) were treated. Six patients (25%) harbored Lynch/Lynch‐like tumors, whereas 18 (75%) had sporadic EC. The tumor mutation burden was higher in Lynch‐like tumors (median, 2939 mutations/megabase [Mut/Mb]; interquartile range [IQR], 867‐5108 Mut/Mb) than sporadic tumors (median, 604 Mut/Mb; IQR, 411‐798 Mut/Mb; P = .0076). The ORR was 100% in Lynch/Lynch‐like patients but only 44% in sporadic patients (P = .024). The 3‐year PFS and OS proportions were 100% versus 30% (P = .017) and 100% versus 43% (P = .043), respectively. Conclusions This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic MSI‐H/dMMR ECs for ORR, PFS, and OS when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Larger confirmatory studies in ECs and other MSI‐H/dMMR tumors are necessary. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs. Oligoprogression in MSI‐H/dMMR patients appears salvageable with surgical resection and/or local treatment and the continuation of pembrolizumab off study. Clinical studies evaluating separate MSI‐H/dMMR EC subtypes treated with ICIs are warranted. This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H) endometrial cancers (ECs) for the objective response rate, progression‐free survival, and overall survival when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs, and clinical s
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.34025
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2608131292</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2608131292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-675f1033da60a61077fb8465fa9384e5797b882c94d728b476bcbf81ce2e903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1O3DAURq2qqEyBTR-gstRNhRTqnyS2l2hEKdIIJMqCXWQ7NxrTxE7tBDRddcED9Bl5knoY2kUXXV1f-ejTd3UQekfJCSWEfbLexhNeEla9QgtKlCgILdlrtCCEyKIq-e0-epvSXV4Fq_gbtM9LKSpKxAI9nuJxrRNghuFe97OeXPA4dHiEwcTQux_zoA3uQsQR7Bwj-AmvNt6un37-6t03wPcQ05xwGkPUrbMYfBsGmKLTPbba2_yNH9y0xoOzMSQ9Qd-7CbDzadLG5ffmEO11uk9w9DIP0NfPZzfLL8Xq6vxieboqLFe8KmpRdZRw3uqa6DrXF52RZV11WnFZQiWUMFIyq8pWMGlKURtrOkktMFCEH6CPu9Qxhu8zpKkZXLK5jfYQ5tSwmkjKKVMsox_-Qe_CHH3ulinOBFNE0Uwd76jtXSlC14zRDTpuGkqarZlma6Z5NpPh9y-Rsxmg_Yv-UZEBugMeXA-b_0Q1y8vl9S70N9QJm40</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2632729091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A phase 2 evaluation of pembrolizumab for recurrent Lynch‐like versus sporadic endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability</title><source>Wiley</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Bellone, Stefania ; Roque, Dana M. ; Siegel, Eric R. ; Buza, Natalia ; Hui, Pei ; Bonazzoli, Elena ; Guglielmi, Adele ; Zammataro, Luca ; Nagarkatti, Nupur ; Zaidi, Samir ; Lee, Jungsoo ; Silasi, Dan‐Arin ; Huang, Gloria S. ; Andikyan, Vaagn ; Damast, Shari ; Clark, Mitchell ; Azodi, Masoud ; Schwartz, Peter E. ; Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R. ; Harold, Justin A. ; Mauricio, Dennis ; Zeybek, Burak ; Menderes, Gulden ; Altwerger, Gary ; Ratner, Elena ; Alexandrov, Ludmil B. ; Iwasaki, Akiko ; Kong, Yong ; Song, Eric ; Dong, Weilai ; Elvin, Julia A. ; Choi, Jungmin ; Santin, Alessandro D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bellone, Stefania ; Roque, Dana M. ; Siegel, Eric R. ; Buza, Natalia ; Hui, Pei ; Bonazzoli, Elena ; Guglielmi, Adele ; Zammataro, Luca ; Nagarkatti, Nupur ; Zaidi, Samir ; Lee, Jungsoo ; Silasi, Dan‐Arin ; Huang, Gloria S. ; Andikyan, Vaagn ; Damast, Shari ; Clark, Mitchell ; Azodi, Masoud ; Schwartz, Peter E. ; Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R. ; Harold, Justin A. ; Mauricio, Dennis ; Zeybek, Burak ; Menderes, Gulden ; Altwerger, Gary ; Ratner, Elena ; Alexandrov, Ludmil B. ; Iwasaki, Akiko ; Kong, Yong ; Song, Eric ; Dong, Weilai ; Elvin, Julia A. ; Choi, Jungmin ; Santin, Alessandro D.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a biomarker for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Whether mechanisms underlying microsatellite instability alter responses to ICIs is unclear. This article reports data from a prospective phase 2 pilot study of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent MSI‐H endometrial cancer (EC) analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES) and potential mechanisms of primary/secondary ICI resistance (NCT02899793). Methods Patients with measurable MSI‐H/dMMR EC confirmed by polymerase chain reaction/immunohistochemistry were evaluated by WES and received 200 mg of pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Twenty‐five patients (24 evaluable) were treated. Six patients (25%) harbored Lynch/Lynch‐like tumors, whereas 18 (75%) had sporadic EC. The tumor mutation burden was higher in Lynch‐like tumors (median, 2939 mutations/megabase [Mut/Mb]; interquartile range [IQR], 867‐5108 Mut/Mb) than sporadic tumors (median, 604 Mut/Mb; IQR, 411‐798 Mut/Mb; P = .0076). The ORR was 100% in Lynch/Lynch‐like patients but only 44% in sporadic patients (P = .024). The 3‐year PFS and OS proportions were 100% versus 30% (P = .017) and 100% versus 43% (P = .043), respectively. Conclusions This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic MSI‐H/dMMR ECs for ORR, PFS, and OS when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Larger confirmatory studies in ECs and other MSI‐H/dMMR tumors are necessary. