Loading…

Assessing inter-rater reproducibility in MScanFit MUNE in a 6-subject, 12-rater “Round Robin” setup

To assess the inter-rater reliability of MScanFit MUNE using a “Round Robin” research design. Twelve raters from different centres examined six healthy study participants over two days. Median, ulnar and common peroneal nerves were stimulated, and compound muscle action potential (CMAP)-scans were r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurophysiologie clinique 2022-04, Vol.52 (2), p.157-169
Main Authors: Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard, Bostock, Hugh, Ballegaard, Martin, Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders, Graffe, Carolina Canillo, Grötting, Arnstein, Jones, Kelvin, Kallio, Mika, Krarup, Christian, Krøigård, Thomas, Lupescu, Tudor, Maitland, Stuart, Moldovan, Mihai, Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard, Pugdahl, Kirsten, Santos, Miguel Oliveira, Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos, Zlateva, Suzana Slavica, Ööpik, Merle, Tankisi, Hatice
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d7eb10017d0f115cc47de2427dc2e433859421da64d9f9fe0f70e6a991731e2c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d7eb10017d0f115cc47de2427dc2e433859421da64d9f9fe0f70e6a991731e2c3
container_end_page 169
container_issue 2
container_start_page 157
container_title Neurophysiologie clinique
container_volume 52
creator Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard
Bostock, Hugh
Ballegaard, Martin
Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders
Graffe, Carolina Canillo
Grötting, Arnstein
Jones, Kelvin
Kallio, Mika
Krarup, Christian
Krøigård, Thomas
Lupescu, Tudor
Maitland, Stuart
Moldovan, Mihai
Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard
Pugdahl, Kirsten
Santos, Miguel Oliveira
Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos
Zlateva, Suzana Slavica
Ööpik, Merle
Tankisi, Hatice
description To assess the inter-rater reliability of MScanFit MUNE using a “Round Robin” research design. Twelve raters from different centres examined six healthy study participants over two days. Median, ulnar and common peroneal nerves were stimulated, and compound muscle action potential (CMAP)-scans were recorded from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and anterior tibial (TA) muscles respectively. From this we calculated the Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) and “A50”, a motor unit size parameter. As statistical analysis we used the measures Limits of Agreement (LOA) and Coefficient of Variation (COV). Study participants scored their perception of pain from the examinations on a rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain). Before this study, 41.6% of the raters had performed MScanFit less than five times. The mean MUNE-values were: 99.6 (APB), 131.4 (ADM) and 126.2 (TA), with LOA: 19.5 (APB), 29.8 (ADM) and 20.7 (TA), and COV: 13.4 (APB), 6.3 (ADM) and 5.6 (TA). MUNE-values correlated to CMAP max amplitudes (R2-values were: 0.463 (APB) (p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neucli.2021.11.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2610410465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0987705321001234</els_id><sourcerecordid>2664897456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d7eb10017d0f115cc47de2427dc2e433859421da64d9f9fe0f70e6a991731e2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFqFTEUhoMo9rb6BiIDblx0xnOSTHKzEUppVWgVql2HmeRMyTB35prMCN31QfTl-iTmcq8uXAghgeT7T37-n7FXCBUCqnd9NdLihlBx4FghVgD8CVuhVqbUKPApW4FZ61JDLY7YcUo9AEhhxHN2JKQBJQWs2N1ZSpRSGO-KMM4Uy9jkvYi0jZNfXGjDEOb7_FZcf3XNeBnm4vr288XuoilUmZa2JzefFsgPyseHnzfTMvriZmrD-Pjwq0g0L9sX7FnXDIleHs4Tdnt58e38Y3n15cOn87Or0slazaXX1CIAag8dYu2c1J645No7TlKIdW0kR98o6U1nOoJOA6nGGNQCiTtxwt7u52b_3xdKs92E5GgYmpGmJVmuEGReqs7om3_QflrimN1lSsm10dlSpuSecnFKKVJntzFsmnhvEeyuCNvbfRF2V4RFtLmILHt9GL60G_J_RX-Sz8D7PUA5jR-Bok0u0OjIh5gTtX4K___hN6NHm0M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2664897456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing inter-rater reproducibility in MScanFit MUNE in a 6-subject, 12-rater “Round Robin” setup</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard ; Bostock, Hugh ; Ballegaard, Martin ; Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders ; Graffe, Carolina Canillo ; Grötting, Arnstein ; Jones, Kelvin ; Kallio, Mika ; Krarup, Christian ; Krøigård, Thomas ; Lupescu, Tudor ; Maitland, Stuart ; Moldovan, Mihai ; Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard ; Pugdahl, Kirsten ; Santos, Miguel Oliveira ; Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos ; Zlateva, Suzana Slavica ; Ööpik, Merle ; Tankisi, Hatice</creator><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard ; Bostock, Hugh ; Ballegaard, Martin ; Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders ; Graffe, Carolina Canillo ; Grötting, Arnstein ; Jones, Kelvin ; Kallio, Mika ; Krarup, Christian ; Krøigård, Thomas ; Lupescu, Tudor ; Maitland, Stuart ; Moldovan, Mihai ; Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard ; Pugdahl, Kirsten ; Santos, Miguel Oliveira ; Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos ; Zlateva, Suzana Slavica ; Ööpik, Merle ; Tankisi, Hatice</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the inter-rater reliability of MScanFit MUNE using a “Round Robin” research design. Twelve raters from different centres examined six healthy study participants over two days. Median, ulnar and common peroneal nerves were stimulated, and compound muscle action potential (CMAP)-scans were recorded from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and anterior tibial (TA) muscles respectively. From this we calculated the Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) and “A50”, a motor unit size parameter. As statistical analysis we used the measures Limits of Agreement (LOA) and Coefficient of Variation (COV). Study participants scored their perception of pain from the examinations on a rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain). Before this study, 41.6% of the raters had performed MScanFit less than five times. The mean MUNE-values were: 99.6 (APB), 131.4 (ADM) and 126.2 (TA), with LOA: 19.5 (APB), 29.8 (ADM) and 20.7 (TA), and COV: 13.4 (APB), 6.3 (ADM) and 5.6 (TA). MUNE-values correlated to CMAP max amplitudes (R2-values were: 0.463 (APB) (p&lt;0.001), 0.421 (ADM) (p&lt;0.001) and 0.645 (TA) (p&lt;0.001)). The average perception of pain was 4. MScanFit indicates a high level of inter-rater reliability, even with only limited rater experience and is overall reasonably well tolerated by patients. These results may indicate MScanFit as a reliable MUNE method with potential as a biomarker in drug trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0987-7053</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1769-7131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2021.11.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34906430</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Action potential ; Action Potentials - physiology ; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ; Clinical trials ; Electromyography - methods ; Humans ; Inter-rater variability ; Motor neurone disease ; Motor Neurons - physiology ; Motor unit number estimation ; MScanFit MUNE ; Muscle, Skeletal - innervation ; Muscles ; Nerves ; Neurodegenerative Disease ; Pain ; Pain perception ; Reproducibility ; Reproducibility of Results ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Neurophysiologie clinique, 2022-04, Vol.52 (2), p.157-169</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d7eb10017d0f115cc47de2427dc2e433859421da64d9f9fe0f70e6a991731e2c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d7eb10017d0f115cc47de2427dc2e433859421da64d9f9fe0f70e6a991731e2c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4764-7031 ; 0000-0003-1097-731X ; 0000-0002-1565-6948 ; 0000-0002-7908-9823 ; 0000-0002-4492-2387 ; 0000-0002-1089-1543 ; 0000-0001-8495-9769 ; 0000-0003-3926-5287 ; 0000-0003-3594-1997</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34906430$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bostock, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballegaard, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graffe, Carolina Canillo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grötting, Arnstein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kelvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallio, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krarup, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krøigård, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupescu, Tudor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maitland, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moldovan, Mihai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugdahl, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Miguel Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zlateva, Suzana Slavica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ööpik, Merle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tankisi, Hatice</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing inter-rater reproducibility in MScanFit MUNE in a 6-subject, 12-rater “Round Robin” setup</title><title>Neurophysiologie clinique</title><addtitle>Neurophysiol Clin</addtitle><description>To assess the inter-rater reliability of MScanFit MUNE using a “Round Robin” research design. Twelve raters from different centres examined six healthy study participants over two days. Median, ulnar and common peroneal nerves were stimulated, and compound muscle action potential (CMAP)-scans were recorded from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and anterior tibial (TA) muscles respectively. From this we calculated the Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) and “A50”, a motor unit size parameter. As statistical analysis we used the measures Limits of Agreement (LOA) and Coefficient of Variation (COV). Study participants scored their perception of pain from the examinations on a rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain). Before this study, 41.6% of the raters had performed MScanFit less than five times. The mean MUNE-values were: 99.6 (APB), 131.4 (ADM) and 126.2 (TA), with LOA: 19.5 (APB), 29.8 (ADM) and 20.7 (TA), and COV: 13.4 (APB), 6.3 (ADM) and 5.6 (TA). MUNE-values correlated to CMAP max amplitudes (R2-values were: 0.463 (APB) (p&lt;0.001), 0.421 (ADM) (p&lt;0.001) and 0.645 (TA) (p&lt;0.001)). The average perception of pain was 4. MScanFit indicates a high level of inter-rater reliability, even with only limited rater experience and is overall reasonably well tolerated by patients. These results may indicate MScanFit as a reliable MUNE method with potential as a biomarker in drug trials.