Loading…

Applicability of the UK DCD risk score in the modern era of liver transplantation: A U.S. update

Background Careful graft and recipient selection have resulted in improved outcomes in liver transplantation (LT) using donation after cardiac death (DCD) organs. The UK DCD Risk Score was established as a risk stratification tool to guide selection. Methods We evaluated the applicability of the UK...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical transplantation 2022-04, Vol.36 (4), p.e14579-n/a
Main Authors: Wu, W. Kelly, Ziogas, Ioannis A., Matsuoka, Lea K., Izzy, Manhal, Alexopoulos, Sophoclis P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bd5c501fb25723e170e0b8c5d0d3740449c84ff13a35f2557ed924cc9500abd53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bd5c501fb25723e170e0b8c5d0d3740449c84ff13a35f2557ed924cc9500abd53
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 4
container_start_page e14579
container_title Clinical transplantation
container_volume 36
creator Wu, W. Kelly
Ziogas, Ioannis A.
Matsuoka, Lea K.
Izzy, Manhal
Alexopoulos, Sophoclis P.
description Background Careful graft and recipient selection have resulted in improved outcomes in liver transplantation (LT) using donation after cardiac death (DCD) organs. The UK DCD Risk Score was established as a risk stratification tool to guide selection. Methods We evaluated the applicability of the UK DCD Risk Score in a contemporary US cohort of adult DCD LT recipients using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry (2011‐2020). Results A total of 3,899 DCD LTs were included in our study (UK DCD Risk Score 0–5 points: 1,438 [36.9%], 6–10 points: 2,034 [52.2%]; 11–20 points: 427 [11.0%]). Compared to a score of 6–10 points, a score of 0–5 points was associated with decreased risk of graft loss (HR = .79, 95%CI: .68‐.93, p = .004), while a score of 11–20 points was associated with increased risk of graft loss (HR = 1.26, 95%CI: 1.01‐1.56, p = .04). The 5‐year graft survival for patients with risk scores of 0–5, 6–10, and 11–20 were 75.9%, 71.8%, and 66.5%, respectively. The C‐statistic for the UK DCD Risk Score in our contemporary cohort was .611. Conclusions The UK DCD Risk Score demonstrates a more limited ability to differentiate recipient outcomes in the modern era of DCD LT in the US. Acceptable long‐term outcomes are achievable for patients stratified to the highest‐risk group.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.14579
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2615300252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2615300252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bd5c501fb25723e170e0b8c5d0d3740449c84ff13a35f2557ed924cc9500abd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQl7BI6kec1OyqlJeohATtOjiOIwx5YTug_j1uU9jhzVgzZ45GF4BzjELs31Q6E-KIJfwAjDHlPEAIk0MwRhwR_4_pCJxY--67MY7ZMRjRiMcRn_ExeJ13XaWlyHWl3Qa2JXRvCq4f4SJdQKPtB7SyNQrqZjeo20KZBiojtmilv5SBzojGdpVonHC6ba7hHK7DlxD2XSGcOgVHpaisOtvXCVjf3qzS-2D5dPeQzpeBpITxIC-YZAiXOWEJoQonSKF8JlmBCppEKIq4nEVliamgrCSMJargJJKSM4SEX6YTcDl4O9N-9sq6rNZWqsrfpdreZiTGjCJEGPHo1YBK01prVJl1RtfCbDKMsm2gmQ802wXq2Yu9ts9rVfyRvwl6YDoA37pSm_9NWbp6HpQ_8Bx9yA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2615300252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Applicability of the UK DCD risk score in the modern era of liver transplantation: A U.S. update</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Wu, W. Kelly ; Ziogas, Ioannis A. ; Matsuoka, Lea K. ; Izzy, Manhal ; Alexopoulos, Sophoclis P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, W. Kelly ; Ziogas, Ioannis A. ; Matsuoka, Lea K. ; Izzy, Manhal ; Alexopoulos, Sophoclis P.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Careful graft and recipient selection have resulted in improved outcomes in liver transplantation (LT) using donation after cardiac death (DCD) organs. The UK DCD Risk Score was established as a risk stratification tool to guide selection. Methods We evaluated the applicability of the UK DCD Risk Score in a contemporary US cohort of adult DCD LT recipients using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry (2011‐2020). Results A total of 3,899 DCD LTs were included in our study (UK DCD Risk Score 0–5 points: 1,438 [36.9%], 6–10 points: 2,034 [52.2%]; 11–20 points: 427 [11.0%]). Compared to a score of 6–10 points, a score of 0–5 points was associated with decreased risk of graft loss (HR = .79, 95%CI: .68‐.93, p = .004), while a score of 11–20 points was associated with increased risk of graft loss (HR = 1.26, 95%CI: 1.01‐1.56, p = .04). The 5‐year graft survival for patients with risk scores of 0–5, 6–10, and 11–20 were 75.9%, 71.8%, and 66.5%, respectively. The C‐statistic for the UK DCD Risk Score in our contemporary cohort was .611. Conclusions The UK DCD Risk Score