Academics as Agentic Superheroes: Female academics’ lack of fit with the agentic stereotype of success limits their career advancement

Gender gaps in academia persist with women being less likely to attain leadership, earning lower salaries, and receiving less research funding and resources compared to their male peers. The current research demonstrates yet another, more intangible gender gap in academia called lack of fit, whereby...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of social psychology 2022-07, Vol.61 (3), p.748-767
Main Authors: Veelen, Ruth, Derks, Belle
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Academic careers
Academic staff
Career advancement
Careers
Efficacy
Fatigue
Females
Gender
gender inequality
Heroism & heroes
lack of fit
Leadership
occupational stereotypes
Peers
Research funding
Stereotypes
Teachers
Teams
Women
women in academia
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Gender gaps in academia persist with women being less likely to attain leadership, earning lower salaries, and receiving less research funding and resources compared to their male peers. The current research demonstrates yet another, more intangible gender gap in academia called lack of fit, whereby compared to male academics, female academics perceive higher misfit between their professional self‐concept and the agentic ‘superhero’ stereotype of the successful academic. The entire population of Dutch academics (i.e., assistant, associate, and full professors from 14 universities) was approached to participate in a nationwide survey. Results from this unique dataset (N = 3978) demonstrate that academics perceive agency (e.g., self‐confident, self‐focused, competitive) as more descriptive of the stereotypical successful academic than communality (e.g., team‐oriented, good teacher, collegial). Importantly, early career female academics perceived highest lack of fit with this narrowly‐defined agentic occupational stereotype, which was correlated with lower work engagement, professional identification and career efficacy, and higher work exhaustion and exit intentions. Thus, lack of fit seems yet another barrier contributing to pervasive gender gaps in academia. Implications for building more inclusive academic cultures, where not only agentic but also communal academic practice is recognized and rewarded are discussed.
ISSN:0144-6665
2044-8309
DOI:10.1111/bjso.12515