Loading…

Dilemma after termination of pregnancy due to urogenital fetal anomalies: Discrepancy between prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis and autopsy

Objective To evaluate the agreement and disagreement between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings in pregnancy terminations due to urogenital anomalies. Methods Of 453 pregnancy terminations performed due to fetal anomalies, 82 cases with urogenital anomalies on either prenatal ultrasound...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2022-10, Vol.159 (1), p.223-228
Main Authors: Ozdemir, Ozge, Aksoy, Figen, Sen, Cihat
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3653-919abd9aa1797121e5c88a1964e468e42d95b6ff3595af0cefc5d49f9b36b2533
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3653-919abd9aa1797121e5c88a1964e468e42d95b6ff3595af0cefc5d49f9b36b2533
container_end_page 228
container_issue 1
container_start_page 223
container_title International journal of gynecology and obstetrics
container_volume 159
creator Ozdemir, Ozge
Aksoy, Figen
Sen, Cihat
description Objective To evaluate the agreement and disagreement between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings in pregnancy terminations due to urogenital anomalies. Methods Of 453 pregnancy terminations performed due to fetal anomalies, 82 cases with urogenital anomalies on either prenatal ultrasound or fetal autopsy were included in this retrospective study. The discrepancy between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings on urogenital anomaly findings was evaluated. Results Complete agreement between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings was noted in 33 (40.2%) cases (particularly for megacystis, bilateral renal agenesis, and infantile polycystic kidney), whereas partial agreement (anal atresia and horseshoe kidney as additional minor findings) and altered diagnosis were noted in 12 (14.6%) and 8 (9.8%) cases, respectively. Disagreement was noted in 29 (35.4%) cases including anomaly only on autopsy in 20 (24.3%) cases (renal agenesis, horseshoe kidney and multicystic dysplastic kidney in particular) and anomaly only on ultrasound in 9 (10.9%) cases. Conclusions Accordingly, our findings indicate fetal autopsy to be a method of vital importance in complementing prenatal diagnosis; it may add valuable information that may improve future pregnancy management and counseling of parents, and hence prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy should be regarded as complementary techniques. Fetal autopsy is crucial in complementing prenatal diagnosis; it can add valuable information that may improve future pregnancy management and counseling of parents.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ijgo.14083
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2614231435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2614231435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3653-919abd9aa1797121e5c88a1964e468e42d95b6ff3595af0cefc5d49f9b36b2533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQQC0EokvhwgcgHxFSiie2k5gbaqEtqtQLnKNJMg6uEjvYiar9iP4z3m7pkYPHh3l6Gj3G3oM4AyHKz-5uDGegRCNfsB00tSmkqs1LtstLUdSlKU_Ym5TuhBBQA7xmJ1IZDQJgxx4u3ETzjBztSpHnNzuPqwueB8uXSKNH3-_5sBFfA99iGMm7FSdu6TDRhxknR-kLv3Cpj7Q84h2t90T-IMi2zG3TGjEFH8aIy2_X88Hh6ENyKSsGjtsalrR_y15ZnBK9e_pP2a_v336eXxU3t5fX519vil5WWhYGDHaDQYTa1FAC6b5pEEylSFUNqXIwuqusldpotKIn2-tBGWs6WXWllvKUfTx6lxj-bJTWds7H0zShp7CltqxAlRKU1Bn9dET7GFKKZNsluhnjvgXRHvK3h_ztY_4Mf3jybt1MwzP6r3cG4Ajc5-z7_6ja6x-Xt0fpX_V2k40</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2614231435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dilemma after termination of pregnancy due to urogenital fetal anomalies: Discrepancy between prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis and autopsy</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Ozdemir, Ozge ; Aksoy, Figen ; Sen, Cihat</creator><creatorcontrib>Ozdemir, Ozge ; Aksoy, Figen ; Sen, Cihat</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate the agreement and disagreement between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings in pregnancy terminations due to urogenital anomalies. Methods Of 453 pregnancy terminations performed due to fetal anomalies, 82 cases with urogenital anomalies on either prenatal ultrasound or fetal autopsy were included in this retrospective study. The discrepancy between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings on urogenital anomaly findings was evaluated. Results Complete agreement between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings was noted in 