Loading…

Crystallization Propensity of Amorphous Pharmaceuticals: Kinetics and Thermodynamics

Four model compounds, nifedipine, indomethacin, felodipine, and ketoconazole, all with nearly identical glass transition temperatures, were chosen to study the effects of thermodynamics and molecular mobility on their crystallization propensities. The time and temperature dependence of the crystalli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular pharmaceutics 2022-02, Vol.19 (2), p.472-483
Main Authors: Krishna Kumar, N. S, Suryanarayanan, Raj
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-b67cee67c6d05fd1588e1bd2303d599e29f3c31e083405639f78b4277cebf2333
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-b67cee67c6d05fd1588e1bd2303d599e29f3c31e083405639f78b4277cebf2333
container_end_page 483
container_issue 2
container_start_page 472
container_title Molecular pharmaceutics
container_volume 19
creator Krishna Kumar, N. S
Suryanarayanan, Raj
description Four model compounds, nifedipine, indomethacin, felodipine, and ketoconazole, all with nearly identical glass transition temperatures, were chosen to study the effects of thermodynamics and molecular mobility on their crystallization propensities. The time and temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time of each compound was determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and enabled the generation of their time–temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams. The relaxation times (τα) were measured by dielectric spectroscopy, and the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) and entropy (ΔS) difference between the crystalline and amorphous states were obtained by DSC. The temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time (τ0(T)) is a function of the thermodynamic activation barrier and the frequency of “attempted jumps” (1/τα(T)) to overcome the barrier. Even though the four model compounds exhibited very similar molecular mobility (relaxation time) over a wide range of temperatures, their crystallization propensities were very different. The observed difference in crystallization propensity was explained in terms of the difference in the thermodynamic barrier, and it is correlated to the empirical relation (TΔS 3)/ΔG 2.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00839
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2616603883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2616603883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-b67cee67c6d05fd1588e1bd2303d599e29f3c31e083405639f78b4277cebf2333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDtPwzAUhS0EoqXwF1DYWFJs3zxstqriJSrRocyW4zhqqjgOdjKEX4-rlkpsLPaRdc65vh9CdwTPCabkQSo_N7bpttIZqfTQz4nCmAE_Q1OSJhAHSc9PmiUTdOX9DmOapBQu0QQSnnOGYYo2Szf6XjZN_S372rbR2tlOt77ux8hW0cJY123t4KP1aVitZOMfo_e61UH7SLZltNlqZ2w5ttKEp2t0UQWPvjneM_T5_LRZvsarj5e35WIVS8igj4ssV1qHIytxWpUkZUyToqSAoUw515RXoIDosFmC0wx4lbMioXlIFRUFgBm6P_R2zn4N2vfC1F7pppGtDn8WNCNZhoGxvZUfrMpZ752uROdqI90oCBZ7qCJAFX-giiPUkL09jhkKo8tT8pdiMKQHw75jZwfXhq3_UfwD-22Mtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2616603883</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crystallization Propensity of Amorphous Pharmaceuticals: Kinetics and Thermodynamics</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Krishna Kumar, N. S ; Suryanarayanan, Raj</creator><creatorcontrib>Krishna Kumar, N. S ; Suryanarayanan, Raj</creatorcontrib><description>Four model compounds, nifedipine, indomethacin, felodipine, and ketoconazole, all with nearly identical glass transition temperatures, were chosen to study the effects of thermodynamics and molecular mobility on their crystallization propensities. The time and temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time of each compound was determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and enabled the generation of their time–temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams. The relaxation times (τα) were measured by dielectric spectroscopy, and the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) and entropy (ΔS) difference between the crystalline and amorphous states were obtained by DSC. The temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time (τ0(T)) is a function of the thermodynamic activation barrier and the frequency of “attempted jumps” (1/τα(T)) to overcome the barrier. Even though the four model compounds exhibited very similar molecular mobility (relaxation time) over a wide range of temperatures, their crystallization propensities were very different. The observed difference in crystallization propensity was explained in terms of the difference in the thermodynamic barrier, and it is correlated to the empirical relation (TΔS 3)/ΔG 2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1543-8384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-8392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00839</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34979803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>Molecular pharmaceutics, 2022-02, Vol.19 (2), p.472-483</ispartof><rights>2022 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-b67cee67c6d05fd1588e1bd2303d599e29f3c31e083405639f78b4277cebf2333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-b67cee67c6d05fd1588e1bd2303d599e29f3c31e083405639f78b4277cebf2333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6322-0575</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34979803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krishna Kumar, N. