Loading…
Assessing inter-rater reproducibility in MScanFit MUNE in a 6-subject, 12-rater “Round Robin” setup
To assess the inter-rater reliability of MScanFit MUNE using a “Round Robin” research design. Twelve raters from different centres examined six healthy study participants over two days. Median, ulnar and common peroneal nerves were stimulated, and compound muscle action potential (CMAP)-scans were r...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neurophysiologie clinique 2022-04, Vol.52 (2), p.157-169 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d7eb10017d0f115cc47de2427dc2e433859421da64d9f9fe0f70e6a991731e2c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d7eb10017d0f115cc47de2427dc2e433859421da64d9f9fe0f70e6a991731e2c3 |
container_end_page | 169 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 157 |
container_title | Neurophysiologie clinique |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard Bostock, Hugh Ballegaard, Martin Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders Graffe, Carolina Canillo Grötting, Arnstein Jones, Kelvin Kallio, Mika Krarup, Christian Krøigård, Thomas Lupescu, Tudor Maitland, Stuart Moldovan, Mihai Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard Pugdahl, Kirsten Santos, Miguel Oliveira Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos Zlateva, Suzana Slavica Ööpik, Merle Tankisi, Hatice |
description | To assess the inter-rater reliability of MScanFit MUNE using a “Round Robin” research design.
Twelve raters from different centres examined six healthy study participants over two days. Median, ulnar and common peroneal nerves were stimulated, and compound muscle action potential (CMAP)-scans were recorded from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and anterior tibial (TA) muscles respectively. From this we calculated the Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) and “A50”, a motor unit size parameter. As statistical analysis we used the measures Limits of Agreement (LOA) and Coefficient of Variation (COV). Study participants scored their perception of pain from the examinations on a rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain).
Before this study, 41.6% of the raters had performed MScanFit less than five times. The mean MUNE-values were: 99.6 (APB), 131.4 (ADM) and 126.2 (TA), with LOA: 19.5 (APB), 29.8 (ADM) and 20.7 (TA), and COV: 13.4 (APB), 6.3 (ADM) and 5.6 (TA). MUNE-values correlated to CMAP max amplitudes (R2-values were: 0.463 (APB) (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neucli.2021.11.002 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2610410465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0987705321001234</els_id><sourcerecordid>2664897456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d7eb10017d0f115cc47de2427dc2e433859421da64d9f9fe0f70e6a991731e2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFqFTEUhoMo9rb6BiIDblx0xnOSTHKzEUppVWgVql2HmeRMyTB35prMCN31QfTl-iTmcq8uXAghgeT7T37-n7FXCBUCqnd9NdLihlBx4FghVgD8CVuhVqbUKPApW4FZ61JDLY7YcUo9AEhhxHN2JKQBJQWs2N1ZSpRSGO-KMM4Uy9jkvYi0jZNfXGjDEOb7_FZcf3XNeBnm4vr288XuoilUmZa2JzefFsgPyseHnzfTMvriZmrD-Pjwq0g0L9sX7FnXDIleHs4Tdnt58e38Y3n15cOn87Or0slazaXX1CIAag8dYu2c1J645No7TlKIdW0kR98o6U1nOoJOA6nGGNQCiTtxwt7u52b_3xdKs92E5GgYmpGmJVmuEGReqs7om3_QflrimN1lSsm10dlSpuSecnFKKVJntzFsmnhvEeyuCNvbfRF2V4RFtLmILHt9GL60G_J_RX-Sz8D7PUA5jR-Bok0u0OjIh5gTtX4K___hN6NHm0M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2664897456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing inter-rater reproducibility in MScanFit MUNE in a 6-subject, 12-rater “Round Robin” setup</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard ; Bostock, Hugh ; Ballegaard, Martin ; Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders ; Graffe, Carolina Canillo ; Grötting, Arnstein ; Jones, Kelvin ; Kallio, Mika ; Krarup, Christian ; Krøigård, Thomas ; Lupescu, Tudor ; Maitland, Stuart ; Moldovan, Mihai ; Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard ; Pugdahl, Kirsten ; Santos, Miguel Oliveira ; Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos ; Zlateva, Suzana Slavica ; Ööpik, Merle ; Tankisi, Hatice</creator><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard ; Bostock, Hugh ; Ballegaard, Martin ; Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders ; Graffe, Carolina Canillo ; Grötting, Arnstein ; Jones, Kelvin ; Kallio, Mika ; Krarup, Christian ; Krøigård, Thomas ; Lupescu, Tudor ; Maitland, Stuart ; Moldovan, Mihai ; Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard ; Pugdahl, Kirsten ; Santos, Miguel Oliveira ; Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos ; Zlateva, Suzana Slavica ; Ööpik, Merle ; Tankisi, Hatice</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the inter-rater reliability of MScanFit MUNE using a “Round Robin” research design.