33 (40.2%) cases (particularly for megacystis, bilateral renal agenesis, and infantile polycystic kidney), whereas partial agreement (anal atresia and horseshoe kidney as additional minor findings) and altered diagnosis were noted in 12 (14.6%) and 8 (9.8%) cases, respectively. Disagreement was noted in 29 (35.4%) cases including anomaly only on autopsy in 20 (24.3%) cases (renal agenesis, horseshoe kidney and multicystic dysplastic kidney in particular) and anomaly only on ultrasound in 9 (10.9%) cases. Conclusions Accordingly, our findings indicate fetal autopsy to be a method of vital importance in complementing prenatal diagnosis; it may add valuable information that may improve future pregnancy management and counseling of parents, and hence prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy should be regarded as complementary techniques. Fetal autopsy is crucial in complementing prenatal diagnosis; it can add valuable information that may improve future pregnancy management and counseling of parents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14083</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34951011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>discrepancy ; fetal autopsy ; fetal urogenital anomaly ; pregnancy termination ; prenatal ultrasound ; value of autopsy</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022-10, Vol.159 (1), p.223-228</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3653-919abd9aa1797121e5c88a1964e468e42d95b6ff3595af0cefc5d49f9b36b2533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3653-919abd9aa1797121e5c88a1964e468e42d95b6ff3595af0cefc5d49f9b36b2533</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2862-0802</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34951011$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ozdemir, Ozge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aksoy, Figen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Cihat</creatorcontrib><title>Dilemma after termination of pregnancy due to urogenital fetal anomalies: Discrepancy between prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis and autopsy</title><title>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate the agreement and disagreement between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings in pregnancy terminations due to urogenital anomalies. Methods Of 453 pregnancy terminations performed due to fetal anomalies, 82 cases with urogenital anomalies on either prenatal ultrasound or fetal autopsy were included in this retrospective study. The discrepancy between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings on urogenital anomaly findings was evaluated. Results Complete agreement between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings was noted in 33 (40.2%) cases (particularly for megacystis, bilateral renal agenesis, and infantile polycystic kidney), whereas partial agreement (anal atresia and horseshoe kidney as additional minor findings) and altered diagnosis were noted in 12 (14.6%) and 8 (9.8%) cases, respectively. Disagreement was noted in 29 (35.4%) cases including anomaly only on autopsy in 20 (24.3%) cases (renal agenesis, horseshoe kidney and multicystic dysplastic kidney in particular) and anomaly only on ultrasound in 9 (10.9%) cases. Conclusions Accordingly, our findings indicate fetal autopsy to be a method of vital importance in complementing prenatal diagnosis; it may add valuable information that may improve future pregnancy management and counseling of parents, and hence prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy should be regarded as complementary techniques. Fetal autopsy is crucial in complementing prenatal diagnosis; it can add valuable information that may improve future pregnancy management and counseling of parents.</description><subject>discrepancy</subject><subject>fetal autopsy</subject><subject>fetal urogenital anomaly</subject><subject>pregnancy termination</subject><subject>prenatal ultrasound</subject><subject>value of autopsy</subject><issn>0020-7292</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQQC0EokvhwgcgHxFSiie2k5gbaqEtqtQLnKNJMg6uEjvYiar9iP4z3m7pkYPHh3l6Gj3G3oM4AyHKz-5uDGegRCNfsB00tSmkqs1LtstLUdSlKU_Ym5TuhBBQA7xmJ1IZDQJgxx4u3ETzjBztSpHnNzuPqwueB8uXSKNH3-_5sBFfA99iGMm7FSdu6TDRhxknR-kLv3Cpj7Q84h2t90T-IMi2zG3TGjEFH8aIy2_X88Hh6ENyKSsGjtsalrR_y15ZnBK9e_pP2a_v336eXxU3t5fX519vil5WWhYGDHaDQYTa1FAC6b5pEEylSFUNqXIwuqusldpotKIn2-tBGWs6WXWllvKUfTx6lxj-bJTWds7H0zShp7CltqxAlRKU1Bn9dET7GFKKZNsluhnjvgXRHvK3h_ztY_4Mf3jybt1MwzP6r3cG4Ajc5-z7_6ja6x-Xt0fpX_V2k40</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Ozdemir, Ozge</creator><creator>Aksoy, Figen</creator><creator>Sen, Cihat</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2862-0802</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Dilemma