Recovery characteristics and parental satisfaction in pediatric procedural sedation

• Published in: Pediatric anesthesia 2022-03, Vol.32 (3), p.452-461
• Main Authors: Cortellazzo Wiel, Luisa, Monasta, Lorenzo, Pascolo, Paola, Servidio, Alessia Giuseppina, Levantino, Laura, Fasoli, Silvia, Saccari, Alessia, Cozzi, Giorgio, Barbi, Egidio, Cravero, Joseph
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anesthesia; Caregivers; Child; Conscious Sedation - methods; Dexmedetomidine; Hallucinations; Hallucinations - chemically induced; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Ketamine; Ketamine - adverse effects; Maternal & child health; Midazolam; Parents; pediatric sedation; Pediatrics; Personal Satisfaction; postdischarge adverse events; propofol; Propofol - adverse effects; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; satisfaction; Sleepiness; Vomiting - chemically induced
• ISSN: 1155-5645; 1460-9592
• DOI: 10.1111/pan.14390

Background Despite being a standard of care for children undergoing stressful procedures, little data exist on parental perception of pediatric sedation. Aims This study aimed to investigate recovery characteristics and parental satisfaction for pediatric sedations performed with four widely used sedative regimens. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted at the Institute for Maternal and Child Health of Trieste, Italy, enrolling children undergoing procedural sedation with one of the following pharmacological regimens: propofol, propofol + midazolam, ketamine + propofol, and dexmedetomidine + midazolam. A questionnaire was used to assess the occurrence of symptoms upon recovery from sedation and the following day, and the caregivers' satisfaction for both the recovery pattern and the overall sedation experience, according to a numerical rating scale (0–10). Answers were collected through a telephone survey. The primary outcome was the difference in the quality of the recovery as perceived by caregivers; the secondary and tertiary outcomes were the perceived quality of the overall sedation experience and the frequency of sedation‐related adverse events, respectively. Results Data from 655 patients, 149 receiving propofol, 245 propofol + midazolam, 134 ketamine + propofol, and 127 dexmedetomidine + midazolam, were analyzed. The level of parents' satisfaction for both the recovery and the sedation experience was overall high and increased with the patients' age in all the pharmacological groups (Spearman's rank correlation, ρ .083, p = .033, and ρ .087, p = .026, respectively), with no statistically significant differences between groups when adjusting for age. The occurrence of irritability, prolonged sleepiness, hyperactivity, unsteadiness, hallucinations, emesis, and respiratory distress at any moment negatively affected parental satisfaction. Conclusions In this study, caregivers' satisfaction with pediatric sedation was high, regardless of the regimen used. Lower parental satisfaction was associated with younger age, irritability after sedation, prolonged sleepiness, hyperactivity, unsteadiness, hallucinations, emesis, and respiratory distress.