Twelve raters from different centres examined six healthy study participants over two days. Median, ulnar and common peroneal nerves were stimulated, and compound muscle action potential (CMAP)-scans were recorded from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and anterior tibial (TA) muscles respectively. From this we calculated the Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) and “A50”, a motor unit size parameter. As statistical analysis we used the measures Limits of Agreement (LOA) and Coefficient of Variation (COV). Study participants scored their perception of pain from the examinations on a rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain).
Before this study, 41.6% of the raters had performed MScanFit less than five times. The mean MUNE-values were: 99.6 (APB), 131.4 (ADM) and 126.2 (TA), with LOA: 19.5 (APB), 29.8 (ADM) and 20.7 (TA), and COV: 13.4 (APB), 6.3 (ADM) and 5.6 (TA). MUNE-values correlated to CMAP max amplitudes (R2-values were: 0.463 (APB) (p<0.001), 0.421 (ADM) (p<0.001) and 0.645 (TA) (p<0.001)). The average perception of pain was 4.
MScanFit indicates a high level of inter-rater reliability, even with only limited rater experience and is overall reasonably well tolerated by patients. These results may indicate MScanFit as a reliable MUNE method with potential as a biomarker in drug trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0987-7053</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1769-7131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2021.11.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34906430</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Action potential ; Action Potentials - physiology ; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ; Clinical trials ; Electromyography - methods ; Humans ; Inter-rater variability ; Motor neurone disease ; Motor Neurons - physiology ; Motor unit number estimation ; MScanFit MUNE ; Muscle, Skeletal - innervation ; Muscles ; Nerves ; Neurodegenerative Disease ; Pain ; Pain perception ; Reproducibility ; Reproducibility of Results ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Neurophysiologie clinique, 2022-04, Vol.52 (2), p.157-169</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d7eb10017d0f115cc47de2427dc2e433859421da64d9f9fe0f70e6a991731e2c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d7eb10017d0f115cc47de2427dc2e433859421da64d9f9fe0f70e6a991731e2c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4764-7031 ; 0000-0003-1097-731X ; 0000-0002-1565-6948 ; 0000-0002-7908-9823 ; 0000-0002-4492-2387 ; 0000-0002-1089-1543 ; 0000-0001-8495-9769 ; 0000-0003-3926-5287 ; 0000-0003-3594-1997</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34906430$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bostock, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballegaard, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graffe, Carolina Canillo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grötting, Arnstein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kelvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallio, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krarup, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krøigård, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupescu, Tudor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maitland, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moldovan, Mihai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugdahl, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Miguel Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zlateva, Suzana Slavica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ööpik, Merle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tankisi, Hatice</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing inter-rater reproducibility in MScanFit MUNE in a 6-subject, 12-rater “Round Robin” setup</title><title>Neurophysiologie clinique</title><addtitle>Neurophysiol Clin</addtitle><description>To assess the inter-rater reliability of MScanFit MUNE using a “Round Robin” research design.
Twelve raters from different centres examined six healthy study participants over two days. Median, ulnar and common peroneal nerves were stimulated, and compound muscle action potential (CMAP)-scans were recorded from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and anterior tibial (TA) muscles respectively. From this we calculated the Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) and “A50”, a motor unit size parameter. As statistical analysis we used the measures Limits of Agreement (LOA) and Coefficient of Variation (COV). Study participants scored their perception of pain from the examinations on a rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain).
