Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for two cylindrical ionization chambers in photon beams

• Published in: Physica medica 2022-02, Vol.94, p.17-23
• Main Authors: Alissa, Mohamad, Zink, Klemens, Tessier, Frédéric, Schoenfeld, Andreas A., Czarnecki, Damian
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Beam quality correction factor; Dosimetry; Ionization chamber; Monte Carlo Method; Monte Carlo simulation; MV photon beams; Particle Accelerators; Photons; Radiometry; Relative Biological Effectiveness; Water
• ISSN: 1120-1797; 1724-191X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.12.012

•Clinical dosimetry in radiotherapy is based on ion chambers.•To calculate the dose, the beam quality correction factor kQ is necessary.•kQ factors were calculated by Monte Carlo simulations using EGSnrc.•for two widely used ion chambers kQ was calculated the first time. Although several studies provide data for reference dosimetry, the SNC600c and SNC125c ionization chambers (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL) are in clinical use worldwide for which no beam quality correction factors kQ are available. The goal of this study was to calculate beam quality correction factors kQ for these ionization chambers according to dosimetry protocols TG-51, TRS 398 and DIN 6800-2. Monte Carlo simulations using EGSnrc have been performed to calculate the absorbed dose to water and the dose to air within the active volume of ionization chamber models. Both spectra and simulations of beam transport through linear accelerator head models were used as radiation sources for the Monte Carlo calculations. kQ values as a function of the respective beam quality specifier Q were fitted against recommended equations for photon beam dosimetry in the range of 4 MV to 25 MV. The fitting curves through the calculated values showed a root mean square deviation between 0.0010 and 0.0017. The investigated ionization chamber models (SNC600c, SNC125c) are not included in above mentioned dosimetry protocols, but are in clinical use worldwide. This study covered this knowledge gap and compared the calculated results with published kQ values for similar ionization chambers. Agreements with published data were observed in the 95% confidence interval, confirming the use of data for similar ionization chambers, when there are no kQ values available for a given ionization chamber.