</description><subject>Action potential</subject><subject>Action Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inter-rater variability</subject><subject>Motor neurone disease</subject><subject>Motor Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Motor unit number estimation</subject><subject>MScanFit MUNE</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - innervation</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Nerves</subject><subject>Neurodegenerative Disease</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>0987-7053</issn><issn>1769-7131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFqFTEUhoMo9rb6BiIDblx0xnOSTHKzEUppVWgVql2HmeRMyTB35prMCN31QfTl-iTmcq8uXAghgeT7T37-n7FXCBUCqnd9NdLihlBx4FghVgD8CVuhVqbUKPApW4FZ61JDLY7YcUo9AEhhxHN2JKQBJQWs2N1ZSpRSGO-KMM4Uy9jkvYi0jZNfXGjDEOb7_FZcf3XNeBnm4vr288XuoilUmZa2JzefFsgPyseHnzfTMvriZmrD-Pjwq0g0L9sX7FnXDIleHs4Tdnt58e38Y3n15cOn87Or0slazaXX1CIAag8dYu2c1J645No7TlKIdW0kR98o6U1nOoJOA6nGGNQCiTtxwt7u52b_3xdKs92E5GgYmpGmJVmuEGReqs7om3_QflrimN1lSsm10dlSpuSecnFKKVJntzFsmnhvEeyuCNvbfRF2V4RFtLmILHt9GL60G_J_RX-Sz8D7PUA5jR-Bok0u0OjIh5gTtX4K___hN6NHm0M</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard</creator><creator>Bostock, Hugh</creator><creator>Ballegaard, Martin</creator><creator>Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders</creator><creator>Graffe, Carolina Canillo</creator><creator>Grötting, Arnstein</creator><creator>Jones, Kelvin</creator><creator>Kallio, Mika</creator><creator>Krarup, Christian</creator><creator>Krøigård, Thomas</creator><creator>Lupescu, Tudor</creator><creator>Maitland, Stuart</creator><creator>Moldovan, Mihai</creator><creator>Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard</creator><creator>Pugdahl, Kirsten</creator><creator>Santos, Miguel Oliveira</creator><creator>Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos</creator><creator>Zlateva, Suzana Slavica</creator><creator>Ööpik, Merle</creator><creator>Tankisi, Hatice</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4764-7031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-731X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1565-6948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7908-9823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4492-2387</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-1543</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8495-9769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-5287</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3594-1997</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Assessing inter-rater reproducibility in MScanFit MUNE in a 6-subject, 12-rater “Round Robin” setup</title><author>Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard ; Bostock, Hugh ; Ballegaard, Martin ; Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders ; Graffe, Carolina Canillo ; Grötting, Arnstein ; Jones, Kelvin ; Kallio, Mika ; Krarup, Christian ; Krøigård, Thomas ; Lupescu, Tudor ; Maitland, Stuart ; Moldovan, Mihai ; Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard ; Pugdahl, Kirsten ; Santos, Miguel Oliveira ; Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos ; Zlateva, Suzana Slavica ; Ööpik, Merle ; Tankisi, Hatice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d7eb10017d0f115cc47de2427dc2e433859421da64d9f9fe0f70e6a991731e2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Action potential</topic><topic>Action Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inter-rater variability</topic><topic>Motor neurone disease</topic><topic>Motor Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Motor unit number estimation</topic><topic>MScanFit MUNE</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - innervation</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Nerves</topic><topic>Neurodegenerative Disease</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bostock, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballegaard, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graffe, Carolina Canillo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grötting, Arnstein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kelvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallio, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krarup, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krøigård, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupescu, Tudor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maitland, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moldovan, Mihai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugdahl, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Miguel Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zlateva, Suzana