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs. Oligoprogression in MSI‐H/dMMR patients appears salvageable with surgical resection and/or local treatment and the continuation of pembrolizumab off study. Clinical studies evaluating separate MSI‐H/dMMR EC subtypes treated with ICIs are warranted. This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H) endometrial cancers (ECs) for the objective response rate, progression‐free survival, and overall survival when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs, and clinical studies evaluating separate MSI‐H EC subtypes treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34875107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; Antigen presentation ; Antigen processing ; Antigens ; Biomarkers ; Cancer ; clinical trial results ; DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics ; Endometrial cancer ; Endometrial Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics ; Endometrium ; Evaluation ; Female ; gynecologic cancers ; gynecologic oncology ; Humans ; Immune checkpoint inhibitors ; Immunohistochemistry ; Immunotherapy ; immunotherapy/checkpoint blockade ; Interferon ; Microsatellite Instability ; Mismatch repair ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Mutation ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - genetics ; Oncology ; Patients ; Pembrolizumab ; phase 2 clinical trial ; Pilot Projects ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Prospective Studies ; Stability ; Survival ; Targeted cancer therapy ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2022-03, Vol.128 (6), p.1206-1218</ispartof><rights>2021 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2021 American Cancer Society.</rights><rights>2022 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-675f1033da60a61077fb8465fa9384e5797b882c94d728b476bcbf81ce2e903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-675f1033da60a61077fb8465fa9384e5797b882c94d728b476bcbf81ce2e903</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0001-888X ; 0000-0003-4724-9738</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34875107$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bellone, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roque, Dana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Eric R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buza, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonazzoli, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guglielmi, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zammataro, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarkatti, Nupur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaidi, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jungsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silasi, Dan‐Arin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Gloria S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andikyan, Vaagn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damast, Shari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Mitchell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azodi, Masoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Peter E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harold, Justin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauricio, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeybek, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menderes, Gulden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altwerger, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratner, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandrov, Ludmil B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Weilai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elvin, Julia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jungmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santin, Alessandro D.