Loading…
A phase 2 evaluation of pembrolizumab for recurrent Lynch‐like versus sporadic endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability
Background Microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a biomarker for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Whether mechanisms underlying microsatellite instability alter responses to ICIs is unclear. This article reports data from a prospective phase 2...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancer 2022-03, Vol.128 (6), p.1206-1218 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-675f1033da60a61077fb8465fa9384e5797b882c94d728b476bcbf81ce2e903 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-675f1033da60a61077fb8465fa9384e5797b882c94d728b476bcbf81ce2e903 |
container_end_page | 1218 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1206 |
container_title | Cancer |
container_volume | 128 |
creator | Bellone, Stefania Roque, Dana M. Siegel, Eric R. Buza, Natalia Hui, Pei Bonazzoli, Elena Guglielmi, Adele Zammataro, Luca Nagarkatti, Nupur Zaidi, Samir Lee, Jungsoo Silasi, Dan‐Arin Huang, Gloria S. Andikyan, Vaagn Damast, Shari Clark, Mitchell Azodi, Masoud Schwartz, Peter E. Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R. Harold, Justin A. Mauricio, Dennis Zeybek, Burak Menderes, Gulden Altwerger, Gary Ratner, Elena Alexandrov, Ludmil B. Iwasaki, Akiko Kong, Yong Song, Eric Dong, Weilai Elvin, Julia A. Choi, Jungmin Santin, Alessandro D. |
description | Background
Microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a biomarker for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Whether mechanisms underlying microsatellite instability alter responses to ICIs is unclear. This article reports data from a prospective phase 2 pilot study of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent MSI‐H endometrial cancer (EC) analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES) and potential mechanisms of primary/secondary ICI resistance (NCT02899793).
Methods
Patients with measurable MSI‐H/dMMR EC confirmed by polymerase chain reaction/immunohistochemistry were evaluated by WES and received 200 mg of pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results
Twenty‐five patients (24 evaluable) were treated. Six patients (25%) harbored Lynch/Lynch‐like tumors, whereas 18 (75%) had sporadic EC. The tumor mutation burden was higher in Lynch‐like tumors (median, 2939 mutations/megabase [Mut/Mb]; interquartile range [IQR], 867‐5108 Mut/Mb) than sporadic tumors (median, 604 Mut/Mb; IQR, 411‐798 Mut/Mb; P = .0076). The ORR was 100% in Lynch/Lynch‐like patients but only 44% in sporadic patients (P = .024). The 3‐year PFS and OS proportions were 100% versus 30% (P = .017) and 100% versus 43% (P = .043), respectively.
Conclusions
This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic MSI‐H/dMMR ECs for ORR, PFS, and OS when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Larger confirmatory studies in ECs and other MSI‐H/dMMR tumors are necessary. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs. Oligoprogression in MSI‐H/dMMR patients appears salvageable with surgical resection and/or local treatment and the continuation of pembrolizumab off study. Clinical studies evaluating separate MSI‐H/dMMR EC subtypes treated with ICIs are warranted.
This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H) endometrial cancers (ECs) for the objective response rate, progression‐free survival, and overall survival when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs, and clinical s |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cncr.34025 