Loading…

Humeral short stem varus–valgus alignment affects bone stress

The use of uncemented humeral stems in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is associated with stress shielding. Shorter length stems have shown to decrease stress shielding; however, the effect of stem varus–valgus alignment is currently not known. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of orthopaedic research 2022-09, Vol.40 (9), p.2169-2178
Main Authors: Tavakoli, Amir, Spangenberg, Gregory, Reeves, Jacob M., Faber, Kenneth J., Langohr, G. Daniel G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-e988bb637476b250072e019b13b7a7a1fbc2870f0729bc03bf8b073d999401c53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-e988bb637476b250072e019b13b7a7a1fbc2870f0729bc03bf8b073d999401c53
container_end_page 2178
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2169
container_title Journal of orthopaedic research
container_volume 40
creator Tavakoli, Amir
Spangenberg, Gregory
Reeves, Jacob M.
Faber, Kenneth J.
Langohr, G. Daniel G.
description The use of uncemented humeral stems in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is associated with stress shielding. Shorter length stems have shown to decrease stress shielding; however, the effect of stem varus–valgus alignment is currently not known. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of short stem distal humeral endosteal contact due to varus–valgus angulation on bone stresses after TSA. Three‐dimensional models of eight male cadaveric humeri were constructed from computed tomography data. Bone models were reconstructed with a short stem humeral component implant in three positions (standard, varus, and valgus). Modeling was performed at 45° and 75° of abduction and the resulting differentials in bone stress compared to the intact state and the expected time‐zero bone response were determined. In cortical and trabecular bone, the standard position (STD) altered bone stress less than the valgus (VAL) and varus (VAR) positions relative to the intact state. For both cortical (p = 0.033) and trabecular (p = 0.012) bone, the VAL position produced a larger volume of bone with resorbing potential compared to the STD position. Statement of Clinical Significance The results of this study show that central positioning of a short stem humeral implant produces the smallest changes in bone stresses compared to the intact state and produces the smallest volume of bone expected to resorb due to stress shielding. If distal contact must occur, valgus malposition resulting in distal medial stem cortical contact may be worse than varus malposition resulting in distal lateral stem contact.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jor.25239
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2610905841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2610905841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-e988bb637476b250072e019b13b7a7a1fbc2870f0729bc03bf8b073d999401c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LwzAYh4Mork4PfgHpUQ_d3iRN05xEhjplMBAFbyHp0tnRPzNpJ7v5HfyGfhKjnd48vfDy8PDjQegUwwgDkPGqsSPCCBV7KMCMxREj_HkfBcBpEgFJkgE6cm4FAByT9BANaCxwjAkN0OW0q4xVZeheGtuGrjVVuFG2c5_vHxtVLjsXqrJY1pWp21DluclaF-qmNh61xrljdJCr0pmT3R2ip5vrx8k0ms1v7yZXsyijhInIiDTVOqE85okmzA8hBrDQmGquuMK5zkjKIfd_oTOgOk-1X78QQsSAM0aH6Lz3rm3z2hnXyqpwmSlLVZumc5IkGASwNMYevejRzDbOWZPLtS0qZbcSg_zuJX0v-dPLs2c7bacrs_gjfwN5YNwDb0Vptv-b5P38oVd-AWVxdIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610905841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Humeral short stem varus–valgus alignment affects bone stress</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Tavakoli, Amir ; Spangenberg, Gregory ; Reeves, Jacob M. ; Faber, Kenneth J. ; Langohr, G. Daniel G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tavakoli, Amir ; Spangenberg, Gregory ; Reeves, Jacob M. ; Faber, Kenneth J. ; Langohr, G. Daniel G.</creatorcontrib><description>The use of uncemented humeral stems in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is associated with stress shielding. Shorter length stems have shown to decrease stress shielding; however, the effect of stem varus–valgus alignment is currently not known. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of short stem distal humeral endosteal contact due to varus–valgus angulation on bone stresses after TSA. Three‐dimensional models of eight male cadaveric humeri were constructed from computed tomography data. Bone models were reconstructed with a short stem humeral component implant in three positions (standard, varus, and valgus). Modeling was performed at 45° and 75° of abduction and the resulting differentials in bone stress compared to the intact state and the expected time‐zero bone response were determined. In cortical and trabecular bone, the standard position (STD) altered bone stress less than the valgus (VAL) and varus (VAR) positions relative to the intact state. For both cortical (p = 0.033) and trabecular (p = 0.012) bone, the VAL position produced a larger volume of bone with resorbing potential compared to the STD position. Statement of Clinical Significance The results of this study show that central positioning of a short stem humeral implant produces the smallest changes in bone stresses compared to the intact state and produces the smallest volume of bone expected to resorb due to stress shielding. If distal contact must occur, valgus malposition resulting in distal medial stem cortical contact may be worse than varus malposition resulting in distal lateral stem contact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-0266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-527X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jor.25239</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34914123</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - instrumentation ; bone resorption ; Elbow Joint ; Humans ; humeral short stem ; Humerus - diagnostic imaging ; Humerus - surgery ; implant positioning ; Male ; Prosthesis Design ; shoulder arthroplasty ; stress shielding</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic research, 2022-09, Vol.40 (9), p.2169-2178</ispartof><rights>2021 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2021 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-e988bb637476b250072e019b13b7a7a1fbc2870f0729bc03bf8b073d999401c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-e988bb637476b250072e019b13b7a7a1fbc2870f0729bc03bf8b073d999401c53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8164-0605</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34914123$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tavakoli, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spangenberg, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Jacob M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langohr, G. Daniel G.</creatorcontrib><title>Humeral short stem varus–valgus alignment affects bone stress</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic research</title><addtitle>J Orthop Res</addtitle><description>The use of uncemented humeral stems in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is associated with stress shielding. Shorter length stems have shown to decrease stress shielding; however, the effect of stem varus–valgus alignment is currently not known. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of short stem distal humeral endosteal contact due to varus–valgus angulation on bone stresses after TSA. Three‐dimensional models of eight male cadaveric humeri were constructed from computed tomography data. Bone models were reconstructed with a short stem humeral component implant in three positions (standard, varus, and valgus). Modeling was performed at 45° and 75° of abduction and the resulting differentials in bone stress compared to the intact state and the expected time‐zero bone response were determined. In cortical and trabecular bone, the standard position (STD) altered bone stress less than the valgus (VAL) and varus (VAR) positions relative to the intact state. For both cortical (p = 0.033) and trabecular (p = 0.012) bone, the VAL position produced a larger volume of bone with resorbing potential compared to the STD position. Statement of Clinical Significance The results of this study show that central positioning of a short stem humeral implant produces the smallest changes in bone stresses compared to the intact state and produces the smallest volume of bone expected to resorb due to stress shielding. If distal contact must occur, valgus malposition resulting in distal medial stem cortical contact may be worse than varus malposition resulting in distal lateral stem contact.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - instrumentation</subject><subject>bone resorption</subject><subject>Elbow Joint</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>humeral short stem</subject><subject>Humerus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humerus - surgery</subject><subject>implant positioning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>shoulder arthroplasty</subject><subject>stress shielding</subject><issn>0736-0266</issn><issn>1554-527X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LwzAYh4Mork4PfgHpUQ_d3iRN05xEhjplMBAFbyHp0tnRPzNpJ7v5HfyGfhKjnd48vfDy8PDjQegUwwgDkPGqsSPCCBV7KMCMxREj_HkfBcBpEgFJkgE6cm4FAByT9BANaCxwjAkN0OW0q4xVZeheGtuGrjVVuFG2c5_vHxtVLjsXqrJY1pWp21DluclaF-qmNh61xrljdJCr0pmT3R2ip5vrx8k0ms1v7yZXsyijhInIiDTVOqE85okmzA8hBrDQmGquuMK5zkjKIfd_oTOgOk-1X78QQsSAM0aH6Lz3rm3z2hnXyqpwmSlLVZumc5IkGASwNMYevejRzDbOWZPLtS0qZbcSg_zuJX0v-dPLs2c7bacrs_gjfwN5YNwDb0Vptv-b5P38oVd-AWVxdIg</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Tavakoli, Amir</creator><creator>Spangenberg, Gregory</creator><creator>Reeves, Jacob M.