</creatorcontrib><title>A phase 2 evaluation of pembrolizumab for recurrent Lynch‐like versus sporadic endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background Microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a biomarker for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Whether mechanisms underlying microsatellite instability alter responses to ICIs is unclear. This article reports data from a prospective phase 2 pilot study of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent MSI‐H endometrial cancer (EC) analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES) and potential mechanisms of primary/secondary ICI resistance (NCT02899793). Methods Patients with measurable MSI‐H/dMMR EC confirmed by polymerase chain reaction/immunohistochemistry were evaluated by WES and received 200 mg of pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Twenty‐five patients (24 evaluable) were treated. Six patients (25%) harbored Lynch/Lynch‐like tumors, whereas 18 (75%) had sporadic EC. The tumor mutation burden was higher in Lynch‐like tumors (median, 2939 mutations/megabase [Mut/Mb]; interquartile range [IQR], 867‐5108 Mut/Mb) than sporadic tumors (median, 604 Mut/Mb; IQR, 411‐798 Mut/Mb; P = .0076). The ORR was 100% in Lynch/Lynch‐like patients but only 44% in sporadic patients (P = .024). The 3‐year PFS and OS proportions were 100% versus 30% (P = .017) and 100% versus 43% (P = .043), respectively. Conclusions This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic MSI‐H/dMMR ECs for ORR, PFS, and OS when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Larger confirmatory studies in ECs and other MSI‐H/dMMR tumors are necessary. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs. Oligoprogression in MSI‐H/dMMR patients appears salvageable with surgical resection and/or local treatment and the continuation of pembrolizumab off study. Clinical studies evaluating separate MSI‐H/dMMR EC subtypes treated with ICIs are warranted. This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H) endometrial cancers (ECs) for the objective response rate, progression‐free survival, and overall survival when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs, and clinical studies evaluating separate MSI‐H EC subtypes treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are warranted.</description><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized</subject><subject>Antigen presentation</subject><subject>Antigen processing</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>clinical trial results</subject><subject>DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics</subject><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gynecologic cancers</subject><subject>gynecologic oncology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune checkpoint inhibitors</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>immunotherapy/checkpoint blockade</subject><subject>Interferon</subject><subject>Microsatellite Instability</subject><subject>Mismatch repair</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - genetics</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pembrolizumab</subject><subject>phase 2 clinical trial</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Targeted cancer therapy</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1O3DAURq2qqEyBTR-gstRNhRTqnyS2l2hEKdIIJMqCXWQ7NxrTxE7tBDRddcED9Bl5knoY2kUXXV1f-ejTd3UQekfJCSWEfbLexhNeEla9QgtKlCgILdlrtCCEyKIq-e0-epvSXV4Fq_gbtM9LKSpKxAI9nuJxrRNghuFe97OeXPA4dHiEwcTQux_zoA3uQsQR7Bwj-AmvNt6un37-6t03wPcQ05xwGkPUrbMYfBsGmKLTPbba2_yNH9y0xoOzMSQ9Qd-7CbDzadLG5ffmEO11uk9w9DIP0NfPZzfLL8Xq6vxieboqLFe8KmpRdZRw3uqa6DrXF52RZV11WnFZQiWUMFIyq8pWMGlKURtrOkktMFCEH6CPu9Qxhu8zpKkZXLK5jfYQ5tSwmkjKKVMsox_-Qe_CHH3ulinOBFNE0Uwd76jtXSlC14zRDTpuGkqarZlma6Z5NpPh9y-Rsxmg_Yv-UZEBugMeXA-b_0Q1y8vl9S70N9QJm40</recordid><startdate>20220315</startdate><enddate>20220315</enddate><creator>Bellone, Stefania</creator><creator>Roque, Dana M.</creator><creator>Siegel, Eric R.</creator><creator>Buza, Natalia</creator><creator>Hui, Pei</creator><creator>Bonazzoli, Elena</creator><creator>Guglielmi, Adele</creator><creator>Zammataro, Luca</creator><creator>Nagarkatti, Nupur</creator><creator>Zaidi, Samir</creator><creator>Lee, Jungsoo</creator><creator>Silasi, Dan‐Arin</creator><creator>Huang, Gloria S.</creator><creator>Andikyan, Vaagn</creator><creator>Damast, Shari</creator><creator>Clark, Mitchell</creator><creator>Azodi, Masoud</creator><creator>Schwartz, Peter E.</creator><creator>Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R.</creator><creator>Harold, Justin A.</creator><creator>Mauricio, Dennis</creator><creator>Zeybek, Burak</creator><creator>Menderes, Gulden</creator><creator>Altwerger, Gary</creator><creator>Ratner, Elena</creator><creator>Alexandrov, Ludmil B.</creator><creator>Iwasaki, Akiko</creator><creator>Kong, Yong</creator><creator>Song, Eric</creator><creator>Dong, Weilai</creator><creator>Elvin, Julia A.