demonstrates a more limited ability to differentiate recipient outcomes in the modern era of DCD LT in the US. Acceptable long‐term outcomes are achievable for patients stratified to the highest‐risk group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0902-0063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14579</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34964989</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark</publisher><subject>Adult ; Death ; donation after cardiac death ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; liver transplantation ; Liver Transplantation - adverse effects ; primary nonfunction ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; risk stratification ; Tissue and Organ Procurement ; Tissue Donors ; United Kingdom ; United Network for Organ Sharing</subject><ispartof>Clinical transplantation, 2022-04, Vol.36 (4), p.e14579-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bd5c501fb25723e170e0b8c5d0d3740449c84ff13a35f2557ed924cc9500abd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bd5c501fb25723e170e0b8c5d0d3740449c84ff13a35f2557ed924cc9500abd53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1834-5931 ; 0000-0002-6742-6909 ; 0000-0001-8082-0532 ; 0000-0002-6402-5333 ; 0000-0001-8785-7469</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34964989$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, W. Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziogas, Ioannis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuoka, Lea K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izzy, Manhal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexopoulos, Sophoclis P.</creatorcontrib><title>Applicability of the UK DCD risk score in the modern era of liver transplantation: A U.S. update</title><title>Clinical transplantation</title><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><description>Background Careful graft and recipient selection have resulted in improved outcomes in liver transplantation (LT) using donation after cardiac death (DCD) organs. The UK DCD Risk Score was established as a risk stratification tool to guide selection. Methods We evaluated the applicability of the UK DCD Risk Score in a contemporary US cohort of adult DCD LT recipients using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry (2011‐2020). Results A total of 3,899 DCD LTs were included in our study (UK DCD Risk Score 0–5 points: 1,438 [36.9%], 6–10 points: 2,034 [52.2%]; 11–20 points: 427 [11.0%]). Compared to a score of 6–10 points, a score of 0–5 points was associated with decreased risk of graft loss (HR = .79, 95%CI: .68‐.93, p = .004), while a score of 11–20 points was associated with increased risk of graft loss (HR = 1.26, 95%CI: 1.01‐1.56, p = .04). The 5‐year graft survival for patients with risk scores of 0–5, 6–10, and 11–20 were 75.9%, 71.8%, and 66.5%, respectively. The C‐statistic for the UK DCD Risk Score in our contemporary cohort was .611. Conclusions The UK DCD Risk Score demonstrates a more limited ability to differentiate recipient outcomes in the modern era of DCD LT in the US. Acceptable long‐term outcomes are achievable for patients stratified to the highest‐risk group.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>donation after cardiac death</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>liver transplantation</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>primary nonfunction</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>risk stratification</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Procurement</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>United Network for Organ Sharing</subject><issn>0902-0063</issn><issn>1399-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQl7BI6kec1OyqlJeohATtOjiOIwx5YTug_j1uU9jhzVgzZ45GF4BzjELs31Q6E-KIJfwAjDHlPEAIk0MwRhwR_4_pCJxY--67MY7ZMRjRiMcRn_ExeJ13XaWlyHWl3Qa2JXRvCq4f4SJdQKPtB7SyNQrqZjeo20KZBiojtmilv5SBzojGdpVonHC6ba7hHK7DlxD2XSGcOgVHpaisOtvXCVjf3qzS-2D5dPeQzpeBpITxIC-YZAiXOWEJoQonSKF8JlmBCppEKIq4nEVliamgrCSMJargJJKSM4SEX6YTcDl4O9N-9sq6rNZWqsrfpdreZiTGjCJEGPHo1YBK01prVJl1RtfCbDKMsm2gmQ802wXq2Yu9ts9rVfyRvwl6YDoA37pSm_9NWbp6HpQ_8Bx9yA</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Wu, W. Kelly</creator><creator>Ziogas, Ioannis A.</creator><creator>Matsuoka, Lea K.</creator><creator>Izzy, Manhal</creator><creator>Alexopoulos, Sophoclis P.