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2608131292</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2608131292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-675f1033da60a61077fb8465fa9384e5797b882c94d728b476bcbf81ce2e903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1O3DAURq2qqEyBTR-gstRNhRTqnyS2l2hEKdIIJMqCXWQ7NxrTxE7tBDRddcED9Bl5knoY2kUXXV1f-ejTd3UQekfJCSWEfbLexhNeEla9QgtKlCgILdlrtCCEyKIq-e0-epvSXV4Fq_gbtM9LKSpKxAI9nuJxrRNghuFe97OeXPA4dHiEwcTQux_zoA3uQsQR7Bwj-AmvNt6un37-6t03wPcQ05xwGkPUrbMYfBsGmKLTPbba2_yNH9y0xoOzMSQ9Qd-7CbDzadLG5ffmEO11uk9w9DIP0NfPZzfLL8Xq6vxieboqLFe8KmpRdZRw3uqa6DrXF52RZV11WnFZQiWUMFIyq8pWMGlKURtrOkktMFCEH6CPu9Qxhu8zpKkZXLK5jfYQ5tSwmkjKKVMsox_-Qe_CHH3ulinOBFNE0Uwd76jtXSlC14zRDTpuGkqarZlma6Z5NpPh9y-Rsxmg_Yv-UZEBugMeXA-b_0Q1y8vl9S70N9QJm40</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2632729091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A phase 2 evaluation of pembrolizumab for recurrent Lynch‐like versus sporadic endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability</title><source>Wiley</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Bellone, Stefania ; Roque, Dana M. ; Siegel, Eric R. ; Buza, Natalia ; Hui, Pei ; Bonazzoli, Elena ; Guglielmi, Adele ; Zammataro, Luca ; Nagarkatti, Nupur ; Zaidi, Samir ; Lee, Jungsoo ; Silasi, Dan‐Arin ; Huang, Gloria S. ; Andikyan, Vaagn ; Damast, Shari ; Clark, Mitchell ; Azodi, Masoud ; Schwartz, Peter E. ; Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R. ; Harold, Justin A. ; Mauricio, Dennis ; Zeybek, Burak ; Menderes, Gulden ; Altwerger, Gary ; Ratner, Elena ; Alexandrov, Ludmil B. ; Iwasaki, Akiko ; Kong, Yong ; Song, Eric ; Dong, Weilai ; Elvin, Julia A. ; Choi, Jungmin ; Santin, Alessandro D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bellone, Stefania ; Roque, Dana M. ; Siegel, Eric R. ; Buza, Natalia ; Hui, Pei ; Bonazzoli, Elena ; Guglielmi, Adele ; Zammataro, Luca ; Nagarkatti, Nupur ; Zaidi, Samir ; Lee, Jungsoo ; Silasi, Dan‐Arin ; Huang, Gloria S. ; Andikyan, Vaagn ; Damast, Shari ; Clark, Mitchell ; Azodi, Masoud ; Schwartz, Peter E. ; Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R. ; Harold, Justin A. ; Mauricio, Dennis ; Zeybek, Burak ; Menderes, Gulden ; Altwerger, Gary ; Ratner, Elena ; Alexandrov, Ludmil B. ; Iwasaki, Akiko ; Kong, Yong ; Song, Eric ; Dong, Weilai ; Elvin, Julia A. ; Choi, Jungmin ; Santin, Alessandro D.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a biomarker for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Whether mechanisms underlying microsatellite instability alter responses to ICIs is unclear. This article reports data from a prospective phase 2 pilot study of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent MSI‐H endometrial cancer (EC) analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES) and potential mechanisms of primary/secondary ICI resistance (NCT02899793).
Methods
Patients with measurable MSI‐H/dMMR EC confirmed by polymerase chain reaction/immunohistochemistry were evaluated by WES and received 200 mg of pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results
Twenty‐five patients (24 evaluable) were treated. Six patients (25%) harbored Lynch/Lynch‐like tumors, whereas 18 (75%) had sporadic EC. The tumor mutation burden was higher in Lynch‐like tumors (median, 2939 mutations/megabase [Mut/Mb]; interquartile range [IQR], 867‐5108 Mut/Mb) than sporadic tumors (median, 604 Mut/Mb; IQR, 411‐798 Mut/Mb; P = .0076). The ORR was 100% in Lynch/Lynch‐like patients but only 44% in sporadic patients (P = .024). The 3‐year PFS and OS proportions were 100% versus 30% (P = .017) and 100% versus 43% (P = .043), respectively.
Conclusions
This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic MSI‐H/dMMR ECs for ORR, PFS, and OS when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Larger confirmatory studies in ECs and other MSI‐H/dMMR tumors are necessary. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs. Oligoprogression in MSI‐H/dMMR patients appears salvageable with surgical resection and/or local treatment and the continuation of pembrolizumab off study. Clinical studies evaluating separate MSI‐H/dMMR EC subtypes treated with ICIs are warranted.