</creator><creator>Choi, Jungmin</creator><creator>Santin, Alessandro D.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-888X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-9738</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220315</creationdate><title>A phase 2 evaluation of pembrolizumab for recurrent Lynch‐like versus sporadic endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability</title><author>Bellone, Stefania ; Roque, Dana M. ; Siegel, Eric R. ; Buza, Natalia ; Hui, Pei ; Bonazzoli, Elena ; Guglielmi, Adele ; Zammataro, Luca ; Nagarkatti, Nupur ; Zaidi, Samir ; Lee, Jungsoo ; Silasi, Dan‐Arin ; Huang, Gloria S. ; Andikyan, Vaagn ; Damast, Shari ; Clark, Mitchell ; Azodi, Masoud ; Schwartz, Peter E. ; Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R. ; Harold, Justin A. ; Mauricio, Dennis ; Zeybek, Burak ; Menderes, Gulden ; Altwerger, Gary ; Ratner, Elena ; Alexandrov, Ludmil B. ; Iwasaki, Akiko ; Kong, Yong ; Song, Eric ; Dong, Weilai ; Elvin, Julia A. ; Choi, Jungmin ; Santin, Alessandro D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-675f1033da60a61077fb8465fa9384e5797b882c94d728b476bcbf81ce2e903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized</topic><topic>Antigen presentation</topic><topic>Antigen processing</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>clinical trial results</topic><topic>DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics</topic><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gynecologic cancers</topic><topic>gynecologic oncology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune checkpoint inhibitors</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>immunotherapy/checkpoint blockade</topic><topic>Interferon</topic><topic>Microsatellite Instability</topic><topic>Mismatch repair</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - genetics</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pembrolizumab</topic><topic>phase 2 clinical trial</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Targeted cancer therapy</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bellone, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roque, Dana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Eric R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buza, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonazzoli, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guglielmi, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zammataro, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarkatti, Nupur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaidi, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jungsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silasi, Dan‐Arin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Gloria S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andikyan, Vaagn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damast, Shari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Mitchell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azodi, Masoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Peter E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harold, Justin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauricio, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeybek, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menderes, Gulden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altwerger, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratner, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandrov, Ludmil B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Weilai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elvin, Julia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jungmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santin, Alessandro D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bellone, Stefania</au><au>Roque, Dana M.</au><au>Siegel, Eric R.</au><au>Buza, Natalia</au><au>Hui, Pei</au><au>Bonazzoli, Elena</au><au>Guglielmi, Adele</au><au>Zammataro, Luca</au><au>Nagarkatti, Nupur</au><au>Zaidi, Samir</au><au>Lee, Jungsoo</au><au>Silasi, Dan‐Arin</au><au>Huang, Gloria S.</au><au>Andikyan, Vaagn</au><au>Damast, Shari</au><au>Clark, Mitchell</au><au>Azodi, Masoud</au><au>Schwartz, Peter E.</au><au>Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R.</au><au>Harold, Justin A.</au><au>Mauricio, Dennis</au><au>Zeybek, Burak</au><au>Menderes, Gulden</au><au>Altwerger, Gary</au><au>Ratner, Elena</au><au>Alexandrov, Ludmil B.</au><au>Iwasaki, Akiko</au><au>Kong, Yong</au><au>Song, Eric</au><au>Dong, Weilai</au><au>Elvin, Julia A.