</creator><creator>Faber, Kenneth J.</creator><creator>Langohr, G. Daniel G.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8164-0605</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Humeral short stem varus–valgus alignment affects bone stress</title><author>Tavakoli, Amir ; Spangenberg, Gregory ; Reeves, Jacob M. ; Faber, Kenneth J. ; Langohr, G. Daniel G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-e988bb637476b250072e019b13b7a7a1fbc2870f0729bc03bf8b073d999401c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - instrumentation</topic><topic>bone resorption</topic><topic>Elbow Joint</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>humeral short stem</topic><topic>Humerus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humerus - surgery</topic><topic>implant positioning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>shoulder arthroplasty</topic><topic>stress shielding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tavakoli, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spangenberg, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Jacob M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langohr, G. Daniel G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tavakoli, Amir</au><au>Spangenberg, Gregory</au><au>Reeves, Jacob M.</au><au>Faber, Kenneth J.</au><au>Langohr, G. Daniel G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Humeral short stem varus–valgus alignment affects bone stress</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Res</addtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2169</spage><epage>2178</epage><pages>2169-2178</pages><issn>0736-0266</issn><eissn>1554-527X</eissn><abstract>The use of uncemented humeral stems in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is associated with stress shielding. Shorter length stems have shown to decrease stress shielding; however, the effect of stem varus–valgus alignment is currently not known. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of short stem distal humeral endosteal contact due to varus–valgus angulation on bone stresses after TSA. Three‐dimensional models of eight male cadaveric humeri were constructed from computed tomography data. Bone models were reconstructed with a short stem humeral component implant in three positions (standard, varus, and valgus). Modeling was performed at 45° and 75° of abduction and the resulting differentials in bone stress compared to the intact state and the expected time‐zero bone response were determined. In cortical and trabecular bone, the standard position (STD) altered bone stress less than the valgus (VAL) and varus (VAR) positions relative to the intact state. For both cortical (p = 0.033) and trabecular (p = 0.012) bone, the VAL position produced a larger volume of bone with resorbing potential compared to the STD position. Statement of Clinical Significance The results of this study show that central positioning of a short stem humeral implant produces the smallest changes in bone stresses compared to the intact state and produces the smallest volume of bone expected to resorb due to stress shielding. If distal contact must occur, valgus malposition resulting in distal medial stem cortical contact may be worse than varus malposition resulting in distal lateral stem contact.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>34914123</pmid><doi>10.1002/jor.25239</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8164-0605</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0736-0266
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic research, 2022-09, Vol.40 (9), p.2169-2178
issn 0736-0266
1554-527X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2610905841
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - instrumentation
bone resorption
Elbow Joint
Humans
humeral short stem
Humerus - diagnostic imaging
Humerus - surgery
implant positioning
Male
Prosthesis Design
shoulder arthroplasty
stress shielding
title Humeral short stem varus–valgus alignment affects bone stress
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A25%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Humeral%20short%20stem%20varus%E2%80%93valgus%20alignment%20affects%20bone%20stress&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20research&rft.au=Tavakoli,%20Amir&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2169&rft.epage=2178&rft.pages=2169-2178&rft.issn=0736-0266&rft.eissn=1554-527X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jor.25239&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2610905841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-e988bb637476b250072e019b13b7a7a1fbc2870f0729bc03bf8b073d999401c53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610905841&rft_id=info:pmid/34914123&rfr_iscdi=true