This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H) endometrial cancers (ECs) for the objective response rate, progression‐free survival, and overall survival when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs, and clinical studies evaluating separate MSI‐H EC subtypes treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34875107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; Antigen presentation ; Antigen processing ; Antigens ; Biomarkers ; Cancer ; clinical trial results ; DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics ; Endometrial cancer ; Endometrial Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics ; Endometrium ; Evaluation ; Female ; gynecologic cancers ; gynecologic oncology ; Humans ; Immune checkpoint inhibitors ; Immunohistochemistry ; Immunotherapy ; immunotherapy/checkpoint blockade ; Interferon ; Microsatellite Instability ; Mismatch repair ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Mutation ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - genetics ; Oncology ; Patients ; Pembrolizumab ; phase 2 clinical trial ; Pilot Projects ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Prospective Studies ; Stability ; Survival ; Targeted cancer therapy ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2022-03, Vol.128 (6), p.1206-1218</ispartof><rights>2021 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2021 American Cancer Society.</rights><rights>2022 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-675f1033da60a61077fb8465fa9384e5797b882c94d728b476bcbf81ce2e903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-675f1033da60a61077fb8465fa9384e5797b882c94d728b476bcbf81ce2e903</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0001-888X ; 0000-0003-4724-9738</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34875107$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bellone, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roque, Dana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Eric R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buza, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonazzoli, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guglielmi, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zammataro, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarkatti, Nupur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaidi, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jungsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silasi, Dan‐Arin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Gloria S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andikyan, Vaagn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damast, Shari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Mitchell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azodi, Masoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Peter E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harold, Justin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauricio, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeybek, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menderes, Gulden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altwerger, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratner, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandrov, Ludmil B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Weilai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elvin, Julia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jungmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santin, Alessandro D.</creatorcontrib><title>A phase 2 evaluation of pembrolizumab for recurrent Lynch‐like versus sporadic endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background
Microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a biomarker for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Whether mechanisms underlying microsatellite instability alter responses to ICIs is unclear. This article reports data from a prospective phase 2 pilot study of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent MSI‐H endometrial cancer (EC) analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES) and potential mechanisms of primary/secondary ICI resistance (NCT02899793).
Methods
Patients with measurable MSI‐H/dMMR EC confirmed by polymerase chain reaction/immunohistochemistry were evaluated by WES and received 200 mg of pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results
Twenty‐five patients (24 evaluable) were treated. Six patients (25%) harbored Lynch/Lynch‐like tumors, whereas 18 (75%) had sporadic EC. The tumor mutation burden was higher in Lynch‐like tumors (median, 2939 mutations/megabase [Mut/Mb]; interquartile range [IQR], 867‐5108 Mut/Mb) than sporadic tumors (median, 604 Mut/Mb; IQR, 411‐798 Mut/Mb; P = .0076). The ORR was 100% in Lynch/Lynch‐like patients but only 44% in sporadic patients (P = .024). The 3‐year PFS and OS proportions were 100% versus 30% (P = .017) and 100% versus 43% (P = .043), respectively.
Conclusions
This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic MSI‐H/dMMR ECs for ORR, PFS, and OS when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Larger confirmatory studies in ECs and other MSI‐H/dMMR tumors are necessary. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs. Oligoprogression in MSI‐H/dMMR patients appears salvageable with surgical resection and/or local treatment and the continuation of pembrolizumab off study. Clinical studies evaluating separate MSI‐H/dMMR EC subtypes treated with ICIs are warranted.