</au><au>Choi, Jungmin</au><au>Santin, Alessandro D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A phase 2 evaluation of pembrolizumab for recurrent Lynch‐like versus sporadic endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2022-03-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1206</spage><epage>1218</epage><pages>1206-1218</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background Microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a biomarker for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Whether mechanisms underlying microsatellite instability alter responses to ICIs is unclear. This article reports data from a prospective phase 2 pilot study of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent MSI‐H endometrial cancer (EC) analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES) and potential mechanisms of primary/secondary ICI resistance (NCT02899793). Methods Patients with measurable MSI‐H/dMMR EC confirmed by polymerase chain reaction/immunohistochemistry were evaluated by WES and received 200 mg of pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Twenty‐five patients (24 evaluable) were treated. Six patients (25%) harbored Lynch/Lynch‐like tumors, whereas 18 (75%) had sporadic EC. The tumor mutation burden was higher in Lynch‐like tumors (median, 2939 mutations/megabase [Mut/Mb]; interquartile range [IQR], 867‐5108 Mut/Mb) than sporadic tumors (median, 604 Mut/Mb; IQR, 411‐798 Mut/Mb; P = .0076). The ORR was 100% in Lynch/Lynch‐like patients but only 44% in sporadic patients (P = .024). The 3‐year PFS and OS proportions were 100% versus 30% (P = .017) and 100% versus 43% (P = .043), respectively. Conclusions This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic MSI‐H/dMMR ECs for ORR, PFS, and OS when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Larger confirmatory studies in ECs and other MSI‐H/dMMR tumors are necessary. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs. Oligoprogression in MSI‐H/dMMR patients appears salvageable with surgical resection and/or local treatment and the continuation of pembrolizumab off study. Clinical studies evaluating separate MSI‐H/dMMR EC subtypes treated with ICIs are warranted. This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H) endometrial cancers (ECs) for the objective response rate, progression‐free survival, and overall survival when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs, and clinical studies evaluating separate MSI‐H EC subtypes treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are warranted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34875107</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.34025</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-888X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-9738</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2022-03, Vol.128 (6), p.1206-1218
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2608131292
source Wiley; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Antigen presentation
Antigen processing
Antigens
Biomarkers
Cancer
clinical trial results
DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics
Endometrial cancer
Endometrial Neoplasms - drug therapy
Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics
Endometrium
Evaluation
Female
gynecologic cancers
gynecologic oncology
Humans
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Immunohistochemistry
Immunotherapy
immunotherapy/checkpoint blockade
Interferon
Microsatellite Instability
Mismatch repair
Monoclonal antibodies
Mutation
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - genetics
Oncology
Patients
Pembrolizumab
phase 2 clinical trial
Pilot Projects
Polymerase chain reaction
Prospective Studies
Stability
Survival
Targeted cancer therapy
Tumors
title A phase 2 evaluation of pembrolizumab for recurrent Lynch‐like versus sporadic endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T09%3A30%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20phase%202%20evaluation%20of%20pembrolizumab%20for%20recurrent%20Lynch%E2%80%90like%20versus%20sporadic%20endometrial%20cancers%20with%20microsatellite%20instability&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Bellone,%20Stefania&rft.date=2022-03-15&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1206&rft.epage=1218&rft.pages=1206-1218&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.34025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2608131292%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-675f1033da60a61077fb8465fa9384e5797b882c94d728b476bcbf81ce2e903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2632729091&rft_id=info:pmid/34875107&rfr_iscdi=true