Loading…
Crystallization Propensity of Amorphous Pharmaceuticals: Kinetics and Thermodynamics
Four model compounds, nifedipine, indomethacin, felodipine, and ketoconazole, all with nearly identical glass transition temperatures, were chosen to study the effects of thermodynamics and molecular mobility on their crystallization propensities. The time and temperature dependence of the crystalli...
Saved in:
Published in: | Molecular pharmaceutics 2022-02, Vol.19 (2), p.472-483 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-b67cee67c6d05fd1588e1bd2303d599e29f3c31e083405639f78b4277cebf2333 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-b67cee67c6d05fd1588e1bd2303d599e29f3c31e083405639f78b4277cebf2333 |
container_end_page | 483 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 472 |
container_title | Molecular pharmaceutics |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Krishna Kumar, N. S Suryanarayanan, Raj |
description | Four model compounds, nifedipine, indomethacin, felodipine, and ketoconazole, all with nearly identical glass transition temperatures, were chosen to study the effects of thermodynamics and molecular mobility on their crystallization propensities. The time and temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time of each compound was determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and enabled the generation of their time–temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams. The relaxation times (τα) were measured by dielectric spectroscopy, and the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) and entropy (ΔS) difference between the crystalline and amorphous states were obtained by DSC. The temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time (τ0(T)) is a function of the thermodynamic activation barrier and the frequency of “attempted jumps” (1/τα(T)) to overcome the barrier. Even though the four model compounds exhibited very similar molecular mobility (relaxation time) over a wide range of temperatures, their crystallization propensities were very different. The observed difference in crystallization propensity was explained in terms of the difference in the thermodynamic barrier, and it is correlated to the empirical relation (TΔS 3)/ΔG 2. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00839 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2616603883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2616603883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-b67cee67c6d05fd1588e1bd2303d599e29f3c31e083405639f78b4277cebf2333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDtPwzAUhS0EoqXwF1DYWFJs3zxstqriJSrRocyW4zhqqjgOdjKEX4-rlkpsLPaRdc65vh9CdwTPCabkQSo_N7bpttIZqfTQz4nCmAE_Q1OSJhAHSc9PmiUTdOX9DmOapBQu0QQSnnOGYYo2Szf6XjZN_S372rbR2tlOt77ux8hW0cJY123t4KP1aVitZOMfo_e61UH7SLZltNlqZ2w5ttKEp2t0UQWPvjneM_T5_LRZvsarj5e35WIVS8igj4ssV1qHIytxWpUkZUyToqSAoUw515RXoIDosFmC0wx4lbMioXlIFRUFgBm6P_R2zn4N2vfC1F7pppGtDn8WNCNZhoGxvZUfrMpZ752uROdqI90oCBZ7qCJAFX-giiPUkL09jhkKo8tT8pdiMKQHw75jZwfXhq3_UfwD-22Mtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2616603883</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crystallization Propensity of Amorphous Pharmaceuticals: Kinetics and Thermodynamics</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Krishna Kumar, N. S ; Suryanarayanan, Raj</creator><creatorcontrib>Krishna Kumar, N. S ; Suryanarayanan, Raj</creatorcontrib><description>Four model compounds, nifedipine, indomethacin, felodipine, and ketoconazole, all with nearly identical glass transition temperatures, were chosen to study the effects of thermodynamics and molecular mobility on their crystallization propensities. The time and temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time of each compound was determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and enabled the generation of their time–temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams. The relaxation times (τα) were measured by dielectric spectroscopy, and the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) and entropy (ΔS) difference between the crystalline and amorphous states were obtained by DSC. The temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time (τ0(T)) is a function of the thermodynamic activation barrier and the frequency of “attempted jumps” (1/τα(T)) to overcome the barrier. Even though the four model compounds exhibited very similar molecular mobility (relaxation time) over a wide range of temperatures, their crystallization propensities were very different. The observed difference in crystallization propensity was explained in terms of the difference in the thermodynamic barrier, and it is correlated to the empirical relation (TΔS 3)/ΔG 2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1543-8384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-8392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00839</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34979803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>Molecular pharmaceutics, 2022-02, Vol.19 (2), p.472-483</ispartof><rights>2022 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-b67cee67c6d05fd1588e1bd2303d599e29f3c31e083405639f78b4277cebf2333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-b67cee67c6d05fd1588e1bd2303d599e29f3c31e083405639f78b4277cebf2333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6322-0575</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34979803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krishna Kumar, N. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suryanarayanan, Raj</creatorcontrib><title>Crystallization Propensity of Amorphous Pharmaceuticals: Kinetics and Thermodynamics</title><title>Molecular pharmaceutics</title><addtitle>Mol. Pharmaceutics</addtitle><description>Four model compounds, nifedipine, indomethacin, felodipine, and ketoconazole, all with nearly identical glass transition temperatures, were chosen to study the effects of thermodynamics and molecular mobility on their crystallization propensities. The time and temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time of each compound was determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and enabled the generation of their time–temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams. The relaxation times (τα) were measured by dielectric spectroscopy, and the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) and entropy (ΔS) difference between the crystalline and amorphous states were obtained by DSC. The temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time (τ0(T)) is a function of the thermodynamic activation barrier and the frequency of “attempted jumps” (1/τα(T)) to overcome the barrier. Even though the four model compounds exhibited very similar molecular mobility (relaxation time) over a wide range of temperatures, their crystallization propensities were very different. The observed difference in crystallization propensity was explained in terms of the difference in the thermodynamic barrier, and it is correlated to the empirical relation (TΔS 3)/ΔG 2.</description><issn>1543-8384</issn><issn>1543-8392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkDtPwzAUhS0EoqXwF1DYWFJs3zxstqriJSrRocyW4zhqqjgOdjKEX4-rlkpsLPaRdc65vh9CdwTPCabkQSo_N7bpttIZqfTQz4nCmAE_Q1OSJhAHSc9PmiUTdOX9DmOapBQu0QQSnnOGYYo2Szf6XjZN_S372rbR2tlOt77ux8hW0cJY123t4KP1aVitZOMfo_e61UH7SLZltNlqZ2w5ttKEp2t0UQWPvjneM_T5_LRZvsarj5e35WIVS8igj4ssV1qHIytxWpUkZUyToqSAoUw515RXoIDosFmC0wx4lbMioXlIFRUFgBm6P_R2zn4N2vfC1F7pppGtDn8WNCNZhoGxvZUfrMpZ752uROdqI90oCBZ7qCJAFX-giiPUkL09jhkKo8tT8pdiMKQHw75jZwfXhq3_UfwD-22Mtg</recordid><startdate>20220207</startdate><enddate>20220207</enddate><creator>Krishna Kumar, N. S</creator><creator>Suryanarayanan, Raj</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6322-0575</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220207</creationdate><title>Crystallization Propensity of Amorphous Pharmaceuticals: Kinetics and Thermodynamics</title><author>Krishna Kumar, N. S ; Suryanarayanan, Raj</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-b67cee67c6d05fd1588e1bd2303d599e29f3c31e083405639f78b4277cebf2333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krishna Kumar, N. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suryanarayanan, Raj</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Molecular pharmaceutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krishna Kumar, N. S</au><au>Suryanarayanan, Raj</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crystallization Propensity of Amorphous Pharmaceuticals: Kinetics and Thermodynamics</atitle><jtitle>Molecular pharmaceutics</jtitle><addtitle>Mol. Pharmaceutics</addtitle><date>2022-02-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>472</spage><epage>483</epage><pages>472-483</pages><issn>1543-8384</issn><eissn>1543-8392</eissn><abstract>Four model compounds, nifedipine, indomethacin, felodipine, and ketoconazole, all with nearly identical glass transition temperatures, were chosen to study the effects of thermodynamics and molecular mobility on their crystallization propensities. The time and temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time of each compound was determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and enabled the generation of their time–temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams. The relaxation times (τα) were measured by dielectric spectroscopy, and the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) and entropy (ΔS) difference between the crystalline and amorphous states were obtained by DSC. The temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time (τ0(T)) is a function of the thermodynamic activation barrier and the frequency of “attempted jumps” (1/τα(T)) to overcome the barrier. Even though the four model compounds exhibited very similar molecular mobility (relaxation time) over a wide range of temperatures, their crystallization propensities were very different. The observed difference in crystallization propensity was explained in terms of the difference in the thermodynamic barrier, and it is correlated to the empirical relation (TΔS 3)/ΔG 2.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>34979803</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00839</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6322-0575</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1543-8384 |
ispartof | Molecular pharmaceutics, 2022-02, Vol.19 (2), p.472-483 |
issn | 1543-8384 1543-8392 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2616603883 |
source | American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list) |
title | Crystallization Propensity of Amorphous Pharmaceuticals: Kinetics and Thermodynamics |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T05%3A35%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crystallization%20Propensity%20of%20Amorphous%20Pharmaceuticals:%20Kinetics%20and%20Thermodynamics&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20pharmaceutics&rft.au=Krishna%20Kumar,%20N.%20S&rft.date=2022-02-07&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=472&rft.epage=483&rft.pages=472-483&rft.issn=1543-8384&rft.eissn=1543-8392&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00839&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2616603883%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a363t-b67cee67c6d05fd1588e1bd2303d599e29f3c31e083405639f78b4277cebf2333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2616603883&rft_id=info:pmid/34979803&rfr_iscdi=true |