This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H) endometrial cancers (ECs) for the objective response rate, progression‐free survival, and overall survival when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs, and clinical studies evaluating separate MSI‐H EC subtypes treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are warranted.</description><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized</subject><subject>Antigen presentation</subject><subject>Antigen processing</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>clinical trial results</subject><subject>DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics</subject><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gynecologic cancers</subject><subject>gynecologic oncology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune checkpoint inhibitors</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>immunotherapy/checkpoint blockade</subject><subject>Interferon</subject><subject>Microsatellite Instability</subject><subject>Mismatch repair</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - genetics</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pembrolizumab</subject><subject>phase 2 clinical trial</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Targeted cancer therapy</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1O3DAURq2qqEyBTR-gstRNhRTqnyS2l2hEKdIIJMqCXWQ7NxrTxE7tBDRddcED9Bl5knoY2kUXXV1f-ejTd3UQekfJCSWEfbLexhNeEla9QgtKlCgILdlrtCCEyKIq-e0-epvSXV4Fq_gbtM9LKSpKxAI9nuJxrRNghuFe97OeXPA4dHiEwcTQux_zoA3uQsQR7Bwj-AmvNt6un37-6t03wPcQ05xwGkPUrbMYfBsGmKLTPbba2_yNH9y0xoOzMSQ9Qd-7CbDzadLG5ffmEO11uk9w9DIP0NfPZzfLL8Xq6vxieboqLFe8KmpRdZRw3uqa6DrXF52RZV11WnFZQiWUMFIyq8pWMGlKURtrOkktMFCEH6CPu9Qxhu8zpKkZXLK5jfYQ5tSwmkjKKVMsox_-Qe_CHH3ulinOBFNE0Uwd76jtXSlC14zRDTpuGkqarZlma6Z5NpPh9y-Rsxmg_Yv-UZEBugMeXA-b_0Q1y8vl9S70N9QJm40</recordid><startdate>20220315</startdate><enddate>20220315</enddate><creator>Bellone, Stefania</creator><creator>Roque, Dana M.</creator><creator>Siegel, Eric R.</creator><creator>Buza, Natalia</creator><creator>Hui, Pei</creator><creator>Bonazzoli, Elena</creator><creator>Guglielmi, Adele</creator><creator>Zammataro, Luca</creator><creator>Nagarkatti, Nupur</creator><creator>Zaidi, Samir</creator><creator>Lee, Jungsoo</creator><creator>Silasi, Dan‐Arin</creator><creator>Huang, Gloria S.</creator><creator>Andikyan, Vaagn</creator><creator>Damast, Shari</creator><creator>Clark, Mitchell</creator><creator>Azodi, Masoud</creator><creator>Schwartz, Peter E.</creator><creator>Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R.</creator><creator>Harold, Justin A.</creator><creator>Mauricio, Dennis</creator><creator>Zeybek, Burak</creator><creator>Menderes, Gulden</creator><creator>Altwerger, Gary</creator><creator>Ratner, Elena</creator><creator>Alexandrov, Ludmil B.</creator><creator>Iwasaki, Akiko</creator><creator>Kong, Yong</creator><creator>Song, Eric</creator><creator>Dong, Weilai</creator><creator>Elvin, Julia A.</creator><creator>Choi, Jungmin</creator><creator>Santin, Alessandro D.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-888X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-9738</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220315</creationdate><title>A phase 2 evaluation of pembrolizumab for recurrent Lynch‐like versus sporadic endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability</title><author>Bellone, Stefania ; Roque, Dana M. ; Siegel, Eric R. ; Buza, Natalia ; Hui, Pei ; Bonazzoli, Elena ; Guglielmi, Adele ; Zammataro, Luca ; Nagarkatti, Nupur ; Zaidi, Samir ; Lee, Jungsoo ; Silasi, Dan‐Arin ; Huang, Gloria S. ; Andikyan, Vaagn ; Damast, Shari ; Clark, Mitchell ; Azodi, Masoud ; Schwartz, Peter E. ; Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R. ; Harold, Justin A. ; Mauricio, Dennis ; Zeybek, Burak ; Menderes, Gulden ; Altwerger, Gary ; Ratner, Elena ; Alexandrov, Ludmil B. ; Iwasaki, Akiko ; Kong, Yong ; Song, Eric ; Dong, Weilai ; Elvin, Julia A. ; Choi, Jungmin ; Santin, Alessandro D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-675f1033da60a61077fb8465fa9384e5797b882c94d728b476bcbf81ce2e903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized</topic><topic>Antigen presentation</topic><topic>Antigen processing</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>clinical trial results</topic><topic>DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics</topic><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gynecologic cancers</topic><topic>gynecologic oncology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune checkpoint inhibitors</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>immunotherapy/checkpoint blockade</topic><topic>Interferon</topic><topic>Microsatellite Instability</topic><topic>Mismatch repair</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - genetics</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pembrolizumab</topic><topic>phase 2 clinical trial</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Targeted cancer therapy</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bellone, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roque, Dana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Eric R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buza, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonazzoli, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guglielmi, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zammataro, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarkatti, Nupur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaidi, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jungsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silasi, Dan‐Arin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Gloria S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andikyan, Vaagn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damast, Shari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Mitchell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azodi, Masoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Peter E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harold, Justin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauricio, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeybek, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menderes, Gulden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altwerger, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratner, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandrov, Ludmil B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Weilai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elvin, Julia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jungmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santin, Alessandro D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bellone, Stefania</au><au>Roque, Dana M.