Before this study, 41.6% of the raters had performed MScanFit less than five times. The mean MUNE-values were: 99.6 (APB), 131.4 (ADM) and 126.2 (TA), with LOA: 19.5 (APB), 29.8 (ADM) and 20.7 (TA), and COV: 13.4 (APB), 6.3 (ADM) and 5.6 (TA). MUNE-values correlated to CMAP max amplitudes (R2-values were: 0.463 (APB) (p<0.001), 0.421 (ADM) (p<0.001) and 0.645 (TA) (p<0.001)). The average perception of pain was 4.
MScanFit indicates a high level of inter-rater reliability, even with only limited rater experience and is overall reasonably well tolerated by patients. These results may indicate MScanFit as a reliable MUNE method with potential as a biomarker in drug trials.</description><subject>Action potential</subject><subject>Action Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inter-rater variability</subject><subject>Motor neurone disease</subject><subject>Motor Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Motor unit number estimation</subject><subject>MScanFit MUNE</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - innervation</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Nerves</subject><subject>Neurodegenerative Disease</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>0987-7053</issn><issn>1769-7131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFqFTEUhoMo9rb6BiIDblx0xnOSTHKzEUppVWgVql2HmeRMyTB35prMCN31QfTl-iTmcq8uXAghgeT7T37-n7FXCBUCqnd9NdLihlBx4FghVgD8CVuhVqbUKPApW4FZ61JDLY7YcUo9AEhhxHN2JKQBJQWs2N1ZSpRSGO-KMM4Uy9jkvYi0jZNfXGjDEOb7_FZcf3XNeBnm4vr288XuoilUmZa2JzefFsgPyseHnzfTMvriZmrD-Pjwq0g0L9sX7FnXDIleHs4Tdnt58e38Y3n15cOn87Or0slazaXX1CIAag8dYu2c1J645No7TlKIdW0kR98o6U1nOoJOA6nGGNQCiTtxwt7u52b_3xdKs92E5GgYmpGmJVmuEGReqs7om3_QflrimN1lSsm10dlSpuSecnFKKVJntzFsmnhvEeyuCNvbfRF2V4RFtLmILHt9GL60G_J_RX-Sz8D7PUA5jR-Bok0u0OjIh5gTtX4K___hN6NHm0M</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard</creator><creator>Bostock, Hugh</creator><creator>Ballegaard, Martin</creator><creator>Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders</creator><creator>Graffe, Carolina Canillo</creator><creator>Grötting, Arnstein</creator><creator>Jones, Kelvin</creator><creator>Kallio, Mika</creator><creator>Krarup, Christian</creator><creator>Krøigård, Thomas</creator><creator>Lupescu, Tudor</creator><creator>Maitland, Stuart</creator><creator>Moldovan, Mihai</creator><creator>Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard</creator><creator>Pugdahl, Kirsten</creator><creator>Santos, Miguel Oliveira</creator><creator>Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos</creator><creator>Zlateva, Suzana Slavica</creator><creator>Ööpik, Merle</creator><creator>Tankisi, Hatice</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4764-7031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-731X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1565-6948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7908-9823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4492-2387</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-1543</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8495-9769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-5287</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3594-1997</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Assessing inter-rater reproducibility in MScanFit MUNE in a 6-subject, 12-rater “Round Robin” setup</title><author>Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard ; Bostock, Hugh ; Ballegaard, Martin ; Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders ; Graffe, Carolina Canillo ; Grötting, Arnstein ; Jones, Kelvin ; Kallio, Mika ; Krarup, Christian ; Krøigård, Thomas ; Lupescu, Tudor ; Maitland, Stuart ; Moldovan, Mihai ; Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard ; Pugdahl, Kirsten ; Santos, Miguel Oliveira ; Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos ; Zlateva, Suzana Slavica ; Ööpik, Merle ; Tankisi, Hatice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d7eb10017d0f115cc47de2427dc2e433859421da64d9f9fe0f70e6a991731e2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Action potential</topic><topic>Action Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inter-rater variability</topic><topic>Motor neurone disease</topic><topic>Motor Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Motor unit number estimation</topic><topic>MScanFit MUNE</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - innervation</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Nerves</topic><topic>Neurodegenerative Disease</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bostock, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballegaard, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graffe, Carolina Canillo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grötting, Arnstein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kelvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallio, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krarup, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krøigård, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupescu, Tudor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maitland, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moldovan, Mihai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugdahl, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Miguel Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zlateva, Suzana