after termination of pregnancy due to urogenital fetal anomalies: Discrepancy between prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis and autopsy</title><author>Ozdemir, Ozge ; Aksoy, Figen ; Sen, Cihat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3653-919abd9aa1797121e5c88a1964e468e42d95b6ff3595af0cefc5d49f9b36b2533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>discrepancy</topic><topic>fetal autopsy</topic><topic>fetal urogenital anomaly</topic><topic>pregnancy termination</topic><topic>prenatal ultrasound</topic><topic>value of autopsy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ozdemir, Ozge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aksoy, Figen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Cihat</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ozdemir, Ozge</au><au>Aksoy, Figen</au><au>Sen, Cihat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dilemma after termination of pregnancy due to urogenital fetal anomalies: Discrepancy between prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis and autopsy</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>223-228</pages><issn>0020-7292</issn><eissn>1879-3479</eissn><abstract>Objective To evaluate the agreement and disagreement between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings in pregnancy terminations due to urogenital anomalies. Methods Of 453 pregnancy terminations performed due to fetal anomalies, 82 cases with urogenital anomalies on either prenatal ultrasound or fetal autopsy were included in this retrospective study. The discrepancy between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings on urogenital anomaly findings was evaluated. Results Complete agreement between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings was noted in 33 (40.2%) cases (particularly for megacystis, bilateral renal agenesis, and infantile polycystic kidney), whereas partial agreement (anal atresia and horseshoe kidney as additional minor findings) and altered diagnosis were noted in 12 (14.6%) and 8 (9.8%) cases, respectively. Disagreement was noted in 29 (35.4%) cases including anomaly only on autopsy in 20 (24.3%) cases (renal agenesis, horseshoe kidney and multicystic dysplastic kidney in particular) and anomaly only on ultrasound in 9 (10.9%) cases. Conclusions Accordingly, our findings indicate fetal autopsy to be a method of vital importance in complementing prenatal diagnosis; it may add valuable information that may improve future pregnancy management and counseling of parents, and hence prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy should be regarded as complementary techniques. Fetal autopsy is crucial in complementing prenatal diagnosis; it can add valuable information that may improve future pregnancy management and counseling of parents.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>34951011</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijgo.14083</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2862-0802</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7292
ispartof International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022-10, Vol.159 (1), p.223-228
issn 0020-7292
1879-3479
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2614231435
source Wiley
subjects discrepancy
fetal autopsy
fetal urogenital anomaly
pregnancy termination
prenatal ultrasound
value of autopsy
title Dilemma after termination of pregnancy due to urogenital fetal anomalies: Discrepancy between prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis and autopsy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A28%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dilemma%20after%20termination%20of%20pregnancy%20due%20to%20urogenital%20fetal%20anomalies:%20Discrepancy%20between%20prenatal%20ultrasonographic%20diagnosis%20and%20autopsy&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Ozdemir,%20Ozge&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=223-228&rft.issn=0020-7292&rft.eissn=1879-3479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijgo.14083&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2614231435%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3653-919abd9aa1797121e5c88a1964e468e42d95b6ff3595af0cefc5d49f9b36b2533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2614231435&rft_id=info:pmid/34951011&rfr_iscdi=true