</au><au>Siegel, Eric R.</au><au>Buza, Natalia</au><au>Hui, Pei</au><au>Bonazzoli, Elena</au><au>Guglielmi, Adele</au><au>Zammataro, Luca</au><au>Nagarkatti, Nupur</au><au>Zaidi, Samir</au><au>Lee, Jungsoo</au><au>Silasi, Dan‐Arin</au><au>Huang, Gloria S.</au><au>Andikyan, Vaagn</au><au>Damast, Shari</au><au>Clark, Mitchell</au><au>Azodi, Masoud</au><au>Schwartz, Peter E.</au><au>Tymon‐Rosario, Joan R.</au><au>Harold, Justin A.</au><au>Mauricio, Dennis</au><au>Zeybek, Burak</au><au>Menderes, Gulden</au><au>Altwerger, Gary</au><au>Ratner, Elena</au><au>Alexandrov, Ludmil B.</au><au>Iwasaki, Akiko</au><au>Kong, Yong</au><au>Song, Eric</au><au>Dong, Weilai</au><au>Elvin, Julia A.</au><au>Choi, Jungmin</au><au>Santin, Alessandro D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A phase 2 evaluation of pembrolizumab for recurrent Lynch‐like versus sporadic endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2022-03-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1206</spage><epage>1218</epage><pages>1206-1218</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background
Microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a biomarker for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Whether mechanisms underlying microsatellite instability alter responses to ICIs is unclear. This article reports data from a prospective phase 2 pilot study of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent MSI‐H endometrial cancer (EC) analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES) and potential mechanisms of primary/secondary ICI resistance (NCT02899793).
Methods
Patients with measurable MSI‐H/dMMR EC confirmed by polymerase chain reaction/immunohistochemistry were evaluated by WES and received 200 mg of pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results
Twenty‐five patients (24 evaluable) were treated. Six patients (25%) harbored Lynch/Lynch‐like tumors, whereas 18 (75%) had sporadic EC. The tumor mutation burden was higher in Lynch‐like tumors (median, 2939 mutations/megabase [Mut/Mb]; interquartile range [IQR], 867‐5108 Mut/Mb) than sporadic tumors (median, 604 Mut/Mb; IQR, 411‐798 Mut/Mb; P = .0076). The ORR was 100% in Lynch/Lynch‐like patients but only 44% in sporadic patients (P = .024). The 3‐year PFS and OS proportions were 100% versus 30% (P = .017) and 100% versus 43% (P = .043), respectively.
Conclusions
This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic MSI‐H/dMMR ECs for ORR, PFS, and OS when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Larger confirmatory studies in ECs and other MSI‐H/dMMR tumors are necessary. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs. Oligoprogression in MSI‐H/dMMR patients appears salvageable with surgical resection and/or local treatment and the continuation of pembrolizumab off study. Clinical studies evaluating separate MSI‐H/dMMR EC subtypes treated with ICIs are warranted.
This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch‐like cancers versus sporadic microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H) endometrial cancers (ECs) for the objective response rate, progression‐free survival, and overall survival when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI‐H ECs, and clinical studies evaluating separate MSI‐H EC subtypes treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are warranted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34875107</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.34025</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-888X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-9738</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
ispartof | Cancer, 2022-03, Vol.128 (6), p.1206-1218 |
issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2608131292 |
source | Wiley; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized Antigen presentation Antigen processing Antigens Biomarkers Cancer clinical trial results DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics Endometrial cancer Endometrial Neoplasms - drug therapy Endometrial Neoplasms - genetics Endometrium Evaluation Female gynecologic cancers gynecologic oncology Humans Immune checkpoint inhibitors Immunohistochemistry Immunotherapy immunotherapy/checkpoint blockade Interferon Microsatellite Instability Mismatch repair Monoclonal antibodies Mutation Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - genetics Oncology Patients Pembrolizumab phase 2 clinical trial Pilot Projects Polymerase chain reaction Prospective Studies Stability Survival Targeted cancer therapy Tumors |
title | A phase 2 evaluation of pembrolizumab for recurrent Lynch‐like versus sporadic endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T09%3A30%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20phase%202%20evaluation%20of%20pembrolizumab%20for%20recurrent%20Lynch%E2%80%90like%20versus%20sporadic%20endometrial%20cancers%20with%20microsatellite%20instability&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Bellone,%20Stefania&rft.date=2022-03-15&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1206&rft.epage=1218&rft.pages=1206-1218&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.34025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2608131292%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-675f1033da60a61077fb8465fa9384e5797b882c94d728b476bcbf81ce2e903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2632729091&rft_id=info:pmid/34875107&rfr_iscdi=true |