Importance of cardiac rehabilitation in rural and remote areas of Australia

• Published in: The Australian journal of rural health 2022-04, Vol.30 (2), p.149-163
• Main Authors: Field, Patricia, Franklin, Richard C., Barker, Ruth, Ring, Ian, Leggat, Peter, Canuto, Karla
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aftercare; Australia; Best practice; Cardiac Rehabilitation; Cardiovascular disease; Cardiovascular diseases; Coronary artery disease; Data; Data collection; Discharge planning; Discharge summaries; Health care; Health services; health systems; Heart Diseases; Holistic approach; Hospitals; Humans; Implementation; Length of stay; Medical personnel; Medical treatment; Multidisciplinary teams; Patient Discharge; Patients; Qualitative analysis; Quantitative analysis; Rehabilitation; Remote areas; Remote regions; Returning home; Risk analysis; Risk factors; Risk management; rural and remote; Rural areas; Rural communities; Rural Health Services; Secondary prevention
• ISSN: 1038-5282; 1440-1584
• DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12818

Objective To assess implementation of in‐patient cardiac rehabilitation (Phase‐1‐cardiac rehabilitation), impact on people in rural and remote areas of Australia and potential methods for addressing identified weaknesses. Design Exploratory case study methodology using qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative data collection via semi‐structured interviews, using thematic analysis, augmented by quantitative data collection via a medical record audit. Setting Four regional hospitals (2 Queensland Health and 2 private) providing tertiary health care. Participants (a) Hospital in‐patients with heart disease ≥18 years. (b) Staff responsible for their care. Outcome Measures Implementation of Phase‐1‐cardiac rehabilitation in tertiary hosptials in North Queensland and the impact on in‐patients discharge planning and post discharge care. Recommentations and implications for practice are proposed to address deficits. Results Phase‐1‐cardiac rehabilitation implementation rates, in‐patient understanding and multidisciplinary team involvement were low. The highest rates of Phase‐1‐cardiac rehabilitation were for in‐patients with a length of stay three days or more  in cardiac units with cardiac educators. Rates were lower in cardiac units with no cardiac educators, and lowest for in‐patients in all areas of all hospitals with length of stay of two days or less days. Low Phase‐1‐cardiac rehabilitation implementation rates resulted in poor in‐patient understanding about their disease, treatment and post‐discharge care. Further, medical discharge summaries rarely mentioned cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention or risk factor management resulting in a lack of information for health care providers on cardiac rehabilitation and holistic health care. Conclusion Implementation of Phase‐1‐cardiac rehabilitation in regional hospitals in this study fell short of recommended best practice, resulting in patients' poor preparation for discharge, and insufficient information on holistic care for health care providers in rural and remote areas. These factors potentially impact on holistic care for people returning home following treatment for heart disease.