Slavica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ööpik, Merle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tankisi, Hatice</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurophysiologie clinique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard</au><au>Bostock, Hugh</au><au>Ballegaard, Martin</au><au>Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders</au><au>Graffe, Carolina Canillo</au><au>Grötting, Arnstein</au><au>Jones, Kelvin</au><au>Kallio, Mika</au><au>Krarup, Christian</au><au>Krøigård, Thomas</au><au>Lupescu, Tudor</au><au>Maitland, Stuart</au><au>Moldovan, Mihai</au><au>Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard</au><au>Pugdahl, Kirsten</au><au>Santos, Miguel Oliveira</au><au>Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos</au><au>Zlateva, Suzana Slavica</au><au>Ööpik, Merle</au><au>Tankisi, Hatice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing inter-rater reproducibility in MScanFit MUNE in a 6-subject, 12-rater “Round Robin” setup</atitle><jtitle>Neurophysiologie clinique</jtitle><addtitle>Neurophysiol Clin</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>157-169</pages><issn>0987-7053</issn><eissn>1769-7131</eissn><abstract>To assess the inter-rater reliability of MScanFit MUNE using a “Round Robin” research design.
Twelve raters from different centres examined six healthy study participants over two days. Median, ulnar and common peroneal nerves were stimulated, and compound muscle action potential (CMAP)-scans were recorded from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and anterior tibial (TA) muscles respectively. From this we calculated the Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) and “A50”, a motor unit size parameter. As statistical analysis we used the measures Limits of Agreement (LOA) and Coefficient of Variation (COV). Study participants scored their perception of pain from the examinations on a rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain).
Before this study, 41.6% of the raters had performed MScanFit less than five times. The mean MUNE-values were: 99.6 (APB), 131.4 (ADM) and 126.2 (TA), with LOA: 19.5 (APB), 29.8 (ADM) and 20.7 (TA), and COV: 13.4 (APB), 6.3 (ADM) and 5.6 (TA). MUNE-values correlated to CMAP max amplitudes (R2-values were: 0.463 (APB) (p<0.001), 0.421 (ADM) (p<0.001) and 0.645 (TA) (p<0.001)). The average perception of pain was 4.
MScanFit indicates a high level of inter-rater reliability, even with only limited rater experience and is overall reasonably well tolerated by patients. These results may indicate MScanFit as a reliable MUNE method with potential as a biomarker in drug trials.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>34906430</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neucli.2021.11.002</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4764-7031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-731X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1565-6948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7908-9823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4492-2387</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-1543</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8495-9769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-5287</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3594-1997</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0987-7053 |
ispartof | Neurophysiologie clinique, 2022-04, Vol.52 (2), p.157-169 |
issn | 0987-7053 1769-7131 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2610410465 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Action potential Action Potentials - physiology Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Clinical trials Electromyography - methods Humans Inter-rater variability Motor neurone disease Motor Neurons - physiology Motor unit number estimation MScanFit MUNE Muscle, Skeletal - innervation Muscles Nerves Neurodegenerative Disease Pain Pain perception Reproducibility Reproducibility of Results Statistical analysis |
title | Assessing inter-rater reproducibility in MScanFit MUNE in a 6-subject, 12-rater “Round Robin” setup |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A30%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20inter-rater%20reproducibility%20in%20MScanFit%20MUNE%20in%20a%206-subject,%2012-rater%20%E2%80%9CRound%20Robin%E2%80%9D%20setup&rft.jtitle=Neurophysiologie%20clinique&rft.au=S%C3%B8rensen,%20Daniel%20Mosgaard&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=157-169&rft.issn=0987-7053&rft.eissn=1769-7131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neucli.2021.11.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2664897456%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d7eb10017d0f115cc47de2427dc2e433859421da64d9f9fe0f70e6a991731e2c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2664897456&rft_id=info:pmid/34906430&rfr_iscdi=true |