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1834-5931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6742-6909</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8082-0532</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6402-5333</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8785-7469</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Applicability of the UK DCD risk score in the modern era of liver transplantation: A U.S. update</title><author>Wu, W. Kelly ; Ziogas, Ioannis A. ; Matsuoka, Lea K. ; Izzy, Manhal ; Alexopoulos, Sophoclis P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bd5c501fb25723e170e0b8c5d0d3740449c84ff13a35f2557ed924cc9500abd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>donation after cardiac death</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>liver transplantation</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>primary nonfunction</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>risk stratification</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Procurement</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>United Network for Organ Sharing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, W. Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziogas, Ioannis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuoka, Lea K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izzy, Manhal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexopoulos, Sophoclis P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, W. Kelly</au><au>Ziogas, Ioannis A.</au><au>Matsuoka, Lea K.</au><au>Izzy, Manhal</au><au>Alexopoulos, Sophoclis P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Applicability of the UK DCD risk score in the modern era of liver transplantation: A U.S. update</atitle><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e14579</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14579-n/a</pages><issn>0902-0063</issn><eissn>1399-0012</eissn><abstract>Background Careful graft and recipient selection have resulted in improved outcomes in liver transplantation (LT) using donation after cardiac death (DCD) organs. The UK DCD Risk Score was established as a risk stratification tool to guide selection. Methods We evaluated the applicability of the UK DCD Risk Score in a contemporary US cohort of adult DCD LT recipients using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry (2011‐2020). Results A total of 3,899 DCD LTs were included in our study (UK DCD Risk Score 0–5 points: 1,438 [36.9%], 6–10 points: 2,034 [52.2%]; 11–20 points: 427 [11.0%]). Compared to a score of 6–10 points, a score of 0–5 points was associated with decreased risk of graft loss (HR = .79, 95%CI: .68‐.93, p = .004), while a score of 11–20 points was associated with increased risk of graft loss (HR = 1.26, 95%CI: 1.01‐1.56, p = .04). The 5‐year graft survival for patients with risk scores of 0–5, 6–10, and 11–20 were 75.9%, 71.8%, and 66.5%, respectively. The C‐statistic for the UK DCD Risk Score in our contemporary cohort was .611. Conclusions The UK DCD Risk Score demonstrates a more limited ability to differentiate recipient outcomes in the modern era of DCD LT in the US. Acceptable long‐term outcomes are achievable for patients stratified to the highest‐risk group.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pmid>34964989</pmid><doi>10.1111/ctr.14579</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1834-5931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6742-6909</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8082-0532</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6402-5333</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8785-7469</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0902-0063
ispartof Clinical transplantation, 2022-04, Vol.36 (4), p.e14579-n/a
issn 0902-0063
1399-0012
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2615300252
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adult
Death
donation after cardiac death
Graft Survival
Humans
liver transplantation
Liver Transplantation - adverse effects
primary nonfunction
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
risk stratification
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Tissue Donors
United Kingdom
United Network for Organ Sharing
title Applicability of the UK DCD risk score in the modern era of liver transplantation: A U.S. update
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T09%3A36%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Applicability%20of%20the%20UK%20DCD%20risk%20score%20in%20the%20modern%20era%20of%20liver%20transplantation:%20A%20U.S.%20update&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20transplantation&rft.au=Wu,%20W.%20Kelly&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e14579&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14579-n/a&rft.issn=0902-0063&rft.eissn=1399-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ctr.14579&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2615300252%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bd5c501fb25723e170e0b8c5d0d3740449c84ff13a35f2557ed924cc9500abd53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2615300252&rft_id=info:pmid/34964989&rfr_iscdi=true