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suryanarayanan, Raj</creatorcontrib><title>Crystallization Propensity of Amorphous Pharmaceuticals: Kinetics and Thermodynamics</title><title>Molecular pharmaceutics</title><addtitle>Mol. Pharmaceutics</addtitle><description>Four model compounds, nifedipine, indomethacin, felodipine, and ketoconazole, all with nearly identical glass transition temperatures, were chosen to study the effects of thermodynamics and molecular mobility on their crystallization propensities. The time and temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time of each compound was determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and enabled the generation of their time–temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams. The relaxation times (τα) were measured by dielectric spectroscopy, and the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) and entropy (ΔS) difference between the crystalline and amorphous states were obtained by DSC. The temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time (τ0(T)) is a function of the thermodynamic activation barrier and the frequency of “attempted jumps” (1/τα(T)) to overcome the barrier. Even though the four model compounds exhibited very similar molecular mobility (relaxation time) over a wide range of temperatures, their crystallization propensities were very different. The observed difference in crystallization propensity was explained in terms of the difference in the thermodynamic barrier, and it is correlated to the empirical relation (TΔS 3)/ΔG 2.</description><issn>1543-8384</issn><issn>1543-8392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkDtPwzAUhS0EoqXwF1DYWFJs3zxstqriJSrRocyW4zhqqjgOdjKEX4-rlkpsLPaRdc65vh9CdwTPCabkQSo_N7bpttIZqfTQz4nCmAE_Q1OSJhAHSc9PmiUTdOX9DmOapBQu0QQSnnOGYYo2Szf6XjZN_S372rbR2tlOt77ux8hW0cJY123t4KP1aVitZOMfo_e61UH7SLZltNlqZ2w5ttKEp2t0UQWPvjneM_T5_LRZvsarj5e35WIVS8igj4ssV1qHIytxWpUkZUyToqSAoUw515RXoIDosFmC0wx4lbMioXlIFRUFgBm6P_R2zn4N2vfC1F7pppGtDn8WNCNZhoGxvZUfrMpZ752uROdqI90oCBZ7qCJAFX-giiPUkL09jhkKo8tT8pdiMKQHw75jZwfXhq3_UfwD-22Mtg</recordid><startdate>20220207</startdate><enddate>20220207</enddate><creator>Krishna Kumar, N. S</creator><creator>Suryanarayanan, Raj</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6322-0575</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220207</creationdate><title>Crystallization Propensity of Amorphous Pharmaceuticals: Kinetics and Thermodynamics</title><author>Krishna Kumar, N. S ; Suryanarayanan, Raj</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-b67cee67c6d05fd1588e1bd2303d599e29f3c31e083405639f78b4277cebf2333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krishna Kumar, N. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suryanarayanan, Raj</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Molecular pharmaceutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krishna Kumar, N. S</au><au>Suryanarayanan, Raj</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crystallization Propensity of Amorphous Pharmaceuticals: Kinetics and Thermodynamics</atitle><jtitle>Molecular pharmaceutics</jtitle><addtitle>Mol. Pharmaceutics</addtitle><date>2022-02-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>472</spage><epage>483</epage><pages>472-483</pages><issn>1543-8384</issn><eissn>1543-8392</eissn><abstract>Four model compounds, nifedipine, indomethacin, felodipine, and ketoconazole, all with nearly identical glass transition temperatures, were chosen to study the effects of thermodynamics and molecular mobility on their crystallization propensities. The time and temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time of each compound was determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and enabled the generation of their time–temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams. The relaxation times (τα) were measured by dielectric spectroscopy, and the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) and entropy (ΔS) difference between the crystalline and amorphous states were obtained by DSC. The temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time (τ0(T)) is a function of the thermodynamic activation barrier and the frequency of “attempted jumps” (1/τα(T)) to overcome the barrier. Even though the four model compounds exhibited very similar molecular mobility (relaxation time) over a wide range of temperatures, their crystallization propensities were very different. The observed difference in crystallization propensity was explained in terms of the difference in the thermodynamic barrier, and it is correlated to the empirical relation (TΔS 3)/ΔG 2.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>34979803</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00839</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6322-0575</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1543-8384
ispartof Molecular pharmaceutics, 2022-02, Vol.19 (2), p.472-483
issn 1543-8384
1543-8392
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2616603883
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
title Crystallization Propensity of Amorphous Pharmaceuticals: Kinetics and Thermodynamics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T05%3A35%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crystallization%20Propensity%20of%20Amorphous%20Pharmaceuticals:%20Kinetics%20and%20Thermodynamics&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20pharmaceutics&rft.au=Krishna%20Kumar,%20N.%20S&rft.date=2022-02-07&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=472&rft.epage=483&rft.pages=472-483&rft.issn=1543-8384&rft.eissn=1543-8392&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00839&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2616603883%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-b67cee67c6d05fd1588e1bd2303d599e29f3c31e083405639f78b4277cebf2333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2616603883&rft_id=info:pmid/34979803&rfr_iscdi=true