Slavica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ööpik, Merle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tankisi, Hatice</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurophysiologie clinique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sørensen, Daniel Mosgaard</au><au>Bostock, Hugh</au><au>Ballegaard, Martin</au><au>Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders</au><au>Graffe, Carolina Canillo</au><au>Grötting, Arnstein</au><au>Jones, Kelvin</au><au>Kallio, Mika</au><au>Krarup, Christian</au><au>Krøigård, Thomas</au><au>Lupescu, Tudor</au><au>Maitland, Stuart</au><au>Moldovan, Mihai</au><au>Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard</au><au>Pugdahl, Kirsten</au><au>Santos, Miguel Oliveira</au><au>Themistocleous, Andreas Constantinos</au><au>Zlateva, Suzana Slavica</au><au>Ööpik, Merle</au><au>Tankisi, Hatice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing inter-rater reproducibility in MScanFit MUNE in a 6-subject, 12-rater “Round Robin” setup</atitle><jtitle>Neurophysiologie clinique</jtitle><addtitle>Neurophysiol Clin</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>157-169</pages><issn>0987-7053</issn><eissn>1769-7131</eissn><abstract>To assess the inter-rater reliability of MScanFit MUNE using a “Round Robin” research design. Twelve raters from different centres examined six healthy study participants over two days. Median, ulnar and common peroneal nerves were stimulated, and compound muscle action potential (CMAP)-scans were recorded from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and anterior tibial (TA) muscles respectively. From this we calculated the Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) and “A50”, a motor unit size parameter. As statistical analysis we used the measures Limits of Agreement (LOA) and Coefficient of Variation (COV). Study participants scored their perception of pain from the examinations on a rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain). Before this study, 41.6% of the raters had performed MScanFit less than five times. The mean MUNE-values were: 99.6 (APB), 131.4 (ADM) and 126.2 (TA), with LOA: 19.5 (APB), 29.8 (ADM) and 20.7 (TA), and COV: 13.4 (APB), 6.3 (ADM) and 5.6 (TA). MUNE-values correlated to CMAP max amplitudes (R2-values were: 0.463 (APB) (p&lt;0.001), 0.421 (ADM) (p&lt;0.001) and 0.645 (TA) (p&lt;0.001)). The average perception of pain was 4. MScanFit indicates a high level of inter-rater reliability, even with only limited rater experience and is overall reasonably well tolerated by patients. These results may indicate MScanFit as a reliable MUNE method with potential as a biomarker in drug trials.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>34906430</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neucli.2021.11.002</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4764-7031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-731X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1565-6948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7908-9823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4492-2387</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-1543</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8495-9769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-5287</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3594-1997</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0987-7053
ispartof Neurophysiologie clinique, 2022-04, Vol.52 (2), p.157-169
issn 0987-7053
1769-7131
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2610410465
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Action potential
Action Potentials - physiology
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Clinical trials
Electromyography - methods
Humans
Inter-rater variability
Motor neurone disease
Motor Neurons - physiology
Motor unit number estimation
MScanFit MUNE
Muscle, Skeletal - innervation
Muscles
Nerves
Neurodegenerative Disease
Pain
Pain perception
Reproducibility
Reproducibility of Results
Statistical analysis
title Assessing inter-rater reproducibility in MScanFit MUNE in a 6-subject, 12-rater “Round Robin” setup
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A30%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20inter-rater%20reproducibility%20in%20MScanFit%20MUNE%20in%20a%206-subject,%2012-rater%20%E2%80%9CRound%20Robin%E2%80%9D%20setup&rft.jtitle=Neurophysiologie%20clinique&rft.au=S%C3%B8rensen,%20Daniel%20Mosgaard&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=157-169&rft.issn=0987-7053&rft.eissn=1769-7131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neucli.2021.11.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2664897456%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d7eb10017d0f115cc47de2427dc2e433859421da64d9f9fe0f70e6a991731e2c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2664897456&rft_id=info:pmid/34906430&rfr_iscdi=true